
Israel's use of human shields in Gaza was systematic, Israeli soldiers and former Palestinian detainees say
Dressed in army fatigues with a camera fixed to his forehead, Ayman Abu Hamadan was forced into houses in the Gaza Strip to make sure they were clear of bombs and gunmen, he said. When one unit finished with him, he was passed to the next.
'They beat me and told me: 'You have no other option; do this or we'll kill you,'' the 36-year-old told The Associated Press, describing the 2 1/2 weeks he was held last summer by the Israeli military in northern Gaza.
Orders often came from the top, and at times nearly every platoon used a Palestinian to clear locations, said an Israeli officer, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.
Several Palestinians and soldiers told the AP that Israeli troops are systematically forcing Palestinians to act as human shields in Gaza, sending them into buildings and tunnels to check for explosives or fighters. The dangerous practice has become ubiquitous during 19 months of war, they said.
In response to these allegations, Israel's military says it strictly prohibits using civilians as shields — a practice it has long accused Hamas of using in Gaza. Israeli officials blame the fighters for the civilian death toll in its offensive that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians.
In a statement to the AP, the military said it also bans otherwise coercing civilians to participate in operations, and 'all such orders are routinely emphasized to the forces.'
The military said it's investigating several cases alleging that Palestinians were involved in missions, but wouldn't provide details. It didn't answer questions about the reach of the practice or any orders from commanding officers.
The AP spoke with seven Palestinians who described being used as shields in Gaza and the occupied West Bank and with two members of Israel's military who said they engaged in the practice, which is prohibited by international law. Rights groups are ringing the alarm, saying it's become standard procedure increasingly used in the war.
'These are not isolated accounts; they point to a systemic failure and a horrifying moral collapse,' said Nadav Weiman, executive director of Breaking the Silence — a whistleblower group of former Israeli soldiers that has collected testimonies about the practice from within the military. 'Israel rightly condemns Hamas for using civilians as human shields, but our own soldiers describe doing the very same.'
Abu Hamadan said he was detained in August after being separated from his family, and soldiers told him he'd help with a 'special mission.' He was forced, for 17 days, to search houses and inspect every hole in the ground for tunnels, he said.
Soldiers stood behind him and, once it was clear, entered the buildings to damage or destroy them, he said. He spent each night bound in a dark room, only to wake up and do it again.
Rights groups say Israel has used Palestinians as shields in Gaza and the West Bank for decades. The Supreme Court outlawed the practice in 2005. But the groups continued to document violations.
Still, experts say this war is the first time in decades the practice — and the debate around it — has been so widespread.
The two Israeli soldiers who spoke to the AP — and a third who provided testimony to Breaking the Silence — said commanders were aware of the use of human shields and tolerated it, with some giving orders to do so. Some said it was referred to as the 'mosquito protocol' and that Palestinians were also referred to as 'wasps' and other dehumanizing terms.
The soldiers — who said they're no longer serving in Gaza — said the practice sped up operations, saved ammunition, and spared combat dogs from injury or death.
The soldiers said they first became aware human shields were being used shortly after the war erupted on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, and that it became widespread by the middle of 2024. Orders to 'bring a mosquito' often came via radio, they said — shorthand everyone understood. Soldiers acted on commanding officers' orders, according to the officer who spoke to the AP.
He said that by the end of his nine months in Gaza, every infantry unit used a Palestinian to clear houses before entering.
'Once this idea was initiated, it caught on like fire in a field,' the 26-year-old said. 'People saw how effective and easy it was.'
He described a 2024 planning meeting where a brigade commander presented to the division commander a slide reading 'get a mosquito' and a suggestion they might 'just catch one off the streets.'
The officer wrote two incident reports to the brigade commander detailing the use of human shields, reports that would have been escalated to the division chief, he said. The military said it had no comment when asked whether it received them.
One report documented the accidental killing of a Palestinian, he said — troops didn't realize another unit was using him as a shield and shot him as he ran into a house. The officer recommended the Palestinians be dressed in army clothes to avoid misidentification.
He said he knew of at least one other Palestinian who died while used as a shield — he passed out in a tunnel.
Convincing soldiers to operate lawfully when they see their enemy using questionable practices is difficult, said Michael Schmitt, a distinguished professor of international law at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Israeli officials and other observers say Hamas uses civilians as shields as it embeds itself in communities, hiding fighters in hospitals and schools.
