logo
Doctor Claims Gene Hackman's Wife Called Him 24 Hours After Police Say She Died

Doctor Claims Gene Hackman's Wife Called Him 24 Hours After Police Say She Died

Yahoo16-03-2025
A doctor has revealed Gene Hackman's wife, Betsy Arakawa, didn't die on February 11, as officers claim, because she called his clinic on February 12.
Hackman, Arakawa, and one of their three dogs were found dead in their home in New Mexico on February 26, with the initial suspicion being that they died due to carbon monoxide poisoning.
However, law enforcement officials from Santa Fe County revealed that Arakawa died of Hantavirus on February 11, while Hackman died seven days later due to hypertensive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with Alzheimer's being a contributing factor.
The circumstances surrounding Arakawa and Hackman's deaths continue to generate confusion, with a doctor now adding another angle to the mystery.
On Saturday, Dr. Josiah Child told the Daily Mail that officers were wrong about Arakawa's day of death.
He said, "Mrs. Hackman didn't die on February 11 because she called my clinic on February 12."
Child, a former emergency care specialist who now runs Cloudberry Health in Santa Fe, explained further, "She'd called me a couple of weeks before her death to ask about getting an echocardiogram [heart scan] for her husband. She was not a patient of mine, but one of my patients recommended Cloudberry to her."
He also said, "She made an appointment for herself for February 12. It was for something unrelated to anything respiratory."
The doctor said Arakawa canceled her appointment two days before she was to see him because Gene Hackman was unwell.
He also revealed, "She called back on the morning of February 12 and spoke to one of our doctors who told her to come in that afternoon."
Dr. Child said, "We made her an appointment but she never showed up. She did not show any symptoms of respiratory distress."
He added, "The appointment wasn't for anything related to hantavirus. We tried calling her a couple of times with no reply."
The doctor's revelations that Arakawa was alive on the day the coroner claimed she died adds another layer of mystery to an already stressful situation.
However, Dr. Child is also disputing that hantavirus is the cause of Arakawa's death as she showed no signs of "respiratory distress."
He said, "I am not a hantavirus expert but most patients who have that diagnosis die in hospital. It is surprising that Mrs. Hackman spoke to my office on the phone on February 10 and again on February 12 and didn't appear in respiratory distress."
Meanwhile, a Los Angeles-based doctor spoke to the outlet on Sunday and cast more doubt on hantavirus being the cause of Arakawa's demise.
They said, "Medical professionals are all scratching their heads over hantavirus as the cause of death. Respiratory failure is not sudden – it is something that worsens over several days."
The doctor concluded, "Most people get admitted to the ER [emergency room] because they are having trouble breathing. It's exceedingly rare for a seemingly healthy 65-year-old to drop dead of it. In fact, no one's heard of such a thing."
On February 11, 2025, Arakawa, 65, reportedly carried out her usual activities, visiting a grocery store, pharmacy, and pet food shop before returning home to Santa Fe.
Authorities believe she died that same day from hantavirus, a rare but deadly disease linked to rodent droppings.
Following her passing, there was no further communication or activity from her.
Hackman, 95, who suffered from Alzheimer's disease, was likely unaware of his wife's death. His pacemaker data recorded heart activity on February 17, with an irregular rhythm on February 18, suggesting he passed away that day due to heart disease.
Arakawa and Hackman's bodies were found on February 26 when a maintenance worker reported them unresponsive. Authorities ruled both deaths as natural causes—Arakawa from hantavirus and Hackman from heart disease, with Alzheimer's as a contributing factor.
Meanwhile, Bruce Willis' wife, Emma Heming Willis, reflected on the couple's death, stressing the need to support caregivers.
She highlighted how Arakawa, Hackman's caregiver, passed away a week before him, reinforcing the challenges caregivers face.
Drawing from her own experience caring for Bruce, who has frontotemporal dementia, Emma urged people to recognize caregivers' struggles.
She debunked the myth that caregivers "have it all figured out," insisting they also need care. In an Instagram post, she emphasized, "Caregivers need care too. Period. Full stop."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Time is running out for kids with a rare disease, parents say, unless the FDA acts
Time is running out for kids with a rare disease, parents say, unless the FDA acts

