After national guards deployed in D.C, are New York and Los Angeles next? Trump drops a warning
Donald Trump has taken an unprecedented step by seizing control of Washington, D.C.'s police force and deploying National Guard troops, citing a 'public safety emergency.' The president claims the city is facing a crime crisis, comparing it to 'worse than Mexico City.' However, official police data shows violent crime has actually dropped 26% this year, with homicides down 12%. The move has sparked sharp criticism from D.C. leaders, who call it a political power grab. Trump has warned New York City could be next, raising questions about how far federal intervention in local policing could go.
After deploying National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., President Donald Trump has hinted that New York and Los Angeles could face similar federal crackdowns, warning he's ready to act if local leaders 'fail to protect their citizens.' President Donald Trump on Monday took the extraordinary step of federalizing Washington, D.C.'s police force and ordering hundreds of National Guard troops into the nation's capital, declaring what he called a 'public safety emergency' and vowing to 'liberate' the city from what he described as 'out-of-control crime.'
But police data tells a sharply different story — violent crime in D.C. has actually fallen 26% this year, with homicides down about 12% compared to 2024.
Invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act — a provision that has never before been used by a sitting president — Trump transferred operational control of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) to the Justice Department for up to 30 days. Attorney General Pam Bondi will oversee the operation, working with newly appointed federal police commissioner Terry Cole. The plan includes up to 800 D.C. National Guard troops, with 100 to 200 on active duty at any given time, patrolling high-crime neighborhoods, transportation hubs, and tourist areas. 'This is Liberation Day,' Trump said from the White House, branding D.C. 'worse than Mexico City' and accusing local leaders of 'surrendering the streets to criminals.'
According to MPD statistics, the first half of 2025 has seen some of the lowest violent crime levels in three decades. Crime category Change vs. 2024 Year-to-date notes Violent crime -26% Significant decline citywide Homicides -12% Down from last year's mid-year tally Property crime -8% Slight drop in theft, burglary rates Local officials argue that the numbers reflect ongoing policing reforms and community initiatives, not a crisis requiring federal intervention.
Mayor Muriel Bowser called the move 'deeply unsettling and unprecedented' but said the city would comply, acknowledging that the Home Rule Act gives the president broad emergency powers over the capital.
D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb labeled the takeover 'unlawful' and vowed to explore legal challenges, saying, 'This is not about safety — this is about control.' Several members of the D.C. Council have condemned the move, noting the timing comes as crime is trending downward. Trump warned during his remarks that New York City 'could be next', hinting at similar federal crackdowns if local governments 'fail to protect their citizens.' Legal experts say the D.C. case is unique because the city lacks statehood, making it subject to federal authority in ways other cities are not. But they warn the precedent could embolden the White House to test the limits of federal intervention in local policing elsewhere. The surprise announcement is already fueling political tensions ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Supporters say the president is delivering on his promise to get 'tough on crime,' while critics accuse him of manufacturing a crisis for political gain. For now, D.C.'s streets will see an unprecedented mix of local officers, federal agents, and National Guard troops — even as crime numbers suggest the city was already getting safer. Q1. Why did Donald Trump take control of D.C. police? Trump cited rising crime concerns and declared a 'public safety emergency' despite data showing crime is falling.