'It's really a heavy lift to look at your own soldiers and say you have to comply,' Schmitt said.
One soldier told the AP his unit tried to refuse to use human shields in mid-2024 but were told they had no choice, with a high-ranking officer saying they shouldn't worry about international humanitarian law.
The sergeant — speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal — said the troops used a 16-year-old and a 30-year-old for a few days.
The boy shook constantly, he said, and both repeated 'Rafah, Rafah' — Gaza's southernmost city, where more than 1 million Palestinians had fled from fighting elsewhere at that point in the war.
It seemed they were begging to be freed, the sergeant said.
Masoud Abu Saeed said he was used as a shield for two weeks in March 2024 in the southern city of Khan Younis.
'This is extremely dangerous,' he recounted telling a soldier. 'I have children and want to reunite with them.'
The 36-year-old said he was forced into houses, buildings and a hospital to dig up suspected tunnels and clear areas. He said he wore a first-responder vest for easy identification, carrying a phone, hammer and chain cutters.
During one operation, he bumped into his brother, used as a shield by another unit, he said.
They hugged. 'I thought Israel's army had executed him,' he said.
Palestinians also report being used as shields in the West Bank.
Hazar Estity said soldiers took her from her Jenin refugee camp home in November, forcing her to film inside several apartments and clear them before troops entered.
She said she pleaded to return to her 21-month-old son, but soldiers didn't listen.
'I was most afraid that they would kill me,' she said. 'And that I wouldn't see my son again.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Going online in Russia can be frustrating, complicated and even dangerous
TALLINN, Estonia — YouTube videos that won't load. A visit to a popular independent media website that produces only a blank page. Cellphone internet connections that are down for hours or days. Going online in Russia can be frustrating, complicated and even dangerous. It's not a network glitch but a deliberate, multipronged and long-term effort by authorities to bring the internet under the Kremlin's full control. Authorities adopted restrictive laws and banned websites and platforms that won't comply. Technology has been perfected to monitor and manipulate online traffic. While it's still possible to circumvent restrictions by using virtual private network apps, those are routinely blocked, too. Authorities further restricted internet access this summer with widespread shutdowns of cellphone internet connections and adopting a law punishing users for searching for content they deem illicit. They also are threatening to go after the popular WhatsApp platform while rolling out a new 'national' messaging app that's widely expected to be heavily monitored. President Vladimir Putin urged the government to 'stifle' foreign internet services and ordered officials to assemble a list of platforms from 'unfriendly' states that should be restricted. Experts and rights advocates told The Associated Press that the scale and effectiveness of the restrictions are alarming. Authorities seem more adept at it now, compared with previous, largely futile efforts to restrict online activities, and they're edging closer to isolating the internet in Russia. Human Rights Watch researcher Anastasiia Kruope describes Moscow's approach to reining in the internet as 'death by a thousand cuts.' 'Bit by bit, you're trying to come to a point where everything is controlled.' Kremlin efforts to control what Russians do, read or say online dates to 2011-12, when the internet was used to challenge authority. Independent media outlets bloomed, and anti-government demonstrations that were coordinated online erupted after disputed parliamentary elections and Putin's decision to run again for president. Russia began adopting regulations tightening internet controls. Some blocked websites; others required providers to store call records and messages, sharing it with security services if needed, and install equipment allowing authorities to control and cut off traffic. Companies like Google or Facebook were pressured to store user data on Russian servers, to no avail, and plans were announced for a 'sovereign internet' that could be cut off from the rest of the world. Russia's popular Facebook-like social media platform VK, founded by Pavel Durov long before he launched the Telegram messaging app, came under the control of Kremlin-friendly companies. Russia tried to block Telegram between 2018-20 but failed. Prosecutions for social media posts and comments became common, showing that authorities were closely watching the online space. Still, experts had dismissed Kremlin efforts to rein in the internet as futile, arguing Russia was far from building something akin to China's 'Great Firewall,' which Beijing uses to block foreign websites. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the government blocked major social media like Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, as well as Signal and a few other messaging apps. VPNs also were targeted, making it harder to reach restricted websites. YouTube access was disrupted last summer in what experts called deliberate throttling by authorities. The Kremlin blamed YouTube owner Google for not maintaining its hardware in Russia. The platform has been wildly popular in Russia, both for entertainment and for voices critical of the Kremlin, like the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Cloudflare, an internet infrastructure provider, said in June that websites using its services were being throttled in Russia. Independent news site Mediazona reported that several other popular Western hosting providers also are being inhibited. Cyber lawyer Sarkis Darbinyan, founder of Russian internet freedom group Roskomsvoboda, said authorities have been trying to push businesses to migrate to Russian hosting providers that can be controlled. He estimates about half of all Russian websites are powered by foreign hosting and infrastructure providers, many offering better quality and price than domestic equivalents. A 'huge number' of global websites and platforms use those providers, he said, so cutting them off means those websites 'automatically become inaccessible' in Russia too. Another concerning trend is the consolidation of Russia's internet providers and companies that manage IP addresses, according to a July 30 Human Rights Watch report. Last year, authorities raised the cost of obtaining an internet provider license from 7,500 rubles (about $90) to 1 million rubles (over $12,300), and state data shows that more than half of all IP addresses in Russia are managed by seven large companies, with Rostelecom, Russia's state telephone and internet giant, accounting for 25%. The Kremlin is striving 'to control the internet space in Russia, and to censor things, to manipulate the traffic,' said HRW's Kruope. A new Russian law criminalized online searches for broadly defined 'extremist' materials. That could include LGBTQ+ content, opposition groups, some songs by performers critical of the Kremlin — and Navalny's memoir, which was designated as extremist last week. Right advocates say it's a step toward punishing consumers — not just providers — like in Belarus, where people are routinely fined or jailed for reading or following certain independent media outlets. Stanislav Seleznev, cyber security expert and lawyer with the Net Freedom rights group, doesn't expect ubiquitous prosecutions, since tracking individual online searches in a country of 146 million remains a tall order. But even a limited number of cases could scare many from restricted content, he said. Another major step could be blocking WhatsApp, which monitoring service Mediascope said had over 97 million monthly users in April. WhatsApp 'should prepare to leave the Russian market,' said lawmaker Anton Gorelkin, and a new 'national' messenger, MAX, developed by social media company VK, would take its place. Telegram probably won't be restricted, he said. MAX, promoted as a one-stop shop for messaging, online government services, making payments and more, was rolled out for beta tests but has yet to attract a wide following. Over 2 million people registered by July, the Tass news agency reported. Its terms and conditions say it will share user data with authorities upon request, and a new law stipulates its preinstallation in all smartphones sold in Russia. State institutions, officials and businesses are actively encouraged to move communications and blogs to MAX. Anastasiya Zhyrmont of the Access Now digital rights group said both Telegram and WhatsApp were disrupted in Russia in July in what could be a test of how potential blockages would affect internet infrastructure. It wouldn't be uncommon. In recent years, authorities regularly tested cutting off the internet from the rest of the world, sometimes resulting in outages in some regions. Darbinyan believes the only way to make people use MAX is to 'shut down, stifle' every Western alternative. 'But again, habits ... do not change in a year or two. And these habits acquired over decades, when the internet was fast and free,' he said. Government media and internet regulator Roskomnadzor uses more sophisticated methods, analyzing all web traffic and identifying what it can block or choke off, Darbinyan said. It's been helped by 'years of perfecting the technology, years of taking over and understanding the architecture of the internet and the players,' as well as Western sanctions and companies leaving the Russian market since 2022, said Kruope of Human Rights Watch. Russia is 'not there yet' in isolating its internet from the rest of the world, Darbinyan said, but Kremlin efforts are 'bringing it closer.' Litvinova writes for the Associated Press.


Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Satellite Photo Shows Israel Military Buildup Near Gaza
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New satellite imagery reveals a significant buildup of Israeli troops and military equipment near the Gaza border, signaling preparations for a major ground offensive in the Palestinian enclave. The deployment comes after Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to seize control of Gaza City, raising the stakes in an already volatile conflict and intensifying fears of a broader and more destructive escalation. Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. State Department and Israel's Foreign Ministry. Why It Matters The buildup highlights an intensifying Israeli military posture amid a fragile and volatile situation in Gaza. Israel's plan to take over Gaza City likely will require a large-scale ground offensive that has alarmed stakeholders in the region. The trajectory of the yearslong conflict now points to a potentially broader and more destructive phase, which could escalate humanitarian suffering and complicate diplomatic relations with Israel's allies including the United States. Imagery dated August 7, 2025, and released by the Chinese satellite firm MizarVision shows the buildup of Israeli military forces at the Karni crossing near northeastern Gaza. Imagery dated August 7, 2025, and released by the Chinese satellite firm MizarVision shows the buildup of Israeli military forces at the Karni crossing near northeastern Gaza. MizarVision What To Know Imagery released this week by a Chinese satellite firm MizarVision showed a growing concentration of Israeli military hardware at the Karni crossing into northeastern Gaza on August 7. The photo appeared to show movements and formations that were consistent with preparations for a significant ground assault. Israeli forces have been conducting ground operations in Gaza since late October 2023, after Hamas militants inflicted the deadliest attack on Israel in its history. There have been occasional pauses for ceasefires, but the new buildup shows Israel is gearing up to seize territory and target Hamas strongholds. A Palestinian boy pushes a cart loaded with jerrycans of water after collecting it at a camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Saturday, July 19, 2025. A Palestinian boy pushes a cart loaded with jerrycans of water after collecting it at a camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Saturday, July 19, 2025. Abdel Kareem Hana/AP Photo Israel's Plan Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to take control of Gaza City early Friday, according to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. While the plan does not extend to full occupation of the Gaza Strip, it marks a strategic escalation aimed at weakening Hamas's hold over the area. Israel closed the Karni crossing in 2011 and completed the final phase of demolition work in 2022. It had been a terminal for goods and humanitarian aid into Gaza but now forms part of the Iron Wall, further tightening the blockade around the small Palestinian territory. Netanyahu has outlined a vision to dismantle Hamas and establish a security perimeter around Gaza rather than govern the enclave directly. Speaking on Fox News, Netanyahu said, "We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza and to pass it to civilian governance that is not Hamas and not anyone advocating the destruction of Israel." Discord Between U.S. and Israel The military buildup comes amid disagreements between the Israel and the its strongest international backer the United States. NBC News reported a recent private phone call between Netanyahu and Donald Trump, in which the U.S. president shouted at his Israeli counterpart over the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the U.S.- and Israeli-supported relief initiative. Officials familiar with the call described the tensions as emblematic of strained relations between the two governments at a critical moment in the conflict. Trump has publicly contradicted Netanyahu's assurances about Gaza's humanitarian conditions. While Netanyahu has said there is no starvation in Gaza, Trump has stated otherwise. What People Are Saying Displaced Palestinians travel on carts and vehicles through a makeshift camp along the beach in Gaza City, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/) Displaced Palestinians travel on carts and vehicles through a makeshift camp along the beach in Gaza City, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/) Jehad Alshrafi/AP Photo Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: "We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza and to pass it to civilian governance that is not Hamas and not anyone advocating the destruction of Israel. That's what we want to do." U.S. President Donald Trump: "I have seen images of children in Gaza who look very hungry. There is real starvation there and you can't fake that." What Happens Next With Israel's security cabinet approval and the confirmed troop buildup, the likelihood of a significant ground offensive in Gaza is increasing. The coming weeks could see intensified fighting, efforts to free hostages and mounting humanitarian challenges. At the same time, the diplomatic strains between the U.S. and Israel may influence both military and relief operations.