NBC News

time9 hours ago

  • NBC News

Time is running out for kids with a rare disease, parents say, unless the FDA acts

Gilbert Dryden probably only has enough medication to get him through the end of October, his mother, Madison, figures. Seven-month-old Gilbert has a rare genetic condition called Barth syndrome, one that can have dire consequences, like heart failure, extreme muscle weakness and a dramatically reduced life expectancy. Children who die early often don't see their fifth birthday. Two infant deaths were reported within the past week, according to the Barth Syndrome Foundation. What's been keeping Gilbert alive and functioning relatively well, according to his family, is an experimental drug called elamipretide, made by Stealth BioTherapeutics. Small studies have suggested it's safe and effective in treating the ultra-rare illness. Just 150 people in the U.S. have the condition. 'Our kids are dying. We have seen that this drug works,' said Kate McCurdy, a co-founder of the Barth Syndrome Foundation. 'This drug totally saves the lives of babies.' After a more than decade-long process to bring the drug to market, the treatment's approval has repeatedly hit roadblocks with the Food and Drug Administration. One setback occurred in the spring, when an FDA inspection found problems at a Stealth manufacturing facility. The problems weren't made public, but apparently weren't egregious enough to warrant regulatory action. The company said the issues have been resolved. In late May, after an advisory panel voted earlier (in October 2024) to recommend the therapy, the FDA declined to approve it. The agency didn't reveal why. An ultra-rare disease like Barth syndrome with an ultra-small population of patients who can be tested for clinical efficacy faces barriers for FDA drug approval. There aren't enough patients to do robust, randomized clinical trials, McCurdy said. 'It is virtually impossible to conduct trials that yield data that are conclusive beyond a reasonable doubt. Statistically, you just can't do that,' she said. Weeks later and following a meeting between Needham, Massachusetts-based Stealth and the FDA in late June, the real bombshell came: The company said the agency informed Stealth on Aug. 4 that it would need to resubmit a new drug application — for the third time. It could use a special pathway called 'accelerated approval' in that submission, but the manufacturing issue would extend the timeline to review elamipretide for at least another six months, according to the company. Stealth said that no additional clinical data or safety data was requested. But without any course correction in the process, the private company could run out of money. The delay is devastating to families like the Drydens. 'When we heard this news, we immediately went to the fridge to count how many vials we have left, because that's how long we have this medication. That's the only guarantee we have right now that Gilbert is not going to die,' said Madison Dryden, 35, of Aurora, Colorado. 'It's the highest level of desperation.' On Monday, Stealth announced that it did submit its third application for approval of elamipretide — asking for an accelerated pathway under a significantly tighter timeline than what the agency initially recommended. What is Barth syndrome? Madison Dryden and her husband, Andrew, weren't sure what was wrong with Gilbert in the hours and days after his Christmas Eve birth in 2024. 'His heart function was so low. He was so sick, his body and his feet were purple, his hands were purple,' Dryden said. 'He couldn't eat.' Gilbert was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and received lifesaving care as doctors urgently tried to figure out a diagnosis. Within a matter of days, Dryden said, Gilbert was airlifted to Children's Hospital Colorado with a heart that was struggling to adequately pump blood. The underlying cause was soon revealed: Barth syndrome. The disease impairs cells' mitochondria, which are kind of like tiny batteries that generate energy for cells to function correctly. The chromosomal disorder almost exclusively affects boys. Roughly 85% of early deaths occur before age 5. Those who survive longer are usually given heart medications and may need a heart transplant. Kids with Barth syndrome often rely on drugs like beta blockers and ACE inhibitors to keep their hearts functioning as well as possible. Gilbert was fortunate, at least initially. He found a lifeline through access to the treatment from Stealth. Elamipretide, a daily injection, works by helping to repair the damaged mitochondria. In clinical trials, like the one the Drydens participated in, patients showed a 45% improvement in muscle strength and a 40% improvement in heart function, according to the drugmaker. Most participants have safely remained on the drug for over eight years. In October 2024, an advisory committee to the FDA voted 10-6 in support of the therapy, paving the way for the agency to clear the first drug to treat Barth syndrome. The FDA isn't required to follow the advisory committee's guidance, but it almost always does. A spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the FDA, wrote in an email that the 'FDA did carefully consider the advice of the advisory committee members, including their rationale for their vote. While there is often a high rate of agreement between FDA and advisory committee recommendations,' the spokesman said, 'there is not always concordance.' 