Brit arrested in Bali pleads judges for leniency as prosecutors say they want to DROP drug charges that carry death sentence
A British man on trial for drug offences pleaded for leniency in an Indonesian court in Bali on Tuesday after a charge that could carry the death penalty was dropped.
Thomas Parker, from Cumbria, was arrested near Kuta beach in January after allegedly collecting a package from a taxi driver at a nearby street.
The package contained slightly over a kilogram of MDMA, a party drug and the main ingredient in ecstasy, according to a lab test result cited in court documents.
Parker, a 32-year-old electrician by trade, was initially charged with drug trafficking and could have faced the death penalty by firing squad if found guilty.
But the trafficking charge was dropped after police investigators determined that the package was not directly linked to him.
Parker repeatedly expressed his remorse in his final plea today, and asked the panel of three judges in Denpasar District Court to consider his situation and impose a lenient sentence.
'I am very sorry and apologise, I know it was a mistake,' Parker said, 'I promise not to repeat it again, because I really didn't know that (the package) was drugs.'
British citizen Thomas Parker, who is accused of drug offences, walks to a holding cell after his trial hearing at a district court in Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, Tuesday, May 20, 2025
After Parker read out his plea, Presiding Judge Gusti Ayu Akhirnyani adjourned the trial until May 27, when the judges will read out their sentence in a verdict.
'Until now, they (prosecutors) cannot prove that our client is a middleman or trafficker,' Pangkahila said.
'He has no connection with any drug network, we hope the judges will come to the same conclusion.'
He said his client is nervous and depressed as he faces trial.
According to the court document obtained by The Associated Press, Parker was noticed 'acting suspiciously' by officers while he was collecting the package.
He allegedly discarded it in a panic and fled when police approached him. He was traced back to the villa where he was staying and was arrested.
But Parker, in court, has maintained that he did not order the package and had initially refused to collect it, doing so only after a friend assured him it was safe and would not endanger him.
The package was sent by a drug dealer friend, identified only as Nicky, who Parker had known for around two years and spoke to regularly through the Telegram messaging app.
Parker was told someone would pick it up shortly from him, his lawyer, Edward Pangkahila said.
Parker was not promised money or anything else by Nicky in return, Pangkahila said.
During the police investigation, Parker was able to prove that he did not order the package.
Authorities reduced the charge from trafficking to the less serious offence of hiding information from authorities.
Prosecutors on May 6 sought a one-year prison term for Parker.
However, under Indonesian legal system, judges have an important role as legal determinants in a trial.
They could seek further charges if applicable laws are unclear or non-existent, meaning that the trafficking charge could be reinstated.
Pangkahila said that Parker last met Nicky a year ago when he was on vacation in Thailand.
As his friend was a dealer, Parker worried the package was filled with drugs.
He panicked when he saw police officers on the street and and was approached by them, Pangkahila said.
He was traced back to the 7 Seas Villas in North Kuta, where he was arrested.
Police showed the discarded package to Parker, who allegedly admitted it was the package he had received earlier.
They claimed they had found a light-brown powder inside later identified as MDMA.
Police took the suspect to the narcotics office for processing back in January, and he has been remanded in custody since.
The case went unreported until authorities showed a handcuffed Parker at a news conference on March 6.
A spokesperson for the Foreign Office told MailOnline they were supporting a British man detained in Bali and are in contact with the local authorities.
Indonesia has very strict drug laws and convicted traffickers can be executed by a firing squad.
About 530 people are on death row in Indonesia, mostly for drug-related crimes, including 96 foreigners, the Ministry of Immigration and Corrections' data showed.
