Transition day: Top tips for starting a new class or school
What are transition days?
Transition days provide you with an opportunity to learn more about your soon-to-be school environment, new teachers, classmates and new routines.It's also a good time to bring up any questions you might have about this new chapter in your life.The idea of starting at a new school can be a little worrying for lots of people, and transition days are a great way of making students feel more comfortable and informed about the whole process.Attending a transition day where other pupils are present can also remind students that lots of people are in the situation and that can be a really reassuring feeling.
Top tips for starting at a new school
Although starting a new class or school can seem scary at times, there are lots and lots of students who've gone through the process before.Wendy Robinson, who works at Childline, told Newsround that it can be a "scary time and every year lots of young people tell us that they are worried about the change in environment and about their friends not going to the same school."Whilst change can feel really difficult, overcoming it gets easier the more often you do it and eventually you may start to look forward to new challenges," she explained.The change from being the oldest in school to being the youngest can be unsettling for some, with some feeling a little worried about being in an environment with older pupils.The idea of having new teachers, new subjects and meeting new people can be daunting but also pretty exciting.
Newsround asked some Year 7s to give their advice to Year 6s starting a new school.They said to "be yourself, don't worry too much and be kind".Their advice for dealing with any unexpected changes next year is to "get fresh air" and "go on a bike ride and play football to reduce stress".They also explained that even if you haven't been able to visit your new class or school, it's important to remember that "all teachers are understanding and can help you with your worries" when you start.If you're still a little worried, there is lots of support out there for you to get help and advice.Speak to a friend or an adult you trust, like a parent, guardian or a teacher.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Capitalise Black but not white because of ‘political connotations', authors told
Authors have been told to capitalise the word 'Black' but never 'white' when writing about race because of 'political connotations'. Edinburgh University Press has produced a guide to the 'inclusive language' it expects in the books it publishes – a guide that itself comes with a warning about 'potentially triggering' words. The guidance states that 'Black' should be capitalised because the racial term refers to 'a distinct cultural group and a shared sense of identity and community'. This is not the case for the racial term 'white', according to the guidance, and authors are told: 'Please do not capitalise 'white' due to associated political connotations'. Sweeping terms like 'Eastern' and 'Western' not allowed The stipulation about referring to white people is set out in a section of the guide entitled 'Terminology related to whiteness, which does not define the unwanted political connotations.' Rules for referring to black people are repeated several times in the guide, which stresses the need to 'acknowledge' the existence of black cultural grouping. Elsewhere, such broad cultural groupings are discouraged, and the guide urges authors not to use sweeping terms like 'Eastern' and 'Western'. Other language issues are covered by the guide for authors working with Edinburgh University Press, which is owned by the leading Scottish university, and publishes around 300 books each year. The online guidance tells authors to avoid using the term 'illegal' when referring to illegal migrants, and urges them to use the terms 'unhoused' instead of 'homeless'. It also states that socio-economic terms such as 'poor' should be replaced by terms like 'under-represented', or 'currently dealing with food insecurity' or possibly 'economically exploited'. Preferred pronouns Edinburgh University Press tells authors to avoid suggesting a gender binary through the terms like 'opposite sex'. Authors are told to use preferred pronouns or 'they' when unsure, and to avoid gendered nouns such as 'postman' and 'chairman'. The guidance ends with advice on providing trigger warnings in texts, covering topics including violence, animal cruelty, and drugs use, along with transphobia and classism. The use of racial terms and gendered language has become contested in recent years following Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, and ongoing debates over the implications of gender ideology – the belief that people can self-identify as their preferred gender. There has been a move across numerous institutions to replace the term 'ethnic minority' with 'global majority' when referring to the non-white population of Britain. There have also been efforts to undermine what is termed 'whiteness', the behaviours associated with white culture. The issue of 'embedded whiteness' The Telegraph revealed this year that the London Museum advised staff to challenge 'embedded whiteness' in the workplace. Last year, it emerged that some teachers in training would be taught to challenge 'whiteness' in lessons, and urged to 'disrupt the centrality of whiteness' in schools. Many institutions, often on the advice of activities groups, have also sought to strip away traditionally gendered language to be more inclusive of those who identify as transgender or non-binary. Some NHS trusts dropped the term 'mother' for terms such as 'birthing person' and 'people who have ovaries'. Some services suggested that 'chestfeeding' by transgender women, who are biological males, was comparable to new mothers feeding with breast milk.
