logo
Trump looms over Virginia governor's race: What to know on primary day

Trump looms over Virginia governor's race: What to know on primary day

USA Today5 hours ago

Trump looms over Virginia governor's race: What to know on primary day November's winner will make history as the first female governor of Virginia: Abigail Spanberger for the Democrats or Winsome Earle-Sears for the GOP
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Watch Gov. Glenn Youngkin's full Republican National Convention speech
Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin delivered an address at the 2024 Republican National Convention.
Virginians are heading to the polls in one of this year's banner election fights where President Donald Trump's name isn't on the ballot but his second-term policies are very much top of voters' minds.
The most consequential of the June 17 primary races center around who will be the next governor of the Old Dominion, a state that has seen its share of the federal government workforce shrink at the hands of Trump and former DOGE leader Elon Musk.
Both of Virginia's expected major party nominees - former Rep. Abigail Spanberger for the Democrats and Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears for the Republicans - ran unopposed in their respective primaries and are readying for a general election race over the next five months that's expected to showcase a sharp contrast in approaches to working with the Trump White House. Whoever wins will make history as the first female governor of Virginia.
More: A critical 2025 election race takes shape: 3 big takeaways from NJ primary
Nationwide, politicos will be paying close attention to the results in both Virginia and New Jersey - the two states that hold gubernatorial contests that tap into voters' moods in the immediate odd year after a presidential election and before the midterms.
Notably, the party opposite to whomever is currently in the White House has a history of winning the Virginia governor's mansion and the right to serve a single non-consecutive term. In a dozen governor races over the last 50 years, only once has a candidate from the same party as the sitting president won in Virginia - Democrat Terry McAuliffe in November 2013 while President Barack Obama was in his second term.
Governor's race set
Of the six statewide primary races in Virginia, only two feature more than one candidate on the June 17 ballot.
Republicans have long had their nominee for governor in Earle-Sears, the 61-year old first female woman of color to hold statewide office in Virginia. She locked down her spot after the only would-be competitor, former state Sen. Amanda Chase, failed to get enough signatures to qualify for the ballot.
The GOP similarly already knows who its November general election candidates are for lieutenant governor - conservative radio host John Reid - and attorney general, the incumbent Jason Miyares.
The Democrats are in the same boat for governor: 45-year-old Spanberger secured her spot back on April 3 after no other candidates emerged by that day's filing deadline. A former CIA officer who served three terms in Congress, Spanberger built a reputation on Capitol Hill as a moderate member of the centrist "Blue Dog" coalition.
Her early jump into campaigning beginning in November 2023, and prolific fundraising, may have given Spanberger the advantage needed to discourage any potential challengers from even trying, said Professor David Richards, chair of the political science department at the University of Lynchburg.
"It just became apparent that if you were going to challenge her, it was going to be very difficult," Richards said.
Earle-Sears has long held the advantage among Republicans as the No. 2 under incumbent GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who because of Virginia's unique law cannot serve consecutive terms. Her only blip of competition came from Chase, who billed herself as "Trump in heels" and challenged Earle-Sears as not MAGA enough for the GOP nomination.
Federal workers flashpoint
Democrats in Virginia are hoping Trump's decisions next door in Washington, D.C., will help to curry them favor in the state's election − particularly his cuts to the federal workforce.
Largely at the direction of Musk, the Trump administration has tried to get rid of tens of thousands of government employees since the outset of his second term. While the moves have been felt across the U.S., Virginia stands out with more than 140,000 federal employees who called the commonwealth home at the close of 2024.
"We know that Virginia's economy, the health of our state, is tied intricately on the good work that is happening by so many who are working at the (Department of Veterans Affairs), at IRS, the Library of Congress, all throughout our government," Spanberger told a roomful of voters at an event in March. "As governor, I will stand up not just for the individuals who focus on serving our country in their day-to-day job, but our whole economy."
Republicans counter that Trump is a popular brand who will help them win in November.
"Democrats are using the same playbook: hoping President Trump will again galvanize their base and distract voters from their state-level failures," Edith Jorge-Tuñón, the president of the Republican State Leadership Committee, wrote in a June 2 Wall Street Journal opinion piece. "But this time Republicans are ready, and we're playing offense."
Trump a main character in Democrats' AG race
Trump's name has been popping up regularly in Virginia's primary to be the nominee for Democratic attorney general, with the winner entering the general election contest in November against Miyares.
The two leading candidates - former state Rep. Jay Jones and Shannon Taylor, the commonwealth's attorney for Henrico County - have made versions of a campaign promise to "stand up to Trump" if elected as Virginia's top legal official.
If successful, they'd likely be quick to join other Democratic attorneys general who have spent the last several months filing ongoing lawsuits against Trump and his administration, including a case related to the federal workforce cuts.
Trump has railed against other state attorneys general for similar campaigns, calling their scrutiny political persecution. It's an argument that Virginia Republicans plan to push against Democrats into the fall, too.
"The law is a shield, not a sword to use against political enemies," Miyares' spokesman, Alex Cofield, told USA TODAY. "If they think that's the role of this office, then it's no small wonder why their policies keep getting rejected by voters. We look forward to the contrast in November."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Trump shatters ethics norms with a Qatari jet and a $499 smartphone, experts lament Biden's ‘failure' to pass reforms
As Trump shatters ethics norms with a Qatari jet and a $499 smartphone, experts lament Biden's ‘failure' to pass reforms

