Nigel Farage says cutting waste is more important than cutting council tax for Reform UK councils
Reform UK's drive to cut local government waste will not necessarily mean lower council tax bills for residents, leader Nigel Farage said on a visit to one of his party's newly-claimed councils.
The MP for Clacton in Essex visited North Northamptonshire Council, of which his party took control in May's local elections, to identify where cost savings could be made.
Mr Farage said the party was "entitled to make sure" council tax was not being wasted, but added: "I think our priority is to reduce waste wherever we find it.
"Our priority is to look at how services are delivered, and to see whether we might negotiate better contracts.
"And that is a bigger priority than cutting council tax at this moment in time."
Reform UK overturned Conservative majorities to take control of both the North and West Northamptonshire unitary authorities, winning a majority of 12 in the former and eight in the latter.
The party has set up an Elon Musk-style Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) unit to target waste in councils, with the first team visiting Kent County Council in June.
Mr Farage said there were probably fewer efficiencies to be made in North Northamptonshire because the council was created in 2021, with the two unitary authorities replacing bankrupt Northamptonshire County Council.
However, he said staff members who currently work from home and refuse to come back into the office could lose their jobs.
"Let's hope we don't have to, but if people are working and being paid out of the public purse and not delivering, they should be accountable," he said.
The leader of North Northamptonshire Council, Martin Griffiths, told ITV News Anglia he wanted to continue to make efficiencies so that the council could tackle issues such as social care and special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).
He said the council was looking at "every single line of our expenditure in full detail" but did not give specific examples of where cuts could be made.
"I want to make North Northamptonshire an exemplary council," he added.
"We want to put our residents first and foremost in everything we do, and that's my ambition."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Opening of HS2 line set to be delayed beyond 2033
The opening of HS2 will be delayed beyond the target date of 2033, the BBC understands. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to tell Parliament on Wednesday that there is "no reasonable way to deliver" the railway line on schedule and within budget - but is not expected to say how long the delay will is set to outline the findings of an independent review into HS2, in which a "litany of failure" has been blamed for ballooning is the latest setback for the high-speed rail project, which has been scaled back and delayed repeatedly. Alexander is expected to say that Conservative governments presided over the cost of HS2 rising by £37bn between 2012, when the line was first approved, and the general election last the original plans, HS2 was intended to create high-speed rail links between London and major cities in the Midlands and North of was designed to cut journey times and expand capacity on the railways, but has has faced myriad challenges and soaring has already been pared down to a high-speed link between Birmingham and London, with the Birmingham to Manchester leg cancelled in 2023. Confirming that decision, the then-Chancellor Jeremy Hunt said costs were getting "totally out of control".That was two years after a planned eastern leg between Birmingham and Leeds was 2010, it was estimated HS2 would cost £33bn and open in year, the Department for Transport said the remaining project cost was estimated at between £45bn and £54bn in 2019 prices - but HS2 management has estimated it could be as high as £ Wednesday, the transport secretary is expected to announce the findings of a review conducted by the former chief executive of Crossrail, James Stewart, which was commissioned last year to "investigate the oversight of major transport infrastructure projects".In October last year, a new chief executive, Mark Wild, was put in place as part of efforts to get control of rising costs.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Fury as Sir Keir Starmer's Brexit deal may change flavour of smoky bacon crisps
