Mone accuses Covid inquiry of 'cover-up'
Baroness Mone and her husband Doug Barrowman have accused the Covid inquiry of an "establishment cover-up" after their second attempt to be given an official role in the inquiry was rejected.
The couple claimed they were the targets of a "politically motivated witch hunt" after the inquiry's chairwoman, Baroness Hallett, refused their application to be made "core participants".
PPE Medpro, a firm led by Mr Barrowman, was awarded government contracts worth more than £200m after Baroness Mone recommended it to ministers.
If approved, the official status would have allowed the couple to access inquiry documents, make statements and apply to ask questions of witnesses.
Baroness Hallett first rejected their approach in February, saying it came 468 days after the deadline for applications, and she did not accept they had a large enough role "in the matters to be investigated by the inquiry".
She had previously said her main focus is on the approach of ministers and the government, rather than Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) suppliers.
The Covid inquiry is conducting four weeks of hearings looking at deals to buy £15bn of PPE during Covid.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) has been investigating PPE Medpro since May 2021 over suspected criminal offences committed in the procurement process.
To date no charges have been brought and the Crown Prosecution Service has not been instructed in the case. Baroness Mone, 52, and Mr Barrowman, 59, have both denied wrongdoing.
A special inquiry hearing about the company will take place behind closed doors next week after Baroness Hallett said she was satisfied there was a risk of prejudice to the ongoing NCA investigation if "sensitive evidence" was made public.
In a joint statement, Baroness Mone and her husband said the decision to hear evidence in private was "a blatant betrayal of transparency and justice" and accused the NCA of waging "a ruthless smear campaign".
The couple said: "While the inquiry refused to exclude PPE Medpro, it handed the NCA the power to dictate the proceedings behind a wall of secrecy, ensuring that only their version of events is heard – while we are denied the right to defend ourselves."
In a social media post, Baroness Mone said she did not realise that the company would be "specifically profiled" by the inquiry until the end of February.
"Until then, it was understood that discussions were general, covering overall PPE procurement, not targeting any individual entity," she added.
The couple's statement was released after their second approach to be made core participants was rejected.
Baroness Hallett said allowing the application to proceed would have led to a "further diversion of resources" and have caused "significant disruption" to the inquiry's timetable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
19 minutes ago
- New York Times
Ex-Arsenal player Jay Emmanuel-Thomas sentenced to four years for involvement in drug smuggling plot
The former Arsenal player Jay Emmanuel-Thomas has been sentenced to four years in prison for his involvement in an attempt to smuggle 60 kilograms of cannabis into the United Kingdom. The 34-year-old will serve one year and seven months, having already served nine months on remand, before being released on license. The maximum sentence for cannabis importation in the UK is 14 years in prison. Advertisement At Thursday's sentencing at Chelmsford Crown Court, Emmanuel-Thomas sat behind a glass-panelled dock in a grey suit jacket, flanked by two security officials. Prosecutor David Josse KC told the court that Emmanuel-Thomas was expecting a payment of £5,000 ($6,800) for his part in getting the cannabis into the country. 'It is clear this was about money despite you being in a position where you had the privilege of playing football as a living,' the judge, Alexander Mills, told Emmanuel-Thomas. 'It is through your own actions that you will no longer be known for being a professional footballer. You will be known as a criminal, a professional footballer who threw it all away, and put others at risk of imprisonment, in pursuit of money.' Appearing via videolink from HMP Chelmsford on May 21, Emmanuel-Thomas pleaded guilty to the charge of fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of cannabis, between July 1 2024 and September 2, 2024, at Chelmsford Crown Court. The former England youth international had been detained by the National Crime Agency (NCA) in September 2024 after the cannabis was detected in suitcases which had arrived on a flight from Bangkok, Thailand to London's Stansted Airport on September 2. The suitcases belonged to Rosie Rowland, 29, and Yasmin Piotrowska, 33, the latter being Emmanuel-Thomas' partner. Having been arrested at Stansted, charges against the women, who denied their involvement at an earlier hearing, were dropped by the prosecution. In May, Josse told the court that the investigation into their involvement was discontinued after analysis of Emmanuel-Thomas's mobile phone. 'They thought they were importing gold, not cannabis,' Josse said. Emmanuel-Thomas initially denied his involvement in importing class B drugs at a hearing at Carlisle Magistrates' Court in September but changed his plea to guilty at Chelmsford Crown Court in May. Advertisement He had been playing at Scottish Championship club Greenock Morton, who terminated his contract after he was charged. After making one Premier League appearance for Arsenal, Emmanuel-Thomas left the north London side in 2011. He then played for clubs including Ipswich Town, Bristol City and Queens Park Rangers, as well as teams in India and Thailand, before joining Morton in July 2024. (Top photo of Jay Emmanuel-Thomas playing for Aberdeen:)