'Compelling medical need' for approval After the advisory committee's recommendation, the FDA's rejection was unexpected. 'It is a small sample size,' said a former FDA official who was involved in the drug approval process. The person asked not to be identified in order to speak freely. But the former official was quick to point out that given the advisory committee recommendation for approval, the 'incredibly compelling medical need' of those living with Barth syndrome and the small sample of individuals who seemed to have benefited from the treatment, it certainly appeared that elamipretide was going to make it across the finish line. A lack of continuity in leadership, however, may have added to the already difficult challenge of guiding the treatment through the final hurdles, the former official said. The FDA has seen many top officials leave the agency in recent months. 'Those who have taken over are not as familiar, or perhaps it'd be more appropriate to say they're inexperienced with how one does drug approvals, how one drives things forward, and they're also somewhat fearful of the current environment,' the former official said. 'And I think that's led to an adverse outcome for some of these rare disease products.' The HHS spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request Monday for comment about the agency's rejection of the drug or leadership issues. A Wall Street Journal Op-Ed recently offered a scathing evaluation of what's happening at the FDA, questioning whether the agency and Commissioner Marty Makary's stated goal of accelerating lifesaving drugs is matching the reality of their actions. The Journal said that there were averages of 52 annual drug approvals under the first Trump administration and 48 under President Joe Biden, but 'there have been only 22 in the first seven months of this year,' projecting to just 38 for the year. Elamipretide was cited in the Journal piece as a casualty of the current environment. The former FDA official pointed out that the treatment hit stumbling blocks under the previous administration, as well, but it was headed in the right direction. 'Now it feels like a hot potato that's been just thrown around,' the former official said. 'And this is just not right. It's just not right.' Families left with few alternatives The Drydens say the FDA decision pulled the rug out from underneath them — and many other families. Dr. Kathryn Chatfield, Gilbert's doctor and a specialist in pediatric cardiology and genetics at Children's Hospital Colorado, said the FDA's inaction leaves families with few alternatives. 'We just don't know what's going to happen,' Chatfield said. 'We're going to have to watch them really closely because they're at risk for recurrence of heart failure and rehospitalization and potentially decompensation to the point where they have to live in the hospital until they could get a heart transplant.' A transplant addresses the heart problem but doesn't alleviate ongoing muscular and skeletal problems. 'I can't be OK with sacrificing my child's life for a bureaucratic process,' Madison Dryden said. The latest hurdle to approval has Barth syndrome families and advocates alike, including some members of Congress, looking for more information and answers. 'Time is of the essence here, and we need to get these drugs to these patients as soon as possible,' said Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., a member of the Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health. Carter spoke to NBC News days before the FDA requested a resubmission in early August and said he'd sent a letter to the agency asking for 'clarity' on elamipretide. 'There aren't that many options out there,' he said. 'In fact, for Barth Syndrome, this elamipretide is really the only drug that we know of that works.' Carter said that there are six families in Georgia alone he's been in contact with who have a loved one with the rare disease. He's hopeful that an 'accelerated pathway' request might prove a viable option for the families and for the company to continue its research. After the recent FDA decision, Carter told NBC News in a statement that he's 'disappointed' with the recommendation 'now that all issues appear to be resolved.' Carter said he's continuing to put pressure on the FDA and that 'patients will suffer with further delays.' He also acknowledged that the economics of a private company, like Stealth, attempting to continue developing a drug for such a small population of patients would be exceedingly difficult without FDA backing. He said he feels deeply for the families in the middle of a terrifying ordeal. 'I'd be calling everybody I could (too), making sure that my child or my grandchild had this medication,' he said in an interview. Madison Dryden and her husband are left with what they call a 'giant unknown' in the absence of approval, struggling for an explanation for their 7- and 3-year-old daughters as families are in a race against time to keep loved ones alive. 'They know that somebody is not giving permission for Gilbert to have his medicine, and that they keep saying no, and they're our kids — like they can't lose … we can't have them lose their baby brother to this,' she said.

