Chevron and other companies exit Egypt's Red Sea concessions, redirect resources
A number of multinational oil and gas companies including Chevron have exited their Red Sea oil and gas concession blocks after making no finds and have channelled their resources elsewhere in the country, the Egyptian petroleum ministry said.
As part of its efforts to become an energy hub, Egypt awarded oil and gas exploration concessions in the Red Sea for the first time to Chevron, Shell and Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investment Company in an international tender in 2019.
"Companies have spent millions on their concessions within the agreed time frames," ministry spokesperson Moataz Atef told reporters on Thursday.
He said: "One company spent $34 million on a contract that initially stipulated it will invest $10 million on exploration, but found no results," without naming said company.
Chevron confirmed it has relinquished its operated 45% stake in Red Sea Block 1, located in the northern Red Sea.
'Chevron remains committed to working together with the government of Egypt and our partners to support the growth of Egypt's energy sector through our exploration programs in the Mediterranean,' spokesperson Sally Jones said in a statement on Friday.
Chevron operates the block along with other shareholders including Australia's Woodside Energy. Shell operates Block 3 with others including Woodside Energy and QatarEnergy.
Atef did not name the other companies that he said had relinquished their Red Sea blocks. Shell declined to comment. Mubadala, Woodside Energy and QatarEnergy were not immediately available for comment.
The petroleum ministry spokesperson stressed his ministry still believed the concession areas could be fruitful.
He said both Shell and Chevron had applied for new concessions in the Mediterranean Sea, reaffirming their commitment to Egypt's oil and gas sector, without giving further details.
Chevron spokesperson Jones said it had interest in three other exploration blocks in Egypt, including two as an operator in the Mediterranean.
In January 2024, Egypt's gas production was 4.6 billion cubic meters of gas. Despite pushing for further increases, production remained on a downward trend, recording 3.6 billion cubic meters in January 2025, data from the Joint Organisations Data Initiative show.
Regarding energy supply, Atef sought to give assurances that Egypt would be able to meet rising electricity demand this summer.
"By the summer, we will have three to four floating storage and regasification units to help stabilize the supply of natural gas," he said, adding that LNG shipments have been secured, while an emergency plan is in place to address any unexpected demand spikes.
Last summer, Egypt faced power shortages exacerbated by high cooling demand. The country resorted to load-shedding and imports costing around $1.18 billion.
(Reporting by Mohamed Ezz and Jaidaa Taha; Editing by Alison Williams)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
a day ago
- Arabian Post
Oil Market Waiting For Clear Signals As Pushes And Pulls Exert Divergent Pressures
By K Raveendran Brent crude oil futures continue to hover around the $65 per barrel mark, a level that reflects the push and pull of market forces clouded by a cocktail of geopolitical tensions, environmental disruptions, and strategic production decisions. As prices hold steady, the broader sentiment among traders and analysts leans toward caution, with a slightly bullish undertone given the confluence of supply-side constraints and persistent demand recovery hopes. Much of the current price resilience can be traced to heightened uncertainty regarding OPEC+'s intentions and external shocks to global oil supply. The oil market has been keenly watching the moves of OPEC+, the coalition of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, including Russia. Speculation about further output increases has gripped the market, especially with an expected announcement at an upcoming meeting this week. OPEC+ has already raised output in the past two consecutive months, signalling a gradual easing of the production curbs that were initially implemented to balance the market in the wake of the pandemic-induced demand collapse. While such actions may appear rational from the perspective of maintaining market share and responding to rebounding global consumption, they have also introduced a layer of uncertainty. The question remains whether the additional barrels will be absorbed smoothly or lead to a supply glut, especially if demand falters or economic growth slows in major oil-consuming regions. Layered atop these production developments are supply disruptions and geopolitical constraints that have bolstered bullish sentiment in recent weeks. Chief among them is the United States' decision to ban Chevron from exporting crude oil from Venezuela. This policy move, while targetted at maintaining pressure on the Venezuelan government, has effectively choked off a potential stream of supply to the international market, thereby tightening global crude availability. Venezuela's oil sector has been under pressure for years due to sanctions and underinvestment, and Chevron had served as one of the few remaining Western oil companies operating in the country. Cutting off exports from that channel amplifies the scarcity narrative that's become increasingly prominent in market discussions. At the same