The Man Behind Bitcoin Pizza Day Spent More Bitcoin Than You Think
The famous pizzas from Laszlo Hanyecz's May 22, 2010 Bitcoin Pizza Day purchase
For Bitcoiners, May 22 – known as Bitcoin Pizza Day – is a day for feasting.
Today, Bitcoin fans around the world are savoring pizza to celebrate Laszlo Hanyecz's famous pizza order on May 22, 2010. On this day 15 years ago, Hanyecz – an early Bitcoin developer and miner – paid another early bitcoin adopter 10,000 BTC in exchange for two large Papa John's pizzas. This marked the first real world purchase of any good with the cryptocurrency, which was barely a year old at the time.
Laszlo Hanyecz's original Bitcoin Pizza Day post on May 18, 2010. His request was fulfilled by ... More another Bitcointalk users four days later.
Bitcoiners observe this greasy, bitcoin-themed simulacrum of Thanksgiving with commiseration as much as celebration, because those 10,000 BTC are now worth more than $1 billion.
But what most people don't realize is that Hanyecz may have spent as much as 79,000 BTC on follow-on pizza purchases that year, a sum that would be worth more than $8.7 billion today. And lost still in the gobsmacked reactions to the billion-dollar forfeit is the question: how did Hanyecz acquire all this bitcoin in the first place?
When I interviewed Hanyecz back in 2019, he mentioned that he spent nearly 100,000 BTC on pizza in 2010. He didn't think anything of the trades at the time.
After all, bitcoin was next to worthless then, and Hanyecz noted that Bitcointalk users – a popular forum then as now for Bitcoin discussion, and the site Hanyecz used to facilitate the original Bitcoin Pizza Day purchase – would give away bitcoin to newcomers by the hundreds or thousands.
Laszlo isn't bitter about the ordeal. He described it as though he 'was winning the internet that day' because his 'hobby bought [him] dinner.'
In fact, he was so pleased by the trade that he kept the offer open from May 22 until August 4, 2010, after which point he posted on Bitcointalk, saying, "I can't afford to keep doing it since I can't [mine]
In the same post, he thanked 'everyone who bought [him] pizza already,' so ostensibly he made additional pizza purchases between the May and August window.
Fast forward four years, Hanyecz wrote about his erstwhile bitcoin fortune in another post. 'I spent it all on pizza,' he said, with a link to the bitcoin address listed in his first ever Bitcointalk post to prove it.
The wallet shows that Laszlo sent over 79,000 BTC from the day it was created on April 10, 2010 through August 4, 2010, the day he closed his open offer to trade bitcoin for pizza. The wallet now ironically holds only enough to purchase a large pizza with the current BTC-USD rate, and it was effectively drained of its last significant bitcoin holdings in June 2011. The wallet's total outflows amount to a little over 81,432 BTC.
In 2009 and 2010, Bitcoin's block reward was 50 BTC per block (plus transaction fees), and since bitcoin blocks are mined every ten minutes on average, this means that Hanyecz's 81,432 BTC fortune represented roughly 1.5% of all mined coins at the time. So how did he amass this stash?
Hanyecz was a prolific developer in Bitcoin's early days. Not only did he design Bitcoin's first MacOS client, but he also was the first person – beside Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto – to discover that bitcoin miners could generate new coins with graphics cards (GPUs).
Hanyecz advertised his discovery in May 2010. Before this, bitcoin miners used their laptop or desktop computer processing unit (CPU) to mine bitcoin, but GPUs upgraded them with 10x more computing power to generate new bitcoin.
The discovery opened the floodgates, and the computing power that secured the bitcoin network increased 1,300-fold by the end of 2010. Ironically, the increase in competition is the very reason that Hanyecz could no longer generate 'thousands of coins a day' as he opined in the August 2010 Bitcointalk post.
Bitcoin's hashrate exploded following Bitcoin Pizza Day legend Laszlo Hanyecz's discovery of GPU ... More bitcoin mining.
With Pandora's box opened, Hanyecz's discovery also elicited a polite reprimand from Satoshi Nakamoto himself. As detailed by Nathaniel Popper in his book Digital Gold, 'Satoshi had mixed feelings' about this early introduction of GPU mining, which the Bitcoin creator seemed to have anticipated.
