New Study Dispels Myths About Retirement Village Profitability In NZ
In its report titled, The path to profitability: Separating fact from fiction in New Zealand's retirement village sector, business advisory and accounting firm Grant Thornton explores the commonly held belief about the retirement village business model disproportionately benefiting operators financially.
Pam Newlove, business advisory partner and retirement village services lead at Grant Thornton New Zealand says, 'This is a major pain point for many of the operators we work with. It stems partly from a misconception that building and operating a retirement village is much the same as selling residential property where operators build units, sell them, buy them back at a discount and sell them again for more, repeating that process every few years as residents come and go.
'In reality, you only need to scratch the surface of the sector's inner workings to see a different and more complex picture emerge – one that clearly demonstrates being a retirement village owner is not for those seeking immediate gains. These misconceptions are not helped by the financial reporting requirements for villages which can present an overly optimistic situation.'
Grant Thornton's study is based on a discounted cashflow financial model of two retirement villages that represent a cross section of the sector: Rural villas in Canterbury and urban apartments in Auckland. It covers a 25-year period comprising the key stages of a retirement village development from sourcing land and construction, to project completion and revenue generation. It then takes into account the sector-specific sensitivities that impact a village's profitability, some of which include occupancy lags, ORA (occupation right agreement) sale prices and construction costs.
The analysis reveals a payback period of just over 21 years for the rural complex of villas, and more than 25 years for the urban-style apartments.
Newlove says, 'That isn't to say these villages are making an operating loss for two decades. The sites in both our scenarios experience strong early cashflows from the initial purchase of ORAs by new residents and subsequent deferred management fee (DMF) payments, but this declines sharply between the seven-and-a-half to 10-year marks as ongoing operational and refurbishment costs start to eat into annual profits.
'And, the average stay of residents is also seven to eight years, which means cashflows from new DMF payments and the resale of ORAs quickly decrease due to reduced inflows of new residents. Weekly fee income is typically only just covering operating expenses, and general feedback during our research was that many operators are struggling to cover operating expenses in the current economic environment. By focussing on actual cashflows, the real financial position for operators emerges.
'Our report covers even more headwinds unique to the sector which, unlike most other businesses, sit at an unusual intersection of commercial viability and the provision of vital services for a particularly vulnerable part of our population. That's why we should all care about the success of the retirement village sector and that starts with understanding what it really takes to invest in this industry.
'More clarity of the financial variables that impact the profitability of villages will aid the understanding of all key stakeholders and ensure a balanced approach to policy and investment decisions.'
About Grant Thornton International Ltd:
Grant Thornton is one of the world's leading organisations of independent assurance, tax and advisory firms. These firms help dynamic organisations unlock their potential for growth by providing meaningful, actionable advice through a broad range of services. Proactive teams, led by approachable partners in these firms, use insights, experience and instinct to solve complex issues for privately owned, publicly listed and public sector clients. Over 62,000 Grant Thornton people, in more than 130 countries, are focused on making a difference to clients, colleagues and the communities in which we live and work.
Grant Thornton International is a non-practicing, international umbrella entity organised as a private company limited by guarantee incorporated in England and Wales. References to "Grant Thornton" are to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms operate and refer to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton International and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. Services are delivered independently by member firms, which are not responsible for the services or activities of one another. Grant Thornton International does not provide services to clients.
*All references to Grant Thornton International in the press release and this 'Notes to editor' section are to Grant Thornton International Ltd. Grant Thornton International Ltd is a non-practicing, international umbrella entity organized as a private company limited by guarantee incorporated in England and Wales.
About Grant Thornton New Zealand Ltd:
Grant Thornton New Zealand has more than 300 people working in offices in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch. We combine service breadth, depth of expertise and industry insight with an approachable client and people first mindset, and a broad commercial perspective.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Kitchen Things in receivership as losses mount
Kitchen Things appliance chain has gone into receivership. Photo: Google Maps A national kitchen appliance chain has gone into receivership because of weak consumer demand and tough competition. The directors of the Kitchen Things group asked its bankers to call in the receivers as the business made continuing losses despite cost cutting and restructuring. Receiver Stephen Keen of Grant Thornton said efforts to keep the chain going have not countered the drop in sales and shrinking margins. "Over the past two years, the group has faced sustained pressure from weaker consumer demand and increased competition on pricing, leading to ongoing trading losses." "Despite efforts to restructure and reduce costs, including exploring possible sales avenues, these measures were not sufficient to offset declining sales and margins." Stephen Keen of Grant Thornton Ltd. Photo: Supplied Keen said the group's 12 stores have been closed for now, as stock levels are checked and they look at options. "Our priority is to identify buyers for the business and/or assets of the group, ideally on a going concern basis. Key staff have been retained as we look to manage costs and re-open stores." "We are calling for urgent expressions of interest from parties interested in acquiring all or part of the group." Kitchen Things was founded in 1986 and dealt in high end international appliance brands including Smeg, Miele, Asko, and Bosch. It was owned by the Jones Family Business, founded by Mark Jones, and a total of seven companies have been put into receivership.
