Pakistan denies ceasefire plea, credits US and Saudi role
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has rejected Indian media reports claiming that it sought a ceasefire during the recent four-day military standoff, insisting it responded "decisively" to Indian actions and agreed to halt hostilities only after intervention by United States and Saudi Arabia.
In a statement issued Friday, the foreign office dismissed interpretations of deputy PM and foreign minister Ishaq Dar's comments as "baseless", saying they distorted his actual position. "Pakistan did not initiate or ask anyone for a ceasefire," the statement said, asserting that it acted in self-defence after Indian strikes.
The sharp exchange, which included cross-border shelling and heightened troop alert along the LoC, marked one of the most serious escalations since the 2019 Pulwama-Balakot episode.
Though both sides have withheld official details, the flare-up triggered urgent calls for restraint from key global players. India has repeatedly denied any third-party mediation in bringing about the ceasefire.
Islamabad said the ceasefire materialised only after US secretary of state Marco Rubio called Dar on May 10 and conveyed that India was ready to de-escalate if Pakistan reciprocated. A similar call from Saudi foreign minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan followed shortly after.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
(1) Your Antivirus May Require Activation
McAfee.com
Click Here
Undo
Dar reportedly confirmed Pakistan's willingness during both conversations.
While welcoming ceasefire, Pakistan's tone remained guarded. The foreign office said Islamabad values peace but would not compromise its right to respond to aggression. "Pakistan's decision to de-escalate followed facilitation by friendly countries," it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
3 years after it was carved, no office for P-East ward
Mumbai: Three years after splitting P-North Ward into two, BMC is still struggling to find an office for the newly carved P-East ward. With BMC elections around the corner, BJP has demanded that BMC acquire a plot of land in Malad (east) to construct a new office for P-East ward. In 2023, the state govt said BMC was awaiting a 40,000 sq ft constructed area in a Slum Rehabilitation Authority project, but it didn't work out. So far, the new ward office hasn't started, and residents have to visit the old P-North ward office for routine work. P-North ward, which earlier covered Malad, Goregaon, and Kandivli, was the most populous ward in the city with a population of around 13 lakh. Following a demand from former BJP corporator Vinod Mishra, minister Ashish Shelar of BJP last week asked BMC officials to construct the new P-East ward office. "Despite the state govt issuing orders, BMC has delayed constructing a new ward office. As a result, people from Malad (east) have to spend a long time besides having to pay Rs 100 to get to the ward office in Malad (west). So we have demanded a ward office in Malad (east). A private plot reserved for a municipal chowky is ideal for the P-East ward office as it is close to Malad (east) railway station, Pathanwadi bus stop, and Dindoshi Metro station," said Mishra, who is following up on the ward office issue. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Investire è più facile che mai BG SAXO Scopri di più Undo BMC officials said that some temporary offices offering some civic services are operating from Ram Leela Maidan, Malad (east). "But this office is also not accessible and takes more than 45 minutes to reach from Malad (east). For all other services, residents have to go to the old P-North ward office, in Malad (west), near Liberty Garden. It is more than 5 km away from Malad (east). Also, there is only one assistant municipal commissioner for the old and new wards," Mishra said. "The fastest option is to acquire this private plot and construct the ward office. We have asked BMC to temporarily start a functional ward office for basic amenities like war works and solid waste management in an existing structure," Mishra said. BMC split up the former combined ward into two since providing civic amenities — water supply, sanitation, and citizen services was a challenge due to the vast area and high population.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Union minister Joshi performs yoga at Pattadakal
