logo
New Jersey Transit trains back on track after strike, bringing customers a sigh of relief

New Jersey Transit trains back on track after strike, bringing customers a sigh of relief

CBS News21-05-2025
New Jersey Transit riders happy to see trains back on track after strike
New Jersey Transit riders happy to see trains back on track after strike
New Jersey Transit riders happy to see trains back on track after strike
NJ Transit is back on track — literally. Trains are up and running and have resumed their normal schedules following the first rail strike in decades in New Jersey.
NJ Transit and the union representing engineers reached a tentative agreement on Sunday night.
The strike started on Friday, and service was halted for four days, affecting the hundreds of thousands of people who rely on the system.
"I am so pleased that the union and NJ Transit reached an agreement. Now it goes to the union to ratify, and it will then come to the NJ Transit board," said Kris Kolluri, NJ Transit president and CEO.
Many passengers who spoke to CBS News Philadelphia said they are happy the strike is over because their backup plans weren't nearly as convenient or were too expensive.
"Car was not an option for me. Amtrak was kind of expensive, so when this actually broke and got settled, I am like, 'This is so great, I get to enjoy the day,'" said Frank Giffone. He said he got tickets through a lottery to go to New York to see the Old City Hall train station in Manhattan for his birthday.
"When this transit strike came around and popped up last week, I was like, 'Oh great. How am I going to get to Manhattan?'" he said
Others said they are relieved travel will be smoother this week.
"I am planning a trip to the airport this coming week, and I was a little nervous it was going to affect getting to the airport via public transportation," said Mackenzie Mueller from Washington.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Some Denver City Council members express concerns about $26,000 retreat: "I'm uncomfortable with the timing"
Some Denver City Council members express concerns about $26,000 retreat: "I'm uncomfortable with the timing"

CBS News

timea few seconds ago

  • CBS News

Some Denver City Council members express concerns about $26,000 retreat: "I'm uncomfortable with the timing"

Two Denver City Council members on Tuesday expressed concerns about a two-night Colorado mountain retreat for Denver City Council members next week that carried a $26,000 price tag, even as 171 city workers are being notified that they are losing their jobs. "I'm uncomfortable with the timing," said council member Paul Kashmann on Tuesday, about the retreat that was spotlighted Monday by a CBS News Investigation. "I don't believe the timing is anywhere close to ideal, and that's an understatement." Denver city workers began receiving notifications Monday that they were being laid off as part of an effort to help the city address a $200 million budget deficit projected for 2026. Ten of Denver's 13 councilmembers are scheduled to go on the retreat from August 27- 29 at the Lone Rock retreat center in Park County. Council representative Stacie Gilmore was not planning to attend the team building and professional development retreat due to a scheduling conflict, but said, "A camping trip, campfire, and s'mores up at Genesee would help as much. And be way cheaper". Council President Amanda Sandoval had pushed for the high country retreat saying, "So just because we're having a time of crisis doesn't mean council shouldn't learn to work better together." Sandoval said the retreat had been discussed since last December, and a contract was signed on May 8. It called for the city council to pay $16,000 for facility use, meals and rooms, $2,600 for ADA transportation, and $7,600 for a facilitator and assessment tool, bringing the cost to about $26,000. In April, Sandoval emailed her colleagues on the city council about the retreat, writing, "I truly believe this will be an incredible opportunity for us to step away from the day-to-day hustle, get to know each other better in a beautiful setting, and just maybe have some fun." She said she had attended an event at the facility in 2024, "and I absolutely fell in love with the facility. I think you all will too". The money came out of the city council's annual budget. Two weeks after signing the contract, Mayor Mike Johnston detailed layoffs, furloughs, and cost-cutting that would be needed to address Denver's financial deficit. "I would never have done any of this", said Sandoval, "had I known any of this information prior to signing that contract." She said the city has tried unsuccessfully to get a refund or reschedule the retreat, which will last about 36 hours. The Park County facility features "breathtaking views," according to its website, 60 individual cabins along with restaurants, meeting spaces, a fitness center, and a yoga room. Asked if there were less expensive options closer to Denver, Sandoval said, "There aren't a lot of options. We do not have a facility like that in Denver." She said the retreat will bring the council together to work more productively, "so we can serve the residents of Denver." Kashmann said he was "not sure" if he would still go to the retreat, in light of the layoffs. "I will decide what's the best use of my time," he said. He complimented Sandoval for "trying to make us more efficient" and said he thought there was value in team building and making the council a more effective body. "I understand people's concerns with the dollars," said Kashmann, who reiterated, "the main concern is the timing".