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As Trump shatters ethics norms with a Qatari jet and a $499 smartphone, experts lament Biden's ‘failure' to pass reforms

Ethics watchdogs rarely mince words about President Donald Trump. They've called him the most corrupt and conflicted president in US history. And since he returned to the White House, they've watched with horror as he privately dined with wealthy investors for his personal memecoin fund, brazenly accepted a $400 million luxury airplane from Qatar and purged inspectors general from federal agencies. Adding to their long list of gripes, the president's company announced Monday that it was launching Trump Mobile, a wireless service with monthly plans and a $499 smartphone, which would be regulated by many of the federal agencies now run by Trump appointees. That has led to soul-searching among Washington, DC's self-appointed ethics watchdogs at advocacy groups and think tanks, who are wondering how this could've been prevented. Some have championed liberal causes for years; others aren't beholden to either party but are stunned by Trump's sea-change to the ethics landscape. While they primarily hold Trump responsible for his own actions, they're increasingly concluding that former President Joe Biden also deserves some of the blame. 'The single biggest failure of the Biden administration was that he and Congress didn't pass any post-Watergate-style reforms,' said Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, director of government affairs at the nonpartisan Project on Government Oversight. 'President Biden had zero interest in doing that, and congressional Democrats didn't have much interest.' Many of these experts, including Biden allies, say much more could've been done to get legislation across the finish line when Democrats had unified control in DC. House Democrats passed a landmark ethics and democracy bill in late 2021, but it languished. It would've banned officials from taking foreign money (as Trump has with his memecoin). It would've tightened the rules for who can serve as acting leaders at federal agencies (a loophole Trump used to install loyalists). It would've protected civil servants from being reclassified and fired (which Trump is trying to do). it would've added job protections for inspectors general (Trump summarily fired more than a dozen in January). And it would've added transparency to the pardon process (which Trump has wielded to reward allies). But one former Biden administration official faulted Trump alone. 'Blaming Biden when Trump breaches ethical norms is a prime example of the Democratic Party's problem right now,' the former Biden administration official told CNN. 'The suggestion is that the previous administration should have passed more laws? They're not following the current ones. The reality is, there is no way to Trump-proof the government.' In response to CNN's questions about Trump breaking ethics norms, White House spokesman Harrison Fields said Trump is 'restoring the integrity of the Executive Branch' and claimed Trump's administration is the 'most transparent in American history.' The Office of Government Ethics didn't respond to requests for comment about how Trump is avoiding conflicts of interests. (In February, Trump fired the Biden-appointed director of the agency, who was confirmed in December by the Senate in a party-line vote.) The Trump Organization rolled out a new ethics pledge in January. Attorneys for the company said Trump won't be involved in managing his real estate empire, that they won't pursue new deals with foreign governments, and that an outside adviser would review all major deals – including deals with foreign businesses that will be allowed to continue. Trump took these steps voluntarily, 'to avoid even the appearance of any conflict,' the lawyers wrote, even though some federal ethics laws don't apply to the president, and 'neither federal law nor the United States Constitution prohibits any President from continuing to own, operate and/or manage their businesses' while in the White House. Presidents have limited time and political capital to enact their agenda. Some outside experts said it was clear that Biden prioritized other landmark laws – on Covid-19 relief, health care, climate change, infrastructure and gun control – instead of ethics reforms. 'That should have been the low-hanging fruit for Congress and the president when there was unified control,' said Daniel Weiner of the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice. Hedtler-Gaudette said that during strategy sessions about reforms, Biden White House officials would often say they were doing their part by 'promoting a culture of compliance' by adhering to ethics laws. 'But compliance means you're complying with the weak set of laws that are already on the books,' Hedtler-Gaudette said, 'and not improving them.' House Democrats did pass the Protecting Our Democracy Act in December 2021, but the Democratic-run Senate never took action on the legislation. (Ten Republicans would've needed to cross party lines to break a filibuster for the Senate to even consider the bill.) 'The Biden administration did not put its weight behind that, and those sorts of reforms really need the buy-in of the administration,' Weiner said. 'It should've been a priority.' A former Democratic Hill staffer, who requested anonymity to speak candidly, said ethics bills 'fell by the wayside' under Biden to make space for more pressing national needs. 'We were still in the worst parts of the pandemic. There were a lot of critical, in-your-face issues that needed to be fixed,' they said. 'We had just defeated Trump, and it was difficult for Democrats to wrap their heads around the fact that he could really come back. These ethics bills would've moved up the priority list if we had internalized that possibility.' Donald Sherman, the top lawyer at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, a liberal-leaning watchdog group, said Trump has redefined what the mainstream deems acceptable. 'Government corruption isn't unique to one political party,' Sherman said. 'But Trump is singular in shifting the Overton window so far, in breaking rules that most people in government could never even imagine breaking, that it's impossible to ignore.' CREW calls itself nonpartisan and has filed ethics complaints in the past against top Democrats, including under Biden. But like many 'good government' groups, it has increasingly adopted a staunch anti-Trump posture, as he keeps pushing the limits. In that vein, CREW led the unsuccessful effort to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot based on the Constitution's 'insurrectionist ban.' These watchdog groups are looking back longingly to when Trump's power was at its nadir. Trump's approval rating tanked after the January 6, 2021, insurrection. And when Biden was sworn in, Democrats had unified control of Washington for the first time in a decade. In those early weeks of the Biden era, a bipartisan House majority voted to impeach Trump, and a bipartisan Senate majority supported the effort, though it fell short of the 67 senators needed for conviction. 'The period after January 6, in the first years of President Biden's term, was an example of a missed opportunity,' Sherman said. 'This is a glaring moment now, because the corruption of President Trump's first term has predictably escalated.'