Indonesia's last executions, of an Indonesian and three foreigners, were carried out in July 2016.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
'For the sake of truth': Weinstein victim Miriam Haley's decision to testify again
On Wednesday, 12 New York jurors found disgraced film mogul Harvey Weinstein guilty of sexual assaulting Miriam Haley in 2006, after his previous sex crimes conviction in the state was overturned last year. When Miriam Haley heard the news last year that a New York court had thrown out a rape conviction against Harvey Weinstein, the man she helped put behind bars four years before, she was 2020, Ms Haley told a Manhattan courtroom every detail of the time Weinstein sexually assaulted her in his New York apartment in 2006. This time, she was planning to turn down prosecutors, not wanting to put herself through it all again. But just weeks before the retrial, she saw a link to a new podcast series aimed at "exonerating" Weinstein. "I just thought, I have to stand up for myself. I have to stand up for the truth," Ms Haley told the BBC. Ms Haley was one of three women to testify against Weinstein during his six-week retrial, accusing him of using his power as a Miramax Hollywood tycoon to sexually abuse young women. The jury found Weinstein guilty of sexually assaulting only Ms Haley. They found him not guilty relating to a second woman and are still deliberating on the third woman's verdict "gives me hope - hope that there is new awareness around sexual violence and that the myth of the perfect victim is fading", Ms Haley said outside the Manhattan courthouse on Wednesday. A court of appeals overturned Weinstein's previous conviction for sex crimes in New York last April. The judges found Weinstein's original trial was not fair because it included testimony from women who made allegations beyond the official charges against him. In September the 73-year-old was indicted on sexual assault charges for a new pleaded not guilty and again vehemently denied the allegations. His lawyers argued in the retrial that his accusers were "friends with benefits" who had consensual sex with him in exchange for work opportunities. Those portrayals were insulting, said Ms Haley, adding that Weinstein's continued denial of the allegations pushed her to "keep showing up" in court. Facing Weinstein again For this trial, Ms Haley spent four days on the stand - three more than she did the first trial, she could look straight at her assailant, who sat in a wheelchair next to the defence table, unlike during the first trial, when he was blocked by the judge's in, she worried, as she had in the previous trial, about how she would feel."Would I feel intimidated? Would I maybe even feel sorry for him?" she said. "And then when I did see him, it was just like nothing."With Weinstein watching, Ms Haley told the court about their first meeting in France in 2006. She said she went to his hotel thinking they would discuss work opportunities, but Weinstein asked her to give him a massage. She declined and left in remained in contact, and Weinstein later helped Ms Haley find work as a production assistant for the television show Project Runway. Then, one night she accepted an invitation to his New York apartment, she said, because he had just asked her to attend a movie premiere in Los Angeles. On that evening of 10 July 2006, the film mogul "lunged" at her from across a couch and kissed her. He pushed her into a bedroom, where he forcibly performed oral sex on her, Ms Haley testified. "I couldn't get away from his grip," she told the court. "I realized, I'm getting raped, this is what this is."Recounting those intimate details to a room full of strangers for the second time was "exhausting", Ms Haley later told the BBC. "It's just so invasive," she said. An 'offensive' cross-examination After direct questioning, Ms Haley faced cross examination from Weinstein attorney Jennifer Bonjean, who is known for her combative style and has defended other major Hollywood figures accused of sexual assault, including Bill Cosby and R Kelly. When Ms Bonjean grilled her about who removed her clothing on that July evening, Ms Haley answered through tears."He took my clothes off…I didn't take my clothes off," she said. "He was the one who raped me, not the other way around.""That is for the jury to decide," Ms Bonjean replied. The comment was disrespectful, said Ms Haley, who said that she could "feel my eyes balling up, and everything, just because it was just so deeply offensive in that moment"."Regardless of the verdict, it still happened, from my perspective," she said. "I'm still the one who has to live with it."Ms Haley was followed on the stand by actress Jessica Mann, who was involved in Weinstein's first New York trial, and former model Kaja Sokola, who testified for the first time, accusing Weinstein of sexually assaulting her when she was 19. The jury found Weinstein not guilty of assaulting Ms Sokola, and is still deliberating over whether he raped Ms Mann. Weinstein still must serve a separate 16-year sentence for sex crimes in California, meaning he was already expected to spend the rest of his life in prison regardless of the retrial's outcome. In total, he has been accused of sexual misconduct, assault and rape by more than 100 women. A 'small victory' in showing up to court Like many victims of sexual assault, Ms Haley did not come forward publicly about the abuse for years. She said she adopted a strategy from her difficult childhood - one that included abuse - where she suppressed the traumatic memories and went on with life as usual. Nonetheless, the assault had emotional consequences. "I lost confidence in a lot of things," Ms Haley said. "All I could see on the surface was all these people fawning over him. It was extremely humiliating and embarrassing."Ms Haley eventually decided to come forward after other women accused Weinstein of assault, helping to galvanize the #MeToo was sent death threats - but also dozens of messages from women who said she had motivated them to speak out about their own abuse."It does have this ripple effect," she said. Ultimately, the verdict was evidence of the "lasting and real change" around sexual assault awareness, Ms Haley said, calling the conviction a "release". Now a freelance producer who spends time in Mexico, Ms Haley believes the end of the retrial will close a painful chapter, one she thought was already sealed with Weinstein's first conviction. "Even me showing up this time feels like a small victory," she said. "I definitely wasn't really doing it for myself. I was doing it for the sake of truth, and for other women."