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Xi Hold First Call in Months
Chinese President Xi Jinping is seen at the Ho Chi Minh Mausoleum in Hanoi on April 15, 2025. Credit - Athit Perawongmetha—POOL/AFP via Getty Images) Trump and Xi Hold First Call in Months, Setting Stage For More Trade Talks President Donald Trump spoke with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday as tariff negotiations between the world's two largest economies have stalled in recent weeks. The call lasted about 90 minutes and focused 'almost entirely on trade,' Trump said in a social media post Thursday morning. Talks had been expected to take place this week after representatives from both countries met in Geneva last month and agreed to temporarily pause the trade war. China's official Xinhua News Agency said the call took place at Trump's request. Trump said a follow-up trade meeting would be held soon, and that both he and Xi had invited each other for official state visits. Trump said one day earlier that it was difficult to reach a deal with Xi: 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday. The call was likely the first time they spoke since Trump took office in January. However, in an April interview with TIME, Trump claimed that Xi had already called him—which Chinese officials disputed. Trade negotiations between the two leaders had stalled after both countries agreed on May 12 to temporarily lower tariffs, with Trump dropping his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days, and Xi easing its levies from 125% to 10%. But the Trump Administration has accused China of reneging on the terms by curbing exports of rare earth minerals used by American manufacturers. China has rejected that charge, saying its export controls apply globally and are not targeted at the United States. In response, the Trump Administration has proposed revoking visas for some Chinese students and issuing new export controls on advanced technologies such as jet engine components and A.I. chips. 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump wrote on Truth Social last week. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump has made reducing America's dependency on Chinese manufacturing a cornerstone of his second-term agenda. Xi, facing a sluggish post-COVID economy and persistent pressures from a real estate slowdown, is pushing to secure China's dominance in future technologies like electric vehicles and artificial intelligence. The United States ran a $295 billion trade deficit with China in 2024, according to U.S. Census Bureau data, a figure Trump frequently cites as evidence of unfair trade practices. His Administration maintains that only top-level talks can break the current deadlock. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently said that a leader-to-leader exchange was essential to restart negotiations in earnest. Write to Nik Popli at
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Truckload's path to equilibrium
The U.S. truckload market has undergone significant transformation since the COVID-19 pandemic, with the industry experiencing dramatic swings in capacity, demand and pricing. In the aftermath of the pandemic, the truckload market found itself awash in excess capacity. This oversupply stemmed from a combination of factors, including the entry of new carriers during the pandemic-era freight boom and subsequent softening of demand as consumer spending patterns normalized. The oversupply situation was further complicated by volatile trade policies, with tariff rhetoric accelerating in early 2025 and creating uncertainty in import patterns. As market conditions deteriorated, thousands of small- and midsize trucking carriers faced unsustainable economics, leading to widespread business failures and market exits. This natural, if painful, adjustment mechanism began to rebalance the supply-demand equation that had tilted heavily in shippers' favor during the post-COVID era. The exodus of carriers was driven by significant cost pressures. Publicly traded freight brokerage RXO noted in its quarterly market report that 'the average cost to operate a truck is 34% higher over the past decade but absolute spot rates are largely the same as they were in 2014.' This economic reality made it increasingly difficult for carriers to maintain profitability, particularly smaller operators without the scale or financial resources to weather prolonged market weakness. According to RXO, the truckload market 'has remained relatively calm' with spot rates continuing to step higher despite disruption from rapidly changing tariff policies. The market has followed a trend – largely in place since 2023 – of soft freight demand, reductions in carrier capacity and gradually stabilizing situation created what RXO described as 'a difficult landscape for carriers,' with many 'running with unsustainable unit economics.' This harsh operating environment accelerated the pace of