China's Cosco Eyes Stake in MSC-BlackRock Panama Ports Deal
China's Cosco Eyes Stake in MSC-BlackRock Panama Ports Deal

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China's Cosco Eyes Stake in MSC-BlackRock Panama Ports Deal

Cosco Shipping could potentially be a new partner in the deal that would transfer two ports on the sides of the Panama Canal to Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and BlackRock. China's largest container shipping company is one of multiple Chinese state-backed companies that is in discussion to invest in the consortium to buy more than 40 ports from port operator CK Hutchison Holdings, according to a report from Bloomberg. More from Sourcing Journal Apparel Tariffs Climbed to Historic Highs in April China-to-US Freight Rates 'No Longer Surging'-Is it All Downhill from Here? Trump Touts Higher Duty Rate for Chinese Imports Under New Trade Deal The addition of Chinese investors emerged as a potential option as the current iteration of the deal has hit regulatory roadblocks in the country amid a power struggle with the U.S. over influence on the trade artery. The Panama Canal Authority acknowledged the sale could put the waterway's neutrality at risk. China's antitrust body is currently probing the deal after reports that President Xi Jinping was unhappy with the port sale by Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison. It is unclear what stake Cosco would have if a port deal took place, or what ports it would gain control over. The deal itself followed President Donald Trump's rhetoric that the U.S. should 'take back' the canal, partly due to Washington's worries that Hutchison's ownership of the adjacent ports poses national security concerns for U.S. trade interests. But according to the Bloomberg report, the idea to include Chinese investors in the MSC/BlackRock consortium came to be after high-stakes tariff negotiations in Switzerland concluded last month between Chinese and U.S. officials. Cosco's—or any other Chinese company's—involvement could still sound off some bells due to their state-owned status, according to analysis by Drewry provided after a webinar on the deal held Thursday. 'This will be problematic in many jurisdictions, for example Cosco was limited to taking only a 24.99 percent stake in Container Terminal Tollerort in Hamburg' in 2021, Drewry said. A previous Financial Times report from early June indicates that Hutchison is also considering exploring a sale of some or all of its remaining 10 ports in greater China in a separate deal as a way to appease the U.S. and China. 'We would expect that if sold that both Cosco Shipping Ports and China Merchants Ports would be likely candidates, but there may be competition concerns here given existing strength of these companies in the Chinese port sector,' according to Drewry. A 145-day period for exclusive talks between Hutchison and the consortium ends in late July. The parties have already missed an initial goal of signing an agreement on the Panama part of the deal by early April. If a deal goes through as initially planned, it would cost $22.8 billion for the ports to switch hands, with CK Hutchison netting more than $19 billion in cash from the transaction. MSC would be the lead investor in this acquisition through its Terminal Investment Limited (TIL) terminal operator subsidiary, various reports have said. The ocean freight giant is setting itself up as the dominant figure across container shipping and port terminals if a tentative deal to acquire the Panama ports clears approval. But that remains a big if—and a resolution isn't going to come quick. 'We're going to be talking about this deal for at least a year, if not longer, while it makes its way through regulatory approvals,' said Eleanor Hadland, senior associate of ports and terminals at Drewry, during the webinar. An approved deal would thrust MSC into the position of largest global terminal operator worldwide, up from its rank of seventh in 2023, Drewry said. When including the 43 ports from Hutchison, which comprise 199 berths in 23 countries, MSC would have a terminal capacity of 196 million 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs), giving the firm equity interest in more than 15 percent of global capacity. 