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Juror at Weinstein sex crimes retrial asks to speak to judge about troubling ‘situation'
Jury deliberations in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial teetered Wednesday as the foreperson again requested to speak to the judge about 'a situation' he found troubling. The man – who complained Monday that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges – was being questioned in private, at his request. While the jury was in court to hear the answer to an earlier request to re-hear the text of a rape law, the foreperson signaled to Curtis Farber, the judge, that he wanted to talk. 'He said words to the effect of 'I can't go back in there with the other jurors,'' Farber explained later. The foreperson was sent to wait in a separate room, where he penned a note saying, 'I need to talk to you about a situation.' When briefly brought into court, the foreperson said he wanted to speak in private. He, the judge, prosecutors and Weinstein's lawyers then went behind closed doors. The seven female and five male jurors started their fifth day of deliberations Wednesday by re-hearing accuser Jessica Mann's testimony that he raped her in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013. Mann's accusation was an apparent focus of Tuesday's deliberations, and the jury ended the day by asking to be re-read her testimony about what happened between her and Weinstein at the hotel. The group also indicated it wanted to continue privately reviewing her emails with Weinstein and some 2017 medical records concerning her reaction to news accounts of other women's allegations against him. Some jurors appeared to take fresh notes Wednesday, while others sat impassively as court stenographers read aloud the requested parts of Mann's days-long testimony. The jury had already reheard some of the passages last week. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to raping Mann and to forcing oral sex on two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola. The Oscar-winning producer and former Hollywood powerbroker maintains that he never sexually assaulted or raped anyone, and his lawyers portrayed his accusers as opportunists who accepted his advances because they wanted a leg up in the entertainment world. While all three women stayed in contact with Weinstein despite what they say were assaults, Mann had a particularly complex history with him. She testified that they had a consensual relationship that exploded into rape, yet continued afterward. Weinstein was one of the movie industry's most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges. He originally was convicted in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola's allegation was added last year, after New York state's highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial. Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles. After a couple of days of apparent interpersonal friction, the retrial jury worked through Tuesday with no further complaints.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
British woman facing 20 years in prison in Indonesia for ‘smuggling cocaine in Angel Delight' insists she was framed
A British woman facing a lengthy jail sentence for allegedly smuggling cocaine into Bali inside Angel Delight sachets has claimed she was set up by a friend. Lisa Ellen Stocker, 39, told a court she was framed after customs officials found suspicious items disguised as food packages in her luggage when she arrived in Bali on 1 February. Officials also discovered similar sachets in luggage belonging to her partner Jonathan Collyer. Last week, prosecutor I Made Dipa Umbara said that lab testing had confirmed that seven sachets of Angel Delight powdered dessert mix discovered in Ms Stocker's luggage and ten sachets found in Mr Collyer's contained a combined 993 grams of cocaine, worth an estimated £272,212. Appearing in court this week, Ms Stocker denied any knowledge of the drugs. "The packages were not mine, but someone else's. I was framed,' she said in court on Wednesday, according to the Daily Mail. The group successfully smuggled cocaine into Bali on two previous occasions before being caught on their third attempt, said Ponco Indriyo, the Deputy Director of the Bali Police Narcotics Unit, during a news conference in Denpasar on 7 February. Speaking in court, Ms Stocker said she had been given the packets of Angel Delight by a man she claimed was a friend in the UK. She alleged the man had asked her to take the packets to Bali. 'Jon and I had been to Bali twice carrying packages from [him]. I was shocked after finding out it was cocaine,' she said, the Daily Mail reported. Mr Collyer said that he had paid for the Bali trip himself, and had not received any payment. '[He] gave me some goods he handed over to his friend in Bali,' he said. '[He] told me the package contained snacks, such as chocolate, pudding and chips.' Mr Collyer said he was told someone would pick the package up in Bali. But the Indonesian prosecutor alleges Mr Collyer was given £2,130 to cover flights and accommodation for the couple. A third Briton, Phineas Ambrose Float, was arrested in a sting operation in which the other two suspects allegedly handed the drug to him in the parking area of a hotel in Denpasar. He is being tried separately. The drugs were brought from England to Indonesia with a transit in the Doha international airport in Qatar, Mr Umbara said. Indonesia has strict laws around drug smuggling, and convictions for smuggling large quantities of drugs have in the past carried the death penalty. Death row prisoners in Indonesia are sometimes executed by firing squad, but there have been no capital punishments in Indonesia since 2017. A lawyer representing the three Britons told the BBC in February that they would each face between 15-20 years in an Indonesian prison if convicted. About 530 people, including 96 foreigners, are on death row in Indonesia, mostly for drug-related crimes, the latest figures from the Ministry of Immigration and Corrections show. Indonesia's last executions, of an Indonesian and three foreigners, were carried out in July 2016. In 2015, two members of the so-called 'Bali nine' group of convicted drug smugglers from Australia were executed by firing squad, after the group were arrested in 2005 attempting to smuggle heroin out of Indonesia. Earlier this year British man Thomas Parker was sentenced to 10 months in prison in Bali for drug offences, after being arrested for collecting a package that contained 1kg of MDMA.