Q2. How much has violent crime dropped in D.C. this year? Police data shows violent crime has fallen by about 26% compared to last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
'Not a single policymaking person who knows Russia,Ukraine' as Trump heads for talks with Putin
Negotiations with Moscow have been handled not by diplomats steeped in years of Russia policy, but by real estate developer Steve Witkoff, who has no background in foreign affairs When Donald Trump steps into a room with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday (August 15), the setting will be a far cry from his first headline-grabbing encounter with the Russian leader in Helsinki six years ago. That summit went so poorly that Fiona Hill, his then top Russia adviser, later admitted she had considered faking a seizure to shut it down. This time, there are unlikely to be any Russia specialists within arm's reach of the president. In his second term, Trump has purged swathes of the federal workforce, elevated loyalists over seasoned experts and sidelined the traditional machinery of foreign policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Negotiations with Moscow have been handled not by diplomats steeped in years of Russia policy, but by real estate developer Steve Witkoff, who has no background in foreign affairs. Former ambassador Eric Rubin says Trump 'does not have a single policymaking person who knows Russia and Ukraine advising him', Financial Times reported. Ordinarily, before a meeting of this magnitude, the US national security council (NSC) would be corralling input from across government to prepare the president for anything Putin might throw at him. Known for his command of detail and skill in exploiting gaps in an opponent's knowledge, Putin has been in power for a quarter of a century. That process has been hollowed out. Dozens of foreign policy and national security officials were forced out of the NSC in May. More than 1,300 state department employees were let go last month, including many analysts covering Russia and Ukraine. The diplomatic corps has also been hit hard; the American Foreign Service Association estimates around a quarter of foreign service officers have quit since January. Top posts dealing with Russia and Ukraine remain unfilled. The administration insists the cuts will make the government 'leaner' and more responsive. Deputy White House press secretary Anna Kelly said Trump still gets input from leaders at the state department, NSC and intelligence agencies before making decisions. But in practice, the most senior roles are concentrated in the hands of a few figures, including secretary of state Marco Rubio, who is also serving as acting national security adviser. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has said the Alaska meeting will be 'a feel-out' and that he will know 'within two minutes' whether progress is possible. 'I may say 'lots of luck, keep fighting', or I may say 'we can make a deal',' he told reporters this week. For many former officials, that approach rings alarm bells. Daniel Fried, a former ambassador to Poland, warned: 'You can't have him and Witkoff winging it because they just don't know enough. You need somebody in the room who can just look at the president, roll his eyes and shake his head.' In Helsinki in 2018, Trump publicly questioned his own intelligence agencies' findings on election interference, accepting Putin's denials instead. Back then, he had what were described as the 'adults in the room' – experienced hands who tried to temper his impulses. John Bolton, his national security adviser at the time, recalled trying to brief Trump on nuclear weapons during the flight to Helsinki, while the president watched a football match. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This time, those guardrails are gone. Fried put it bluntly: 'This is not an administration that is going to have an experts-led process.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
Lula hits back at Trump over judiciary attacks, says US president would face trial in Brazil if January 6 riots happened there
President Lula da Silva has rebuked Donald Trump's escalating campaign against the country's judiciary, saying the US leader would face trial in Brazil if the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots had happened there. Read here Brazilian President Lula da Silva has pushed back against President Donald Trump's campaign targeting the country's judiciary, saying the US leader would face trial in Brazil had the January 6 US Capitol attacks taken place there, the Guardian reported. Lula's comments come amid what analysts describe as one of the deepest diplomatic rifts between Washington and Brasília in decades. Trump has imposed 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports and sanctioned a supreme court justice, the moves which are widely considered as an attempt to aid Trump's far-right ally and former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who faces up to 40 years in prison over allegations of plotting a coup after losing the 2022 election to Lula. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bolsonaro could face up to 40 years in prison when Brazil's supreme court delivers its verdict in the coming weeks. Trump has denounced the case as a 'witch-hunt' and urged Brazilian authorities to drop the charges. Lula also dismissed US criticism of Brazil's human rights record after the State Department's annual report accused his administration of stifling democratic debate and restricting the speech of Bolsonaro supporters, journalists, and elected officials. 