time, wildfires in Alberta, Canada, have further disrupted supply dynamics. Canada is one of the top global crude producers, and Alberta's oil sands represent a significant portion of that output. Wildfires in this region pose a dual threat: direct production halts due to damage or evacuation and logistical delays as transportation routes are impacted. These fires are not a one-off event but part of a growing trend of climate-induced challenges to oil production. Their recurrence and increasing intensity underscore the vulnerability of fossil fuel infrastructure to environmental risks, which is feeding into longer-term risk assessments and price expectations in the crude futures market. While these events tighten current and anticipated supply, they occur against a backdrop of broader transformation in the U.S. oil production landscape. Gone are the days of the 'drill baby drill' mantra that once dominated energy discourse in the United States. The shale revolution, which propelled the U.S. to become the world's largest oil producer, has hit a wall of investor skepticism, environmental scrutiny, and capital discipline. Production growth has plateaued, and the appetite for aggressive expansion has waned considerably. The lack of reinvestment, combined with mounting operational and regulatory hurdles, suggests that U.S. output may struggle to fill the gap left by other supply disruptions. This restraint from the U.S., once a swing producer capable of responding swiftly to market signals, has added another layer of tightness and unpredictability to global supply forecasts. In response to these multifaceted uncertainties, many countries are recalibrating their downstream strategies. Refiners are likely to maximize throughput to take advantage of margins that remain relatively healthy amid the tight crude market. With product inventories at historically low levels in several key regions, the incentive to run refineries at full tilt is strong. This move serves not only to meet immediate fuel needs but also as a hedge against future volatility. In a market where supply chains can be disrupted by policy or natural disaster overnight, stockpiling refined products becomes a strategic imperative. Moreover, building inventories now may offer a buffer as the market braces for further uncertainty in the second half of the year. Seasonal factors, such as increased travel during summer months in the northern hemisphere, typically boost gasoline and jet fuel demand. On the other side of the equation, supply risks persist—not just from the geopolitical and environmental fronts but also from the potential for OPEC+ discord. While the alliance has held together remarkably well since the pandemic, cracks could emerge, especially if price trajectories diverge significantly from the interests of individual members. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia may have differing tolerance levels for price volatility or production ceilings, and any sign of disunity could rattle markets. Complicating the picture further is the lack of clarity around Chinese demand. As the world's largest crude importer, China plays an outsized role in determining global oil balances. While there have been signs of recovery in Chinese industrial activity and mobility, the pace and sustainability of that recovery remain uncertain. Should China's demand ramp up more slowly than expected, the additional barrels from OPEC+ could depress prices. Conversely, if the Chinese economy rebounds more sharply, it could absorb much of the additional supply and further tighten the market. In such a finely balanced environment, sentiment can swing rapidly. Traders are closely monitoring inventory data, refinery throughput rates, and shipping flows for any signal that might provide clues about the trajectory of supply and demand. The tightness in product inventories across regions is especially significant. Low diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel stocks indicate that any hiccup in refining or logistics could lead to local shortages and price spikes, even if crude prices remain stable. This bifurcation between crude and product markets reflects structural bottlenecks and underscores the complexity of energy market dynamics today. (IPA Service)
Sharjah 24
3 days ago
- Sharjah 24
Nahyan bin Mubarak receives outgoing Egyptian ambassador
Appreciation for strengthening UAE-Egypt ties During the meeting, Sheikh Nahyan bin Mubarak expressed his appreciation for the ambassador's efforts in strengthening bilateral relations between the UAE and Egypt. Advancing bilateral cooperation He also highlighted the significant progress witnessed in recent years across various areas of cooperation, crediting the continuous coordination and shared vision of the two nations' leadership. Ambassador expresses gratitude The Egyptian Ambassador conveyed his appreciation and gratitude to the UAE's leadership and people for the support and collaboration extended to him throughout his term. UAE as a model of success He praised the UAE's remarkable cultural and developmental progress, describing it as a regional and global model of success. Farewell wishes and continued partnership At the end of the meeting, Sheikh Nahyan wished the ambassador success in his future assignments and reiterated the enduring fraternal ties between the UAE and Egypt that continue to serve shared interests and enhance regional security and stability.
