8 Polite Ways to Decline a Party Invitation
Credit - Photo-Illustration by Chloe Dowling for TIME (Source Images: MirageC/Getty Images, Liliya Krueger—Getty Images)
When you get invited to a wedding or a party, 'yes' might feel like the only socially acceptable response. If your RSVP is something short of that, you might put off responding at all—or stumble into a response that's unintentionally rude.
'We're raised to be polite or not rock the boat and to avoid hurting someone's feelings, and yet in trying to be nice, we end up being vague and unclear and often more hurtful than if we were just candid,' says Priya Parker, a conflict resolution facilitator and author of The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why it Matters. 'There are so many ways to decline with grace, but instead of saying we'd rather not, we flake, or we're ambivalent and say 'maybe,' which is horrible for the host.'
When opting out of a gathering, Parker recommends following this formula: acknowledge the invitation; honor something about it, like the host's creativity or vision; express gratitude for the fact that they thought of you; and then clearly decline, without putting the weight of your reasons on the person inviting you.
Here's what that might look like in action.
If you can't swing an event, say so confidently and directly: "What a lovely invitation! Thanks for thinking of me.' 'All invitations are nice, even if you don't want them,' says Lizzie Post, co-president of the Emily Post Institute (and great-great-granddaughter of renowned etiquette expert Emily Post). That said, 'You have the agency to decline them. They're requests, not demands—they're hopeful wishes.'
Instead of sticking to a simple 'yes' or 'no,' some people turn their RSVP into a soliloquy about why they can't attend. Parker recently heard from a woman who, while planning a 30th wedding anniversary celebration, received a surprising number of emails from invitees who weren't sure if they could make it or not. 'She was getting these responses, like, 'If I come to your party, I'll miss X, Y, and Z,'' Parker recalls. 'Or, 'I'll have to move mountains to get there, but I'm trying.'' These types of notes made the host feel so badly, she second-guessed even having the party. In some cases, she felt compelled to apologize for causing them distress. 'Do not transfer your guilt onto the host,' Parker says.
Read More: 9 Ways to Set Healthy Boundaries With Your Parents
On the flipside, the woman received one denial that was so lovely, she told Parker she read it multiple times, including to her husband, and shared it with others. It read, in part: 'I was waiting to RSVP for your celebration because I was hoping to resolve a conflict we had. Unfortunately, the timing just didn't work out on that exact weekend. I want you to know that we're really touched you invited us. It's so important to mark special occasions with people you love and who love you back, and we consider ourselves in that last category.'
Aim to compliment something about your host that you genuinely admire. Maybe they always throw the most epic birthday parties, know exactly which restaurant to book, or reliably plan out-of-office mixers for colleagues in a lonely profession. The point, Parker says, 'is to honor and see what it is they're trying to do.' That will make it clear you appreciate them and cushion the blow of the fact that you can't attend.
If you genuinely feel bad about declining an invite, and hope it doesn't preclude you from being included in the future, don't refrain from expressing your enthusiasm. You might tell your friend: 'I want to say yes so badly.'
Read More: 9 Things to Say When Someone Asks Why You're Not Drinking
'Let them know this isn't you faking it,' Post adds. 'My cousin does this a lot. He's like, 'I can't say yes today, but ask me again any time you think of it. I really want to do this with you.' It works.'
No matter what, a short and to-the-point response is better than fibbing about why you can't make it to a gathering. 'Saying you're committed to something else when you're not is unnecessary,' Post says. 'Why do it when there's potential to get caught later on?' The host, after all, will be much more likely to forgive you for sitting out her second cousin's baby shower than for lying about why you can't be there.
You don't have to share that you're declining an invite due to financial reasons, but if you have a close relationship with the person, it might make sense to provide context. Post's friend, for example, is traveling to New York City this summer, and Post hopes to meet her there—but can't swing a whole week in a hotel. Post told her how much she'd like to attend, and then added: 'For me it would have to be a budget trip, and I'd need to really look into it to make sure I could commit.' From there, the two brainstormed solutions, like a shorter stay in the city.
By wording your response like this, you're making it clear that you're setting a boundary, which can be useful if someone keeps pushing you after you've said 'no' once. It's best used when you don't want to leave anything open for negotiation. 'It's short, clear, and calm,' says Cheryl Groskopf, a therapist in Los Angeles. 'You're not apologizing. You're also not being rude—just honest.' Consider this approach if you often get talked into doing things you don't want to do, she suggests. 'Directness isn't cruelty,' Groskopf says. 'It's clarity.'