The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
Lottery results and numbers: Lotto and Thunderball draw tonight, August 13, 2025
THE NATIONAL Lottery results are in and it's time to find out who has won a life-changing amount of money tonight (August 13, 2025). Could tonight's £2million jackpot see you handing in your notice, jetting off to the Bahamas or driving a new Porsche off a garage forecourt? 3 3 You can find out by checking your ticket against tonight's numbers below. Good luck! Tonight's National Lottery Lotto winning numbers are: 01, 16, 27, 41, 50, 55 and the Bonus Ball is 54. Tonight's National Lottery Thunderball winning numbers are: 02, 05, 17, 30, 36 and the Thunderball is 08. The first National Lottery draw was held on November 19 1994 when seven winners shared a jackpot of £5,874,778. The largest amount ever to be won by a single ticket holder was £42million, won in 1996. Gareth Bull, a 49-year-old builder, won £41million in November, 2020 and ended up knocking down his bungalow to make way for a luxury manor house with a pool. TOP 5 BIGGEST LOTTERY WINS ACROSS THE WORLD £1.308 billion (Powerball) on January 13 2016 in the US, for which three winning tickets were sold, remains history's biggest lottery prize £1.267 billion (Mega Million) a winner from South Carolina took their time to come forward to claim their prize in March 2019 not long before the April deadline £633.76 million (Powerball draw) from a winner from Wisconsin £625.76 million (Powerball) Mavis L. Wanczyk of Chicopee, Massachusetts claimed the jackpot in August 2017 £575.53 million (Powerball) A lucky pair of winners scooped the jackpot in Iowa and New York in October 2018 Sue Davies, 64, bought a lottery ticket to celebrate ending five months of shielding during the pandemic — and won £500,000. Sandra Devine, 36, accidentally won £300k - she intended to buy her usual £100 National Lottery Scratchcard, but came home with a much bigger prize. The biggest jackpot ever to be up for grabs was £66million in January last year, which was won by two lucky ticket holders. Another winner, Karl managed to bag £11million aged just 23 in 1996. The odds of winning the lottery are estimated to be about one in 14million - BUT you've got to be in it to win it. 3
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
VJ Day is rapidly slipping from active memory – we must document it now
There will be a day soon when there will be no one alive who fought in the Second World War. Collecting and preserving the first-hand stories of those who served – Britain and the Commonwealth, yes, but from every nation – is an act of national and global importance. VJ Day 80: We Were There (BBC Two) was not just a fascinating and moving documentary, but a profoundly important document of a time rapidly slipping from active memory. One imagines many more hours of interviews were filmed than the brief 60 minutes we had here. Hopefully every minute has been catalogued. There has always been a bitter irony that 99 days passed between VE Day and VJ Day, with those in the UK hanging up the bunting and swinging from lampposts while the Fourteenth Army continued a brutal and harrowing war against the Japanese in Singapore, Thailand, Burma (now Myanmar), India and the Pacific Ocean. It was not lost on those interviewed here, most of them over 100. As Reg Holbrook of the Fleet Air Arm said: 'What did it matter to us if the German war started or finished?' Presented by Radio 5 Live's Rachel Burden, We Were There deserves credit for refusing to sentimentalise, romanticise or censor the testimony of the veterans. Some of it was appalling to hear and much anti-Japanese sentiment was expressed, but these were honest, raw interviews with people who were often in visible distress. Robin Rowland of the British India Army remembered Japanese soldiers bayoneting 31 British soldiers who lay in a field hospital and coming across mounds of Japanese troops who had starved to death. Jim Wren of the Royal Marines, who seemed visibly weighed down by the awfulness of his memories, was blunt: 'It's ruined my life. To see men die like that.' A Pathé newsreel of the time announced that 'the triumph in Burma has brought everlasting glory to our fighting men'. Yet here were those lucky fighting men who survived. None of them mentioned glory. There was no glory for Olga Henderson, a prisoner of war in Singapore aged nine, who looted the bodies of Japanese officers who had committed suicide after the surrender. She tried to pull gold teeth out of their mouths, 'with no feeling at all'. When taken prisoner, Henderson and her family had crossed a bridge lined with the decapitated heads of Commonwealth soldiers. Later, in a moment that would have had a statue in tears, Henderson wept at seeing a news report of a starving little boy begging for food in a modern-day war. 'That's what we were doing,' she said. 'What have we done? What are we doing to the world? Nothing's changed.' There was light in the dark. Tales of 'friendships' formed between soldiers and nurses on a boat to India, of the beautiful feeling of a monsoon on your body after weeks of baking heat, of one soldier's amazement at all the yellow balloons that suddenly appeared when the Japanese surrendered (they were condoms). And the wonderful Yavar Abbas, of the 11th Sikh Regiment, who was sent to Japan as part of the occupying force after the war and 'fell in love' with the people. The end credits informed us that many of those interviewed have since died, underlying the sheer importance of this film.
