South Carolina treasurer faces calls to resign after report released in $1.8 billion accounting scandal
SOUTH CAROLINA (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — There are growing calls for the resignation of South Carolina's state treasurer following a new report on an investigation into a $1.8 billion accounting blunder.
'It's just a terrible situation to be in. It shouldn't be that way,' State Republican Senator Larry Grooms of Berkeley County said.
Grooms is one of the loudest voices calling for state treasurer Curtis Loftis to resign. This comes after a lengthy investigation into $1.8 billion found in a state account in March 2024.
'We stopped short of calling for the treasurer's resignation because we needed to hire a forensic accounting team to get to the bottom of it,' Grooms said.
PREVIOUS |
An audit found the money never existed; it was the result of errors during a transition to a new accounting system, even though Loftis claimed it was real last year. The Senate finance subcommittee report released on Monday finds that Loftis 'willfully neglected' his duties as treasurer.
'When you're the treasurer and you don't know whether $1.8 billion is real when you have hundreds of millions of dollars in error on the state treasury books and you hide it when confronted about it, you lie about it. There's a problem with that treasurer, that elected officer,' Grooms said.
The 49-page report claims South Carolina's financial future is not secure with Loftis, and leaving him as treasurer would cause irreparable harm.
'The subcommittee that I chair with been investigating the $1.8 billion anomaly now for the past 13, 14 months. And so we've collected thousands and thousands of pages of testimony that countless interviews, hours and hours of a dozen or more committee hearings. And so the work of the subcommittee, the 49 page report, is meticulously footnoted with 605 pages of documentation to go along with it,' Grooms said.
'Our state's two elected officers that handled the money, the accountant and the banker, the two, they're supposed to be a check on each other, but they weren't. They actually had corruption going on within each other's houses,' Groom said.
The previous comptroller general and state auditor resigned over recent financial errors, and lawmakers say Loftis should be next.
However, the treasurer doesn't agree with that assessment, saying in a statement, 'South Carolina's financial threat isn't from mismanagement or missing money… The real danger comes from a relentless, politically motivated attack on my office.'
Grooms says it's now up to lawmakers to take the next constitutional step.
'The state constitution has mechanisms for removal of a constitutional officer. One is outright impeachment, and that's really for high crimes and a misdemeanor. I think that's what it says in there. But willful neglect of duty is another reason. It's in the same article as impeachment, but it does forcibly remove a constitutional officer for willful neglect of duty. And that's why he's being charged with willful neglect of duty. And he'll have an opportunity to defend himself. But it requires a two-thirds vote of the house and a two-thirds vote of the senate to vacate the office of state treasurer,' Grooms said.
Senator Grooms believes this scandal affects the trust people in South Carolina have in elected officials to keep their money safe, and it could have a big impact on the state's ability to borrow money — due to a lack of faith in its real finances.
That means taxpayers would have to pay more for priority items like schools and roads.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
No, Adam Wainwright is not running for U.S. Congress anytime soon
ST. LOUIS – Adam Wainwright is a man of many hats: A father of five, a recently-retired St. Louis Cardinals pitcher, a country music artist and an occasional analyst on MLB broadcasts. One title he won't be adding soon? A Missouri Congressman. FOX 2 has learned that Wainwright is not pursuing a run for political office in the foreseeable future, despite recent speculation. Earlier this week, a report from claimed that Wainwright had been 'recruited' to challenge Missouri U.S. Rep Ann Wagner for political office. Wagner, a U.S. Congresswoman of the Republican party, has served in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District since 2013. The report referenced an apparent poll question from Democratic polling firm Public Policy Polling, which was reportedly discussed in a Cardinals subreddit post. According to that post, the poll included questions such as 'Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Adam Wainwright?' and 'If the candidates for Congress next time were Republican Ann Wagner and Democrat Adam Wainwright, who would you vote for?' (The poll did not identify Wainwright with a particular political party in its phrasing.) The online chatter led some to believe that Wainwright might seriously be considering a campaign for a political office. FOX 2 reached out to multiple sources to verify information, and ultimately heard directly from Wainwright. On Thursday, Wainwright shared the following statement with FOX 2 Sports Director Martin Kilcoyne: 'It was an honor to be thought of in regards to the upcoming congressional election in Missouri. St. Louis has been home to me and my family for almost 2 decades and I couldn't have picked a better place to play the game that I love or raise a family. 'With 5 kids going 5 different ways everyday, Jenny and I stay incredibly busy as it is, not to mention the broadcast schedule with Fox and concert dates thrown in. Right now I would not be able to spend the time needed to serve Missouri like they deserve, but will be praying for great candidates on both sides of the aisle to run so Missourians have great choices for their future. 'I appreciate the consideration and putting all the well-written political jargon aside… That was cool for me and very encouraging that lots of people thought of me that way. Pretty neat stuff.' Wainwright's statement did not confirm whether any political group approached him directly or attempted to 'recruit' him for political office. He made clear he would not be running for political office in the upcoming election cycle. Wagner's seat is next up for election in November 2026. And based on Wainwright's statement to FOX 2, it's unclear whether he aspires to run for any political office. According to Public Policy Polling's website, the organization 'conducts surveys for politicians and political organizations, unions, consultants, and businesses' and formed in 2001 'to measure and track public opinion.' Public Policy Polling's website does not explicitly explain its methodology behind questions asked in surveys. Though its polling methods may include hypothetical high-profile matchups as a way to measure incumbent support, name recognition or voter preferences. That could explain why Wainwright, a well-known St. Louis figure with no previous background in political offices, may have been included in polling. FOX 2 reached out to Public Policy Polling for comment on the matter, but our requests have not been returned as of this story's publication. NOTE: Video is from FOX 2's August 2024 coverage of Wainwright taking on MLB broadcast analyst duties, unrelated to this story. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Comer launches probe into LA protests
