logo
How South Korea's next president wants to deal with Trump and his tariffs

How South Korea's next president wants to deal with Trump and his tariffs

Miami Herald22-05-2025

SEOUL, South Korea - The winner of South Korea's upcoming presidential election will be faced with the task of uniting a country riven by political acrimony since the impeachment of former President Yoon Suk Yeol, who sparked national outrage after declaring martial law in December.
But first, they will have to contend with President Donald Trump's tariffs.
On Wednesday, U.S. and South Korean trade officials kicked off a new round of negotiations aimed at reaching a deal by July 8, when Trump's 90-day reprieve for his "liberation day" tariffs expires. South Korea faces a 25% reciprocal tariff rate as well as product-specific duties of 25% for steel, aluminum and automobiles - all of which are major exports.
With the election scheduled for June 3, carrying these talks to the finish line will be the first and most pressing agenda item for South Korea's next president.
For now, officials from the two countries have agreed to expand the talks beyond tariffs rates to include broader topics such as currency exchange rates and economic security - a reflection of Trump's desire for a sweeping realignment of the U.S.–South Korea relationship that he has described as "one-stop shopping."
But there are likely to be further complications.
Trump, who has long griped that South Korea does not pay enough for the upkeep of the 28,500 U.S. troops stationed in the country, has expressed a desire to fold defense cost-sharing into the current talks. Writing on his social media site last month, he said that he had discussed "payment for the big time Military Protection we provide to South Korea" with then-acting President Han Duck-soo.
But with Trump having once claimed he would get Seoul to pay $10 billion a year, the topic has been highly sensitive in South Korea, fueling calls for the country's nuclear self-armament on grounds that the U.S. can no longer be relied upon for military support. There are also concerns in the country that a "package deal" favored by Trump may not work out to Seoul's advantage.
Here's what to know about what South Korea's three leading presidential candidates have said about tariffs and the U.S.-South Korea relationship under Trump.
Lee Jae-myung
The former leader of South Korea's liberal Democratic Party, Lee, 61, is the front-runner in the race, having led by as many as 20 percentage points.
During Trump's first term, Lee, then the mayor of Seongnam, cautioned against what he called "overly submissive attitudes" in the face of demands that South Korea should pay more for the presence of the U.S. military.
"Giving up whatever is demanded of us will only lead to us losing everything," he said. "We need to boldly assert our position."
Lee echoed those sentiments in a presidential debate Sunday, criticizing Han, the former acting president, for reportedly signaling his willingness to renegotiate the latest defense cost-sharing deal between Seoul and Washington.
Under what is known as the Special Measures Agreement, the U.S. has covered 40% to 50% of the total costs of keeping troops in South Korea, according to the U.S. Congressional Research Service.
Under the latest version, which was signed under the outgoing Biden administration and will last from 2026 to 2030, Seoul's annual contribution in the first year will be $1.19 billion, an 8.3% increase from 2025.
Lee, who is running on a platform of pragmatic diplomacy, has also stressed the need to balance South Korea's relationship with the U.S. against those with regional neighbors such as Russia or China.
"The U.S.-South Korea alliance is important, and we need to expand and develop that in the future - from a security alliance into an economic alliance and a comprehensive alliance," he said Sunday. "But that does not mean we can rely exclusively on the U.S.-South Korea alliance."
While describing Trump's tariffs as the "campaign of a madman," Lee has also indicated a willingness to discuss a package deal that spans Trump's Alaska natural gas pipeline project, the defense cost issue and cooperation in shipbuilding.
Lee's camp has said that if elected, he will begin his term by seeking an extension of Trump's 90-day grace period for the tariffs.
"If we win the election we will need time to closely examine the issues at the center of the trade relationship with the U.S. as well as any progress made on the tariff negotiations and come up with alternatives," an official from Lee's camp told the South Korean newspaper Donga Ilbo last week.
Kim Moon-soo
A distant second in the polls, Kim, 73, served as labor minister under the impeached Yoon and is the conservative People Power Party's nominee.
Staying true to the South Korean right's self-identification as the staunchly pro-U.S. political camp, Kim has accused Lee of seeking to curry favor with China at the expense of the U.S.-South Korea relationship.
"Your comments in the past would be considered appalling from the perspective of the U.S.," he told Lee at the debate Sunday.
Unlike Lee, who has warned against rushing into a trade deal in favor of a slower and more strategic approach, Kim has said that he would immediately set up a U.S.-South Korea summit to ink a deal before July 8, if he is elected president.
"I will make sure that tariffs against South Korea are either removed or the lowest out of any country in the world," he said at a recent rally.
To this end, Kim has cast himself as the candidate with the greatest chance of winning over Trump.
During his party's primary debates in April, when asked by the moderator whether he would wear a MAGA hat if Trump requested it during any tariff negotiations, Kim responded: "I would do even more, I would even wear a jumper if he asked."
"The most important thing in negotiating with President Trump is trust," he said Sunday. "Only when both sides can trust each other can the U.S.-South Korea alliance be strengthened, and I am the one who has the most favorable and trusting relationship with President Trump."
On defense cost-sharing, Kim has struck a noticeably more acquiescent tone than Lee: At a meeting Monday of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea, he said that he would be willing to accept a hike in Seoul's contribution.
"The global order and trade environment is rapidly changing. In order to overcome these crises, it is critical that we strengthen positive cooperation and the U.S.-South Korea alliance," he said. "I will establish common ground between the two countries through comprehensive negotiations and find a win-win solution for both."
Lee Jun-seok
Polling around 10%, the 40-year old candidate from the conservative Reform Party faces long odds for the presidency.
Still, he has emphatically rejected repeated calls to form a unity ticket, presenting himself as the younger, shrewder and less doctrine-driven alternative to what he has criticized as the old-hat conservatism of those such as Kim.
At the debate Sunday, Lee Jun-seok called for "careful calculation" in navigating the U.S.-South Korea relationship under Trump, while emphasizing the need to demonstrate that South Korea is not just a trading partner but also an important strategic ally to Washington.
Yet when it comes to tariffs, he has also openly called Trump's bluff.
"I think we have to bet on the fact that Trump will eventually find that it's difficult to maintain this situation," he said on a YouTube political talk show last month, citing the economic pressures that tariffs against China will create for Trump's heartland supporters.
"What Trump is advancing isn't sustainable…. My view is that, it's likely that Trump will admit defeat as soon as within the next six months."
_____
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TPXimpact Holdings Full Year 2025 Earnings: UK£0.10 loss per share (vs UK£0.24 loss in FY 2024)
TPXimpact Holdings Full Year 2025 Earnings: UK£0.10 loss per share (vs UK£0.24 loss in FY 2024)