Zawya
3 days ago
- Zawya
Dan Etete: Architect of Nigeria's oil sovereignty
BY the twilight of 2024, Nigeria's local content participation in oil and gas had risen to an unprecedented 56 percent, as reported by the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB). This remarkable milestone reflects a strategic shift in Nigeria's resource governance—an ongoing revolution in which Nigerian companies, workers, and communities increasingly occupy center stage in the oil and gas value chain. But long before such progress became measurable or fashionable, it was visionaries like Chief Dan Etete, Nigeria's Minister of Petroleum Resources from 1995 to 1998, who laid the philosophical, political, and structural foundation for this transformation. Etete's time in office coincided with a turbulent yet defining period in Nigeria's history. Serving under the late General Sani Abacha, he operated in a milieu of intense international scrutiny, geopolitical tension, and entrenched foreign dominance over Nigeria's energy resources. For decades, multinational oil corporations such as Shell, Chevron, and Mobil had maintained monopolistic control over oil exploration and production in Nigeria. Local content was virtually non-existent, and the concept of indigenous ownership of oil blocks was treated as radical, even dangerous. Etete challenged this orthodoxy with courage and clarity. He recognised that economic sovereignty was inseparable from resource control, and he pursued bold reforms to break the stranglehold of foreign multinationals over Nigeria's oil wealth. It is instructive to note that the foresight of Etete in pioneering local content laid the foundation for the recent dynamic Nigeria First Policy by President Bola Tinubu that places emphasis on made in Nigeria goods. For the record, Etete was the one that set up Marginal Field Decree of 1998 for the benefit of all Nigerians to be included in the oil and gas industry. His tenure heralded a new era of indigenous participation and empowerment, even as it attracted controversy from entrenched interests both within and outside Nigeria. Pioneering the local content revolution Etete's boldest policy decision was the allocation of Oil Prospecting Licences (OPLs) to Nigerian-owned companies. On April 29, 1998, he signed off on the award of critical oil blocks—including OPL 245 (Malabu Oil and Gas), OPL 246 (South Atlantic Petroleum), OPL 247 (Heritage Oil), and OPL 248 (Zebra Energy)—to Nigerian firms. Far from being arbitrary handouts, these allocations were grounded in a nationalistic philosophy: to redistribute wealth, transfer technology, build local capacity, and give Nigerian entrepreneurs a stake in the oil economy. It is crucial to understand the status quo Etete was up against. According to the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), over 80% of Nigeria's oil wealth historically accrued to foreign firms, with only $5 out of every $100 remaining in the country. The rest was exported as capital flight, enriching foreign shareholders while Nigerian communities, particularly in the Niger Delta, endured pollution, poverty, and violence. Etete was the first senior public official to confront this injustice—not through rhetoric, but through policy. He expanded the Indigenous Concession Programme (ICP), which had been initiated in the early 1990s but lacked political will and institutional support. Under Etete, the ICP gained teeth. Notably, he facilitated the transfer of OPL 216 from BP-Statoil to Famfa Oil, co-founded by Mrs. Folorunsho Alakija. Today, Famfa Oil is among Nigeria's most successful indigenous oil companies, producing in partnership with Chevron. The saga of OPL 245: A symbol of resource nationalism Perhaps no oil block better illustrates the high stakes and political complexities of Etete's tenure than OPL 245. Covering over 1,800 square kilometers in deep offshore waters, the block holds an estimated 9 billion barrels in oil reserves. In 1998, the oil block was awarded to Malabu Oil and Gas. It is important to state with high sense of responsibility that Dan Atete did not have interest in OPL 245. It was the directors of Malabu that appointed him as a consultant to the oil firm. The goal, as contemporaneous documents show, was not personal enrichment but to create a Niger Delta-led consortium that would ensure the people of the oil-bearing region had a direct stake in the resources beneath their soil. The ownership of OPL 245 became a litmus test for indigenous empowerment. However, in 2001, during