GLP-1 Pills Will Be Priced Similarly to Injections, Wall Street Predicts
GLP-1 Pills Will Be Priced Similarly to Injections, Wall Street Predicts

Business of Fashion

time12 hours ago

  • Business of Fashion

GLP-1 Pills Will Be Priced Similarly to Injections, Wall Street Predicts

US prices for obesity-treatment pills that Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk aim to launch next year likely will be on par with their weight-loss injections, analysts and investors say, in a departure from the usual practice of charging more for new medicines despite pressure to cut prices. Neither drugmaker has disclosed pricing plans for their new daily oral medications. With regulatory approvals and launches still months away, pricing plans could change. Denmark-based Novo expects approval later this year and to launch soon after, while Indianapolis-based Lilly expects to launch by August 2026. Novo's Wegovy and Lilly's Zepbound, administered as weekly injections, are the only highly effective weight-loss drugs targeting the GLP-1 hormone, and the United States is their biggest market. US list prices are about $1,000 per month or more, with both companies offering a monthly supply for $499 to customers paying cash rather than using health insurance. Both companies have said they developed oral weight-loss drugs to meet patient needs and widen access to the market, mindful that some people are averse to injections. ADVERTISEMENT The pills, however, are not more effective than the injections. Lilly said this month its pill orforglipron cut weight by 12.4 percent after 72 weeks in a trial. That compares with weight loss of 15 percent for Novo's daily oral semaglutide. Both trail Lilly's injection at up to 21 percent. UBS analyst Trung Huynh said that will cap Lilly's pricing. The price is 'probably going to come on par with the current drugs today or slightly lower,' Huynh said. TD Cowen analyst Michael Nedelcovych said he expects Novo's pill to debut near Wegovy's price, citing the precedent of its diabetes pill Rybelsus being priced at parity with injection Ozempic, the diabetes-treatment version of Wegovy. Novo executives told analysts this month they were not in a hurry for discount pricing for the new pill. Oral GLP-1 drugs will fill a niche rather than displace injections, according to analysts. TD Cowen estimates that pills will account for a percentage share of the global obesity drug market in the mid-teens by 2030, which could reach $150 billion by then. Growing Cash Pay US doctors, patients and insurers are pressing for lower prices to make the weight-loss drugs more affordable for the 40 percent of Americans who are obese. Typically, drugmakers launch new drugs at higher prices, citing scientific advances. President Donald Trump and lawmakers from both parties have urged the companies to reduce US prices. Novo declined to comment on pricing, pointing to Aug. 6 comments by David Moore, its US operations head, saying that the company may tap customers paying cash directly via its new NovoCare pharmacy, which was launched this year to sell Wegovy outside of insurance. A Lilly spokesperson called it premature to comment on pricing and launch plans for its pill because the company has not yet submitted data for regulatory approval. Peak annual sales forecasts for Lilly's orforglipron fell to as low as $10 billion after its trial data from earlier estimates of up to $30 billion, according to a Reuters review of analyst estimates. HSBC forecasts $15 billion in peak annual sales for Novo's pill, while Barclays expects only $1 billion. ADVERTISEMENT Manufacturing Volume A key question is how much supply will be available at the time of launch. Shortages of injectable GLP-1s in 2023 and 2024 opened the US market to cheaper compounded versions as the manufacturers failed to anticipate the huge demand. 'It's all about scale and pricing,' said Kevin Gade, portfolio manager at Bahl & Gaynor, which owns Lilly shares. Gade pointed to Novo's manufacturing challenge. The pill form requires about 75 times more active ingredient than the highest-dose Wegovy injection, two analysts told Reuters. Lilly has said it already has $808.5 million in orforglipron inventory for next year's expected launch. Novo has said it will launch its pill without supply constraints after billions of dollars in investment to expand semaglutide production. Despite the high production needs, Novo is unlikely to debut its pill at a higher price than Wegovy, said Karen Andersen, healthcare strategist at Morningstar. 'Particularly in the growing cash-pay market, I doubt it can risk a launch at a premium to Wegovy,' Andersen added. By Maggie Fick and Bhanvi Satija; Editors: Caroline Humer and Will Dunham Sign up to The Business of Beauty newsletter, your complimentary, must-read source for the day's most important beauty and wellness news and analysis.

