
Why does Scotland hold public inquiries amidst escalating costs
The current cost of all live inquiries has soared thirteen-fold over ten years to stand at nearly £180m and it is estimated the overall costs has reached nearly £250m since 2007.
What are public inquiries?
Public inquiries in Scotland are formal investigations established to examine events or issues of significant public concern.
They are often convened in response to events that have caused significant public concern, such as disasters, systemic failures, or allegations of misconduct.
The inquiries are typically independent and aim to establish facts, determine accountability, and recommend changes to prevent recurrence.
Why are they held?
They aim to uncover the truth, ensure accountability, and recommend improvements to prevent future occurrences.
They aim to establish what happened during a particular event or series of events and to determine who was responsible for the events in question.
They seek to learn lessons from an event, identify what went wrong and recommend measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
They aim to restore public confidence, and show that issues are being taken seriously and addressed appropriately.
Do they have any legal standing?
They are primarily governed by the Inquiries Act 2005 which sets out procedures for their establishment and conduct including the appointment of a chairman, the powers to compel evidence, and the publication of findings. Additionally, the Inquiries (Scotland) Rules 2007 provides specific procedural rules for inquiries held in Scotland.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
READ MORE by Martin Williams
ScotGov says it has 'no legal obligation' to ensure 20 years of inquiry lessons are learnt
Ministers warned over public inquiries secrecy as taxpayer cost soars by £60m in a year
Swinney urged to act over 'stalled' lifeline funding of ferry fiasco firm
Revealed: £400k public cost of ScotGov Euro 2028 ticket tout ban that 'won't work'
'People going bananas': New ferry fiasco hits vital island supplies
'Stretched to breaking': Nation loses 800 officers since formation of Police Scotland
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They can be either statutory or non-statutory, with statutory inquiries having legal powers to compel evidence and witness testimony under the Inquiries Act.
What are the most notable public inquiries in Scotland?
The Scottish Child Abuse inquiry which was established in 2015 to investigate the abuse of children in care faced criticism for delays and costs which have exceeded £90m.
The Scottish Child Abuse InquiryThe second most expensive live public probe is the Scottish Covid-19 inquiry which started in August, 2022 to examine Scotland's response to and the impact of the pandemic and to learn lessons for the future. Its costs in December last year were at £34m.
The Penrose inquiry which ran between 2008 and 2015 examined the transmission of hepatitis C and HIV through NHS blood products. The inquiry faced criticism for its limited scope and lack of accountability.
The Edinburgh Tram Inquiry which was started in 2014 to investigate delays and cost overruns in the capital trams project also faced scrutiny for its prolonged duration and expenses.
And the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry was established in 2019 to examine issues related to the construction of two major hospitals, focusing on patient safety and building standards.
How are public inquiries conducted?
They appoint a chairman and set terms of reference where the scope of the probe is defined.
The inquiry collects written and oral evidence from witnesses, experts, and relevant parties.
Public hearings may be held to examine evidence and question witnesses, often open to the public and media.
A final report is usually published, detailing findings, conclusions, and recommendations.
Throughout the process, inquiries aim to be transparent and impartial, ensuring public trust in their findings.
What are the challenges that public inquiries face?
Their costs can be expensive, with some, like the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry, costing over £90 million.
And they can take several years to complete, leading to criticism over delays in justice and implementation of recommendations.
There has also been concern that recommendations from inquiries are not always acted upon promptly or effectively, limiting their impact.
How effective are public inquiries?
It varies. While they can reveal critical information and lead to significant reforms, their success is reliant on the implementation of recommendations, the willingness of authorities to enact change and the ability to get to all crucial evidence.
There is concern about about the standing of non-statutory inquiries through the ability to access evidence and to compel key witnesses to co-operate.
Unlike statutory inquiries, participation with non-statutory inquiries such as the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry is voluntary which can hinder the inquiry's ability to gather comprehensive evidence.
Edinburgh Tram InquiryInquiries that are seen as thorough and impartial tend to restore confidence, while those seen as delayed or inconclusive may exacerbate public dissatisfaction.
How does the Scottish Government view public inquiries?
