logo
Indian history for children: From 1200 to 1850, a brief history of the North Eastern states

Indian history for children: From 1200 to 1850, a brief history of the North Eastern states

Scroll.in17-07-2025
The term 'north-east' in its simple lexicographical sense indicates a direction – and raises the question north-east of what? The answer to the question in the case of Indian history and culture is simple: north-east of the Gangetic plain and peninsular India. But the term cannot be restricted, in the case of India, to merely its dictionary meaning. Northeast India – or in shorthand just the Northeast – has come to denote histories and cultures that are distinct from those of the Indian heartland.
As things stand today, the Northeast consists of seven separate states – Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura. Each of these states has its distinctive culture and history. But in the past, before the Indian republic fashioned these seven states, this vast geographical territory was referred to as Assam, which harked back to the land of Kamrup, which stretched from the eastern points of the Brahmaputra valley to the river Karatoya.
In the early 13th century, Kamrup, already in ruins, saw the arrival of the Turko-Afghans from Bengal, and the Ahom settlers from Upper Burma. From this period to the coming of the British in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, this area did not see any centralised ruling structure. Political authority was fragmented – tribal state formations, and non-tribal and armed landed sections of the population known as Bhuyan or Bhaumik exercised power. The dominance of the Bhuyan was concentrated in the western and central parts of the region.
One of the more important tribal formations was that of the Ahoms. They used the plough and made their own village settlements and established their authority over other tribal villages. The Ahoms were ruled by a king chosen from the royal clan; the king allocated domains to the nobility but the king could also be removed by the council of great nobles. The system was thus based on loyalty and service. The two other major tribal formations – the Chutiyas and the Kacharis – were either subjugated or pushed back to the southwest by the Ahoms who also pushed westward at the cost of the Bhuyans. These were processes that occurred in the 16th century.
Another tribal state formation was that of the Koch which during the 16th century established its power in the western part of the region from the Karatoya to the Barnadi. In 1562, the Koch were powerful enough to march to the Ahom capital of Garhgaon and sack it. But the power of the Koch dissipated when the kingdom split into the Koch-Bihar and the Koch-Hajo. The latter overlapped with the western part of what is today known as Assam. In the Khasi Hills there emerged in the 15th century the state of Jaintia.
Under the dispensation of the Koch and the Ahoms, the Bhuyans were absorbed into the official class and formed an elite. They could attain this status because of their knowledge of the scriptures, measurements, and arithmetic, and their ability to use arms. The Bhuyans were mostly high-caste migrants from North India who wielded considerable local political authority. Some of them were Muslims. Their power base was control over land and over armed tenants whom they could mobilise. Sometimes they formed partnerships against a common enemy.
The Bhuyans were very often pioneers in land reclamation and in dyke-building activities for water control. The Koch-Hajo areas were subjugated by the Mughals but this was not permanent. The Ahoms in 1682 annexed the Koch-Hajo areas. This meant that Ahom control extended right up to the Manas River. The conflict between the Ahoms and the Mughals opened up the region to external influences. In economic terms, since the Ahoms knew the use of the plough, there was a shift among the tribal populations they subjugated to permanent cultivation.
The use of the plough and the prevailing ecology facilitated wet rice cultivation. This is not to say that hunting and fishing and other tribal occupations disappeared in a geography where forests and swamps were prominent. Increasingly, however, the rice economy gained in importance.
Under the Ahoms, the militia (regular members of the civil population trained to serve as a military force) played a crucial role in the extension of rice cultivation by reclaiming land, settling the population, and building embankments as safeguards against floods. The land was also carefully levelled. An observer in the second half of the seventeenth century wrote, referring to the lands the Ahoms controlled: 'In this country they make the surface of the field and gardens so level that the eyes cannot find the least elevation in it up to the extreme horizons.'
During the course of the 16th century, the Vaishnava movement became very popular in the region and by 1700, there were around 1,000 monasteries (sutra). The latter also enhanced the process of land reclamation and the extension of cultivation. The monks sought for themselves exemption from obligatory military service to the state. There was a period when the Ahom state attempted to suppress the monasteries and force the monks to join labour camps to build roads and embankments. But this was a passing phase. By the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Ahom state was making revenue-free grants of wastelands to the monasteries.
Originally, the militia system was not very coercive but from the reign of Pratap Singha (1603–41), coercion became an integral part of the militia. The entire male population, with the exception of serfs, priests, and those of noble birth, within the age group of fifteen to sixty, was expected to be part of the militia. The system was organised in such a fashion that at any given point of time one-fourth to one-third of the militia was available for work. In the Koch and Kachari kingdoms and also in the neighbouring kingdoms of Jaintia and Manipur a somewhat similar system operated.
Excerpted with permission from A New History of India for Children: From Its Origins to the Twenty-first Century, Rudrangshu Mukherjee, Shobita Punja, and Toby Sinclair, Aleph Book Company.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zohran Mamdani under fire for lavish Uganda wedding: 'Socialism for thee, not for me'
Zohran Mamdani under fire for lavish Uganda wedding: 'Socialism for thee, not for me'

Hindustan Times

time2 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Zohran Mamdani under fire for lavish Uganda wedding: 'Socialism for thee, not for me'

