logo
AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CESCE México, S.A. de C.V. and CESCE Fianzas México, S.A. de C.V.

AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CESCE México, S.A. de C.V. and CESCE Fianzas México, S.A. de C.V.

Business Wire4 days ago

MEXICO CITY--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- AM Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of B++ (Good), the Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings of 'bbb' (Good) and the Mexico National Scale Rating of 'aa.MX' (Superior) of CESCE México, S.A. de C.V. (CESCEM) and its affiliate, CESCE Fianzas México, S.A. de C.V. (CESCEF). The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) is stable. Both companies are domiciled in Mexico City, Mexico.
The ratings of CESCEM and CESCEF reflect the companies' balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as their marginal operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM).
The ratings of CESCEM and CESCEF also reflect their affiliation with Compañía Española de Seguros de Crédito a la Exportación, S.A. Compañía de Seguros y Reaseguros (CESCE), which provides underwriting and business expertise, policies and procedures, and reinsurance support. Partially offsetting these positive rating factors for CESCEM and CESCEF are the competitive market dynamics in Mexico's credit insurance and surety segments.
CESCEM is 51% owned by CESCE's subsidiary, Consorcio Internacional de Aseguradores de Credito, S.A. (CIAC), and 49% owned by Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, a Mexico-based development bank. CESCEM specializes exclusively in credit insurance and ranks in the top five of Mexico's credit insurance segment.
CESCEF began operations in 2011 and is wholly owned by CIAC. CESCEF currently has a small share of Mexico's surety market. The company's business portfolio is concentrated almost completely in administrative surety, which is consistent with the portfolios of other market participants.
AM Best assesses the companies' business profile as limited given their concentration on one business line, with relatively small participation, in very competitive markets.
AM Best assesses the companies' balance sheet strength as very strong, given their historical strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR), denoting sound capitalization levels that effectively cover risk exposures. The companies' ERM is assessed as appropriate given their well-established practices and defined risk appetites substantially through a conservative underwriting and investment policy, as well as a comprehensive reinsurance program mainly placed with its parent and affiliates, with the remainder placed with high-quality counterparties.
CESCEM's operating performance assessment remains as marginal. In 2024, the business volume slightly deteriorated, the claim levels returned to historical levels, the acquisition ratio continued benefiting from the inflow of reinsurance commissions, and the administrative ratio increased considerably. Nonetheless, profitability prevailed due to investment income.
CESCEF's operating performance assessment is marginal due to sustained combined ratios that stand above premium sufficiency levels. The challenging growth environment faced in the surety sector, driven by the low volume of public projects, along with CESCEF's small market share, increases the vulnerability of the company's business model. AM Best will monitor the deployment of the company's strategy to strengthen operating performance and achieve consistent profitability.
CESCEM's stable outlooks reflect AM Best's expectation that the company will maintain its balance sheet strength assessment at the very strong level as it continues with its prudent underwriting practices.
Positive rating actions could occur if the company continues achieving a positive trend that denotes steady premium sufficiency in the medium term. Conversely, negative rating actions could occur if CESCEM's operating performance deteriorates to a level that affects its capital base.
CESCEF's stable outlooks reflect AM Best's expectation that the company will maintain its balance sheet strength assessment at the very strong level, in line with prudent underwriting practices, while maintaining its current levels of risk-adjusted capitalization.
Negative rating actions could occur as a result of CESCEF's negative bottom-line results eroding the company's capital base, either as a cause of increasing administrative expenses or lower investment income. Although unlikely, positive rating actions could occur if the company achieves a positive trend that denotes steady premium sufficiency in the medium term.
This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major healthcare business files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
Major healthcare business files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Miami Herald