They see public inquiries as essential instruments for investigating events of significant public concern, establishing facts, and ensuring accountability. They are designed to operate independently, providing transparent and thorough examinations of issues to learn lessons and implement necessary changes.
In establishing the Scottish Covid inquiry, the government emphasised its dedication to openness and accountability. The inquiry was tasked with scrutinizing the strategic handling of the pandemic, aiming to provide an independent assessment of decisions and actions taken. And the government said that reflected its belief in the effectiveness of public inquiries to address complex issues and restore public confidence.
It has previously told the Herald: "Public inquiries provide important opportunities to establish facts and to learn lessons for the future in the most transparent means possible.
"Statutory public inquiries are established in accordance with the Inquiries Act 2005 and operate independently of government."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
39 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Scottish water bosses should not be getting eye-watering bonuses
It is a kick in the teeth that the company's boss Alex Plant has received a boost in his pension pot while we are all paying more for our water. Rewarding failure is never a good look. But that is what the Scottish Government seems to have done with the bosses of Scottish Water. Bills have gone up for Scots by nearly 10 per cent this year, after an 8.8 per cent hike the year before. This has come as other bills have skyrocketed over recent years - with rents, food and council tax all going up. Too many people have been struggling to make ends meet, and water bills have played their part in that. You would expect that we would have a better service by paying more, but Scottish Water has been failing when it comes to dealing with our waste. Its sewage sites breached its licences more than 250 times in three years. Sewage spilled into the environment over 24,000 times last year. In England, private firms have received fines for this kind of performance. But the publicly-owned water firm in Scotland hasn't faced similar measures. It is a kick in the teeth that the company's boss Alex Plant has received a boost in his pension pot while we are all paying more for our water. Other bosses at Scottish Water have also had their salaries and pension pots increased. Scottish Labour's Jackie Baillie is right that water rates should be frozen and that bosses should not be receiving such eye-watering sums. They should only be receiving bumper pay rises if they bring bills down and make our water system fit for purpose. If they fail they should have to make do with their existing sky-high salaries. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. JD's Scot us wrong JD Vance is on holiday in Scotland with his family. He claims to have ancestors in our country. But the US Vice President should get his facts right next time he wants to wade in on Scottish politics. Vance suggested Scots could be prosecuted for praying in their own homes as a result of a law that says protests outside abortion clinics must be at least 200m away. Let's be clear - no one is being arrested for praying in their own home. The law protects women from harassment while seeking medical treatment. free speech no longer exists. While he is in Scotland we hope the US Vice President spends more time enjoying the stunning Ayrshire scenery - and less time lecturing us on subjects he knows nothing about.


Daily Record
39 minutes ago
- Daily Record
MSP demands Donald Trump pay up to cover costs of policing for Scottish visit
EXCLUSIVE: The ex-Nat MSP said there is "no justifiable reason for the public to subsidise the commercial activity of the President". An MSP has demanded Donald Trump stump up to cover the costs of policing the President's recent visit to Scotland. The Republican leader jetted into Prestwick airport on July 25 before spending the weekend at his Turnberry Hotel and golf resort, where he held a rambling 60-minute press conference with Keir Starmer. Trump then flew to Aberdeenshire where he dined with John Swinney and later formally opened a second golf course at his Menie Estate. An estimated 5,000 Police Scotland officers - working 12 hour shifts - were involved in policing the duration of the President's four day visit, which was classed as a "private" trip. The New Yorker will return to the UK again in September for a formal state visit, where he will be an official guest of the King. John Mason, an independent MSP, has now lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament claiming there is "no justifiable reason for either the Scottish or UK public to subsidise the private travel or commercial activity of the President". The controversial member for Glasgow Shettleston, who was booted out of the SNP last year over remarks about Gaza, said he "hopes to see the recovery of public expenditure from Mr Trump or his associated business interests". Mason's motion states that Trump's visit "focused on time at his golf courses in Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire, required a substantial deployment of Police Scotland and other police officers, as well as other public service resources". It claims "as the visit was not undertaken in any official capacity, the significant costs involved should not be footed by Scottish or UK taxpayers". The motion has so far only been supported by two MSPs from the SNP, Christine Grahame and Kevin Stewart. The cost of policing Trump's visit became a major talking point last month after the Scottish Police Federation (SPF) warned response times could double as a result of the force being overstretched. Asked if the quality of policing will be impacted by the visit, SPF chief David Kennedy said: "It will be seriously affected, it has to be. There's not enough police officers for it not to be affected." He added: 'We want the president of the United States to be able to come to Scotland. That's not what this is about. It's the current state of the police service and the numbers we have causes great difficulty." Mason was ejected by the SNP last year for a social media post in which he claimed there was "no genocide" in Gaza. He previously caused controversy in 2017 when he suggested some people view IRA killers as "freedom fighters". The veteran MSP for Glasgow Shettleston will retire from the Scottish Parliament next year and currently sits as an independent. He previously admitted his stance of speaking his mind had got him "into a lot of trouble" during his career - but insisted "we could do with a bit more of it".


