&w=3840&q=100)
Want to become a US citizen? Donald Trump wants you to have ‘good moral character'. But what does that mean?
Having a 'good moral character' has long been considered one of the criteria for US citizenship. Reuters
Want to become a citizen of the United States? Having a 'good moral character' has long been considered one of the criteria for citizenship.
However, now the administration of US President Donald Trump has told officials to expand on the definition.
But what happened? What are the changes one needs to be cognisant of?
Let's take a closer look:
What happened?
First let's briefly take a look at the 'good moral character' requirement for citizenship. This stipulation was added after the US passed the 1790 Naturalization Act. This had long been interpreted to mean that a person has no criminal convictions against him or her – for example murders, felonies and genocide. However, drink driving, for example, can also be a disqualifier.
Those wanting to apply to become a citizen must show that they have undergone rehabilitation. This citizenship test is usually given to green card holders who have been in the country between three and five years and who want to become American citizens – a process known as naturalisation. Other than showing 'good moral character', those wanting to become citizens must also clear English and civics tests.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the change in policy in a memo on Friday. The agency ordered its employees to do a more complete and 'holistic' assessment of applicants' 'good moral character'.
This includes being involved in their local community, positive contributions to the US, having family ties, having a long employment history, being a lawful resident of the us for a long time and paying taxes.
The agency asked employees to consider applicants' 'positive attributes and not simply the absence of misconduct.' The applicant must show their character is 'commensurate with the standards of average citizens of the community in which the alien resides.'
Officers have been told to bar applicants if they have committed 'any other acts that are contrary to the average behaviour of citizens in the jurisdiction where aliens reside. This even if those acts are 'technically lawful.'
USCIS has also said it will check prospective citizens and visa applicants for 'anti-Americanism,' and in particular 'antisemitic ideologies' including their behaviour on social media.
The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has also said it will check prospective citizens and visa applicants for 'anti-Americanism,' and in particular 'antisemitic ideologies' including their behaviour on social media. AFP
'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' USCIS chief spokesperson Matthew Tragesser said on Tuesday. '[USCIS] is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right,' he added.
'USCIS is adding a new element to the naturalization process that ensures America's newest citizens not only embrace America's culture, history, and language but who also demonstrate Good Moral Character,' Tragesser earlier said. 'US citizenship is the gold standard of citizenship—it should only be offered to the world's best of the best.'
What do experts say?
That this is the latest move from Trump to attempt to restrict immigration to the United States. Trump has also taken aim at birthright citizenship which he has vowed to do away with.
Since 2015, anywhere from 600,000 to 1 million immigrants have become US citizens every year. There are around 25 million naturalised citizens in the US. Critics say the Trump administration is trying to keep the keep the number of people who enter the US and become naturalised citizens in check.
'They're trying to increase the grounds for denial of US citizenship by kind of torturing the definition of good moral character to encompass extremely harmless behaviour,' Doug Rand, a former senior USCIS official who worked in the Biden Administration, told CBS.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Gabriel J Chin, a University of California, Davis, law professor, told The Washington Post that new USCIS guidance is 'so loose and discretionary that it is obviously susceptible to arbitrary enforcement.'
'Many birthright US citizens do not have sufficient educational or economic achievements that would entitle them to a visa to immigrate to the United States,' said Chin. 'If they had not been born here, they would not make the cut'.
Some in the Trump administration have propounded 'the Great Replacement theory' – a conspiracy advanced by many on the far-right that accuses shadowy elitist figures of seeking to replace white citizens with non-white immigrants.
While Trump has never explicitly referred to this theory, he has consistently put down immigrants, particularly from South American nations as 'animals' and 'rapists'. He has also repeatedly said that America is at risk of being invaded and its culture lost.
'For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome,' Jane Lilly Lopez, an associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University, said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Experts say that this is the latest move from Donald Trump to attempt to restrict immigration to the United States. Trump has also taken aim at birthright citizenship which he has vowed to do away with. AFP
Lopez said the development 'make it harder for noncitizens to obtain legal belonging in the United States' because officers have to 'evaluate something they cannot consistently describe or define.'
Trump has also threatened to denaturalise US citizens – most prominently Elon Musk and Zoran Mandani. However, denaturalisation can only be done under the strictest of terms. The Trump administration has also cracked down on college students protesting against Israel's actions in Gaza under the guise of 'anti-Semitism'. The Trump administration has also vowed to deport 'pro-Hamas students'.
Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student with a green card, has already been deported for advocating for Palestinian rights. Meanwhile, Rümeysa Öztürk, a student from Turkey, was taken into custody by the government for writing an op-ed saying that her college should 'acknowledge the Palestinian genocide' and cut all ties with Israel. A judge ordered Öztürk to be released after finding that the government had no grounds to hold her in custody,
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What does this mean?
It means that if you are planning to apply for the United States for visa or a citizenship, the last thing you should do is criticise President Donald Trump on social media. Or even worse, take aim at Israel over the unfolding events in Gaza.
This, of course, is steeped in irony given that Trump himself is a convicted felon. Trump in May 2024 was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records during the 2016 presidential election. Trump did so to cover up an affair with a porn star Karen McDougal, with whom he had carried on at a time when his wife Melania had just given birth to their son Baron. Trump also is the first president to enter office as a convict.
A New York judge found Trump civilly liable for sexual abuse and defamation of E Jean Carroll. Trump also has been credibly accused of sexual harassment by dozens of women. Trump has also claimed that the late Jeffrey Epstein, who ran a sex trafficking ring, was a good friend for many years. The two men are said to have had a falling out. Trump has since distanced himself from the late disgraced financier.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While Trump isn't exactly in a position to be the arbiter of moral standards, that has not deterred his administration from trying to do so anyway.
Israel, meanwhile, is more and more being widely accused by experts of conducting a genocide in Gaza. The International Court of Justice has issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Experts are warning that Gaza faces a starvation crisis. Over 60,000 Palestinians are said to have died since the war in Gaza began according to the Palestinian Health Ministry.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Not aware of any anti-Bangladesh activities by Awami League in India: MEA
India on Wednesday said it was not aware of any anti-Bangladesh activities in the country by the Awami League party led by former prime minister Sheikh Hasina. New Delhi's comments came after Bangladesh's interim government said that the opening of its offices by the Awami League in Indian cities could adversely impact bilateral ties. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said New Delhi is not aware of any anti-Bangladesh activities by purported members of the Awami League in India or of any action that is contrary to Indian law. "The government does not allow political activities against other countries to be carried out from Indian soil," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. "The press statement by the Interim government of Bangladesh is thus misplaced," he said. "India reiterates its expectation that free, fair and inclusive elections will be held at the earliest in Bangladesh to ascertain the will and mandate of the people," he added. In its statement, Dhaka said on Wednesday that the opening of Awami League offices in Indian cities poses a risk to bilateral ties. "This development also risks upholding the good-neighbourly relations with India driven by mutual trust and mutual respect, and lends serious implications for the political transformation underway in Bangladesh," Bangladesh's foreign ministry said. It alleged the Awami League has set up offices in India against the backdrop of what it described as "growing anti-Bangladesh activities" by the leadership of the party from Indian soil. Many senior Awami Party leaders, "absconding" in several criminal cases in Bangladesh on account of "grievous crimes", were in Indian territory, it further alleged. Such political activity "against the interests of Bangladesh" is an "affront against the people and State of Bangladesh", the Bangladesh foreign ministry said. There has been a sharp downturn in India-Bangladesh relations after deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina fled Dhaka and took shelter in India in August last year in the face of a massive anti-government protest. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: Rolling the dice on gaming bans, AI rules, and growth
In the Mahabharata, Chausar was not mere entertainment but a test of foresight, nerve, and destiny. Dice in hand, pieces moving, fortunes shifting, the game carried the weight of unpredictability and choice. Each roll of dice carried the possibility of triumph or ruin, every move shaping the course of kingdoms. What made the game enduring was its blend of chance and calculation, a reminder that even the strongest warriors could falter when strategy met uncertainty. Modern policymaking and economic choices carry the same weight. Laws, frameworks, and reforms resemble moves on a vast board where ambition, caution, and risk constantly collide. Let's dive in. The Union government's Online Gaming Bill, 2025 embodies this duality. It seeks to ban online money games, citing addiction, fraud, and financial losses, while simultaneously creating a regulatory framework to promote e-sports and casual play. The industry warns of job losses, underground markets, and declining investor confidence if prohibition prevails, notes our first editorial. With over Rs 25,000 crore in FDI and Rs 2 trillion in valuations at stake, the decision resembles a risky throw. Like a hasty roll of dice, Parliament must decide whether prohibition secures or destabilises the board. The Reserve Bank's FREE-AI report, too, is a masterclass in anticipating moves, highlights our second editorial. With its seven guiding 'sutras,' it seeks to balance the promise of AI with the perils of bias and opacity. By proposing common AI infrastructure, sandboxes, and indigenous models, the RBI wants India to play not as a follower but as a designer of the game. Execution, however, will decide whether AI becomes a trusted ally or a loaded dice. Meanwhile, Naushad Forbes urges India to respond to Donald Trump's tariff threats not with defensive swagger but transformative ambition, much like Japan transformed humiliation into industrial resurgence. To become a developed nation by 2047, India must reform education, agriculture, taxation, and manufacturing, aiming for sustained growth above 9 per cent. The choice is whether to play defensively or pursue the bold moves that can transform the board. Amit Kapoor cautions that India's cities risk losing vitality if migration slows. Migrants power both formal and informal economies, yet fear-driven governance has weakened their sense of belonging. With urban investment needs of $840 billion over 15 years, cities must remain open and trusting, or else the pieces on the board may stop moving altogether. And finally, as Ambi Parameswaran notes in his review of Sandeep Das's Why Your Strategy Sucks, strategy itself is the master move. Das distinguishes true strategy from mere plans, offering frameworks for both corporate goals and personal careers. Even if richer case studies might have added depth, its core lesson stands, that strategy is not about playing every piece but choosing the few moves that can redefine the entire game. Stay tuned!