Satoshi emailed the following to Laszlo:
And with that, we're left with a burning question: Did Hanyecz divest himself of his bitcoin fortune as a form of absolution for hastening Bitcoin's mining centralization?
Only Hanyecz knows the answer, but he's unlikely to tell it since he rarely (if ever) gives interviews anymore. After all, why should he when the topic at hand – Bitcoin Pizza Day – is a constant reminder that he traded a future, multi-billion dollar fortune for pretty mediocre pizza?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Musk Looms Over Latest Ergen Fight Threatening EchoStar Debt
Save Welcome to The Brink. I'm Eliza Ronalds-Hannon, a senior reporter in Atlanta, covering EchoStar's missed interest payment after the Federal Communications Commission started a review. We also have updates on Wellness Pet and auto sector distress. Follow this link to subscribe. Send us feedback and tips at debtnews@ Creditors to EchoStar and its pay-TV unit Dish Network huddled over the past eight days as they came to terms with the latest curveball thrown by Charlie Ergen.
TechCrunch
34 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Superblocks CEO: How to find a unicorn idea by studying AI system prompts
Brad Menezes, CEO of enterprise vibe coding startup Superblocks, believes the next crop of billion-dollar startup ideas are hiding in almost plain sight: the system prompts used by existing unicorn AI startups. System prompts are the lengthy prompts — over 5,000-6,000 words — that AI startups use to instruct the foundational models from companies like OpenAI or Anthropic on how to generate their application-level AI products. They are, in Menezes view, like a master class in prompt engineering. 'Every single company has a completely different system prompt for the same [foundational] model,' he told TechCrunch. 'They're trying to get the model to do exactly what's required for a specific domain, specific tasks.' System prompts aren't exactly hidden. Customers can ask many AI tools to share theirs. But they aren't always publicly available. So as part of his own startup's new product announcement of an enterprise coding AI agent named Clark, Superblocks offered to share a file of 19 system prompts from some of the most popular AI coding products like Windsurf, Manus, Cursor, Lovable and Bolt. Menezes's tweet went viral, viewed by almost 2 million including big names in the Valley like Sam Blond, formerly of Founders Fund and Brex, and Aaron Levie, a Superblocks investor. Superblocks announced last week that it raised a $23 million Series A, bringing its total to $60 million for its vibe coding tools geared to non-developers at enterprises. So we asked Menezes to walk us through how to study other's system prompts to glean insights. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'I'd say the biggest learning for us building Clark and reading through the system prompts is that the system prompt itself is maybe 20% of the secret sauce,' Menezes explained. This prompt gives the LLM the baseline of what to do. The other 80% is 'prompt enrichment' he said, which is the infrastructure a startup builds around the calls to the LLM. That part includes instructions it attaches to a user's prompt, and actions taken when returning the response, such as checking for accuracy. He said there are three parts of system prompts to study: role prompting, contextual prompting, and tool use. The first thing to notice is that, while system prompts are written in natural language, they are exceptionally specific. 'You basically have to speak as if you would to a human co-worker,' Menezes said. 'And the instructions have to be perfect.' Role prompting helps the LLMs be consistent, giving both purpose and personality. For instance, Devin's begins with, 'You are Devin, a software engineer using a real computer operating system. You are a real code-wiz: few programmers are as talented as you at understanding codebases, writing functional and clean code, and iterating on your changes until they are correct.' Contextual prompting gives the models the context to consider before acting. It should provide guardrails that can, for instance, reduce costs and ensure clarity on tasks. Cursor's instructs, 'Only call tools when needed, and never mention tool names to the user — just describe what you're doing. … don't show code unless asked. … Read relevant file content before editing and fix clear errors, but don't guess or loop fixes more than three times.' Tool use enables agentic tasks because it instructs the models how to go beyond just generating text. Replit's, for instance, is long and describes editing and searching code, installing languages, setting up and querying PostgreSQL databases, executing shell commands and more. Studying others' system prompts helped Menezes see what other vibe coders emphasized. Tools like Loveable, V0, and Bolt 'focus on fast iteration,' he said, whereas 'Manus, Devin, OpenAI Codex, and Replit' help users create full-stack applications but 'the output is still raw code.' Menezes saw an opportunity to let non-programmers write apps, if his startup could handle more, such as security and access to enterprise data sources like Salesforce. While he's not yet running the multi-billion startup of his dreams, Superblock has landed some notable companies as customers, it said, including Instacart and Paypaya Global. Menezes is also dogfooding the product internally. His software engineers are not allowed to write internal tools; they can only build the product. So his business folks have built agents for all their needs, like one that uses CRM data to identify leads, one that tracks support metrics, another that balance the assignments of the human sales engineers. 'This is basically a way for us to build the tools and not buy the tools,' he sais.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto's Shocking Transformation: How Bitcoin Volatility Plummeted From 400% To 80%
