Paramount agrees to pay $16m to settle Trump lawsuit over CBS interview
The payout announced on Wednesday will go towards Trump's planned presidential library, with Paramount stating the funds would not be given to him 'directly or indirectly'.
The case stems from a broadcast of 60 Minutes featuring then-Vice President Kamala Harris, which Trump alleged had been deceptively edited to benefit the Democratic Party before the 2024 election. Trump initially sought $10bn in damages, later raising the claim to $20bn.
While CBS had described the lawsuit as 'completely without merit' and sought its dismissal, the case proceeded to mediation in April. 'The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret,' the company statement added.
As part of the settlement, 60 Minutes will begin releasing interview transcripts with future presidential candidates following their broadcast, except where legal or national security concerns apply.
Trump had alleged that the edited Harris interview – in which her comments on Israel's war on Gaza appeared inconsistent – violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to use false, misleading or deceptive acts in commerce.
Legal analysts and press freedom groups have raised concerns over Trump's use of consumer protection laws against media outlets, warning it may be a tactic to sidestep constitutional protections afforded to journalists, who can only be held liable for defamation against public figures if they say something they knew or should have known was false.
Neither the White House nor Trump's legal team has commented on the settlement.
The settlement follows a decision by Disney-owned ABC News in December to settle a defamation suit with a $15m donation to Trump's library and issue a public apology over inaccurate on-air comments.
In January, Meta – parent company of Facebook and Instagram – agreed to pay $25m to resolve a lawsuit over the suspension of Trump's accounts following the January 6 Capitol riot.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump says Powell should resign ‘immediately' in latest attack on Fed chair
United States President Donald Trump has repeated his call for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to step down, the latest in a series of attacks that have raised concern about the independence of the US central bank. Trump made the call for Powell to 'resign immediately' on Wednesday after his administration's top housing regulator urged the US Congress to launch an investigation into the central banker. Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said in a post on X that Powell should be investigated for his 'political bias' and 'deceptive testimony' about renovations at the Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington, DC. In a Truth Social post responding to Pulte's comments, Trump said 'Too Late' – a nickname used to lambast Powell for not lowering rates faster – should resign. Trump's latest broadside comes days after he sent Powell a letter demanding that the central banker lower the benchmark interest rate, which is currently set at a range of 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent, by 'a lot'. The US president has repeatedly criticised Powell for not backing faster rate cuts, arguing that the central banker's cautious stance is holding back economic growth and that concerns about inflation are overblown. Lower interest rates reduce the cost of borrowing for businesses and consumers, helping boost economic growth. But rate cuts also have the effect of increasing inflation, which central banks typically wish to keep low, and Trump's sweeping tariffs are generally expected to put upward pressure on prices. On Tuesday, Powell told a panel discussion at the European Central Bank Forum in Portugal that the central bank had taken a wait-and-see approach to rate cuts in order to gauge the impact of Trump's tariffs, many of which are in limbo ahead of a July 9 deadline. 'In effect, we went on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs, and essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of the tariffs,' Powell said. 'We didn't overreact. In fact, we didn't react at all; we're simply taking some time.' Trump has repeatedly demanded that Powell, whose term does not expire until May 2026, step down or be removed since coming into office in January. Last week, Trump told reporters that he would 'love' for Powell to step down 'if he wanted to'. In April, Trump said that Powell's 'termination cannot come fast enough,' before backing off his threat after stocks and the US dollar dipped sharply. Under US federal law, the US president is only permitted to fire the Fed chair 'for cause', a provision widely interpreted to mean specific misconduct, not policy decisions. In May, the US Supreme Court reaffirmed precedent limiting the president's ability to remove the top central banker in a ruling that singled out the Federal Reserve as having a distinct status compared with other independent agencies. Trump earlier on Tuesday told reporters that he had 'two or three' choices in mind to succeed Powell without elaborating on who is under consideration.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Judge blocks Trump's ban on asylum at the southern US border
A federal court has ruled that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by barring asylum claims at the southern border of the United States, as part of his broader immigration crackdown. On Wednesday, US District Judge Randolph Moss warned that Trump's actions threatened to create a 'presidentially decreed, alternative immigration system' separate from the laws established by Congress. The country had previously enshrined the right to asylum in its laws. But on January 20, upon taking office for a second term, President Trump issued a proclamation invoking the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). 'This authority,' Trump wrote, 'necessarily includes the right to deny the physical entry of aliens into the United States and impose restrictions on access to portions of the immigration system.' But Judge Moss, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, pushed back on that assertion in his 128-page decision (PDF). 