This option makes sense for those who feel they have to justify why they're not attending a gathering, Groskopf says. It's an especially good choice 'if you're the kind of person who's always been the helper, the listener, the one who shows up even when they're drained,' she adds. It focuses on your capacity, rather than the event or person, which is key. You're simply saying, 'I don't have it in me right now.' 'This one also gives the other person something they can understand,' Groskopf says. 'Most people get 'I'm maxed out,' even if they don't know what's behind it.'
Wondering what to say in a tricky social situation? Email timetotalk@time.com
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aggie Beever-Jones takes chance to lead breakout night for England's next generation
After all the talk this week of who's not going to the Euros, England made sure they moved the conversation onto those who will be travelling to Switzerland this summer. Aggie Beever-Jones produced a performance, and scored a hat-trick against Portugal on her first Wembley start, that meant the excitement around the Chelsea forward will go up to another level ahead of Euro 2025. The Women's PFA Young Player of the Year seized her opportunity, with the type of display that comes from the sheer hunger of wanting to really make your case for going to a major tournament. It's what Sarina Wiegman wanted to see. Advertisement Beever-Jones followed the instructions. 'As cliche as it sounds, Sarina said, 'It's a new kit, new England today. Go out there and put a graft in',' Beever-Jones revealed. 'I think her words were 'destroy them'.' This was a reborn England, putting the noise of the past week behind them in style. 'I told them we have a job to do,' Wiegman said. 'It helps when you have energy and fun.' Beever-Jones played with that spirit. She left nothing to chance and was not the only one. Aggie Beever-Jones celebrates after scoring her hat-trick for England (The FA via Getty Images) This was perhaps not what Mary Earps had in mind when the retiring England goalkeeper spoke of wanting to step aside to 'give the younger generation an opportunity to thrive'. But Beever-Jones visibly grew in confidence with a Wembley goal tucked under her belt from the third minute, making curved runs behind the defence and demanding the ball with the sharpness of her movement. Behind her Jess Park brought nimble touches and the intelligence to turn; Grace Clinton strode around midfield as if she owned it. Beever-Jones is 21, Clinton is 22 and Park is 23. They will all be going to their first major tournament when Sarina Wiegman names her squad next week and they will all have important roles to play. Hannah Hampton, at 24, had already become England's No 1 before Earps's shock retirement this week. Wiegman is often criticised for the changes she doesn't make to her team, but over the past six months she has helped to bring through the talent that was knocking on the door. They now feel at home. Beever-Jones leads an excellent night for England and Sarina Wiegman (The FA via Getty Images) It helps, of course, when there is the experience there as well. Lauren Hemp made her first England appearance of the year after recovering from a knee injury and brought the dynamism and bursts from the left wing that only she can. Lucy Bronze marauded down the right, coming off after an hour with a poacher's finish and a wonderful assist. Keira Walsh comes to life when there is energy and movement in front of her and was faultless in midfield. Leah Williamson, standing a foot taller after leading Arsenal to Champions League glory, marshalled the back-line and sprayed some excellent passes. Advertisement We knew all this already, but there was a freshness and energy about England. Wiegman punched the air and laughed as the goals flew in during the first half. How the Lionesses manager needed a night like this, too, after the grilling she has been under in recent days. But with England's opening game of the Euros against France just over a month away, those selection headaches have never looked tougher. On a different night, England could have lined up with Alessia Russo up front, with Lauren James and Chloe Kelly either side. If James is fit, Wiegman is going to be able to take six elite forward options to Switzerland. Portugal, it should be said, were atrocious. In February, they managed to frustrate England to a 1-1 draw in the Algarve. Back then, they looked to be an organised team then with a few touches of attacking talent. But in April they conceded seven and four in heavy defeats to Spain and at Wembley plunged to rock bottom under Francisco Neto. Beever-Jones scored her second from Lucy Bronze's cross (Getty Images) But England were rampant and ruthless. With Russo nursing a calf injury, Beever-Jones took the No 9 shirt and made a compelling case for keeping it. She is a very different forward to Russo, lacking the all-round game and physicality that Russo possesses that can bring others into play, but with a sharpness and belief in front of goal that makes her such an interesting option. Advertisement 'She's a goalscorer,' Wiegman said. 'She scores goals very easy, such quick feet, tight on the ball. She played relaxed.' Beever-Jones is not on England's plane to Switzerland just yet, of course, but Wiegman's grin all but confirmed it. 'She did really well today,' Wiegman smiled. The finish for her first Wembley goal was not clean but the instinct was. After Park regained possession on the edge of the Portugal box, Beever-Jones slipped as she struck the ball and it took a deflection on the way through. But the effect it had on Beever-Jones was extraordinary; arrowing down the channels and directing others as if she was an established international. Her second was a towering header from Bronze's cross, crashing in off the bar. The hat-trick goal was another thunderous finish, struck low and inside Ines Pereira's near post after Williamson's pass forwards from defence. Chloe Kelly comes off the bench to score England's sixth (The FA via Getty Images) Portugal, by then, were in disarray. Bronze scored England's second from the goalmouth when Beth Mead was denied at close range. The Portugal defence then vanished as Mead pulled off a clever nutmeg and finished low into the corner. Pereira called a huddle inside the Portugal half after conceding the fourth, but there was little resistance throughout and virtually nothing for Hampton to do, barring a header from Andreia Norton that caught the outside of the post. England were five goals up by the break but the second half brought further positives. Alex Greenwood and Georgia Stanway also made their returns, with Greenwood playing a stunning, raking pass out wide in the move that led to Kelly's back-post header and England's sixth. They will go to Spain on Tuesday needed a victory to beat the world champions to top spot in their Nations League group, but at Wembley the Lionesses ensured they have already taken a step forward.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
