Walmart Brings Back 'Basket Fee' for Some Orders: What To Know
Enlarge Image
Walmart Plus Assist is a discounted membership program for eligible customers.
Walmart
Convenience often has a cost. Retail membership programs like Amazon Prime and Target Circle 360 come with monthly or annual fees. The same applies to Walmart Plus. Membership fees are expected, but sometimes other fees sneak into the picture. If you use Walmart Plus Assist, there's a fee to keep an eye on.
Walmart recently reinstated a minimum basket fee for store delivery orders for Walmart Plus Assist, a program designed for customers who rely on government assistance. The $6.99 fee applies to orders under $35. Regular Walmart Plus members are already accustomed to the fee.
The minimum basket fee isn't a new idea, but Walmart had removed the fee from the Assist program during the peak of COVID-19. Now, the fee is back at a time of economic uncertainty as the Trump administration continues its push for tariffs on foreign goods.
Reuters first reported on the fee's return in late April after obtaining an internal Walmart memo.
Here's what you need to know about the Walmart Plus Assist minimum basket fee.
What is Walmart Plus Assist?
Walmart Plus Assist is an offshoot of the Walmart Plus membership program. The perk-filled program offers special savings, free shipping of eligible items, free pharmacy delivery, fuel discounts, a Paramount Plus streaming subscription and 25% off on Burger King, among other enticements.
Regular Walmart Plus costs $13 per month. Walmart Plus Assist is $6.47 per month or $49 for a year.
Who is eligible for Walmart Plus Assist?
The Assist program is meant for shoppers who qualify for government assistance programs like SNAP, WIC and Medicaid. You'll need to verify your eligibility and re-verify annually. There's a one-month free trial.
What is a minimum basket fee?
It costs a retailer to send an employee out on the store floor to gather groceries and goods for customers. It also costs to send out delivery drivers. Minimum basket fees encourage consumers to place larger orders or else pay for the privilege of receiving smaller orders. Target, for example, charges a fee for store delivery orders under $35 for Target Circle 360 members.
Why did Walmart reinstate the fee?
The fee puts Walmart on similar footing as other retailers like Target and Amazon. Amazon charges a $3 same-day delivery fee for Prime orders under $25. Walmart told Mashable the basket fee is not related to tariffs. Walmart did not immediately respond to a CNET request for comment.
Should the fee change your shopping behavior?
Every dollar counts when money is tight. Walmart Plus Assist store delivery users can avoid the basket fee by saving up the items they need until the order total is over $35. You can also avoid the fee by shopping in person or ordering from Walmart's eligible items online with free shipping.
Evaluate if the convenience and perks are worth the membership fee for your household. Looking for alternatives? Here are CNET's recommendations for the best grocery delivery services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Academic Publishers Sign AI Deals as Trump Cuts Research Funding
Academic publishers are rushing to sign licensing deals with artificial intelligence companies, carving out a new revenue stream as US research funding cuts dim their outlook. Informa Plc 's Taylor & Francis signed a $10 million deal with Microsoft Corp. last year to provide the tech giant access to part of its library to train large language models, or LLMs. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc is looking to 'monetize academic content through AI deals,' it said in its latest set of results, while John Wiley & Sons Inc. announced partnerships with Amazon Web Services and Perplexity earlier this year.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Minnesota Legislature during special session passes next state budget to avert government shutdown
The Minnesota Legislature approved the remaining pieces of the next state budget on Monday during a special session, after lawmakers failed to complete their work last month. The House adjourned around 10:40 p.m., and the Senate was on track to do the same around midnight or early on Tuesday. They had 14 bills on their to-do list; most of them were spending plans that made up the roughly $66 billion budget for the next two years. The political make-up of the Capitol is unique, with a tied House for only the second time in state history, and is as closely divided as a Legislature can be in Minnesota, with 100 Republicans and 101 Democrats. That made negotiations challenging and forced compromise. "The tie forced us to work together, and I think that's something that people outside of the bubble here in St. Paul are looking for people to do," said House Speaker Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring. "They want representation in the state that can work together and do the best things for our state." A delayed start in the House, after DFL lawmakers boycotted the first few weeks over a power dispute, ended in overtime. But a divided Legislature is not unique in Minnesota. Four of the last five budget-writing sessions, including this one, have ended with special sessions because they didn't finish the budget on time when Republicans and Democrats shared power. "We prevented a duly elected member of the Minnesota House from being kicked out for no reason whatsoever other than political expediency. And I think in the end, fighting for that equal shared power made this a better session," said former DFL House Speaker Melissa Hortman. "And I think the way that today unfolded was about cooperation and collaboration, we could have had that from the word go. I'm really happy that we did finally get there." Finishing their work on Monday prevented nearly 30,000 state workers from getting layoff notices on Tuesday in advance of a partial government shutdown on July 1 if they failed to approve a budget. As of 11:30 p.m. Monday, the Senate had to pass a tax bill and a bonding proposal funding infrastructure projects before they adjourned, but had approved the budget bills. The legislation made significant cuts to stave off a projected $6 billion deficit in future years. Most of the day was smooth sailing after lawmakers in the House began by passing the most contentious bill of the year that will remove undocumented immigrant adults from MinnesotaCare, a state health care coverage program, by the year's end. The debate in that chamber lasted for four hours and at times was emotional. The change was a top priority for Republicans who are concerned that growing enrollment would balloon costs in an unsustainable way. Democrats in both chambers are deeply opposed to the measure, which will preserve coverage for children despite the rollback for adults. Through tears, Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, DFL-St. Paul, said approving it, which she agreed to in a larger budget compromise among legislative leaders, was among the most "painful" votes she ever had to take. She and three other Democrats supported it in the Senate. Hortman was the sole DFL vote alongside Republicans in the House. Hortman was similarly emotional when reflecting on that moment. "What I worry about is the people who will lose their health insurance. I know that people will be hurt by that vote," she said. "We worked very hard to try to get a budget deal that wouldn't include that provision, and we tried any other way we could to come to a budget agreement with Republicans, and they wouldn't have it. So I did what leaders do, I stepped up and I got the job done for the people of Minnesota."