House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) is launching an investigation into California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) over their handling of demonstrations that broke out in the city this week over President Trump's immigration policies. 'Claims were made that state and local law enforcement had protests under control, however, police were clearly unable to quell the violence in Los Angeles prior to the arrival of the National Guardsmen,' Comer and Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), who chairs the Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement, wrote in letters to the two California Democrats. 'You have championed California's sanctuary policies, which prevent local law enforcement's cooperation with federal immigration authorities,' the lawmakers wrote. 'You have also made it clear that you intend to block the objectives of the federal government, and defend aliens, regardless of their immigration status, criminal activity, anti-American views, or incitement to riot.' The two House Republicans requested that Newsom and Bass hand over all documents and communications related to the demonstrations between their two offices, state law enforcement, local law enforcement, and federal entities by June 27. The committee also requested 'all records and communications including video and dispatch logs, regarding the source of weapons (including rocks and cinderblocks) used by rioters.' The House investigation comes after Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who serves as chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, launched his own investigation into whether the Los Angeles protesters are funded by a local nonprofit. Hawley requested a history of internal communications and financial records from the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) to address allegations that they are fueling chaos in California. Newsom, Bass, and Democrats have hit back at Republican criticism of the unrest in Los Angeles, arguing that Trump has provoked violence through his administration's use of deportations and deployment of the National Guard and Marines to the city.

USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Missouri activates National Guard as states brace for anti-Trump protests
Missouri activates National Guard as states brace for anti-Trump protests The Show-Me State's Republican governor, Mike Kehoe, joins Texas in preemptively activating the state's National Guard ahead of 'No Kings' protests this weekend Show Caption Hide Caption Appeals court blocks decision on Trump's control of National Guard An appeals court has halted a federal judge's decision to take control of the National Guard away from President Trump and return it to California. Missouri has joined Texas in preemptively activating the state's National Guard ahead of the "No Kings" protests planned at about 2,000 sites across the nation on June 14 against President Donald Trump. Both Republican-led states followed Trump's lead after he tapped the California National Guard to respond to protests in Los Angeles. "While other states may wait for chaos to ensue, the State of Missouri is taking a proactive approach in the event that assistance is needed to support local law enforcement in protecting our citizens and communities," GOP Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe wrote on social media June 12 in announcing his executive order activating the Missouri National Guard. More: Planned 'No Kings' protests grow in number after LA militarization: What organizers expect Kehoe's order declares a state of emergency in Missouri "due to civil unrest." The move is another sign of the increasingly militarized response to unrest surrounding Trump's policies. Responding to demonstrations against ICE raids, the president deployed the California National Guard in Los Angeles over Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections, and also sent U.S. Marines. Trump's decision to bypass Newsom and federalize the California National Guard drew protests from Democrats. Newsom described it as the act of a "dictator." Republican governors in Texas and Missouri are activating the Guard on their own. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced June 11 that the Texas National Guard would be deployed throughout the state "to ensure peace & order." The move came after protesters in Austin clashed with police, and ahead of more planned protests in the state. About 2,000 "No Kings" protests are scheduled across the country on June 14, when Trump is staging a large military parade in Washington D.C. on the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. It's also Trump's 79th birthday. A map on the "No Kings" website shows dozens of protests are planned in Missouri and Texas. More: Governors aren't on same page about using National Guard for 'No Kings' protests With immigration enforcement protests spreading across the country and millions of Americans expected to demonstrate on June 14, governors are having to weigh calling in the National Guard in case of violence versus chancing having Trump do it for them. New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, told USA TODAY that Democratic governors are speaking with one another about being prepared if Trump deploys their state National Guard over their objections. Lujan Grisham said she expects the New Mexico protests to be peaceful and managed by local law enforcement. She isn't preparing the Guard in case protests turn violent because that isn't their job. The National Guard has long been used by governors to help police protests. When George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, was murdered by a Minneapolis police officer on May 25, 2020, governors in 28 states had deployed the National Guard by June 3, 2020, to help contain demonstrations that erupted across the country, according to the Department of Defense. Among them was Newsom in California. California recently sued to stop Trump from deploying the National Guard in Los Angeles. A federal judge blocked the mobilization, but the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 13 temporarily halted the judge's order. Contributing: Sarah D. Wire, Jeanine Santucci, Davis Winkie