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is facing backlash after reports of a lavish three-day wedding celebration at his family's estate in Uganda. According to The New York Post, the Indian-origin Democratic Socialist celebrated his wedding to Rama Duwaji in a wealthy suburb outside Kampala. The Indian-origin Democratic Socialist celebrated his wedding to Rama Duwaji in a wealthy suburb outside Kampala.(Getty Images via AFP) Although Mamdani, 33, tied the knot last year, the Uganda event appeared to be extravagant. It reportedly featured armed guards, a cellphone jamming system to prevent photo leaks, and tight security around the estate. A source quoted in the Post claimed that masked special forces were stationed outside the compound to guard the invitation-only event. The revelations quickly drew criticism online, particularly from those questioning Mamdani's political positions on public safety. "NYC Mayor candidate Zohran Mamdani has run on the platform of defunding the police and abolishing prisons but this is his private security outside his family compound in Uganda. Don't those that can't afford private security, also deserve to feel safe and protected?" said one X user. Another added, "Zohran Mamdani wants to ban all guns and defund the police, then flies to Uganda for his wedding, guarded by masked special forces at his family's multimillion-dollar compound. Socialism for thee, not for me." A third user taunted Mamdani's lavish celebration, mocking him as a "man of the people". "Zohran Mamdani: Nothing says American like getting married on your family's luxury Uganda compound. A man of the people," they added. "So it's ok to have masked military for his wedding but ICE isn't supposed to wear masks?" quipped a fourth user. Others criticised Mamdani's privilege in the East African country. "He is privileged. He offers freebies because he's incapable of taking any real steps to improve the economy, as that requires effort."

RSS Chief Bhagwat Invokes Yogi Arvinds Vision For Hindu Rashtra; Says, First Understand...
RSS Chief Bhagwat Invokes Yogi Arvinds Vision For Hindu Rashtra; Says, First Understand...

India.com

time2 minutes ago

  • India.com

RSS Chief Bhagwat Invokes Yogi Arvinds Vision For Hindu Rashtra; Says, First Understand...

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday asserted that the rise of Sanatan Dharma and the emergence of a Hindu nation are inevitable, echoing the words of Yogi Arvind. Speaking at the 'Gyan Sabha', a national education conference organised by the Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas, Bhagwat said, "Yogi Arvind said that it is God's will for the Sanatan Dharma to rise and for the rise of Sanatan Dharma, the rise of the Hindu nation is inevitable. These are his words, and we see that today's world needs this vision. Therefore, we will have to first understand what Bharat is" Bhagwat said that India's identity must be preserved, asserting that if you lose your identity, no matter how good you are, the world will neither respect nor protect you. "Bharat is a proper noun. It should not be translated. 'India that is Bharat' is true. But Bharat is Bharat, and that is why, while writing and speaking, we should keep Bharat as Bharat... Bharat must remain Bharat. The identity of Bharat is respected because it is Bharat. If you lose your identity, whatever other meritorious qualities you may have, you will never be respected or secure in this world. That is the thumb rule,' Bhagwat said. Bhagwat also called for India to move beyond the symbolism of being the 'golden bird' and instead become a 'lion', asserting that the world recognises and respects power. 'The world understands power. Therefore, Bharat must become strong. It must also grow rich in economic terms,' Bhagwat said, stressing that strength and prosperity are essential for India to find its rightful place in the global order. Touching on the theme of national identity, Bhagwat made a strong case for preserving the name 'Bharat' without translation. 'Bharat is a proper noun. It should not be translated. 'India is Bharat' — that's true. But Bharat is Bharat. In every context — whether personal or public, while speaking or writing — we should say Bharat,' he emphasised. The RSS chief also spoke at length about the purpose and values of education, stating that true education empowers an individual to live independently while inculcating a spirit of sacrifice and selflessness. 'Education that teaches selfishness is not real education,' he declared. He further said that education is not confined to schools alone but extends to the home and society. 'The environment in which children grow up plays a crucial role. Society must reflect on what kind of atmosphere is needed to raise a confident and responsible generation,' Bhagwat said. The conference was attended by Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar, along with several senior academicians and vice-chancellors from across India. President of Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas, Dr Pankaj Mittal, Secretary Dr Atul Kothari, Coordinator A Vinod, Chairman of Cochin Shipyard Madhu Nair were also present. The event focused on reshaping the country's educational framework in alignment with Indian cultural values and preparing the youth to face future challenges with clarity and confidence.

Minister slams Rahul-Ambedkar comparison
Minister slams Rahul-Ambedkar comparison

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Minister slams Rahul-Ambedkar comparison

Patna: BJP functionary and minister Janak Ram on Sunday lashed out at Congress's Udit Raj for likening Rahul Gandhi to Dr B R Ambedkar, describing the comparison as "an insult" and demanding an apology. "Rahul has been a failed leader in the true sense," Janak Ram said. "In Indian politics, he is remembered as a failed leader. Congress never respected Babasaheb and comparing him with anyone is an insult to Ambedkar." The controversy erupted after Udit Raj posted on X on Saturday, "OBCs will have to think that history does not give opportunities for progress again and again. They should follow and support what Rahul Gandhi said at the Talkatora Stadium conference. If they do so, then Rahul Gandhi will prove to be the second Ambedkar for them." Responding strongly, Janak Ram accused the Congress of exploiting marginalised communities. "Despite being in power for over six decades, Congress treated the Dalit and OBC communities merely as a vote bank. It never worked honestly for their welfare," he said. "In fact, Congress betrayed these communities, and the public will never forgive them. This is the same Congress which delayed conferring the Bharat Ratna on Ambedkar but wasted no time in securing the country's highest civilian award for its own family," the BJP minister added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store