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TPXimpact Holdings Full Year 2025 Earnings: UK£0.10 loss per share (vs UK£0.24 loss in FY 2024)

Revenue: UK£77.3m (down 8.2% from FY 2024). Net loss: UK£9.16m (loss narrowed by 59% from FY 2024). UK£0.10 loss per share (improved from UK£0.24 loss in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period TPXimpact Holdings shares are up 2.6% from a week ago. Before we wrap up, we've discovered 3 warning signs for TPXimpact Holdings (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Countries Ditch NATO Summit After Trump Decision to Bomb Iran
Countries Ditch NATO Summit After Trump Decision to Bomb Iran

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Countries Ditch NATO Summit After Trump Decision to Bomb Iran

Key allies are shunning the U.S. after it bombed Iranian nuclear sites with Israel. South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on Monday both announced their intentions to skip the upcoming NATO summit at the Hague. South Korean sources confirmed that Jae-myung's decision was in part due to Trump's attack on Iran, while the Japanese prime minister has cited 'various circumstances.' 'Despite the pile of issues to deal with on the home front, the administration had seriously considered attending this year's NATO summit,' South Korea's presidential office told reporters on Sunday. 'However, considering various pending national issues and uncertainty in the Middle East, the president has decided not to attend the summit.' Japan's leader has attended every NATO summit since 2022, making this a significant snub. This move shows that the U.S. is growing increasingly isolated due to its support of Israel and its unprovoked aggression towards Iran. This escalation shows our allies that the U.S. is no longer as committed to the traditional principles and customs of the Western world. Japan and South Korea aren't the only ones. Trump's demands for increased NATO defense spending and his sweeping retaliatory tariffs have caused other traditional European allies like Britain, France, and Canada to draw closer together and work without the United States. It's clear that U.S. diplomatic power is eroding on a worldwide scale with each passing day, as our leadership is viewed as unserious and unreliable.

Alligator Alcatraz: ICE to detain migrants in middle of remote Florida swamp
Alligator Alcatraz: ICE to detain migrants in middle of remote Florida swamp

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Alligator Alcatraz: ICE to detain migrants in middle of remote Florida swamp

In the fight to secure the US border, immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) has deployed an unexpected new line of defence. Construction has begun on an 1,000-bed detention centre for undocumented migrants in the middle of the Florida everglades national park that state officials have nicknamed 'Alligator Alcatraz'. The facility, built on the site of an abandoned runway, is designed to temporarily house migrants and has drawn comparisons to the infamous island prison because of the thousands of alligators and pythons living in the flooded grasslands that surround it. The detention centre is the brainchild of James Uthmeier, the state attorney general and Trump ally who last week shared a video suggesting the area's dangerous wildlife will function as natural security. 'Alligator Alcatraz: the one-stop shop to carry out president Trump's mass deportation agenda,' Mr Uthmeier said. 'People get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide.' Located at Dade-Collier training and transition airport, a former landing strip west of Miami, the 39-square-mile-square Everglades detention centre is one of several major new sites in Florida designed to house upwards of 5,000 detainees, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Touted as a 'cost-effective' way to support mass deportations, the new site follows proposals by the Trump administration to reopen the original Alcatraz prison in San Francisco and efforts to send illegal migrants to Guantanamo Bay. Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, said the facility will be funded in large part by the federal emergency management agency's shelter and services programme, which is designed to provide emergency housing for undocumented migrants. According to The Hill, a temporary site could open within days, while the facility is projected to cost around $450m a year once it is fully operational. Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor, has backed the project, with his office releasing a statement saying he 'will facilitate the federal government in enforcing immigration law'. 'Florida will continue to lead on immigration enforcement,' a spokesman for Mr DeSantis said. The new facility has drawn the ire of immigrant rights groups and environmentalists, who reacted furiously to the prospect of large tents being pitched in one of the country's most prized areas of natural beauty. The national park is home to dozens of threatened species including manatees, American crocodiles, American flamingo and wood storks. On Sunday, more than 300 protesters flocked to the Everglades to demonstrate against the new centre. The decision to build the site comes after the Trump administration's efforts to send migrants to Guantanamo Bay and to a migrant detention centre in Texas were thwarted. A contract for a vast tent city at the Fort Bliss military base in Texas was terminated in April, while courts have blocked attempts to send undocumented migrants to the Guantanamo military base in Cuba. In March, Mr Trump proposed reopening the original Alcatraz prison located in San Francisco bay in order to deter 'vicious' criminals. Addressing plans to build a detention centre in Florida, Ms Noem said: 'Under president Trump's leadership, we are working at turbo speed on cost-effective and innovative ways to deliver on the American people's mandate for mass deportations of criminal illegal aliens. 'We will expand facilities and bed space in just days, thanks to our partnership with Florida.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store