'Nothing in the INA or the Constitution grants the President or his delegees the sweeping authority asserted in the Proclamation,' Moss wrote. He emphasised that the president had no power to 'replace the comprehensive rules and procedures' in US immigration law with an 'extra-statutory, extraregulatory regime'. Asylum is the process by which individuals request protection on foreign soil when they fear persecution or harm. While asylum applications face a high bar for acceptance, successful applicants are allowed to remain in the country. But Trump has framed immigration across the US's southern border with Mexico as an 'invasion' led by foreign powers. He has used that rationale to justify the use of emergency powers to suspend rights like asylum. Judge Moss, however, ruled that suspending asylum could result in significant harms to those facing persecution. 'A substantial possibility exists that continued implementation of the Proclamation during the pendency of an appeal will effectively deprive tens of thousands of individuals of the lawful processes to which they are entitled,' Moss wrote. Nevertheless, he gave the Trump administration a 14-day window to appeal. The administration is expected to do so. 'A local district court judge has no authority to stop President Trump and the United States from securing our border from the flood of aliens trying to enter illegally,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in response to Wednesday's ruling. 'We expect to be vindicated on appeal.' In court filings, the administration had also argued that it alone had the right to determine whether or not the US was facing invasion. 'The determination that the United States is facing an invasion is an unreviewable political question,' government lawyers wrote. Judge Moss expressed sympathy with another administration argument that the asylum processing system had simply become swamped with applications. 'The Court recognizes that the Executive Branch faces enormous challenges in preventing and deterring unlawful entry into the United States and in adjudicating the overwhelming backlog of asylum claims of those who have entered the country,' he wrote. But, he concluded, US laws did not award President Trump 'the unilateral authority to limit the rights of aliens present in the United States to apply for asylum'. The ruling comes as the result of a class-action complaint filed by immigrant rights groups, including the Florence Project, Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and RAICES. The American Civil Liberties Union applauded Wednesday's decision as an important step in protecting Congress's powers to pass laws – and protecting immigrants' rights. 'The president cannot wipe away laws passed by Congress simply by claiming that asylum seekers are invaders,' ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt said to US media.
Qatar Tribune
7 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Big US auto makers report sales jump on pre-tariff demand
Agencies Several leading automakers including Detroit giants General Motors and Ford reported increased US car sales in the second quarter on Tuesday as consumers fast-forwarded purchases ahead of US tariffs. Sales were particularly brisk early in the quarter as expectations of US President Donald Trump's coming tariffs dominated the news. Besides the US companies, Japanese automakers Toyota and Honda and South Korean brands Kia and Hyundai all reported increased sales compared with the 2024 stretch. 'They were able to capitalize on the tariff-induced fear and that drove sales, especially in the early part of the quarter,' said Garrett Nelson, equity analyst at CFRA Research. While the auto industry has been near the center of Trump's efforts to reset global trade, consumers have yet to see significant price increases due to tariffs. That is because companies have relied on existing inventories that include vehicles imported before tariffs took effect. Prices are expected to rise more in the second half of 2025, but market demand and supply forces could constrain such hikes, analysts said. GM notched a 7.3 percent rise in vehicle deliveries to 746,588 behind a continued solid performance in pickup trucks and SUVs, as well as good sales of models geared towards customers seeking affordable vehicles. These include the Chevrolet Equinox and Chevrolet Trax, a lower-priced vehicle imported from South Korea. Ford, meanwhile, scored a 14.2 percent jump in sales to 612,095, reflecting the boon from a popular program that offered customers employee pricing on many models. Most of Ford's leading vehicles saw higher sales, including the best-selling pickup F-series, as well as the Ford Explorer SUV. While Ford had lower sales of its all-electric F-150 Lightning Truck and the Mustang Mach-E, it reported a jump in hybrid vehicle sales. Higher sales had been expected for both companies, but the increases were slightly more than projected by analysts at At Toyota, sales jumped 7.2 percent to 666,470 autos, with double digit gains in several vehicles, including the Toyota Camry sedan and the Toyota Tacoma pickup truck. Honda, Kia and Hyundai reported quarterly sales increases of between five and 10 percent.—AFP But Nissan reported a 6.5 percent drop in quarterly sales to 221,441, while Jeep-owner Stellantis was projected by Edmunds to have a 12.8 percent drop to just over 300,000 vehicles. The United States imposed 25 percent tariffs on imported finished cars in early April. The Trump administration also enacted a 25 percent tariff on imported auto parts in early May, although White House officials allowed a two-year grace period and stipulated that automakers would not face duplicative tariffs due to a 25 percent levy on imported steel and aluminum. While retail car prices have not risen significantly, analysts at Cox Automotive last week pointed to a recent ebbing in dealer incentives as evidence of a somewhat tighter market. Cox Automotive Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke has projected an eight percent rise in prices due to tariffs, adding that 'we don't think consumers or fleet buyers are able and willing to accept that added cost,' he said at a briefing last week. Smoke predicted that uncertainty about the economy and whether the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates could lead many buyers to defer purchases. Nelson said automakers have to be 'very careful' with price hikes. 'Things have cooled off from where they were at the beginning of the quarter,' he said. 'Everything we're seeing suggests that consumers are still very price sensitive.'