Daily Record
39 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Rape survivors go head to head with controversial mens' rights group outside Parliament
Members of Justice for Innocent Men Scotland (JIMS), who have been slammed for targeting women speaking out on abuse, are to be met with a counter protest at Holyrood. Rape survivors will go head to head outside the Scottish Parliament with a controversial mens' rights group accused of trolling victims. Members of Justice for Innocent Men Scotland (JIMS), who have been slammed for targeting women speaking out on abuse, are to stage a 'silent protest' outside the Scottish Parliament in the coming weeks - pledging support of 'innocent people caught in broken justice systems'. But the group is set to be met with a counter protest organised by JEMS - Justice for Exploited and Mistreated Survivors - after members hit out over being targeted online by supporters of the group. Ellie Wilson, who says she was labelled an 'attention seeker' for campaigning in the wake of her rapist's conviction, said survivors will stand up to those who seek to blame victims. The 27-year-old said: 'All of us survivors have come together because we've faced targeting by this group. 'They're gathering for their protest so we thought it was important that we show survivors solidarity. 'Our aim is to call out victim blaming and show survivors that we stand with them and stand together. 'We stand against any sort of behaviour that tries to blame them for what happened. 'It's so difficult in this country to get a guilty verdict in the first place. So to go through that then be told this didn't happen to you, in quite a public way as well, just isn't acceptable. 'It's bullying and it's public humiliation. It shouldn't be happening and we believe that the majority of Scotland does stand with survivors and we want to show that.' Ellie's ex-partner Daniel McFarlane was sentenced to five years in prison in 2022 for raping her twice while they were both students at Glasgow University. Ellie bravely waived her right to anonymity to fight for change in the justice system. But she has told how supporters of JIMS accused her of using her experience to 'gain fame' and make money. She said: 'It's obviously really difficult when you're a survivor and you've gone through the trauma of rape and domestic abuse and the justice system to then have people going on the internet saying you're a liar and calling you names. 'It's retraumatising and it's not what people need after going through so much already. 'I've waived my anonymity and other survivors have done the same, but it's almost like people like JIMS think we shouldn't be heard or exist in public life. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 'I think people feel more empowered to say or do things online, which is leading to a lot of this horrible behaviour. 'We definitely have lots of interest (in the counter protest), so I think it will be quite likely that we get more numbers than they do.' Scottish Conservative MSP Pam Gosal said: 'The last thing survivors need after enduring heinous abuse is to be trolled when they bravely speak out about their ordeal. 'Abuse victims deserve to be listened to and supported, not have their trauma reignited by misguided activists. 'Survivors deserve to be at the heart of a Scottish justice system which currently panders to offenders rather than victims.' JIMS has publicly denied harassing victims. One of the group's arguments is that crucial evidence is being ignored by parts of the Criminal Procedure Act, which was designed to protect victims from intrusive questioning. In a statement on its social media yesterday, JIMS said it would hold its silent protest on September 9 - International Falsely Accused Day (IFAD). It said: 'IFAD is a global movement that began to support innocent people caught in broken justice systems. It is not just a Scottish issue. Our colleagues in London and international partners at DAVIA will be gathering too. The world will be watching. 'We stand for justice and fairness. We stand with everyone who has been failed by the system and all the people maintaining their innocence, and all we ask for is FAIR TRIALS - nothing more, nothing less. 'Together, we can raise our voices for change.' The Record contacted JIMS for comment.