
Stimulant Medications Don't Cause Psychosis, New Study Finds
Instead, the new study found children with more severe attention and hyperactivity issues or other mental health conditions such as anxiety were more likely to be medicated for ADHD. These children were also more likely to experience psychotic episodes, suggesting stimulants such as Adderall were not the cause.
'These results provide reassurance both to families and to prescribers that routine ADHD medication treatment is unlikely to cause psychotic experiences,' said Ian Kelleher, PhD, chair of child and adolescent psychiatry in the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences at The University of Edinburgh in Edinburgh, Scotland, who led the trial.
Kelleher and his colleagues used data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, a longitudinal study tracking brain development and child health in the United States. The study included more than 8300 children and teens who were between 9 years and 14 years of age from 2016 to 2020.
At the beginning of the study, none of the children were taking a prescription stimulant. In the first year, 460 kids were prescribed a drug for ADHD, which included methylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate, amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine. They did not have information on the dose of medication. Researchers then compared rates of psychosis among these children with approximately 7900 children who were not on one of these medications.
The researchers analyzed self-reported questionnaires from each child, which they filled out at baseline and again 1 year into the study. The screener for psychosis risk asked 21 questions about whether they had experienced hallucinations or delusions, and if so, how distressed they were by these experiences.
Among the population taking stimulants, the drugs were not associated with psychosis after adjusting for confounding factors that can predispose a person to psychosis, including mental illness, parental income, and race (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.71-1.56).
In the unweighted analysis, children prescribed ADHD medications were about 1.5 times more likely to have had a psychotic episode than those not taking a stimulant (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15-1.84).
Those who had more severe ADHD symptoms, like hyperactivity or impulsiveness, and those who had other, co-occurring mental health symptoms like anxiety and depression, were most likely to report psychotic episodes. This group, as well as boys generally, were also more likely to have been prescribed stimulants.
'It's important to recognize that any difference in risk may not be due to stimulant treatment,' Kelleher said. 'If you take children with ADHD and you divide them into two groups, kids treated with medication and kids not treated with medication, those two groups are not the same.'
Kelleher said previous research linking stimulants with episodes of psychosis had not done a thorough job of factoring in a person's mental health or severity of ADHD.
One observational study published in 2024 suggested higher doses of prescription amphetamines were associated with more than a fivefold increase in the risk of developing psychosis.
A 2023 meta-analysis also cited studies suggesting taking higher doses of stimulants than typically prescribed for ADHD could cause psychosis. An observational study published in 2024, in the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , concluded that while risk for psychosis was low, taking amphetamines and atomoxetine for longer periods of time may increase a person's risk for psychosis. However, the authors of the meta-analysis did note that clinicians may have misidentified a child's symptoms as ADHD instead of signs of psychosis.
In addition to factors like race and age, researchers should consider that hallucinations and delusions are 'quite common' during childhood, said Melissa Batt, MD, MPH, an assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, who was not involved with the trial. They should take this knowledge into account when looking into potential causes of psychotic episodes in kids.
'They are usually fleeting and usually go away,' Batt said, adding that only a small number of young people who report having a psychotic episode are eventually diagnosed with a psychotic disorder. 'Upwards of 90% do not go on to have a diagnosis,' she said.
Batt said one limitation of the study was the 9- to 14-year-old age range.
'They are missing a pretty critical range of folks, especially older teens and people in their 20s. Those are the ages that we see who develop psychosis or mania,' she said.
Batt agreed observational studies left out a lot of factors that could connect psychotic episodes to influences other than stimulant medications. Family history, she said, is a huge influence in whether a person develops a psychotic disorder.
Future trials should build on these new findings and take different patient characteristics into account, she said.
'We should be looking at family history, other medications they are taking, they could be using other substances such as cannabis, which they didn't control for,' she said. 'That is a huge variable we should be looking at.'.