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China rushes to build out solar, and emissions edge downward
High on the Tibetan plateau, Chinese government officials last month showed off what they say will be the world's largest solar farm when completed 610 sq km, the size of the American city of Chicago. China has been installing solar panels at a blistering pace, far faster than anywhere else in the world, and the investment is starting to pay off. A study released Thursday found that the country's carbon emissions edged down 1 per cent in the first six months of the year compared to a year earlier, extending a trend that began in March 2024. The good news is China's carbon emissions may have peaked well ahead of a government target of doing so before 2030. But China, the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, will need to bring them down much more sharply to play its part in slowing global climate change. For China to reach its declared goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, emissions would need to fall 3 per cent on average over the next 35 years, said Lauri Myllyvirta, the Finland-based author of the study and lead analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. China needs to get to that 3 per cent territory as soon as possible, he said. China's emissions have fallen even as it uses more electricity China's emissions have fallen before during economic slowdowns. What's different this time is electricity demand is growing up 3.7 per cent in the first half of this year but the increase in power from solar, wind and nuclear has easily outpaced that, according to Myllyvirta, who analyses the most recent data in a study published on the UK-based Carbon Brief website. We're talking really for the first time about a structural declining trend in China's emissions, he said. China installed 212 gigawatts of solar capacity in the first six months of the year, more than America's entire capacity of 178 gigawatts as of the end of 2024, the study said. Electricity from solar has overtaken hydropower in China and is poised to surpass wind this year to become the country's largest source of clean energy. Some 51 gigawatts of wind power was added from January to June. Li Shuo, the director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute in Washington, described the plateauing of China's carbon emissions as a turning point in the effort to combat climate change. This is a moment of global significance, offering a rare glimmer of hope in an otherwise bleak climate landscape, he wrote in an email response. It also shows that a country can cut emissions while still growing economically, he said. But Li cautioned that China's heavy reliance on coal remains a serious threat to progress on climate and said the economy needs to shift to less resource-intensive sectors. There's still a long road ahead, he said. One solar farm can power 5 million households A seemingly endless expanse of solar panels stretches toward the horizon on the Tibetan plateau. White two-story buildings rise above them at regular intervals. Sheep graze on the scrubby vegetation that grows under them. Solar panels have been installed on about two-thirds of the land. When completed, it will have more than 7 million panels and be capable of generating enough power for 5 million households. Like many of China's solar and wind farms, it was built in the relatively sparsely populated west. A major challenge is getting electricity to the population centres and factories in China's east. The distribution of green energy resources is perfectly misaligned with the current industrial distribution of our country, Zhang Jinming, the vice governor of Qinghai province, told journalists on a government-organised tour. Part of the solution is building transmission lines traversing the country. One connects Qinghai to Henan province. Two more are planned, including one to Guangdong province in the southeast, almost at the opposite corner of the country. Making full use of the power is hindered by the relatively inflexible way that China's electricity grid is managed, tailored to the steady output of coal plants rather than more variable and less predictable wind and solar, Myllyvirta said. This is an issue that the policymakers have recognized and are trying to manage, but it does require big changes to the way coal-fired power plants operate and big changes to the way the transmission network operates, he said. So it's no small task. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