Bessent says US tariff revenues to rise 'substantially,' focus on reducing debt
Bessent says US tariff revenues to rise 'substantially,' focus on reducing debt

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent says US tariff revenues to rise 'substantially,' focus on reducing debt

By Andrea Shalal WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he expects a big jump in revenues from sweeping tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, and said the money would be used first to start paying down the federal debt, not to give rebate checks to Americans. Bessent, speaking in an interview on CNBC's "Squawk Box," said he expected to substantially revise upward his earlier estimate of $300 billion in revenues from the tariffs, but declined to be more specific. Bessent said he had not spoken with Trump about the idea of using funds from the tariffs to create a dividend for Americans, but stressed that both of them were "laser-focused" on paying down the debt. "I've been saying that tariff revenue could be $300 billion this year. I'm going to have to revise that up substantially," Bessent said. "We're going to bring down the deficit to GDP. We'll start paying down the debt, and then at that point that can be used as an offset to the American people." The U.S. economy could return to the "good, low-inflationary growth" of the 1990s, Bessent said, but he blamed higher interest rates for problems plaguing some pockets of the economy, singling out housing and lower-income households with high credit card debt. A cut in the Federal Reserve's key interest rate - which Trump has continually pressed for - could help facilitate a boom or pickup in home building, which would help keep prices down in one to two years, he said. The U.S. Census Bureau on Tuesday reported a small increase in groundbreaking for single-family homes and permits for future construction in July, even as high mortgage rates and economic uncertainty continued to hamper home purchases. Trump's wide-ranging import tariffs have kept the Federal Reserve from lowering interest rates this year, with most central bank policymakers wary of easing borrowing costs until they have more confidence the levies will not rekindle inflation, which has yet to return to the Fed's 2% target. Recent indications of softening in the job market, however, have largely convinced investors that the Fed will cut rates by a quarter of a percentage point when it meets in mid-September. That expectation has helped bring down mortgage rates in recent weeks. Bessent has previously said a 50-basis-point cut in rates was warranted. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

USDA will heighten scrutiny for solar and wind projects on farms, but some may continue
USDA will heighten scrutiny for solar and wind projects on farms, but some may continue

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

USDA will heighten scrutiny for solar and wind projects on farms, but some may continue

By Leah Douglas and Nichola Groom WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Department of Agriculture said on Tuesday it will heighten scrutiny of some solar and wind projects but stopped short of ending all agency support for clean energy projects on U.S. farms, according to a press release. The release came a day after Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced on X that her agency would no longer fund wind and solar on productive farmland. Rather, the agency said it will move away from funding larger renewable energy facilities, the Tuesday release said. Wind and solar projects will not be eligible for the agency's Rural Development Business and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program, the USDA said, and ground-mounted solar systems over 50 kilowatts and those that cannot document historical energy usage will not qualify for the Rural Energy for America Program Guaranteed Loan Program, according to the release. "USDA will ensure that American farmers, ranchers and producers utilizing wind and solar energy sources will install units that are right-sized for their facilities," the release said. The agency will also not allow the use of solar panels "manufactured by foreign adversaries" in USDA-funded projects, the release said. The USDA did not immediately respond to questions about whether smaller-scale projects are still eligible for agency support. Thomas Clark, director of marketing and communications for solar installation company Northstone Solar in Whitefish, Montana, said potential clients in his region had already been impacted by the USDA's pullback in project funding. "If you are trying to do a ground mount system on farmland, which a couple years ago would not have been an issue, now they don't want that to happen," Clark said. "And that just seems like you're sticking it to farmers that are trying to find ways to diversify their revenue and be able to stay in business." Rollins said in the release that prime farmland has been displaced by solar farms and the new investment guardrails are meant to keep farmland affordable. Yet data from the USDA shows that a very small amount of rural land is used for solar and wind projects and that most continues in agricultural production even after the projects are installed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store