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Most US workers say they have unpredictable, inflexible schedules, new survey finds
FacebookTweetLink Follow After seven years as a retail associate at a big-box store in Virginia, Alicia Costello still did not have a consistent schedule week to week, and requesting paid time off was a hassle. For a while, Costello got by — until she became pregnant with her first child. Doctors' appointments had to be noted at least a month in advance, and approval wasn't guaranteed, she said. 'It's frustrating to be limited on the time that you've accrued and worked so hard for, not knowing when you can and cannot use that time,' Costello said. 'There's only so much that we can take on physically and mentally.' Needing a job that would allow her to spend more time with her family, Costello quit in April, and her experience is shared by a majority of the US workforce. Almost two-thirds of US workers struggle with volatile, inflexible work schedules, according to a new national Gallup survey, called the State of American Jobs Study, published Tuesday. Meanwhile, workers with predictable schedules enjoy more financial security, better work-life balance and more overall satisfaction with their jobs, according to the survey of 18,000 employees. 'I think one of the biggest questions on people's minds right now is, even though unemployment is fairly low, why are millions of workers still feeling so disillusioned and disengaged and struggling to get by?' said Rachel Korberg, executive director and cofounder of the Family and Workers Fund, which partnered to create the survey. 'We need to shift from a conversation that's just about job quantity to a conversation also about job quality.' Most notably, about 41% of those surveyed said they had little to no control over how many hours they work, what days they work or when they can take time off. Additionally, more than one quarter of workers said they don't know their schedule two weeks or more in advance. 'I think the important thing to underscore here is not just that everyone wants a 9-to-5 with the exact same hours all the time Monday through Friday,' Korberg said. 'It's actually about the worker having a say in their schedule.' Unpredictable schedules often involve frequent schedule changes and shift cancellations, making it difficult to plan for life events or maintain a second form of employment, according to the survey. For this reason, about 38% of those with low-quality schedules reported facing financial hardship. Many employers may cut hours in the week to be just below 40 hours so that overtime pay won't be necessary — a small adjustment that can have a big impact for low-wage workers, Korberg said. In Costello's case, she had to work 39-hour weeks. 'There was never any approval for overtime,' Costello recalled. 'That was difficult because, especially in preparation for the holidays, it would be nice to save up money and get overtime here and there.' Schedule volatility was found to be especially common among part-time workers and those without a college degree, even when controlled for age, gender, education and industry, according to the survey. 'There's an (attitude) that these employees are potentially more replaceable and may have less say in their workplace,' said Guy David, the Alan B. Miller Professor and Chair of Health Care Management at the Wharton School and professor of medical ethics and health policy at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He was not involved in the survey. From his own research into the working conditions of health care employees, David found those with unreliable schedules were more likely to quit. However, many employers may be unaware of just how important work-life balance has become for workers, he added. 'I think this (survey) confirms our findings and is a wake-up call for companies wishing to increase or improve retention without potentially increasing payroll,' David said. 'Newer generations especially want to have very clear boundaries.' The Covid-19 pandemic was likely a big driver in this attitude change as well, suggested Maria Flynn, CEO and president of Jobs for the Future, which also partnered to create the survey. As more companies shifted to at-home work, the labor force became more accustomed to greater flexibility. Though automated scheduling systems are widely used across industries already, in the future more companies may adopt artificial intelligence-driven systems capable of studying the needs of workers and balancing them with the demands of the company, David said. While Flynn and Korberg suggested workers communicate openly about schedule preferences with their managers, they also acknowledged the change will largely have to take place among employers. 'A good schedule helps businesses engage and retain workers, and that contributes to the bottom line,' Korberg said. 'I'm hoping companies will take note of the study and look at (whether) there (are) changes, they could make to their scheduling practices.'