Otago Daily Times
04-08-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Cryptopia customer tried to bribe court registrar for information
A man claiming to be an affected party in the collapse of a multimillion-dollar cryptocurrency company has tried to bribe a court registrar to release information related to the case for $2 million in Bitcoin. New Zealand-based company Cryptopia was allegedly hacked in January 2019, leading to the loss of about $30m in cryptocurrency held by it in an exchange. The business tried to reopen, but customer trust was low following the hack, and it went into liquidation. Liquidators are still trying to disentangle its finances and return funds to customers where possible. In December last year, public accountancy firm Grant Thornton announced that $400 million in cryptocurrency had been returned to about 10,000 customers. Then, in June this year, the firm announced a further 2624 customers had received $50m in Bitcoin and Dogecoin. It was also preparing to launch distributions to affected customers to qualifying account holders in Cardano, Tether, Tron and Litecoin currencies. Cryptopia, founded by Adam Clark and Rob Dawson, owed IRD more than $19m and a further $22m to unsecured creditors. The accountancy firm has said it was unclear whether there would be money remaining to pay those creditors. 'I need assets returned to me' Now, a man claiming to be a creditor has applied to the High Court at Christchurch to access court documents related to the liquidation of Cryptopia. The case has been before the court since liquidators applied for a court order to sell some of Cryptopia's bitcoin to pay their own fees in liquidating the company. The documents the man requested were related to an affidavit filed in 2019 by one of the liquidators, David Ruscoe, in which he annexed two spreadsheets containing databases of commercially sensitive and confidential information relating to 960,000 of Cryptopia's account holders and their cryptocurrency holdings. The court had received the information on a USB drive. According to court documents, a court registrar inadvertently sent it to Thomas Cattermole, who runs an unincorporated enterprise called 'Cryptopia Rescue' that purports to offer help to former customers of Cryptopia. Grant Thornton then took Cattermole to court, claiming he was in contempt of court for passing the information held on that USB to third parties, and secured an injunction to stop him sharing the information further. 'Abuse of process' Any member of the public can request documents held by a court, but it's at the judge's discretion to release them. In this case, the man, emailed the Christchurch High Court registry requesting access to the confidential spreadsheet. 'I would like to seek out answers as to why the TRUSTEE / Liquidator are hiding the blockchain wallet addresses for my assets. They have breached trust law, and I would like to seek out the return of my funds. I need assets returned to me,' his email read. Grant Thornton opposed those documents being released, noting that a person by the same name was currently going through the account registration process to receive funds released by liquidators. In addition to filing a request for access to Ruscoe's affidavit, the man emailed a court registrar and said he had faced 'significant barriers' in accessing the information he was seeking. A registrar responded, identifying themselves as the case manager, and the man then replied with allegations about the conduct of the liquidators. He told the registrar that if they saw 'anything dodgy happen', to email a private email address, which he provided. 'They can't pay you, but I think they will donate 10 bitcoin to any wallet of the whistleblower's choice,' his email said. Ten Bitcoin is roughly equivalent to $2 million at the time the ruling was issued. The man also accused High Court judge, Justice Andru Isac, of holding a private teleconference with the liquidators. In a recent ruling by Justice Isac declining the man's application for the requested documents, he pointed out that the man had attempted to arrange an unlawful Bitcoin payment to a member of the court registry in exchange for information, before providing an email address to facilitate a private response. 'Given the applicant's improper attempt to solicit information from a Court officer I am satisfied the request for access to Court documents is an abuse of process,' Justice Isac said. 'The party lodging the request has not provided proof of their identity. They claim to be residing overseas. 'And as the premise of the application is the applicant's desire to be repatriated with an account held by Cryptopia, given the liquidators have an identification process available to the applicant, it is unclear why he should need access to Court documents to establish his interest in the relevant account. 'That information should already be available to him.'
