Lehrmann inquiry head Walter Sofronoff engaged in ‘serious corrupt conduct' , review finds
Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct', the ACT Integrity Commission has found, after reviewing his inquiry into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann.
The commission released a report on Wednesday into Sofronoff's conduct as a Board of Inquiry into the prosecution.
It found that 'Sofronoff's conduct fell within several elements of the definition of 'corrupt conduct'', through his disclosures to two journalists: Janet Albrechtsen at The Australian newspaper and Elizabeth Byrne at the ABC.
The report found that '[Sofronoff's] disclosure of confidential material to journalists contrary to the obligations of confidentiality prescribed by the Inquiries Act could have amounted to offences against the Inquiries Act'.
'The disclosures were dishonestly concealed from persons involved in the Inquiry, in particular [prosecutor Shane] Drumgold and the [ACT] chief minister, which prevented them taking protective legal action.'
The report said Sofronoff 'claimed that his conduct complied with the requirements of the Inquiries Act, and that he had acted in the public interest to ensure the media were adequately informed about the issues being investigated by his Inquiry and in a position to comment accurately about them.
'However, the commission concludes that he had not, in fact, acted in good faith and that his conduct, amounting to corrupt conduct within the meaning of the IC Act, undermined the integrity of the Board's processes and the fairness and probity of its proceedings to such an extent as to have been likely to have threatened public confidence in the integrity of that aspect of public administration. It therefore constituted serious corrupt conduct.'
More details to follow
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Parliament moves closer to setting up Iraq war-style inquiry into Gaza conflict
A Chilcot-style inquiry would uncover the 'murky history of what's gone on' in Gaza, Jeremy Corbyn has said. Parliament moved a step closer to setting up a probe after MPs agreed that the Gaza (Independent Public Inquiry) Bill should be listed for a debate later this year. The draft new law would 'require the inquiry to consider any UK military, economic or political co-operation with Israel since October 2023', the month when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel and killed around 1,200 people and kidnapped more than 250 others. Israel's retaliatory offensive has seen more than 54,000 people in Gaza killed, according to the territory's health ministry. 'Our future history books will report with shame those that had the opportunity to stop this carnage but failed to act to achieve it, and so we will continue our campaigns in this House and outside because we're appalled at what is happening,' the former Labour Party leader told the Commons. Mr Corbyn, the Independent MP for Islington North, had earlier said: 'In the aftermath of the Iraq war, several attempts were made to establish an inquiry surrounding the conduct of the British military operations. 'The government of the day spent many years resisting those attempts and those demands for an inquiry, however, they could not prevent the inevitable and in 2016 we had the publication of the Chilcot Inquiry, which Sir John Chilcot had undertaken over several years.' Mr Corbyn added that when he was the Labour leader, when the 12-volume report came out, he 'apologised on behalf of the Labour Party for the catastrophic decision to go to war in Iraq' and added: 'History is now repeating itself.' He warned that 'human beings have endured a level of horror and inhumanity that should haunt us all forever – entire families wiped out, limbs strewn across the street, mothers screaming for their children buried under the rubble, human beings torn to pieces, doctors performing amputations without anaesthetic, children picking grass and dirt from the ground thinking they might find something edible to eat'. Mr Corbyn alleged that the UK had a 'highly influential role in Israel's military operations', including by supplying weapons, and also said a future inquiry should seek the 'truth regarding the role of British military bases in Cyprus' and Government 'legal advice over an assessment of genocide'. He said the inquiry would uncover the 'murky history of what's gone on, the murky arms sales and the complicity in appalling acts of genocide'. Deputy Speaker Nus Ghani called 'order' when several MPs applauded, as Mr Corbyn presented his Bill. The Bill will be listed for its next debate on July 4.
The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
Omagh bomb inquiry chair refuses Government's bid to redact civil servant names
The chairman of the Omagh Bombing Inquiry has rejected a bid by the Government to redact the names of junior civil servants in documents shared with other parties involved in the probe. The Northern Ireland Office (NIO) had argued that junior members of the Civil Service had more expectation of privacy than senior civil servants and it had raised potential security concerns over sharing their names. Inquiry chairman Lord Turnbull refused the application made by Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn in a ruling published on Tuesday and the documents, which are already in the possession of the inquiry, will now be shared with other core participants. The chairman made clear that the issue under consideration only related to sharing the documents with other core participants in the inquiry, and did not relate to the potential for them to be made public. Lord Turnbull stressed that all core participants are bound by confidentiality agreements. He said the issue about the potential publication of the names during the inquiry proceedings would be dealt with at a later juncture. 'This ruling is not concerned with the separate question of whether the content of any documentation which is disclosed in an unredacted fashion may, in due course, be aired in evidence and, or, published in the media,' he said. The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Mr Benn's application was considered during procedural hearings in Belfast last month. During proceedings, the inquiry also considered a submission on the PSNI's position in respect of disclosing the names of people suspected of involvement in the 1998 attack and other linked terror activity. The PSNI did not make an application for redaction, and instead just set out its own view in respect of the issue. During the hearings, several media organisations also made representations in respect of both the Government and PSNI's submissions. In relation to the naming of suspects, Lord Turnbull said the matter was more 'straightforward' than the application to redact junior civil servants' names. 'In the end, there was no dispute between any of the contributing counsel as to what the correct approach should be,' he added. The inquiry intends to put suspects in one of two categories – those who have been named publicly in the media or Parliament already, and those who have not. Those in the first category will be assumed not to have a 'reasonable expectation' of privacy. Those in the second category will be subject to further examination by the inquiry to consider issues around privacy rights and security risks.