carrier exits, despite 'a couple of atypical months of operating authority growth in March and April.' By mid-2025, the prolonged exodus of carriers finally brought the market closer to equilibrium. As RXO observed in its quarterly forecast, 'We're as close to equilibrium, in terms of carrier supply and shipper demand, as we've been in over two years.' The broker noted that 'relatively speaking, the capacity situation is much more fragile than at this time last year.' This newfound balance began manifesting in key market indicators. The national average Outbound Tender Rejection Index, which measures the percentage of tendered loads rejected by carriers, climbed to 6.67% by June 2025 – reaching the threshold where rejections start putting inflationary pressure on spot rates. Most enterprise shippers prefer to maintain tender acceptance percentages in the upper 90s, meaning many were already experiencing problematic service levels. The data showed significant improvement in rate trends as well. TL spot rates (excluding fuel) were up 9.1% year over year in the first quarter of 2025, following an 11.6% growth rate during the fourth quarter of 2024. Contractual rates also increased 1.4% year over year in the first quarter – the first annual increase since the end of 2022.A notable development in the recovering market has been the emergence of significant regional disparities. By June 2025, tender rejection rates for truckload shipments originating in the Southeast surpassed 10% – marking the first time in nearly three years they reached that level. In contrast, rejection rates for freight departing the West Coast remained well below the national average and were the lowest among the seven major U.S. regions. This contrast was particularly striking given the focus on imports and Southern California ports that handle the bulk of U.S. container traffic. While tender volumes out of the Southeast were down 6% year over year, West Coast volumes declined 14% annually, suggesting that demand alone wasn't driving the regional disparity. Part of the explanation lies in intermodal transportation patterns. Much of the long-haul freight demand from the West shifted to rail, with intermodal capturing a large share from the truckload sector. Loaded container volumes moving by rail out of Los Angeles remained up year over year, even as they dipped alongside declining import levels. Meanwhile, long-haul tender volumes out of Los Angeles dropped 26% annually. The Outbound Tender Rejection Index measures the percentage of truckload tenders rejected by carriers and serves as an indicator of the relative balance of supply and demand in the truckload market. (Chart: SONAR. To learn more about SONAR, click here.) By June 2025, the 'interior' markets of Atlanta, Chicago and Dallas showed the tightest capacity conditions among major freight centers. Atlanta's outbound tender rejection rate reached 8.89%, continuing an upward trend that began in late February. Chicago's rejection rate stood at 7.07%, while Dallas reported 6.86% – all above the national average. The market trajectory for truckload rates remains 'inflationary,' according to RXO, though trade policy presents a significant wild card. The 3PL classified the early part of 2025 as 'still primarily a shippers' market' but noted that 'with a continued difficult landscape for carriers, and (in many cases) decreasing 2025 contract rates setting in, it could set the stage for volatility later in 2025.' The broader trend for 2025 calls for more carrier exits and high operating costs to keep upward pressure on rates. RXO pointed to the possibility of a more material uptick in rates if trade tensions calm ahead of peak season and carrier exits become more pronounced. In that scenario, 'contract rates and routing guides set in the softer market of 2024 may not survive a tighter market late in 2025, when the spot market will likely become more lucrative than the contract market.' Transportation prices were forecast to be significantly higher a year from now, with industry respondents returning a reading of 75 for the pricing outlook in the Logistics Managers' Index. There is a growing consensus that 'the worst-case scenarios associated with potential tariffs will not come to pass,' and 2026 could reflect a more robust transportation recovery, barring a macroeconomic U.S. truckload market has traveled a difficult road since the pandemic, moving from extreme oversupply to a more balanced state through the painful but necessary process of carrier exits. This gradual market healing has finally restored equilibrium between supply and demand, enabling carriers to regain pricing power as evidenced by rising tender rejection rates and strengthening spot market conditions. The market remains sensitive to external shocks, particularly trade policy developments and potential economic headwinds. However, the significant reduction in truckload capacity over the past year has made the market more responsive to even modest demand changes. As one analyst noted, 'a significant reduction in truckload capacity over the past year has made the market more vulnerable. Even with a somewhat bearish outlook for demand, the truckload sector appears increasingly reactive — and poised for volatility.' The post Truckload's path to equilibrium appeared first on FreightWaves. Sign in to access your portfolio