time44 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Major healthcare business files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Biotechnology companies often encounter common challenges of long timelines for developing their products, the high costs associated with creating their innovations, and regulatory problems that must be solved to bring their inventions to market. Companies will amass huge amounts of debt over the years that's needed to develop medical devices, drugs, and other products, which can lead to financial distress and sometimes bankruptcy filings. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Over a 12-year period from 2011 through 2022, biotech firms filed fewer than 10 bankruptcies each year, but that changed beginning in 2023. Related: Key healthcare company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Biotech firms filed 14 cases in 2023, which was the highest number since 2010, when 14 firms filed for bankruptcy. Companies filed 13 petitions in 2024. Economic issues common to all businesses, such as rising costs of labor and products driven by inflation and rising inflation, played a role in distress over the last two years. AmplifyBio, which develops next-generation vaccines, medicine, and therapeutics, filed for Chapter 11 protection on May 17, 2025, seeking to sell all of its assets and liquidate through the bankruptcy process. The debtor's largest creditors included certain shareholders, including Battelle Services Co., owed $3.25 million; Battelle Memorial Institute, owed $1.89 million; and Kavra 14 LLC, owed $1.8 million. Distressed biotechnology company Synthego Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 5, seeking to sell its assets to its prepetition lender Perceptive Credit Holdings III L.P. in a bankruptcy sale with a stalking-horse bid calling for a credit bid of $74.4 million of debt owed to the lender, as well as a $12.5 million DIP financing. Austin, Texas-based biotechnology company Molecular Templates Inc., which develops cancer treatment drugs, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on April 20, 2025, with plans to hand its assets to its secured lender as part of a restructuring support agreement. And now, medical diagnostics company Capture Collective Inc., which is developing and commercializing medical testing equipment for early detection of radiation exposure, and two affiliates, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 27 to reorganize their debts, facing high litigation costs. Related: Major health care company files for bankruptcy to sell assets The company listed $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities in its petition filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio, including a $5.7 million disputed tax claim owed to its largest creditor Hawaii Department of Taxation. More bankruptcy: Iconic auto repair chain franchise files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular beer brand closes down and files Chapter 7 bankruptcyPopular vodka and gin brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Columbus, Ohio-based debtor and affiliates Capture Diagnostics LLC and Capture Diagnostics HIB01 had also faced costly contract disputes as a result of its Covid-19 testing business that ceased operations in May 2023. Capture Collective was unable to resolve the contract disputes with claimants after the Covid-19 testing business ended. The company said high litigation costs had exhausted all of its remaining capital resources and made it impossible for the company to obtain new venture capital, according to information provided by RK Consultants. All litigation filed against Capture Collective and its affiliates is subject to an automatic stay while the bankruptcy case proceeds. Capture Collective is developing the radiation biodosimetry diagnostic test, MiRAD, a high-throughput, microRNA biomarker-based biodosimetry assay, which enables individualized clinical biomarker quantification in direct correlation with radiation exposure. Related: Another major healthcare company files Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Luxury outerwear brand avoids tariffs as rivals try to exit China
Luxury outerwear brand avoids tariffs as rivals try to exit China

Miami Herald

time44 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Luxury outerwear brand avoids tariffs as rivals try to exit China

In 2018, for my 25th birthday, my mom and I went to the Canada Goose store in Boston. I'd been eyeing one of their famously warm jackets for years, and the store's immersive "cold room" just seemed too fun not to try. This was no gimmick. The subzero chamber blasts you with industrial chill and fake snow while you test-drive your jacket of choice (okay maybe I am exaggerating on the snow part). My mom and I went in and out of that cold room at least half a dozen times, each time trying a different jacket. After some dramatic pacing and completely ridiculous over-analysis, I finally settled on a bright red coat with a fur-lined hood. Related: Key Marshalls, TJ Maxx, and Dillard's partner bets big on USA Seven winters later? I still live in that jacket. It's survived Nor'easters, icy sidewalks, and at least one impromptu snowball fight. And while that coat is built for extreme weather, it turns out Canada Goose is also built for something else: extreme tariffs. While other brands are scrambling to shift production out of China, Canada Goose hasn't had to flinch. The brand's decision to keep most of its manufacturing close to home is suddenly looking like a genius-level move in a shaky global market. Most brands treat manufacturing like a group project: outsource everything and pray it shows up on time. Canada Goose? They're more the "do the whole project yourself and get an A" type. According to Supply Chain Drive, over 90% of the company's down-filled outerwear is made in-house in Canada. That kind of vertical integration is rare in fashion and it's giving the brand a serious edge. "Our vertical manufacturing is a real source of competitive advantage for us," President and COO Beth Clymer said during the company's Q4 2025 earnings call. "We are currently leveraging this capability more than we ever have before." Related: Huge appliance brand leaving China to avoid tariffs Translation: while other global brands are redrawing supply chain maps and scrambling to diversify away from China, Canada Goose is already sitting pretty. Their made-in-Canada model means they're mostly untouched by U.S. tariffs under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Now, that's not to say they're totally immune. About 20% of their goods are still made in Europe, and that's where they've felt some sting. But with most of their key production locked down locally, they've been able to pivot fast-something that's proving harder for competitors. Canada Goose ( (GOOS) ) might be one of the few fashion brands thriving because they're control freaks. Instead of chasing trends or racing to the cheapest factory, they've doubled down on quality, ownership, and-apparently-weatherproofing their business. And it's working. The company reduced inventory by 14% over the full fiscal year and expanded gross margins to 71.3% in the fourth quarter. All of this happened while the company dodged the kind of global supply chain chaos that has bigger brands sweating through their technical fleece. Nice. They didn't even offer a full-year forecast-not out of weakness, but because they know the consumer landscape is unstable. That's not panic. That's discipline. While others rush to rejigger production and rewrite playbooks, Canada Goose is what it's always done. The same way my red jacket hasn't lost a stitch, the company's strategy hasn't needed much tailoring either. Turns out, being built for the cold might also mean being built for uncertainty. Related: Versace, Michael Kors, Jimmy Choo stumble hard The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