This study was funded in part by an International Secondment Award to J.F.B. from the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences. The study authors reported receiving financial support from the St John of God Research Foundation and the Health Research Board, among others.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASA Wasn't Happy When Astronaut John Young Smuggled This Food Into Space
On March 23, 1965, NASA launched astronauts Virgil "Gus" Grissom and John Young into orbit on the Gemini III mission. The launch was the result of countless hours of preparation and research, and, of course, millions upon millions of dollars. Every detail of the mission was meticulously planned, including approved foods that could be eaten once up and out of the atmosphere. NASA didn't send many provisions on the mission (it was less than five hours long). In fact, there were only rations for Young. Young took it upon himself to smuggle in a meal for Grissom, one he knew that Grissom enjoyed. The sneaky astronaut tucked a corned beef sandwich on rye bread into his spacesuit without informing NASA, a move which the space giant (and Congress) wasn't happy about once the secret was uncovered. Once the astronauts were in orbit, Young passed the sandwich to his commander, who ate some of the sandwich but hid the remainder in his own pocket. It's unclear when NASA found out about the unapproved food, but the two rule-breakers were disciplined by their employer once the beef was out of the bag. The event even appears in the Guinness Book of World Records as the first food smuggled into space, further cementing the exchange in history. The sandwich (or rather, a replica caked in resin) and the incident is memorialized at the Grissom Memorial Museum in Mitchell, Indiana. You may be wondering what the big deal is. The fact is, any foods allowed to go out of this world are thoroughly vetted because certain items can be downright dangerous for either the astronauts or the spacecraft itself. Read more: Once Popular Sandwiches People Don't Eat Anymore Space food and menu planning are an important part of any space mission. Not only do the nutritional and caloric needs of the astronauts need to be taken into account, but logistics as well. For example, there's limited storage space. If a food is too bulky, it might get banned to prioritize smaller, more calorie-dense items. The lack of gravity is another factor, as is any mess potential. In fact, mess is precisely why bread is on NASA's list of banned foods. Bread crumbs will begin to float in the absence of gravity and could potentially end up in an astronaut's eye or in important equipment. Tortillas are NASA's preferred type of grain. For similar reasons, salt and pepper are also not allowed in space, but that doesn't mean space food must be bland. Liquid seasonings have been developed for astronauts to use. Carbonated drinks like sodas stay on earth. In space, the carbon dioxide (bubbles) in these beverages don't rise up and out of the liquid. If a person were to drink one in orbit, they'd be ingesting more carbonation than they would if they were drinking one on earth. This can cause stomach aches. Space food has come a long way since the first Mercury missions, where food was largely freeze-dried, unappetizing, and packaged in aluminum tubes. As space exploration has evolved, so has the menu for astronauts. It's unclear whether corned beef (which isn't the same as pastrami) on tortillas is allowed to go to infinity and beyond, but we do know that bacon already made it to the moon with NASA's approval. For more food and drink goodness, join The Takeout's newsletter. Get taste tests, food & drink news, deals from your favorite chains, recipes, cooking tips, and more! Read the original article on The Takeout.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
These Are the 4 Most Unfriendly Myers-Briggs Personality Types, According to a Psychotherapist
These Are the 4 Most Unfriendly Myers-Briggs Personality Types, According to a Psychotherapist originally appeared on Parade. Everybody's different, and we've all had our own unique experiences in life that have shaped us. In the intricate tapestry of human personalities, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) stands out as one of the most renowned and widely used personality assessment tools. The MBTI identifies individuals' preferences across four areas: extraversion (E) vs. introversion (I), sensing (S) vs. intuition (N), thinking (T) vs. feeling (F) and judging (J) vs. perceiving (P), resulting in 16 personality types. It ultimately indicates differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make each Myers-Briggs personality type carries its unique strengths and charms, some personalities have been perceived as less friendly than others. Mayya Fleyshmakher, MA, LPC, is a licensed clinical psychotherapist who utilizes the MBTI in her own private practice to help clients with their career choices and advancements as they progress. Here, she offers her expert insight to answer the ultimate question: what are the most unfriendly Myers-Briggs personality types? The answers may surprise you!Related: There is no singular Myers-Briggs personality type that can be drawn as the most unfriendly of them all. However, particular dichotomies of these differing types may make them seem more unfriendly than others. Fleyshmakher tells Parade, "The 'Thinking' (T) types might be more prone to exhibit cold or detached behavior due to their focus on logic and objectivity over emotional considerations." She continues, "They may lack empathy, therefore portraying signs of misattunement, appearing to be unfriendly and even selfish." These "Thinking" types that may seem more unfriendly include INTJ, INTP, ENTJ and ENTP. And out of all the types to be considered the most unfriendly Myers-Briggs personality types, Fleyshmakher says that the INTJ seems to face more isolating behaviors due to introverted tendencies. This often leads them to be more reserved and less empathetic towards others. So, if you're friends with one of these "Thinking" Myers-Briggs types, try to keep in mind that they are not purposely being unfriendly. These personality types tend to lean on facts and logic over acting on emotion. "It's crucial to remember that such traits do not necessarily indicate hostility or unkindness; rather, they reflect a different approach to processing and expressing emotions. When factoring in trauma, you might even meet 'Thinking' types who utilize this personality trait to bypass dealing with complex emotions, often resorting to numbing responses," Fleyshmakher The most important consideration to remember when utilizing the MBTI