‘Ozempic for dogs' may be the next big thing in pet health
‘Ozempic for dogs' may be the next big thing in pet health

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Ozempic for dogs' may be the next big thing in pet health

With the runaway success of drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro effectively helping humans slim down, researchers and biotech firms are now sniffing out a new frontier: weight-loss drugs for dogs. With up to 60 per cent of dogs in the UK estimated to be overweight or obese, the market for such drugs could be considerable. Okava, a San Francisco-based bio-pharma company which specialises in pet health, is planning to run trials for a drug designed to mimic the effects of Ozempic, with the goal to produce an implant-version for dogs, which lasts six-months at a time. According to estimates on the company's website, the current market for such a product could be worth $10bn, and they hope to have a canine weight-loss drug available as early as 2028 or 2029. In human weight-loss drugs, the active ingredient in Mounjaro is called tirzepatide, and in Ozempic, it is semaglutide. Both work in similar ways, mimicking a natural hormone called GLP-1. This hormone regulates blood sugar and appetite, ultimately leading people to feel fuller longer and reducing food intake. The challenge for biotech firms is to reproduce that effect in dogs – a species well-known for practically limitless gorging. The hope is that an Ozempic-style drug may reduce dogs' begging behaviour, which many owners find it difficult to resist rewarding. Often, lack of appetite in dogs is associated with illness, meaning developing an effective drug that doesn't appear to make pets seem unwell is a fine balance. One such drug, named Slentrol, was launched in 2007, but did not sell well, partly due to how owners' perceived their pets behaviour when on the medication. Okava's planned implant, called OKV-119, contains a GLP-1 mimic called exenatide. Michael Klotsman, Okava's chief executive, said he hoped dogs' behavioural changes from OKV-119 would be quite different from illness-related appetite loss. 'What owners should expect to see is their pet eating appropriate portions without the previous food obsession – they'll still eat regularly and show interest in meals, just without the excessive begging, scavenging or gulping behaviour,' he told The Guardian. But not all tails are wagging. Vets have suggested that in most cases, dog owners would be better off avoiding obesity in their dogs through more exercise and by restricting their pets' diets. Caroline Allen, Chief Veterinary Officer at the RSPCA told The Independent: 'A healthy diet and exercise is the best way to keep our pets happy and well but we understand that owners can sometimes struggle to manage their pets' weight. There is currently little information about proposed weight-loss implants or vaccinations for animals, and owners shouldn't rely on them becoming available. 'Before resorting to these sorts of interventions, owners should seek help from their vet about how to reduce their pet's weight with a good diet and providing lots of opportunities to exercise and play in ways that their pet will enjoy." She added: 'It may be that weight loss jabs or implants may have a role to play in future in very limited circumstances where animals are clinically unwell, but the best thing we can do is set healthy habits from the start so our pets can live the best life possible.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store