'There was really no reason to hit Brazil with tariffs, and nor will we accept being told that we don't respect human rights here in Brazil,' Lula said. Drawing a sharp contrast between Brazil's handling of political unrest and Trump's pardons for January 6 participants, Lula noted that 141 people are serving prison terms for joining the 8 January 2023 riots in Brasília, which prosecutors say formed part of Bolsonaro's coup attempt. In the US, Trump granted 'full, complete and unconditional' pardons to about 1,500 people involved in the Capitol assault soon after taking office last year. Lula urged Brazilians not to be intimidated by Trump's pressure campaign, adding that his administration had repeatedly tried to negotiate with Washington before the tariffs were enacted. According to Brazilian diplomats, those overtures went unanswered, with key decisions reportedly taken within Trump's inner circle, a group to which they had no access. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Unveiling a long-anticipated aid package on Wednesday to offset the impact of steep US tariffs, Brazil's government said it would offer credit lines for exporters and increase government purchases of goods struggling to find new markets. A delegation of Brazilian senators travelled to Washington in the final week of July in a last-ditch effort to defuse tensions. The group, led by Senator Nelsinho Trad, met with business leaders with ties to Brazil and nine US senators, only one of them Republican, Thom Tillis of North Carolina. 'We found views on Brazil were ideologically charged,' Trad told The AP. 'But we made an effort to present economic arguments.' While the delegation was in Washington, Trump signed the order imposing the 50% tariff. But there was relief: not all Brazilian imports would be hit. Exemptions included civil aircraft and parts, aluminium, tin, wood pulp, energy products and fertilizers. Trad believes Brazil's outreach may have helped soften the final terms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I think the path has to remain one of dialogue and reason so we can make progress on other fronts,' he said. With inputs from agencies
India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump warns Russia of ‘very severe consequences' if Putin blocks Ukraine deal
US President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin, threatening "severe consequences" if Moscow obstructs peace in on Wednesday, Trump hinted that punitive measures -- possibly economic sanctions -- could follow if their scheduled meeting in Alaska on Friday fails to produce Trump did not specify what the consequences could be. He stressed that the talks would serve as a stepping stone for a possible second meeting, this time involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy."Will Russia face any consequences if Vladimir Putin does not agree to stop the war after your meeting on Friday?"@POTUS: "Yes, they will." Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 13, 2025advertisement "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump told reporters. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there."The US president also said the conflict in Ukraine was the result of the Biden administration's policies, saying, "This is Biden's work, this is not my work. He got us into this thing. This war would have never happened if I were the President. But it is what it is. I am here to fix it."He emphasised his record on global conflicts, claiming, "If we can save a lot of lives, it will be a great thing. I have stopped five wars in the last six months. On top of that, we wiped out the nuclear capability of Iran, obliterated it."EU, UKRAINE DRAW RED LINES AHEAD OF ALASKA TALKSThe warning comes after a high-level virtual call between Trump, Zelenskyy, and European leaders, hosted by Germany, to outline non-negotiable positions ahead of the Alaska talks."We had a very good call. He was on the call. President Zelenskyy was on the call. I would rate it a 10, very friendly," Trump President Emmanuel Macron said Trump had agreed that Ukrainian land could not be negotiated away without Kyiv's consent. Macron also noted that Trump backed the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine in any post-war Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated that the principle of borders being respected must remain intact. "If there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and we Europeans should increase the pressure," Merz said, adding that Trump "shares this position very extensively."The Alaska meeting is intended to address the nearly three-and-a-half-year-old war -- the largest conflict in Europe since World War II. Trump has previously suggested that some form of territorial exchange might be necessary to end the fighting, an idea met with deep concern in Kyiv and across travelled to Berlin for consultations before the virtual call, warning allies that Putin's recent military gains in eastern Ukraine were part of a broader strategy to pressure Kyiv into told the US president and all our European colleagues that Putin is bluffing about wanting to end the war," Zelenskyy said. "Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine, but this is an attempt to intimidate before the Alaska talks."Meanwhile, the Kremlin has shown little sign of softening its stance. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeev reiterated that Moscow's demands remain unchanged since last the scenes, officials have been considering potential locations for a three-way summit involving Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy, should the Alaska meeting yield progress. European governments have welcomed Trump's initiative but remain firm that no agreement should be made without Ukraine's direct participation.- EndsWith inputs from AgenciesTune InMust Watch
