Russ Vought: key Project 2025 figure set to continue Trump cuts after Musk exit
Russ Vought's years-long quest to dismantle the federal workforce and consolidate power for the president is coming to fruition, and he may be given a major boost when he reportedly takes on Elon Musk's cost-cutting efforts as the billionaire bows out of the federal government.
The director of the office of management and budget has worked alongside Musk's 'department of government efficiency' to slash through the federal government since Trump took office. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that Vought would take on an increased public role in Washington as Musk transitions out and the president's budget process advances. The outlet reported that Vought could use the budget process to make some of Doge's cuts permanent.
Vought embraces Christian nationalism and is more ideologically driven than Musk. He knows more intimately how to use the levers of government to enact his goals. He was a key figure in Project 2025, the conservative manifesto to guide a second Trump term, and authored a chapter on how to lead the agency he's again tasked with leading.
His distaste for civil servants, the so-called 'deep state' that prevented Trump from carrying out his full agenda the first time, is profound. 'We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,' Vought said in a video obtained by ProPublica and the research group Documented in October. 'When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work, because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down … We want to put them in trauma.'
Musk and Vought have forged a 'quiet alliance', Politico reported in March. Musk served as the public face of cutting the government, the wrecking ball whose team forced its way into federal agencies to access data to underpin cuts to spending. Vought and his team had the knowledge and precision to then parse that data and figure out whether and how to cut, Politico reported. A former official told the outlet that Vought was a ''by any means necessary' guy', grasping the political moment to serve his vision.
Max Stier, who leads the Partnership for Public Service, a non-profit that seeks to advance the federal workforce, told Politico that the difference between the two men is that 'Vought wants to reshape our government into a bludgeon for his ideological vision, while Musk seems much more focused on destruction without understanding or care for the many harmful consequences of his actions'.
Vought told the conservative commentator Tucker Carlson he thought Doge was 'bringing an exhilarating rush' and creativity to slashing the government, praising the agency's 'outside- the-box thinking [and] comfortability with risk and leverage'.
Vought is expected to work on the new version of Schedule F, a proposal he advanced in Trump's first term that was revived, which would eliminate job protections for tens of thousands of career civil servants, making it easier to fire them and replace them with loyalists.
Vought wants to flex executive power and exert the president's role over the federal budget by impounding funds, or not spending money Congress has already appropriated in its role as budget-maker. He's spoiling for a court battle on the topic, hoping the US supreme court will overturn the Impoundment Control Act, which limits impoundment.
Before he was confirmed in his role, the office of management and budget sent a memo that created confusion and chaos nationwide when it called for a mass freeze on federal grants and funds in the early days of the Trump administration. That memo had 'Russ's name written all fucking over it', a Republican aide told Politico, though Vought was not formally tied to it.
Vought served in Trump's first term as deputy director of the agency, then director, ending when Trump left office. Before his White House tenure, Vought was a fixture in rightwing politics in Washington, holding a variety of roles in Republican offices.
Related: Russell Vought: Trump appointee who wants federal workers to be 'in trauma'
After his time in the White House, Vought started the Center for Renewing America, an organization with a mission to 'renew a consensus of America as a nation under God' that has railed against critical race theory and progressive ideology. The center has recommended invoking the Insurrection Act and ending the Impoundment Control Act. The center, and Vought, contributed to Project 2025, which was helmed by the conservative thinktank the Heritage Foundation.
In Project 2025's chapter on the office of the president, Vought lays out how the federal government is not beholden to the president's plan and is instead 'carrying out its own policy plans and preferences – or, worse yet, the policy plans and preferences of a radical, supposedly 'woke' faction of the country'. The bureaucracy believes it has independent authority and protection, making it too powerful to be reined in, Vought said.
'The great challenge confronting a conservative President is the existential need for aggressive use of the vast powers of the executive branch to return power – including power currently held by the executive branch – to the American people,' he wrote.
As for his own role, the budget director 'must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the president's mind as it pertains to the policy agenda'. Vought, and the project writ large, call for mass firings of federal employees to better stock the workforce with Trump loyalists who will not stand in the way of his agenda.
'The overall situation is constitutionally dire, unsustainably expensive, and in urgent need of repair,' he wrote of the federal bureaucracy. 'Nothing less than the survival of self-governance in America is at stake.'
Since Trump has taken office, a host of Project 2025-aligned proposals have been introduced or put in place, cementing the role the ideological document plays in the advancement of the rightwing agenda. The first wave of Project 2025-aligned actions has been conducted largely by executive orders. A second wave of recommendations requires the rule-making process at agencies, and others would require congressional action.