SIR Keir Starmer has been blasted for a 'smoky bacon surrender' after his Brexit deal left Britain taking orders from Brussels on what goes in our crisps. The PM agreed to follow new EU food rules - including a ban on smoke flavourings still allowed in the UK - prompting fears much-loved bacon crisps will never taste the same. 2 Reform UK leader Nigel Farage told The Telegraph: 'Leave our smoky bacon alone. 'You have to ask what next? Changes to the way we smoke our kippers? Who knows? The truth is this is all now totally out of our hands. 'Our industries have to change to adapt to how the EU sets the rules, maybe not what our own people, our own innovators, entrepreneurs and industries would choose to do.' Shadow Cabinet Office Minister Richard Holden added: ' Labour's smoky bacon surrender is just the latest flavour of betrayal served up by their EU deal.' A No10 spokesperson insisted major crisp firms no longer use the banned flavourings and most had already changed recipes to keep selling into the EU. A Government spokesperson also told The Sun: 'Anyone claiming smoky bacon crisps are for the chop is peddling porky pies. 'The Great British crisp industry will still be able to produce mouthwatering flavours - and find it easier to bring home the bacon by exporting to new markets.' 'Sell-out' Starmer has betrayed Brexit – he should follow in Trump's footsteps instead 2
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Tice condemns Scottish plan to send 600,000 tonnes of rubbish to England
England should reject Scotland's rubbish, Richard Tice has said, after it emerged that up to 100 truckloads a day are to be sent over the border. The Reform UK deputy leader said it would be 'fair' for Scotland to 'sort its own rubbish' and manage the impact of the SNP's ban on landfill. Scots would be 'furious' at a situation in which large quantities of English waste had to be shipped north, he said. It emerged this week that a Scottish government ban on domestic black bin bag waste being sent to landfill from next year would result in about 600,000 tonnes of rubbish being shipped southwards from next year. Scotland does not have enough incinerators to cope with the surge in demand that the policy will cause. New incinerators and 'energy from waste' facilities that are still being built will not be ready in time. Scottish councils and commercial waste companies have approached firms in England to negotiate 'bridging contracts'. However, as there is also pressure on incinerator capacity there, much of Scotland's excess rubbish is expected to go to landfill in England instead. Experts have said that the equivalent of 80 to 100 trucks a day, seven days a week, will be needed to take the waste to England or even farther afield. Some lorries may have to travel for three days, it has been claimed, as there is particular pressure on sites in northern England. Tice, the Boston and Skegness MP, said: 'Scots would be furious if they were told to take English rubbish. The reverse is also true. Scotland should sort its own rubbish. Fair is fair.' The SNP government introduced the ban to protect the environment and deliver a 'net-zero society'. However, critics have pointed to the emissions which are set to be caused as a result of taking waste large distances — it cannot be disposed of in Scotland. The UK government also wants to eliminate biodegradable waste from landfill. It announced a consultation earlier this year, but there is no firm policy in place south of the border. Thomas Kerr, the Glasgow councillor who defected from the Conservatives to Reform in January, also said England would be within its rights to refuse to take Scottish waste. 'Like the SNP's disastrous deposit return scheme, this rushed-out policy is unworkable and will put huge pressure on English landfill,' Kerr said. 'At the very least, the SNP should wait till our national incinerator capacity is ready. Otherwise English landfills would be well within their rights to refuse to take this, and every day Scots will be left with the mess.' It had been hoped that the landfill ban, which was initially due to come into force in 2021 but was delayed due to the Covid pandemic, would coincide with an increase in recycling rates. However, these have barely shifted in a decade, with Scottish homes recycling 41.6 per cent of their waste in 2013, rising to 43.5 per cent in 2023. Kim Pratt, the senior circular economy campaigner at Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: 'By failing to prepare properly for the upcoming landfill ban, the Scottish government has missed an opportunity to move away from the current throwaway society. 'Without immediate action, Scotland will end up burning and exporting much of its waste. 'The solution is for the Scottish government to invest more in reuse and repair, provide better access to recycling services and close the loopholes in its incineration ban as soon as possible.' Gillian Martin, the SNP's climate action and energy secretary, blamed an 'incineration gap' on 'outside factors' such as inflation and the cost of building new facilities. The SNP government introduced an effective ban on new incinerators in 2022 but said existing plans for 11 sites could still proceed. Martin said: 'We've got plans for more incinerators, with energy from waste schemes, to come on in the next year and over the next three years — so it is a temporary situation.' She added that 'the positive environmental impact of stopping landfills' outweighed the impact of temporary measures to export the rubbish over the border.