Pic: Pralhad Joshi, Union minister for new and renewable energy, participated in Yoga organised in the Unesco world heritage site Pattadakal in the Bagalkot district Bagalkot: The Unesco World Heritage Site at Pattadakal hosted the 11th International Yoga Day celebrations. Union Minister for New and Renewable Energy, Pralhad Joshi, joined the yoga session, enhancing the event's significance. At the Saturday morning celebration in Pattadakal, a renowned tourist spot, minister Joshi performed yoga alongside local officials and representatives. The participants demonstrated various yoga postures during the session. The minister highlighted yoga as a valuable practice rooted in ancient spiritual, physical, and mental wellness traditions. He emphasised its role in strengthening the body, mind, and soul whilst promoting global harmony. He noted that yoga exemplifies action and proficiency in karma yoga. As referenced in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'Mann Ki Baat', this year's International Yoga Day theme focuses on 'Yoga for One Earth, One Health'. The minister highlighted yoga's contribution towards establishing India's prominence in the 21st century. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo He noted that International Yoga Day's worldwide celebration demonstrates the global recognition of India's yoga heritage. The Archaeological Survey of India organised the event, which saw participation from MP PC Gaddigoudar, MLC Hanumanth Nirani, DC Sangappa M, ZP CEO Shashidhar Kurer, SP Amarnath Reddy, ASI Senior Officer Navratna Kumar Pathak, and other officials. Accuses Congress of fostering corruption Pralhad Joshi, speaking in Pattadakal, directly accused the Congress of establishing and fostering corruption. Following the disclosure of the Housing Corporation corruption audio, Rayareddy acknowledged substantial corruption during Congress administration, leading to the audio's subsequent release. He further said the North Karnataka legislators highlighted the absence of development funds while pointing out widespread corruption. The audio emerged yesterday. The BJP's statements are consistently dismissed by opponents claiming the party lacks accomplishments. The response from the chief minister remains anticipated, particularly given his statements about monetary requirements for housing allocation. A Congress legislator has brought attention to an ongoing transfer scandal, whilst contractors have labelled it a 60% govt. The UPA govt, under Sonia Gandhi's leadership, faced corruption allegations totalling Rs 12 lakh crore. There appears to be uncertainty in accountability, with neither senior nor junior officials being questioned about corruption. "With Sonia and Rahul being out on bail, there remains no authority to question them. Consequently, the Congress party's statements lack credibility and attention from the public," the Union minister accused.
The Hindu
41 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How will Israel-Iran conflict impact India?
The story so far: As the latest Israel-Iran conflict crossed the one-week mark, the Indian government began to bring back Indian citizens from both countries, fearing a further escalation. In a sudden attack on June 13, Israel launched strikes on Iranian nuclear installations, assassinated top generals, and bombed several cities across the country. Iran's response has been more robust than expected, as it too has launched barrage after barrage of ballistic missiles on military targets and research facilities in Israel. How has India reacted to the conflict? Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on June 13, briefing him on the attack by Israel on Iran's nuclear facilities in several cities, including Tehran, where senior Iranian generals were assassinated through targeted strikes. The strikes were a clear violation of international law, Iran argued at the U.N. Security Council, as even Israel claimed they were 'pre-emptive' and not in retaliation to an attack. In a statement, the government said Mr. Modi had 'shared India's concern and emphasised the need for early restoration of peace and stability in the region.' In a call with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar expressed the 'deep concern of the international community at the turn of events,' and urged against retaliation and for diplomacy. Mr. Jaishankar also spoke to Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) statement played safe, calling for dialogue and diplomacy while making no criticism of Israel for launching the strikes. It also disassociated from a statement of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which includes China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, Belarus and Central Asian states, that had condemned Israel's 'aggression'. Also read: India stands 'isolated' over abstention on Gaza ceasefire in the UNGA, says Congress Last week, India had abstained in a UN resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza. Every other member of BRICS, SCO and SAARC and even all G-7 members minus the U.S. had voted in favour of the resolution critical of Israel's bombardment of Gaza. In a break from older positions, New Delhi has made it clear that India will not criticise Israel. What about Indians caught in the conflict? As the conflict escalated, the MEA and its embassies in Tehran and