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Bitcoin's journey from digital experiment to mainstream investment has been marked by one defining characteristic: extreme price volatility. However, data from NYU Stern's Volatility Lab reveals a remarkable transformation in how dramatically Bitcoin's price swings, offering important lessons for today's investors. Between 2010 and 2017, Bitcoin experienced volatility that would make even the most seasoned traders nervous. During this period, annualized volatility frequently exceeded 200% and occasionally spiked above 400%. To put this in perspective, traditional stocks typically see volatility between 15-30% annually. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . This extreme volatility reflected Bitcoin's status as an unproven digital asset with minimal institutional backing. Small trading volumes meant that even modest buy or sell orders could trigger massive price swings. News events, regulatory announcements, or technical developments could send prices soaring or crashing within hours. The 2017 cryptocurrency bubble perfectly exemplified this era. Bitcoin's price rocketed from under $1,000 to nearly $20,000 before crashing back down, creating the kind of volatility that attracted speculators while terrifying traditional investors. Following the 2017-2018 market correction, something interesting began happening. Bitcoin's volatility started declining meaningfully. Between 2018 and 2020, volatility generally ranged between 50% and 150% – still extreme by traditional standards, but a significant improvement from the earlier chaos. This period coincided with several important developments: major companies began accepting Bitcoin payments, institutional investors started taking notice, and cryptocurrency exchanges became more sophisticated and regulated. These factors contributed to deeper liquidity and more stable price discovery. Current data shows Bitcoin's volatility has continued moderating, now typically ranging between 30%-80%. While this remains substantially higher than stocks or bonds, it represents a dramatic evolution from Bitcoin's early days. Recent analysis shows Bitcoin's average volatility sitting around 80%, with minimum levels reaching as low as 31%. This represents remarkable progress for an asset that once regularly experienced 300%-400% volatility. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. This volatility evolution carries several important implications. First, Bitcoin has become more accessible to risk-conscious investors who were previously deterred by extreme price swings. Institutions and retail investors alike can now consider Bitcoin allocation with more predictable risk parameters. However, 'more stable' doesn't mean 'stable.' An 80% volatility level means investors should still expect significant price movements. Bitcoin can easily gain or lose 20%-30% in a single week, making it unsuitable for investors who can't tolerate substantial short-term losses. The data also suggests this maturation trend may continue. As Bitcoin's market capitalization grows and institutional adoption increases, basic economics suggests volatility should continue declining gradually. For investors considering Bitcoin exposure, this volatility evolution suggests several strategies. Dollar-cost averaging becomes particularly attractive, as it helps smooth out price fluctuations over time. Position sizing remains critical – financial advisors typically recommend limiting Bitcoin exposure to 1%-5% of total portfolios. Risk management takes on heightened importance. Even with reduced volatility, Bitcoin remains far more volatile than traditional assets, requiring careful consideration of overall portfolio risk. Bitcoin's volatility journey from 400% to 80% represents one of the most significant developments in cryptocurrency history. While still volatile by traditional standards, this evolution reflects Bitcoin's gradual transition from speculative experiment to legitimate asset class. For investors, this trend suggests Bitcoin is becoming more investable while remaining distinctly different from traditional assets. Understanding this evolution helps investors make informed decisions about whether and how to include Bitcoin in their portfolios, recognizing both its progress and its continued unique risk profile. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article Crypto's Shocking Transformation: How Bitcoin Volatility Plummeted From 400% To 80% originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