From France, A Fresh Warning About Islamism
Not all that long ago, warnings about a creeping Islamist infiltration in Europe were widely ridiculed as conspiracy theories or, worse, "Islamophobia." In previous years, when politicians like Geert Wilders of the Netherlands and Britain's Michael Gove, or authors like France's Michel Houellebecq raised alarms about the growing prevalence of political Islam on the Continent, they were routinely dismissed as cranks, alarmists, or simply as racists. These days, though, such concerns are getting harder to refute. Just ask the French. The minaret of the Great Mosque of Paris is pictured. The minaret of the Great Mosque of Paris is pictured. Getty Images Last month, a new government report caused a national firestorm when it concluded that the Muslim Brotherhood, the world's most influential Islamist movement, is trying to penetrate the country and subvert its institutions. The 73-page study, excerpts from which were published in the prestigious Le Figaro, makes the case that the country's branch of the Brotherhood, known as the Federation of Muslims of France (FMF), is "involved in republican infrastructure ... in order to change it from the inside." The study details that the FMF now controls or influences nearly 10 percent of the mosques in the country, as well as running nearly 300 sports, educational, or charity organizations and close to two-dozen schools. Its objective is to establish "ecosystems at a local level" that gradually impose strict Islamic norms on society at-large. The warning is a stark one. France has long prided itself on laïcité, a foundational principle of the country's political order that provides freedom of, and from, religion for its citizens. The FMF's efforts are a direct challenge to that norm. Or, as Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau has put it, France is now facing "below-the-radar Islamism trying to infiltrate institutions, whose ultimate aim is to tip the whole of French society under sharia law." Predictably, the conclusions were greeted with the usual outrage. Far-left leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon, for instance, proclaimed on social media that the report was "fueling Islamophobia" and full of "delusional theories" aligned with the country's far right. Even French President Emmanuel Macron, who himself had belatedly ordered the production of the study last fall, after years of turning a blind eye to the problem, fretted about stigmatizing all Muslims and criticized the lack of ready solutions. He has ordered "new proposals" to address the issue in time for the next meeting of the country's Defense Council in early June—although there are real doubts, given his low popularity and battered public image, that Macron will be in a position to do anything meaningful. Voices on the country's political right, meanwhile, have grumbled that the study is too little, and far too late. The French case, though, is just the tip of the iceberg. A 2023 report by George Washington University's Program on Extremism noted that, over the past several years, assorted security services throughout Europe have mapped out what amounts to "an extensive and sophisticated network linked to the Brotherhood operates covertly in Europe, both at the national and pan-European level." Moreover, it stresses, the continent's security officials are unified in their conviction that "Brotherhood networks in Europe ... have views and goals that are problematic, subversive, undemocratic, and incompatible with basic human rights and Western society." Some European societies, at least, are starting to wake up to this reality. In Austria, successive governments have attempted to mitigate the perceived danger over the past decade by instituting reforms to the national Islam Law, shuttering mosques and deporting extremist imams, and establishing a Documentation Centre to research and monitor political Islam in the country. Germany has also been comparatively activist, and has begun domestic training for imams, stepped up its monitoring of "legalist Islamism," and started a parliamentary debate on a Muslim Brotherhood ban. Other places in Europe, though, have done far less of substance. Meanwhile, even these steps, and others like them (such as the 10-point anti-migration plan recently unveiled by Wilder's ruling Party for Freedom) suffer from a common failing. That is, they view political Islam as an overwhelmingly foreign phenomenon—one that can be addressed through hardened national borders, curbs on immigrants, and stepped-up policing. But as the new French report lays out, the danger is different. "The reality of this threat, even if it is long term and does not involve violent action, poses a risk of damage to the fabric of society and republican institutions (...) and, more broadly, to national cohesion," it states. In other words, entrenched Islamist groups within Europe are actively trying to reshape Western societies in their own image. Now that this uncomfortable reality is finally out in the open, though, the operative question becomes: what is Macron's France, and the rest of Europe, actually prepared to do about it? Ilan Berman is senior vice president of the American Foreign Policy Council in Washington, D.C. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Can AI With A Human Touch Help Restore Confidence In Customer Service?