In this more precise stage, Vought would carry out his plans to create long-term changes to how the federal government functions and operates. He has written the budget office plays a 'vital role in reining in the regulatory state'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
25 minutes ago
- Politico
White House allies ‘disappointed' at Musk's opposition to the megabill
Republican allies close to the White House are privately argue that the former special government employee — who spent Tuesday afternoon blasting the spending bill and threatening to retaliate against its supporters — is opposing the bill because it harms the tech billionaire's business interests. The House-passed megabill represents the president's chief — and potentially only — major legislative priority this Congress. But Musk's opposition suggests that the coalition that vaulted Trump to the White House is still facing internal disagreement over it as it makes its way through the Senate. It marks another dust-up between the MAGA and Tech Right. And it raises the possibility some members face pressure from Musk if they ultimately support it. 'The West Wing is perplexed, unenthused, and disappointed' with Musk, who left the White House to attend to his ailing business empire, according to one White House official, who like others interviewed for this story were granted anonymity to be candid about an ally who spent hundreds of millions to ensconce them in the White House.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chuck Schumer Admits He Agrees With Elon Musk: ‘He's Right'
Chuck Schumer and Elon Musk sure make strange bedfellows – but this is politics, after all. The Senate Majority Leader from New York, a fierce critic of DOGE who's called Musk a liar and a hypocrite and accused the Tesla CEO of 'sabotaging' critical benefits and a 'hostile takeover' of federal government, pirouetted on Tuesday, declaring, without irony: 'He's right.' This rare moment of political reconciliation is thanks to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping federal spending package narrowly passed by the House last month and under consideration in the Senate. To put it mildly, Musk is not a fan. Days after the Space X chief and President Trump revealed at the White House that Musk's role at DOGE would be severely narrowed – possibly over his growing dislike of the Republican-backed bill – the X owner could hold his tongue no longer. On Tuesday, he posted a fiery screed against the bill. Schumer's agreement was so strong that he stepped to a Senate chamber podium and declared on Tuesday: 'I agree with Elon Musk.' Holding a printed placard of Musk's X posts, he read from them, word-for-word. 'Within the hour, [Musk] put on X the following,' Schumer said. 'I have it right here so you can all see it – he said, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You did wrong. You know it. It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion, and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.'' To make it clear he wan't joking, Schumer added: 'He's right.' The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on May 22, with a narrow vote of 215–214 and one member voting 'present.' The vote was largely along party lines, with all Democrats opposing; Republican Representatives Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson voted against it. 'If even Elon Musk, who's been part of the whole process and is Trump's buddy, says the bill is bad, you can imagine how bad this bill is,' Schumer told reporters. 'Musk said people shouldn't vote for the bill. Let's hope the Republicans follow him, not Trump.' Schumer wasn't the only Democrat who agreed with Musk, as Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and Sen. Bernie Sanders also echoed his scathing distaste for the package. 'Breaking news: Elon Musk and I agree with each other,' Jeffries said in a press conference. 'The GOP tax scam is a disgusting abomination.' Incidentally, the words 'disgusting' and 'abomination' were certainly having a moment on Tuesday. 'Musk is right,' Sanders conceded on X. 'Let's defeat this disgusting abomination.' The post Chuck Schumer Admits He Agrees With Elon Musk: 'He's Right' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Back to the drawing board: UF presidential finalist nixed for conflicting DEI stances
University of Florida President Santa Ono takes questions from trustees before they unanimously approved him as the school's president-elect on May 27, 2025. He was rejected by the state Board of Governors on June 3, 2025. (Photo courtesy of University of Florida) In a stunning move, the panel that oversees Florida's state university system voted against hiring Santa Ono as the next president for the University of Florida during an extended special meeting Tuesday. The State University System Board of Governors voted against Ono in a 6-10 vote that followed hours of contentious questioning and debate where Ono was grilled over his past positions on diversity equity and inclusion. The vote comes a week after UF trustees approved Ono, the immediate past-president of the University of Michigan and sole finalist for the job, which would have paid him a $3 million annual package that included $1.5 million base salary After conducting a months-long search, UF remains without a permanent president. Former UF President Kent Fuchs has been serving as interim president since former President Ben Sasse resigned last year. Approving Ono was the only item discussed during the board meeting, which ran nearly two hours longer than originally scheduled. Some members compared the vetting to a court interrogation. Members mainly asked about Ono's changing stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion, and how he could carry out Florida's agenda denouncing DEI, but delved into other topics, like a Christian's interpretation of original sin and Gov. Ron DeSantis' COVID-19 response. 