Scoop
04-08-2025
- Scoop
New Reporting Standard Good News For Misrepresented Retirement Villages
It's been a long-held misconception that retirement village operators in New Zealand rake in excess profits—at least on paper. But a closer look reveals a different story. A recent study carried out by Grant Thornton New Zealand highlights the disconnect between retirement village reported profitability and actual cash flow performance. David Pacey, National Technical Partner at Grant Thornton New Zealand says, 'A major culprit is the application of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), particularly IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement, which governs the valuation of investment property. 'Financial reporting relief for this conundrum may be on the horizon by way of the newly issued standard IFRS 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements when it comes into effect in 2027.' Under IFRS 13, retirement village operators are required to measure investment property—typically the independent living units occupied by residents—at fair value. This fair value includes not only the physical property but also the right to receive future cash flows, such as deferred management fees (DMFs) and capital gains on unit resales. Pacey says, 'These future cash flows are often non-cash items at the time of recognition, yet they are included in the income statement as unrealised gains. This means operators end up reporting substantial profits even though the actual cash inflows are often influenced by resident turnover and could occur several years into the future. 'The application of IFRS 13 can mislead stakeholders about the financial and operational performance of retirement villages due to the disconnect between reported net profit after tax (NPAT) and the business's actual cashflows. This reliance on fair value gains can distort profitability and not fully reflect cashflow challenges such as rising operating costs or delayed unit turnover.' Enter IFRS 18, a potential hero in the often-maligned world of accounting standards IFRS 18 replaces IAS 1; in addition to its more structured and transparent approach to the presentation of financial statements, one of its key features is the possibility to disclose management-defined performance measures (MPMs). 'For retirement village owners, this means they can present alternative profit metrics that better reflect their operational reality, such as underlying profit, alongside NPAT. While village operators currently can - and do - report such MPMs like EBIT, being able to align these to an accounting standard will ensure consistency and comparability across the sector. While there is scope for organisations to define their own management performance measures (MPMs), they still have to reconcile their reporting back to GAAP. This requirement ensures transparency with what is being captured by the MPM and to allow a degree of consistency and comparability between organisations.' IFRS 18 also mandates clearer classification and division of income and expenses, which helps users of financial statements distinguish between operating results and fair value adjustments. This change is particularly beneficial for retirement village operators, as it enables them to isolate the impact of IFRS 13-driven fair value gains from their core business performance. The alignment between the statement of profit or loss and the cash flow statement under IFRS 18 also improves transparency. By requiring entities to explain the relationship between reported profit and cash flows, stakeholders gain a more accurate picture of financial sustainability. Pacey says, ' Grant Thornton's research reveals it can take more than 20 years for the owner of an average retirement village to fully recover their investment – a story not often told in the ongoing commentary about the sector. With increasing calls for greater regulation in the industry, achieving a clearer, more transparent understanding of its financial position is mission critical.' Notes: About Grant Thornton International Ltd* Grant Thornton is one of the world's leading organisations of independent assurance, tax and advisory firms. These firms help dynamic organisations unlock their potential for growth by providing meaningful, actionable advice through a broad range of services. Proactive teams, led by approachable partners in these firms, use insights, experience and instinct to solve complex issues for privately owned, publicly listed and public sector clients. Over 76,000 Grant Thornton people, across 150 markets, are focused on making a difference to clients, colleagues and the communities in which we live and work. Grant Thornton International is a non-practicing, international umbrella entity organised as a private company limited by guarantee incorporated in England and Wales. References to "Grant Thornton" are to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms operate and refer to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton International and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. Services are delivered independently by member firms, which are not responsible for the services or activities of one another. Grant Thornton International does not provide services to clients. *All references to Grant Thornton International in the press release and this 'Notes' section are to Grant Thornton International Ltd. Grant Thornton International Ltd is a non-practicing, international umbrella entity organized as a private company limited by guarantee incorporated in England and Wales. About Grant Thornton New Zealand Ltd Grant Thornton New Zealand has more than 300 people working in offices in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch. We combine service breadth, depth of expertise and industry insight with an approachable client and people first mindset, and a broad commercial perspective. In the New Zealand context only, the use of the term 'Grant Thornton' may refer to Grant Thornton New Zealand Limited and its New Zealand related entities.