A simple question, but one for the ages: What makes great customer service? From my experience – and borne out by our research over a number of years - customers value empathy, reassurance that their needs are understood, and confidence that appropriate action is being taken. Quite simply, they want a personal response and genuine care. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) should, in theory, help businesses provide more efficient service, supporting and freeing up employees to create better and more personal interactions. AI offers new capabilities to respond faster, personalize communication, understand connections, and spot systemic issues earlier. Yet, despite these possibilities, customer satisfaction remains stubbornly low. According to the latest UK Customer Satisfaction Index (UKCSI), a twice-yearly study of nearly 60,000 customers, satisfaction is at its lowest point in a decade, costing businesses billions every month in lost productivity and damaged customer loyalty. AI of course has huge potential to improve things. However, to fully harness its potential, we need to first understand why customer satisfaction has fallen and what the real concerns of customers are. We know that trust is becoming increasingly critical for consumers, and that there is a strong correlation between trust and customer service – our research shows that higher levels of service drive higher levels of trust. Despite growing adoption, I'm often asked: do customers really trust AI? There are many factors keeping consumers skeptical about AI in customer service, and perhaps more so about the organisations deploying it. Some examples here are frustrating chatbot experiences, a loss of control over interactions, question marks around how data and information is being used by organisations – or indeed just a genuine preference for human reassurance around complex queries and difficult situations. However, there are reasons to be enthusiastic about AI, if it's implemented correctly. Alongside improving customer interactions when implemented well, much of AI's impact comes from enhancing the customer service journey from behind the scenes. Use cases include analyzing large data sets to predict issues, providing real-time prompts to agents handling complex cases, and helping plan and allocate resources more effectively during peak times. Customer-facing AI adoption may continue to face some resistance, but its potential to improve service design and delivery – particularly for commonplace transactional interactions – offers hope for improving customer satisfaction in the future. (Photo by Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images) NurPhoto via Getty Images AI tools used in customer-facing roles can process vast amounts of information much faster than a person. For example, IBM reports that chatbots can answer nearly four-fifths of routine questions, providing quicker and more detailed responses than a human could. Air India is one example demonstrating AI's effectiveness, with nearly 97% of inbound customer queries now handled by AI, saving time and millions of dollars. AI also helps monitor interactions, analyze persistent problems, and offer real-time insights that can improve both short-term staff deployment and long-term company strategies. On top of this, it is enabling personalized customer experiences, such as faster check-ins or tailored onboarding programs. These are all great examples of how a strategic investment in AI can complement existing service strategies to the benefit of both customers and the organisation's bottom line. When you consider that the UKCSI shows that service failures continue to cost UK businesses £7.3bn per month, there is a lot to be learned from successful process improvements – however they are achieved. Recent research by a team from Harvard and The Hebrew University found that up to 50% of participants would wait for extended periods for a human response over an AI response. Furthermore, when participants believed they were interacting with a human, they read the answers as more empathetic, even when they were actually generated by AI. So, there is something in the fact that we do as human beings trust a human response more than an automated one. As our human response to these AI generated messages demonstrates, AI service tools have evolved beyond limited and robotic messages. AI can detect emotions, pick up on social cues, and respond with the appropriate tone. It can also deliver fluent responses in multiple languages - vital for industries like travel and hospitality. Ultimately however, AI becoming more human raises ethical questions that business leaders need to answer. Uncertainty around the future implications of AI is forcing leaders need to make difficult decisions that may test their moral judgement. The right choices will protect their companies' long-term reputation with customers and employees and ensure sustainable future growth. Technology is changing by the moment and offers immense potential in unlocking knowledge and data but can be cripplingly expensive when firms don't get it right – in fact, just recently we saw UK retailer Marks & Spencer face a £300m loss because due to a large-scale cyber-attack. And indeed, when we look at the £7bn a month estimated cost of service failings I mentioned above, some of this is undoubtedly caused by an over-reliance on AI-powered solutions. Technology is not a panacea. The key to serving customers well – and ensuring they stay loyal, spend more, and recommend you to others – lies in understanding their journeys and touch points. It's not a question of either/or when it comes to technology and the human interface, what matters is the context and intent behind each customer interaction. How you make your customers feel, and whether you build or erode trust in your brand though your interactions, is what counts. As customers we are seeking reassurance that the basics will be right. We are also looking for those magic moments that spark genuine delight and get us recounting our experience to others – which in turn builds up the crucial brand affinity, trust, and reputation that truly differentiates your organisation.