Time Magazine
14 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Anas al-Sharif's Last Words Before Israeli Strike Killed Him
Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif was killed in a targeted Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on Sunday, alongside four of his colleagues. Before his death, the 28-year-old had prepared a final message to be released posthumously. 'This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice,' he wrote in a message shared Sunday. 'I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification,' it continued. 'Do not forget Gaza… And do not forget me in your sincere prayers for forgiveness and acceptance,' it said. Al-Sharif leaves behind a wife and two young children. In a statement announcing the killing of al-Sharif, the IDF said he was the 'head of a Hamas terrorist cell and advanced rocket attacks on Israeli civilians and IDF troops.' It shared images of what it claimed was a Hamas roster list and injury record with his name on both. TIME has not been able to independently verify these claims. Al Jazeera condemned the killings, calling the attack a 'targeted assassination' and a 'blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom.' 'Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people,' the Qatari network said in a statement. Al-Sharif had faced threats and allegations of ties to Hamas from the Israeli army for nearly a year before his death, but they intensified following a broadcast in July in which he broke down crying while reporting on Gaza's hunger crisis. Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson Avichay Adraee accused him of crying 'crocodile tears' and of being part of a 'false Hamas campaign on starvation.' Al Jazeera rejected the claims as 'baseless'. The Committee To Protect Journalists (CPJ) issued a statement describing Adraee's statements as 'unfounded accusations [that] represent an effort to manufacture consent to kill al-Sharif,' and noted that Israel had killed four other Al Jazeera journalists about whom they had made similar statements. In messages sent to TIME in late July, during reporting for a separate story, al-Sharif said the IDF's allegations left him infear for his life. 'I live with the feeling that I could be bombed and martyred at any moment,' he wrote in one message. 'These threats are clear incitement and an attempt to assassinate my voice, either through bombing or moral distortion,' he added. Al-Sharif, who had covered the war from the first days of the conflict, told TIME how he had received direct calls from Israeli military officers demanding that he stop his coverage and leave northern Gaza. He also received WhatsApp messages that detailed his precise whereabouts, which he considered a threat to his life. TIME has contacted an IDF spokesperson for comment. Deadliest conflict for journalists ever recorded The airstrike that killed him struck a tent being used by media near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. It also killed Al Jazeera staff members Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Al Thaher, Moamen Aliwa, and Mohamed Nofal, as well as freelance journalist Mohammad al-Khaldi. Their deaths brought the total number of journalists killed in Gaza since October 7, 2023, to 186—180 of those journalists being Palestinian, according to the International Federation of Journalists. Hundreds gathered at the Sheikh Radwan cemetery in the Gaza Strip to mourn the five journalists on Monday. The airstrike came just hours after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended a planned military offensive into some of Gaza's most populated areas, including Gaza City, where the team was based. CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah accused Israel of 'murdering the messengers,' in a statement condemning the strike. 'Israel wiped out an entire news crew. It has made no claims that any of the other journalists were terrorists. That's murder. Plain and simple,' she said. 'It is no coincidence that the smears against al-Sharif — who has reported night and day for Al Jazeera since the start of the war — surfaced every time he reported on a major development in the war, most recently the starvation brought about by Israel's refusal to allow sufficient aid into the territory,' Qudah added. The CPJ has previously called the Gaza war the 'deadliest conflict for journalists ever documented.' Reporting on hunger Al-Sharif was a mainstay of Al Jazeera's rolling coverage of the Gaza war and one of its best known correspondents. In the video about starvation that drew the condemnation of the IDF, al-Sharif cries as a woman collapses from hunger behind him. 'They need only one meal. They need one loaf of bread. They need one sip of water,' he said, his voice breaking. Nearly 200 people have died from malnutrition in Gaza, including at least 96 children, according to Gaza's health ministry. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC)'s latest update concluded that 'mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths,' and famine thresholds have been met for food consumption across most of Gaza. In his last video, al-Sharif reported on heavy airstrikes nearby. On the broadcast, he can he heard saying: 'Nonstop bombing… For the past two hours, the Israeli aggression on Gaza City has intensified.' After October 2023, Israel prohibited foreign journalists from entering Gaza. In the absence of international reporters, much of the reporting on the war has fallen to Palestinian journalists on the ground, often risking their own lives and safety in the process. Reporting from the frontlines, they have faced the same losses and destruction as the communities they document, including the destruction of their homes and the deaths of loved ones. Al-Sharif's father, Jamal al-Sharif, was killed in a strike in December 2023 while he was praying, according to messages al-Sharif sent TIME in July. Due to the ongoing shelling, he was forced to bury his father in a schoolyard because he could not reach the cemetery safely. While on-air in October 2024, he found out about the deaths of his own relatives while reporting for Al Jazeera. The Israel-Hamas war was triggered after Hamas launched a terror attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, in which the group killed over 1,200 people and took around 250 hostages. Over 61,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of the war, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. In the absence of independent monitoring on the ground, the ministry is the primary source for casualty data relied upon by humanitarian groups, journalists, and international bodies. Its figures do not differentiate between civilians and combatants and cannot be independently verified by TIME.