From 30 to 5: Some S'poreans not surprised at Jollibean's closures & downsizing
On Thursday (July 10), CNA reported that Jollibean's employees claimed that their wages and Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions had not been paid for several months.
The report added that the company now has a new owner and that problems with workers' salaries are being ironed out, with a resolution expected to be reached by the end of July.
In a statement to CNA, the Food, Drinks and Allied Workers Union (FDAWU) said, 'Affected workers can approach the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) to make an appointment for advisory services on employment disputes.'
On July 2, a woman took to the Complaint Singapore Facebook page to let others know that she had seen that many of the Jollibean outlets appeared to be closed, including those at Raffles Place MRT and Bugis Junction. She wrote that a search on Google had shown that many outlets were listed as 'temporarily closed.'
She added that Shopee had stopped selling Jollibean F&B deals and vouchers.
When the CNA report was shared on Reddit, a number of commenters appeared to be unsurprised at Jollibean's closures and problems, claiming competitor brands such as Munchi and Mr Bean were partly responsible for its woes. Others, meanwhile, said they've seen a drop in the quality of the brand's products for some time now.
'As a lover of the thick style min jiang kueh, I have a soft spot for Jollibean because it was a quick & fairly reliable way to satisfy my cravings. But the last few times I ate it, it was just clammy, overly sweet, and the peanut filling, as well as the pancake itself lacked flavour. Not particularly cheap either. Overall, just a bit sad to see an ex-household name die this way,' wrote one.
'TBH, Jollibean has been dropping in quality for a while. Nowadays, it's just getting massacred by Munchi,' another agreed.
'Jollibean is a personal favourite for pancakes. Lately feels like their sizes have decreased quite significantly, though, and it doesn't help that they are hard to come by these days,' a commenter wrote.
'My go-to is always the Jollibean peanut pancake, but it's gotten so bad now. Lumpy and no taste, unlike last time, but the price is also so expensive,' another chimed in.
Some Facebook users appeared to feel the same way.
'I used to buy Jollibean's pancake. I stopped when the size got smaller and peanut lesser,' wrote one.
'The pieces keep getting smaller and more expensive as days pass. The filling is getting lesser and lesser,' another agreed. /TISG
Read also: Singaporean says he supports 'foreign F&Bs over locals,' gets mixed reaction from netizens
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
13 minutes ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - Groups like UNC3886 focus on online espionage and exploiting vulnerabilities
What is UNC3886 - the entity targeting prominent strategic organisations globally - and how could it threaten Singapore's national security infrastructure? Lance Alexander and Daniel Martin speak with Vivek Chudgar, Managing Director for Asia Pacific & Japan at Mandiant, Google Cloud.
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Money banked, promises broken: unsavoury side of Vietnam's PE and VC dealmaking
[HO CHI MINH CITY] A planned stake sale by shareholders of EQuest Education, one of Vietnam's biggest private education groups, is facing setbacks after a school acquisition in Hanoi collapsed, in a case highlighting the broader risks of doing business in the country's fast-growing, but often unpredictable, business sector. KKR, the largest shareholder with a 54.8 per cent stake in EQuest, held through its Singapore-based vehicle Equinox II, invested more than US$200 million into the Vietnamese group in two funding rounds in 2021 and 2023. The PE juggernaut and other shareholders of EQuest were eyeing a stake sale this year, in hopes of raising funds and paving the way for KKR's exit four to five years since its investment in EQuest, sources familiar with the matter told The Business Times. That plan now hangs in limbo. The dispute has delayed negotiations and the due diligence process, causing uncertainties, particularly over valuation-related matters, a source noted. KKR did not respond to BT's queries. In 2021, a member company of EQuest signed deals worth one trillion dong (S$49 million) to acquire 80 per cent stakes in two schools in Hanoi. At the time, EQuest had already consolidated some 20 education institutions in Vietnam. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The schools were part of the Ngoi Sao school system, a prominent private education network co-founded by Pham Bich Nga, a 66-year-old educator. The transaction for the second school, which was established in 2023, hit a deadlock. In a statement issued on Wednesday (Jul 16), EQuest alleged that Nga and her team withdrew funds from the first school and declined to transfer the agreed stake and management control of the second school. EQuest said it has lodged a police report on the matter, alleging embezzlement, misappropriation and fraud. In a Facebook post on Jul 16, Nguyen Quoc Toan, co-founder, chairman and chief executive of EQuest Education, alleged that the former partners claimed they 'did not understand' or had a 'different interpretation' of the contract, while retaining all the investor's funds over the past few years to develop the schools. A day earlier on Jul 15, Nga wrote on Facebook that she had proactively ended the partnership, citing major differences in educational direction and operational culture during their 2022 collaboration. 