is that no personality type is inherently unfriendly. People are complex and unique beings, and it's imperative that the role of individual trauma is not overlooked. "Determining more or less 'friendlier' types of the MBTI requires consideration as to how trauma affects these personality traits in the first place," Fleyshmakher explains. Our society has long associated the word "trauma" with intense experiences, like abuse and war combat. However, the updated definition of trauma is generally understood as an emotional response to a distressing or disturbing event(s) that overwhelms an individual's ability to cope. Fleyshmakher adds, "Considering how we now define trauma, more and more individuals report that they have experienced some level of trauma in their lifetime." She continues, "The Myers-Briggs and its types present limitations, as it does not set out to factor the role of trauma on personality." As with any tool similar to the MBTI, it's not a one-size-fits-all and must be carefully reviewed, relative to each person. When considering individualized trauma and the use of the MBTI, some trauma responses may mimic the Myers-Briggs personality features. "Individuals with trauma symptoms exhibit hyper-independence, overthinking and mistrust. Many of my clients are shocked to find out that what they thought was part of their personalities turned out to be symptoms, which quickly changed once they completed trauma work." Fleyshmakher adds, "Therefore, what may seem as the unfriendly, introverted types of the MBTI are really just the symptoms of difficult childhoods and stress."Related: Contrasting their highly logical counterparts, the "Feeling" (F) types tend to prioritize empathy and emotions in their decision-making process, often leading to a more friendly demeanor. These more friendly Myers-Briggs personality types include INFJ, INFP, ENFJ and ENFP."The ability to display empathy is a key factor in fostering healthy platonic and romantic relationships and, overall, 'Feeling' types come off as the friendlier types of the Myers-Briggs," Fleyshmakher shares. "Individuals who struggle in finding the right partner often overlook prioritizing empathy as above looks or status. These types might find more success in looking to formulate relationships with 'Feeling' types."Fleyshmakher tells Parade that she often shies away from creating rigid definitions of personality because there is usually always more work lying beneath the surface. She touches upon her own experience from a psychotherapist's lens: "I have met many 'Feeling' types who fall under the ENFP types that, upon doing deeper work in therapy, learned their complacent and often lovable, friendly demeanor was a learned behavior from childhood, specifically in learning to survive with abrasive, volatile and harsh parents." Related: Overall, the MBTI can provide insight into an individual's preferences and tendencies. It shows differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions. However, the MBTI should not be used as a definitive assessment of personality or as the sole basis for therapeutic her own private practice, Fleyshmakher uses the MBTI to help clients with their career choices and advancements—with the important caveat that it is only utilized once a client has completed the appropriate clinical interventions to help them process and heal trauma. Thus, therapists may use the MBTI to better understand a client's communication style, decision-making processes and coping mechanisms. But, considering individualized trauma and responses will allow for a more accurate reading of the Myers-Briggs Due to its popularity, there are many variations of the MBTI test online. However, the original assessment, which is still utilized by certified practitioners, is considered the most accurate, as it involves a structured and methodical approach. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was first developed by Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers. The assessment was based heavily on Carl Jung's theory of psychological types. Up Next:Mayya Fleyshmakher, MA, LPC, is a licensed clinical psychotherapist in private practice in Holmdel, New Jersey. Fleyshmakher specializes in trauma-focused EMDR Therapy and spreading awareness about the importance of trauma work, specifically in educating people about how they perceive, define and treat can connect with Mayya here: Website Instagram TikTok These Are the 4 Most Unfriendly Myers-Briggs Personality Types, According to a Psychotherapist first appeared on Parade on Jul 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Dinner With King Tut' Review: The Taste of Ancient Egypt
The science writer Sam Kean's all-in approach to research is evident not only from the ink on the pages of his books but from the ink on his skin. In 'Dinner With King Tut: How Rogue Archaeologists Are Re-creating the Sights, Sounds, Smells, and Tastes of Lost Civilizations,' Mr. Kean spends time with various specialists devoted to understanding the lives of our distant ancestors. In the course of his travels, he makes stone tools, tans leather, mummifies a fish and renders seal blubber into oil. The depth of the writer's commitment is tested when he meets with a Southern Californian tattooist proficient in ancient methods of body art. While he is, in his own words, 'not a tattoo guy,' the author feels obligated to submit to the artist's needle, settling on a small asterisk on his thigh. 'Given how universal tattooing was in prehistory, I realized I'd always have a gap in my understanding of life unless I sucked it up and got a hand-poked tattoo myself,' he writes, referring to the manual method some experts believe was used to ink Ötzi, a 5,300-year-old mummy discovered in the Alps. Traditional archaeology holds little appeal for Mr. Kean. He recalls time spent at archaeological digs, where he observed practitioners meticulously sifting through dirt, as 'such a letdown, the most godawful tedium I could imagine.' He's instead drawn to the burgeoning subfield of experimental archaeology (also known as experiential or living archaeology), whose adherents attempt to accurately replicate elements of ancient people's lives. Each chapter of this lively book covers a specific time and place, beginning 75,000 years ago on the African savanna and concluding with 16th-century Mexico. Stops along the way include ancient Egypt, Imperial Rome, Viking Europe and medieval China. Each chapter presents an overview of life during the period and introduces the experimental archaeologists Mr. Kean meets in his travels. (Some, it should be said, aren't technically archaeologists but are, in the author's fond description, 'screwball enthusiasts.')