‘Something you can never replace': NC widows sue Myrtle Beach aviation company after husbands 2022 plane crash deaths
‘Something you can never replace': NC widows sue Myrtle Beach aviation company after husbands 2022 plane crash deaths

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Something you can never replace': NC widows sue Myrtle Beach aviation company after husbands 2022 plane crash deaths

HORRY COUNTY, S.C. (WBTW) — Two North Carolina widows say they're heartbroken and frustrated after filing a federal lawsuit in February against a Myrtle Beach-based aviation company that may be liable for the deaths of their husbands. 'As much as we don't want to go to trial, we will do anything for justice,' widow Toni Titone said. Terry Druffel and Barrie McMurtrie died in a single-engine plane crash in a wooded area outside of Conway in September 2022. Almost six hours after the crash, widow Linda Druffel says the Horry County coroner called her and Toni Titone to tell them their husbands died at the scene. The widows told News13 the plane was in flames when it crashed. They say authorities could not identify their husbands until they found McMurtrie's logbook. 'This is the only thing I have left of my husband,' Linda said, holding the center of her necklace. 'It's his wedding ring from that crash.' The widows' wrongful death and negligence lawsuit says Druffel and McMurtrie flew McMurtrie's single-engine Piper PA-28R on September 14, 2022. The lawsuit claims Myrtle Beach-based Executive Helijet Aviation worked on that plane months earlier. Linda says experts who examined the plane told her, within about 10 minutes of the flight, oil started leaking from the engine. When Druffel and McMurtrie tried to land in a landfill area, their right wing hit a tree. Titone and Linda say their husbands were experienced pilots. McMurtrie flew for 30 years. Druffel spent 24 years in the Navy as a helicopter pilot and 25 years with his commercial pilot's license. 'My nephews, today, just got their private pilot's licenses because of Uncle Terry, who started flying with them when they were little boys,' Linda said. In its final report in December 2023, the National Transportation Safety Board said the probable cause of the crash was the mechanic's failure to install a required gasket on the vacuum pump drive pad, which led to a loss of engine power. Linda said 16 months before Druffel and McMurtrie died, another pilot crashed and died after Executive Helijet Aviation allegedly put equipment into his plane upside down. 'Three wonderful pilots, three wonderful men, were killed because of their negligence,' Linda said. Titone says Executive Helijet's insurance company initially offered her and Linda a $2 million policy. However, the insurance company eventually told the widows they would not be getting that money. Linda and Titone are suing the aviation company for more than $75,000. 'We didn't just lose our husbands,' Titone said. 'We lost a lot of financial stability, and we lost love.' 'We lost something you can never replace,' Linda added. In response to the widows' complaint, Executive Helijet Aviation denies any liability for the crash. News13 reached out to Executive Helijet's lawyer, but we have not heard back. Court records show jury selection is set for March 2, 2026. * * * Skylar Musick is a multimedia journalist at News13. Skylar is originally from Long Island, New York. She joined the News13 team in June 2024 after graduating from Villanova University in May 2024. Follow Skylar on X, formerly Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram, and read more of her work here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store