'While it's unlikely that MSC/TIL will be allowed to take over all of Hutchison's assets due to market concentration concerns from the relevant competition authorities, it's also unlikely that this would make a large enough dent in the combined portfolio to affect this final outcome of going up to first place in the rankings,' said Eirik Hooper, senior associate of ports and terminals at Drewry. The MSC shakeup would spark an uptrend of 'hybrid' global terminal operators (GTOs), Hooper pointed out. For the first time, three hybrid operators would be represented among the top five GTOs, including MSC, Cosco (fourth) and Maersk (fifth) through its APM Terminals division. Hooper acknowledged the risks of consolidation within the industry, namely for liners without terminal-operating capacity, noting that the larger ports will typically see greater alignment between ownership of the terminal and the customer base of the terminal. However, these carriers can still reap benefits in a hybrid-dominated environment, he said. 'In small-medium ports, even where terminals are operated by a hybrid GTO, they are catering to all liners calling at the port. While this may sound less than ideal, terminal service agreements specify the berth windows, productivity and price therefore minimizing the risk of 'preferential treatment' for aligned carriers,' Hooper said. 'In some markets, the investment by a hybrid operator may be motivated to improve service levels for their own shipping services, but equipment upgrades and service level improvements will benefit all users.' Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump says he won't call Walz about Minnesota lawmaker shootings, calls governor "whacked out"
Trump says he won't call Walz about Minnesota lawmaker shootings, calls governor "whacked out"

CBS News

time28 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Trump says he won't call Walz about Minnesota lawmaker shootings, calls governor "whacked out"

President Trump said Tuesday that he won't call Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after the targeted shootings of two state lawmakers because it would "waste time." One of the lawmakers and her husband were killed. The president spoke to reporters early Tuesday aboard Air Force One as he flew back to Washington after abruptly leaving the G7 summit in Canada. The White House said the president wants to better monitor the rising tensions in the Middle East between Israel and Iran. Asked if he planned to call Walz, Trump said the Democratic governor is "slick" and "whacked out" and said, "I'm not calling him." Presidents often reach out to other elected officials at times of tragedy to offer condolences. Trump added, "The guy doesn't have a clue. He's a mess. So, you know, I could be nice and call him, but why waste time?" A source close to the governor's office told CBS News Minnesota that Walz spoke with Vice President JD Vance on Saturday about the shootings. "The governor expressed appreciation for the ongoing coordination between federal law enforcement and Minnesota public safety officials," the source said. Walz was the vice presidential running mate for 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, who lost her presidential bid to Trump. During the campaign, Walz often branded Trump and other Republican politicians as "just weird." Vance Boelter, 57, faces federal and state charges in the killings of Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark and wounding state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette. Boelter was captured after a massive, multi-agency manhunt. Authorities say he planned to target other lawmakers and even visited others' homes the night of the shootings. Boelter has not yet entered a plea.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store