The Herald Scotland
4 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why does Scotland hold public inquiries amidst escalating costs
It has come as it emerged the Scottish Government has admitted there is no legal requirement to monitor whether lessons learnt recommendations from inquiries are actually acted on. The current cost of all live inquiries has soared thirteen-fold over ten years to stand at nearly £180m and it is estimated the overall costs has reached nearly £250m since 2007. What are public inquiries? Public inquiries in Scotland are formal investigations established to examine events or issues of significant public concern. They are often convened in response to events that have caused significant public concern, such as disasters, systemic failures, or allegations of misconduct. The inquiries are typically independent and aim to establish facts, determine accountability, and recommend changes to prevent recurrence. Why are they held? They aim to uncover the truth, ensure accountability, and recommend improvements to prevent future occurrences. They aim to establish what happened during a particular event or series of events and to determine who was responsible for the events in question. They seek to learn lessons from an event, identify what went wrong and recommend measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future. They aim to restore public confidence, and show that issues are being taken seriously and addressed appropriately. Do they have any legal standing? They are primarily governed by the Inquiries Act 2005 which sets out procedures for their establishment and conduct including the appointment of a chairman, the powers to compel evidence, and the publication of findings. Additionally, the Inquiries (Scotland) Rules 2007 provides specific procedural rules for inquiries held in Scotland. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- READ MORE by Martin Williams ScotGov says it has 'no legal obligation' to ensure 20 years of inquiry lessons are learnt Ministers warned over public inquiries secrecy as taxpayer cost soars by £60m in a year Swinney urged to act over 'stalled' lifeline funding of ferry fiasco firm Revealed: £400k public cost of ScotGov Euro 2028 ticket tout ban that 'won't work' 'People going bananas': New ferry fiasco hits vital island supplies 'Stretched to breaking': Nation loses 800 officers since formation of Police Scotland --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- They can be either statutory or non-statutory, with statutory inquiries having legal powers to compel evidence and witness testimony under the Inquiries Act. What are the most notable public inquiries in Scotland? The Scottish Child Abuse inquiry which was established in 2015 to investigate the abuse of children in care faced criticism for delays and costs which have exceeded £90m. The Scottish Child Abuse InquiryThe second most expensive live public probe is the Scottish Covid-19 inquiry which started in August, 2022 to examine Scotland's response to and the impact of the pandemic and to learn lessons for the future. Its costs in December last year were at £34m. The Penrose inquiry which ran between 2008 and 2015 examined the transmission of hepatitis C and HIV through NHS blood products. The inquiry faced criticism for its limited scope and lack of accountability. The Edinburgh Tram Inquiry which was started in 2014 to investigate delays and cost overruns in the capital trams project also faced scrutiny for its prolonged duration and expenses. And the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry was established in 2019 to examine issues related to the construction of two major hospitals, focusing on patient safety and building standards. How are public inquiries conducted? They appoint a chairman and set terms of reference where the scope of the probe is defined. The inquiry collects written and oral evidence from witnesses, experts, and relevant parties. Public hearings may be held to examine evidence and question witnesses, often open to the public and media. A final report is usually published, detailing findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Throughout the process, inquiries aim to be transparent and impartial, ensuring public trust in their findings. What are the challenges that public inquiries face? Their costs can be expensive, with some, like the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry, costing over £90 million. And they can take several years to complete, leading to criticism over delays in justice and implementation of recommendations. There has also been concern that recommendations from inquiries are not always acted upon promptly or effectively, limiting their impact. How effective are public inquiries? It varies. While they can reveal critical information and lead to significant reforms, their success is reliant on the implementation of recommendations, the willingness of authorities to enact change and the ability to get to all crucial evidence. There is concern about about the standing of non-statutory inquiries through the ability to access evidence and to compel key witnesses to co-operate. Unlike statutory inquiries, participation with non-statutory inquiries such as the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry is voluntary which can hinder the inquiry's ability to gather comprehensive evidence. Edinburgh Tram InquiryInquiries that are seen as thorough and impartial tend to restore confidence, while those seen as delayed or inconclusive may exacerbate public dissatisfaction. How does the Scottish Government view public inquiries? They see public inquiries as essential instruments for investigating events of significant public concern, establishing facts, and ensuring accountability. They are designed to operate independently, providing transparent and thorough examinations of issues to learn lessons and implement necessary changes. In establishing the Scottish Covid inquiry, the government emphasised its dedication to openness and accountability. The inquiry was tasked with scrutinizing the strategic handling of the pandemic, aiming to provide an independent assessment of decisions and actions taken. And the government said that reflected its belief in the effectiveness of public inquiries to address complex issues and restore public confidence. It has previously told the Herald: "Public inquiries provide important opportunities to establish facts and to learn lessons for the future in the most transparent means possible. "Statutory public inquiries are established in accordance with the Inquiries Act 2005 and operate independently of government."
