logo
Pakistan's airspace block unlikely to rattle India's cargo routes

Pakistan's airspace block unlikely to rattle India's cargo routes

Time of India29-04-2025

India is assessing the impact of Pakistan's airspace closure on air cargo, though exporters say disruption will be limited as most goods move by sea. Air shipments of garments, gems, perishables and electronics may face pressure before the July 9 tariff deadline. Falling freight rates and a temporary pause in US tariffs have offered some relief.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In response to Indian government downgrading diplomatic ties with Pakistan in the aftermath of the gruesome terrorist attack in Pahalgam in India's Kashmir, the neigbour country had shut its airspace to Indian airlines.Shutting airspace to foreign airlines can backfire economically, as it leads to a loss of lucrative overflight fees, risks tit-for-tat retaliation that hurts the national carrier, and disrupts tourism and trade flows. Such bans also increase operational costs for global airlines forced to take longer routes, potentially straining broader diplomatic relations.Now, while India is also considering closing its airspace to Pakistani airlines, according to a report in ET that quoted people familiar with the matter, Pakistan may not have dealt a sigificant cargo hit for India.The Indian government is currently assessing how Pakistan's decision to shut its airspace may affect air cargo heading from India to regions such as the Gulf, Europe, and the United States. Exporters have said the disruption is unlikely to be significant, ToI reported.Although the closure could require rerouting for certain flights, most Indian exports move by sea, keeping air-based cargo at a minimal level. According to exporters, only around 3-4% of garments are flown abroad, whether on passenger aircraft or dedicated freighters. A small quantity of gems and jewellery is also transported by air, alongside some perishables and electronics. Exporters believe the volumes of these air-based exports are not large enough to cause major disruptions.The government's recent move to ban cargo transshipment from Bangladesh is also expected to help ease pricing pressures in the Indian market.However, some stress may emerge towards the end of May, as exporters rush to send shipments ahead of the July 9 deadline for reciprocal tariffs. A similar situation unfolded when US President Donald Trump announced tariff hikes in early April. At that time, companies rushed to move products before the new duties came into effect. Apple alone reportedly shipped five plane-loads of goods in response. Exporters of garments as well as gems and jewellery also resorted to significant air freight volumes.Following Trump's decision to pause the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days, pressure on freight eased. The effect was further supported by a steep drop in shipments from China. During the week ending April 24, the Drewry World Container Index (WCI) composite dropped 2% to $2,157 for 40-foot containers, with the sharpest rate reductions seen in routes from China due to the tariff conflict.On a year-on-year basis, container shipping rates between New York and Rotterdam rose by 32%. However, rates fell by 36% on the Rotterdam-Shanghai route and by 24% on the Shanghai-Rotterdam route. Freight rates from Shanghai to New York dropped 3%—or by $95—to $3,611 for a 40-foot container. Prices from Shanghai to Los Angeles and Rotterdam to Shanghai decreased 2% to $2,617 and $481 respectively for 40-foot containers.Meanwhile, the rate for containers moving from New York to Rotterdam edged up 1% to $825, while prices on the Shanghai-Genoa and Los Angeles-Shanghai routes held steady.'Drewry expects rates to continue to decline in the coming week due to uncertainty stemming from reciprocal tariffs,' maritime research and consulting firm Drewry said.(with ToI inputs)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans inmates
US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans inmates

Hindustan Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans inmates

A US judge on Tuesday ruled the US Bureau of Prisons must keep providing transgender inmates gender-affirming care, despite an executive order President Donald Trump signed on his first day back in office to halt funding for such care. US District Judge Royce Lamberth in Washington, D.C., allowed a group of more than 2,000 transgender inmates in federal prisons to pursue a lawsuit challenging the order as a class action. He ordered the Bureau of Prisons to provide them with hormone therapy and accommodations such as clothing and hair-removal devices while the lawsuit plays out. The ruling does not require the bureau to provide surgical care related to gender transitions. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said the Trump administration expects to ultimately prevail in the legal dispute. "The District Court's decision allowing transgender women, aka MEN, in women's prisons fundamentally makes women less safe and ignores the biological truth that there are only two genders," Fields said in an email. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the inmates, said the ruling was "a critical reminder to the Trump administration that trans people, like all people, have constitutional rights that don't simply disappear because the president has decided to wage an ideological battle." About 2,230 transgender inmates are housed in federal custodial facilities and halfway houses, according to the US Department of Justice. About two-thirds of them, 1,506, are transgender women, most of whom are housed in men's prisons. The named plaintiffs, two transgender men and one transgender woman, sued the Trump administration in March to challenge Trump's January 20 executive order aimed at combating what the administration called "gender ideology extremism." The executive order directed the federal government to only recognize two, biologically distinct sexes, male and female; and house transgender women in men's prisons. It also ordered the bureau to stop spending any money on "any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate's appearance to that of the opposite sex." Lamberth, appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, said in Tuesday's ruling that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their lawsuit because the bureau did not perform any analysis before cutting off treatment that its own medical staff had previously deemed to be medically appropriate for the inmates. Even if it had extensively studied the issue before deciding to stop gender-affirming care, the decision might still violate the US Constitution's Eighth Amendment's protections against "cruel and unusual" punishment, Lamberth wrote. The Department of Justice had argued that the judge should defer to the policy decision of a democratically elected president, but Lamberth said a functioning democracy requires respect for "all duly enacted laws," including those that blocked the executive branch from acting in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner. Democratic self-governance "does not mean blind submission to the whims of the most recent election-victor," Lamberth wrote. The executive order said it was meant to promote the "dignity, safety, and wellbeing of women, and to stop the spread of "gender ideology" which denies "the immutable biological reality of sex." But the inmates receiving hormone treatments had little interest in promoting any ideology, and were instead taking "measures to lessen the personal anguish caused by their gender dysphoria," Lamberth wrote. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Richard Chang)

Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit
Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit

Time of India

time14 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit

NEW DELHI: Pakistan said India conducted strikes at seven more locations than the targets officially acknowledged by Indian armed forces between May 7 and 10 during Operation Sindoor . A Pakistan govt document on its Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos (Iron Wall) and India's "unprovoked aggression", shared with its media, lists out Indian drone strikes at Attock, Bahawalnagar, Gujrat and Jhang (Punjab province), Peshawar (Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province), and Chhor and Hyderabad (Sindh province), which it claimed killed many civilians. None of these places were mentioned in the detailed briefings conducted by Indian foreign and military establishments. "We had disclosed the targets we hit in the briefings. This Pakistani document could be a propaganda attempt to show that India also targeted civilian sites," an Indian defence official said. After Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians, India on May 7 hit 4 terror hubs in Pakistan and five in POK, in calibrated strikes against terror infrastructure across the border, without targeting any Pakistani military base or civilian centre. The targets ranged from Sawai Nala camp in Muzaffarabad in north to Markaz Taiba in Muridke (Lashkar-e-Taiba HQ) and Markaz Subhan at Bahawalpur (Jaish-e-Muhammed HQ) in south. After Pakistan escalated the situation by targeting Indian military bases and civilian centres with missiles and waves of drone swarms, IAF struck at least nine Pakistani airbases and at least four military radar sites.

Trader, driver held in Rourkela for ‘illegal' sale of explosives
Trader, driver held in Rourkela for ‘illegal' sale of explosives

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trader, driver held in Rourkela for ‘illegal' sale of explosives

Bhubaneswar/Rourkela/Keonjhar: An explosives trader and his driver were arrested in Rourkela on Tuesday for illegal operations, with local police simultaneously inspecting explosives storage facilities in Keonjhar district. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The crackdown follows the recent loot of 4,000 kg of explosives materials by Maoists from a stone quarry in Sundargarh district on May 27. Shravan Agrawal (42) and his driver Birsa Samad alias Ishak Samad (30), who were arrested in Rourkela, do not have any links with Maoists, police said. "Agrawal is accused of selling explosives to unlicensed persons, preparing fake invoices, fudging stock registers and facilitating illegal storage. We have so far not found his link with Naxals," SP (Rourkela), Nitesh Wadhwani, told TOI. The arrests occurred after cops found explosives materials in a truck near a petrol station on June 1, posing public safety risks. A second truck containing unauthorised explosives was seized on Tuesday. The accused were booked under sections 288 (negligent conduct with respect to explosive substance), 125 (endangering life or personal safety of others), 318(4) (cheating) of the BNS and section 4 and 5 of Explosives Substance Act. The seized trucks contained explosives, super electronic detonators, and various types of wires, used for blasting in mines and stone quarries. "Our investigation revealed Agrawal's involvement in illegal explosive distribution for profit, with four warehouses located in different areas of Bargaon in his name," another police officer said. DIG (western range), Brijesh Kumar Rai, said, "The accused not just supplied explosives to ineligible persons, but also violated the SOPs regarding the safe movement of explosives on roads. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Further investigation is on." Following the loot of explosives in Sundargarh, police in Keonjhar district inspected all magazine explosives warehouses in mining-dominated Joda, Barbil, Champua, Bamebari, Rugudi, Bolani, Sadar, Ghatgaon, Soso and Daitari areas and checked their licences, safety measures and compliance of guidelines for storage. "An awareness meeting is going to be organised with the owners of all explosives warehouses in the district. Strict action will be taken against those who violate the rules," said SP (Kepnjhar), Nitin Kusalkar. Sources said districts like Sundargarh, Mayurbhanj and Keonjhar require substantial explosives due to extensive mining operations. Police are scrutinising storage facilities, transportation practices and documentation. "Frequent violations of safety protocols, with explosives transported improperly on motorcycles have come to the fore. Warehouses, typically situated half a km from village boundaries, often lack adequate security personnel," Santosh Nayak, a retired police officer, said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store