Tel Aviv put evacuation efforts, as part of what was named 'Operation Sindhu', on priority. Unlike the rest of West Asia, where nearly 10 million Indians reside, relatively fewer numbers live in Iran and Israel. There are about 10,000 students and professionals in Iran and about 25,000 workers, students and researchers in Israel, many of whom only moved recently to fill in for construction and caregiver jobs after Israel dismissed thousands of Palestinian workers in the wake of the October 7 terror attacks in 2023. The evacuation efforts are multi-pronged and require the cooperation of both governments to help Indians cross over to bordering countries and fly back. Iran has even opened its airspace, otherwise closed due to the war, to allow chartered flights carrying Indian citizens home. While it is important to keep them safe, the government has learnt from past conflicts that it is necessary to find work and study opportunities for those coming back, or they end up returning to the conflict zones. Apart from the loss in remittances, what's at stake for India economically? India has had declining levels of trade with both Iran and Israel in the last few years due to tensions in the region. After India bowed to the previous Trump administration's demand to cancel oil trade or face sanctions, its trade with Iran dropped from about $14 billion in 2017 to $1.4 billion last year. Tensions in the Gulf region post-attacks as well as Israeli operations on Gaza have also sent trade with Israel down from $11 billion in 2022 to $3.75 billion last year, the Indian embassy said. However, India's defence imports from Israel have soared in the past decade, from about $5.6 million in 2015 to $128 million presently. However, where India will feel the pinch financially, is in trade route disruptions, especially if the Strait of Hormuz is closed as a pressure tactic by Iran, or due to intensified fighting. According to thinktank GTRI, this could sharply increase oil and LNG prices, given that 40-50% of India's energy imports come through the area. Shipping costs, security, and insurance premiums would rise, leading to more costly imports, less competitive exports, and inflation. What are the geopolitical impacts of the conflict for New Delhi to worry about? Dealing with the Israel-Iran conflict has always meant a tricky tightrope balance for New Delhi, given its strong ties with both countries. The balance is also required in view of the two polarised parts of the world they represent. The U.S. and G-7 countries have largely backed Israel strikes as its 'right to defend itself'. In a joint statement at the summit in Canada this week, they called Iran the 'principal source of regional instability and terror' that can 'never have a nuclear weapon'. U.S. President Donald Trump is mulling a decision to formally join the attack on Iran, but U.S. support for Israel is crucial and unquestioning, even if he doesn't. Mr. Trump's lunch invitation to Pakistan's Army chief General Asim Munir this week, and speculation that the U.S. may ask Pakistan for support in a possible operation in Iran, from logistics to overflight and refuelling to intelligence sharing, will make India's path more difficult. Also read: Huge blow to Indian diplomacy, says Congress on Trump-Munir lunch On the other hand, the Global South, which has been very critical of Israel's war in Gaza, has also expressed sympathies with Iran during the current crisis. After the stand India took with the SCO, all eyes will be on what position Mr. Modi takes when he travels to Brazil for the BRICS summit of emerging economies on July 6-7. Apart from founders Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the BRICS grouping includes new members Iran, the UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and now Indonesia (Saudi Arabia has yet to formally join), and India will face a harder challenge in separating itself from any statement that is issued there. There's also the possible cost to India's ties with the Gulf region that has to be factored in. For India, West Asia is not just the source of 40% of its remittances but also 54% of oil imports and the region accounts for over $170 billion in trade. A perceived pro-Israel shift has a reputational impact for India, which was the first non-Arab nation to recognise the Palestinian State. Finally, there is the impact of a prolonged Israel-Iran conflict on India's connectivity plans. Plans for the India Middle East Europe Economic Corridor had already run aground after the October 7 attacks given that it requires connectivity through Arab countries and through Israel to Haifa port. With the current crisis, India's investment in the Chabahar port project and the International North-South Transport Corridor for trade and connectivity to Afghanistan, Central Asia and Eurasia will be affected, and New Delhi's best hope is an early end to the conflict.