'It's insidious that it feels like pushing a rope uphill when we establish these policies, if a president doesn't really believe in those policies,' Board of Governors Vice Chair Alan Levine said during the meeting in Orlando. 'And it's a powerful position, you can be an inhibitor, or you can help advance. And so I guess so much of your record reflects your deeply held beliefs, that you have been an advocate of DEI up until recently.' Ono supported diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives at the University of Michigan, one of the top-ranked public institutions in the country, guiding its 'DEI 2.0' initiative and touting benefits of such programs but ultimately closed DEI offices earlier this year. 'It looks to me like you got rid of the program because you needed to do what you had to do with the president's orders and the funding issues. But you didn't really push to get rid of DEI,' Levine said. Ono replied with an answer he uttered several times, that he began looking at DEI when he took office at Michigan, rather than an immediate decision after Trump's executive order. Ono told UF trustees last week that he developed his new stance on DEI in the last year and a half after talking with students and other members of the university community. Before, he wasn't an expert on the topic, which had been universal in higher education, he said, and told trustees his conviction is 'rock solid.' Ono said he mirrors Florida's evolution with accepting, and then rejecting, DEI. 'For anyone who believes Dr. Ono's earlier views on DEI, views that many university leaders and civic organizations once shared, are disqualifying despite his evolution and the changes made under his leadership at Michigan, I would remind you that this body adopted DEI strategic priorities as recently as 2020. Like Michigan, the Board of Governors has evolved since,' BOG member Charles Lydecker said, adding that Ono's previous positions on the topics governors were concerned about 'are not meaningfully different from those previously held by this board.' 'The real question is this: Should we punish someone for evolving beyond a view this very body once held, especially when that person has already led one of the nation's most prominent universities to a different course, a course that mirrors our own?' Lydecker said. Lydecker added that 'There is something fundamentally unjust about cancel culture, and to cancel Dr. Ono would not only be unjust, it would be a setback for the University of Florida.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The degree of vetting from governors Tuesday was not typical, and is the first time the Board of Governors has rejected a president, the Orlando Sentinel reported. 'I've been on this board for five, six years, and we have never used this as a forum to interrogate. And in this case, it feels to me patently unfair,' Lydecker said after former House Speaker and now-BOG member Paul Renner put documents in front of Ono about his past. At one point, BOG member Eric Silagy asked if any of the governors had expressed interest in the UF presidency. Mori Hosseini, the chair of the UF Board of Trustees, said yes. He acknowledged Renner reached out to him asking about the job. Renner insisted that he reached out to to Hosseini before he was on the BOG. Renner said he would not take the UF job if offered now that he's on the BOG. Renner did not recuse himself, although, and voted against Ono. Ono told the BOG he had made 12 commitments, which include ideological neutrality, solely merit-based hiring and admissions, keeping the university aligned with state government, and upholding state laws and university regulations. He said he asked for those provisions to be included in his contract. 'Doctor, your recent reversal on an entire architecture of ideology is nothing short of incredible,' BOG member and former House Speaker Jose Oliva said. Oliva also voted against Ono. Hosseini, stood by Ono's candidacy, and sat next to him during the 'interrogation.' 'The bottom line is that Dr. Ono is globally recognized as one of the most respected leaders in higher education, and we are lucky to have him,' Hosseini said. Ono was previously president of the University of British Columbia and the University of Cincinnati. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE The GOP pushback mounted high enough to reject Ono, who had already stepped down as Michigan's president. U.S. Rep. and GOP gubernatorial candidate Byron Donalds posted to X questions related to DEI that he encouraged BOG members to ask, and Rick Scott did the same, Monday evening releasing a statement and questions concerning Ono's commitment to protecting Jewish students. After the vote, Scott called the vote 'the right decision,' and U.S. Rep. Jimmy Patronis said 'I'm happy to see the system work.' Donald Trump Jr. posted to X 'WTF! Have the decision makers at @UF lost their minds!???' calling on BOG members to vote against Ono. U.S. Rep. Greg Steube sent a letter to BOG members, asking them to reject Ono, 'and find a suitable replacement who truly represents Florida values.' After the UF trustees' meeting last week, Steube said 'I'm not sold' on Ono 'walking back his woke past.' The governor's office appoints six of 13 of the university trustees at each institution and 14 of the 17 BOG members. 'The Board of Governors has a strong history of affirming presidential nominees who received unanimous approval from their university boards to continue this practice sends a message that the Board of Governors values the opinion of their colleagues with the state university system and does not yield to outsiders who post out of context sound bites on social media,' Hosseini said.