'Trying to forcibly maintain a partnership when the other party no longer wishes to continue – or attempting to claim what doesn't belong to them – cannot lead to a positive outcome for either side,' she wrote. Familiar red flags The case underscores the travails of doing business in Vietnam, which experts warn could weigh on investor confidence and undermine dealmaking in the long term. In fact, observers say disputes after deal closure between investors and Vietnamese target firms are fairly common, especially in private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) circles; legal experts cite mismatched expectations and poor mutual understanding as key sources of friction. David Harrison, a partner for global law firm Hogan Lovells in Ho Chi Minh City, said: 'We do a lot of transactions with Vietnamese targets – family businesses in many cases – where there's no law firm on the other side to help them understand what they're signing.' They may be eager to close the deal and secure cash for their business by taking a pragmatic view, which, in the long run, may not serve their best interests, he added. Tran Duy Canh, managing partner at Dentons LuatViet in Ho Chi Minh City, said post-deal disputes often arise when critical conditions in sale agreements are not met. These do not always arise out of bad faith; more often, it comes from 'overconfidence' or misunderstanding, he said, adding that some local firms assume they can sort things out later or renegotiate if the deal veers off course. One notable case involved Vietnamese plastics firm Rang Dong and Japanese investor Sojitz Pla-Net, over a 2017 deal in which Sojitz bought five million shares in Rang Dong's Long An Plastic unit for more than 174 billion dong. Sojitz later alleged that Rang Dong failed to meet post-closing obligations. On its part, the Vietnamese firm claimed that there were 'unreasonable' terms in the contract, such as requiring it to sign employment contracts with 700 people that Sojitz appointed. Their conflict lasted about three years, from 2020 to 2023, including arbitration at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre in 2022 and subsequent onshore court proceedings in Vietnam. The ruling ultimately went Sojitz's way. However, it remains uncertain whether Rang Dong can fulfil its financial obligations to Sojitz, because the Vietnamese company is now facing bankruptcy proceedings. Lessons from soured deals Such cases worry investors, who often bear the bulk of financial losses and face lengthy investigations and legal battles. Legal counsel typically recommend mediation over taking the matter to court, especially when both sides genuinely want to resolve the misunderstanding. Another high-profile case was VinaCapital's Vietnam Opportunity Fund (VOF) investing US$32.5 million for a 34 per cent stake in Vietnamese egg and poultry giant Ba Huan in early 2018. The deal quickly unravelled after founder Pham Thi Huan publicly sought to cancel it, claiming the investor's terms risked eroding family control. She claimed VinaCapital imposed a 22 per cent annual return rate without consent, and that the Vietnamese contract included clauses missing from the English version, such as penalties for missed targets and a possible transfer of at least 51 per cent of the company's shares. VinaCapital maintained that all terms were lawful and in line with market norms, but later agreed to an amicable exit from the deal. Vu Nguyen Khanh, managing director and lead portfolio manager at VinaCapital's VOF, told BT: 'We may have a very clear view of what those terms mean, but at the same time, we want to make sure that the person on the other side of the table also understands that.' Founded in 2003 and managed by VinaCapital, VOF is a closed-ended investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange with net assets exceeding US$970 million as at the end of June; it invests in listed equities and private companies in Vietnam. Khanh said the fund has invested in more than 200 companies in Vietnam over the past two decades. Harrison from Hogan Lovells stressed the importance of robust financial, legal and technical due diligence and forging direct ties with local partners, rather than relying on 30- to 40-page term sheets drafted for deals in other markets. He also highlighted the value of including downside protection mechanisms for investors – in the form of put rights, redemption rights, pull-back clauses, or earn-outs, for example – in case deals do not go as expected. 'The diligence, monitoring and the engagement process throughout the investment should pick up a lot of the flags,' VOF's Khanh added. He said if a situation calls for renegotiation, the first step should be to revisit the original agreements, which ought to include an avenue to resolve the issues before turning to the court. 'At the end of the day, our objective as investors is to create value and exit at a return. Disputes rarely create that kind of return,' he noted. Cultural gaps Hoang Minh Duc, special counsel at Duane Morris Vietnam, said investors are usually open to dialogue if founders stay transparent and actively work towards the best solutions for the businesses when obligations become difficult to meet. Drawing on his experience advising deals between foreign VCs and Vietnamese startups, he said many disputes stem from cultural gaps between Vietnamese business norms and those in more developed markets. He noted that Vietnamese startup founders often sign agreements without fully grasping the terms, sometimes without legal counsel or under guidance by inexperienced advisers. And when problems arise, some try to sidestep the investors. 'Vietnamese founders often value flexibility, while most VC investors, many of whom are from Singapore, prioritise transparency and an agreed structure,' he said, adding: 'This cultural gap can lead to painful partings, which may ultimately undermine dealmaking in Vietnam over the long term.'
Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
'Savings? What savings? How Singaporeans are surviving paycheck to paycheck'
SINGAPORE: In an instant of vulnerability, a Reddit user in his late 20s posted an earnest revelation that resonated with thousands: 'This post is just for me to know I'm not alone. I'm nearly 30 yet have no savings due to circumstances such as no allowance for nearly two decades and having to help pay off expensive bills. Every pay after offsetting important bills makes me feel like I'm back to square one… I am trying my very best still and just wondering how others around my age are coping.' Soon, others began to share their own stories, not with judgment, but with agreement. 'Enjoy life while you can.' One of the most touching reactions came from a netizen who had fought cancer in her late 20s. 'I'm surviving well, with around S$1,000 in savings. The rest went to healthcare. Don't think too much — enjoy your life while you can. Many dying people your age would give everything they have for a few days of your life.' The message wasn't indifferent to financial pressure, but a compelling reminder that life's worth isn't only measured in how thick one's bank book is. The post-pandemic financial freefall Another Redditor showed how his uncertain recovery from the COVID-19 financial drain was suddenly dashed: 'All my savings were wiped out during the first COVID outbreak. Just as I started rebuilding, my company retrenched me. Everything gone again.' Now that he is in a new job on probation, he's in survival mode — juggling bills, becoming skilled at DIY home upkeep, and cuddling every cent of savings from transport handovers. 'Living hand to mouth and hoping nothing explodes at home.' 'It's okay to start over.' Many in their 30s are hitting the reset financial button. Medical expenses, price increases, and stagnant salaries have merged into a seamless tornado that's left many tramping waters. 'It's okay to start over — it's not too late. Any savings is good savings,' one netizen reassured. The Redditor suggested tapping into government subsidies and grants like CDC vouchers, SG60 promotions, and WTC transport discounts for lower-income earners. 'These save me about $20 to S$30 a month — it adds up.' Some commenters exposed extremely personal challenges — medical ailments kept secret from their families, with swelling expenditures draining their funds every month. 'Every other month, there's something that needs looking at. It's so awful,' one Redditor wrote. Their voice joined a rising echo — numerous adults are just about hanging on, mutely going through their struggles away from the public eye. A different path: Choosing experience However, one commenter stood out for taking a different turn at 30. 'I took a gap year and went to travel and volunteer overseas with only S$10,000 to my name.' Upon his return, he spent the subsequent five years conscientiously saving. Now at 35, he has bought a flat, with zero debt (apart from a loan settled via CPF), and is working towards expanding his financial portfolio. 'All is not lost if you set your priorities right.' Others shared everyday sacrifices that have become part of their routine — hopping away from restaurants in favour of food courts, to walking instead of riding on buses or trains. 'I only have S$2,000 in the bank. No job for 3.5 years. I rely on CDC vouchers and walk home often.' You're not the only one The original Reddit post may have begun as a call for comfort and encouragement, but it swiftly turned into something more reflective, a digital campfire where most of those gathered said, 'Me too.' If you're approaching 30, trying hard to build savings, and feeling like you've fallen behind, know this — you're not alone. Others are treading on parallel paths — grinding, starting over, and doing the best they can. In that collective experience, relief, flexibility, and the inaudible hope that things will get better can be found. Because even when you're back to square one, you're not starting from nothing — you're starting from experience.