President Olusegun Obasanjo's administration, Malabu's license was revoked and the block was reallocated to Shell. This triggered a legal battle that would last more than two decades, involving multiple Nigerian administrations, international oil giants Shell and Eni, and litigation in Nigeria, the UK, France, and Italy. Despite the media firestorm and politically motivated allegations, no court has ever found Etete personally guilty of corruption regarding the Malabu transaction. In fact, in 2017, an Italian court acquitted Shell and Eni executives, and in 2021, a Milan court reaffirmed that no criminal wrongdoing was proven. Even Nigerian courts have affirmed Malabu's title to the block on several occasions. The enduring controversy surrounding OPL 245 is a case study in how resource nationalism can be criminalised when it challenges global corporate interests. Etete became a convenient scapegoat—not because of criminal acts, but because he sought to give Nigerians ownership of their oil. Advocacy for the Niger Delta: Born in the heart of the Ijaw ethnic nation, Chief Dan Etete had firsthand knowledge of the paradoxes of Nigeria's oil wealth. He was vocal about the marginalization of the Niger Delta, and his policies reflected a desire to use oil wealth to catalyze development in the region. Etete's advocacy extended to calls for new states in the Niger Delta, greater resource control, and environmental remediation. He supported the idea of using oil-derived revenue to fund education, infrastructure, and local enterprise. This perspective, though ahead of its time, now aligns with today's Host Community Development Trusts (HCDTs) embedded in the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021. The long-term impact of Etete's tenure is undeniable. Companies such as Seplat Energy, Aiteo, Oando, Sahara Energy, and Notore—all of which now employ thousands of Nigerians and are publicly traded—owe their rise to the indigenous empowerment precedent set by Etete. The idea that Nigerian firms could compete globally in oil and gas was once unthinkable. Today, it is taken for granted. In 2010, more than a decade after Etete's reforms, the Nigerian government enacted the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act (NOGICD Act), which mandates that Nigerians must own a minimum percentage of goods, services, and workforce in the sector. This legislation draws a direct philosophical lineage to Etete's early efforts. Under the administration of President Bola Tinubu, Nigeria has doubled down on local content. In 2024, NCDMB reported that 56 percent of oil and gas industry services were performed by indigenous companies. These include fabrication yards, engineering services, and upstream operations—sectors previously monopolized by foreign contractors. In essence, the nation owes these milestones to the brave and bold efforts of pioneers like Dan Etete. A visionary ahead of his time Etete's role in shaping Nigeria's oil and gas architecture has been systematically downplayed, even maligned. Yet, a dispassionate review of the facts reveals that he was not a rogue actor, but a reformer within a resistant system. His decisions were rooted in strategic intent to advance national interest, despite being opposed by powerful foreign and domestic actors. While some critics focus on his association with Malabu, they fail to assess the broader structural changes he made possible. Etete laid the groundwork for local ownership of Nigeria's most vital economic sector. He empowered Nigerian entrepreneurs, defended the rights of marginalized communities, and helped reposition Nigeria on the global oil map—not merely as a supplier, but as a sovereign participant. Restoring a distorted legacy At 80 years old, Chief Dan Etete remains one of the most misunderstood and misrepresented figures in Nigeria's modern economic history. Yet, his legacy is evident in every local oil company that thrives, every Nigerian engineer that works offshore, and every government policy that prioritizes domestic capacity over foreign Nigeria looks to the future—with energy transition, climate change, and economic diversification at the forefront—it must not forget the shoulders it stands upon. Etete's boldness, foresight, and unwavering belief in Nigeria's potential deserve acknowledgment, not vilification. It is time to tell the full story of Chief Dan Etete: not as a footnote in controversy, but as a patriot and pioneer who helped reclaim Nigeria's economic destiny from the grip of foreign dominance.
