Trump says Coke will shift to cane sugar. But increasingly, shoppers want no sugar in their sodas
Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, which was introduced in 2017, uses both the artificial sweetener aspartame and the natural sweetener stevia in its recipe. It's one of Coke's fastest-growing products, with global case volumes up 14% in the first quarter of the year. By comparison, the company's total case volumes were up 2%.
PepsiCo also noted Thursday that 60% of its sales volumes in major markets in the second quarter came from low- or no-sugar drinks.
'When you look at colas, the percentage of growth coming from zero sugar is significant,' said Duane Stanford, the editor and publisher of Beverage Digest.
Coca-Cola Co. hasn't confirmed a presidential pronouncement
The scrutiny over Coke's sweeteners began Wednesday, when President Donald Trump announced that Atlanta-based Coca-Cola Co. had agreed to switch to using cane sugar in the regular version of its beverage manufactured in the U.S.
'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump wrote on his social media site. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!'
Coca-Cola didn't confirm the change. In a statement, the company said it appreciated Trump's enthusiasm and would share details on new offerings soon.
Stanford said he doubts Coca-Cola will fully shift away from high fructose corn syrup, which has sweetened Coke in the U.S. since the 1980s. There would be tremendous supply chain and logistics headaches, he said, and the U.S. doesn't make enough sugar for Coke's needs.
He expects the Atlanta-based company will offer a cane sugar-sweetened version in the U.S. just like its rival Pepsi has been doing since 2009. He noted that Coke has indulged U.S. fans by importing Mexican Coke, which is made with cane sugar, since 2005. Coke positions Mexican Coke as an upscale alternative and sells it in glass bottles.
A rush to defend high fructose corn syrup
The corn industry wasn't happy with the speculation. In a statement Wednesday, Corn Refiners Association President and CEO John Bode said replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar makes no sense and would cost thousands of American manufacturing jobs.
Shares in ADM, a maker of high fructose corn syrup, dipped nearly 2% Thursday after Trump's announcement.
In a message on X, Coca-Cola defended high fructose corn syrup, saying it's no more likely to contribute to obesity than table sugar or other full-calorie sweeteners.
'It's safe; it has about the same number of calories per serving as table sugar and is metabolized in a similar way by your body,' the company said. 'Please be assured that Coca-Cola brand soft drinks do not contain any harmful substances.'
The Food and Drug Administration also says there is no evidence of any difference in safety among foods sweetened with high fructose corn syrup and those that sugar, honey or other traditional sweeteners.
US consumers are seeking more options
Soft drink preferences are highly subjective, as anyone who has been in a Pepsi vs. Coke or 7-Up vs. Sprite debate knows. But recent trends indicate that Coke and other drink makers need to focus on the kinds of low- and no-sugar drinks that a growing number of consumers are seeking, according to Stanford.
He said his data shows original Coke was the top seller by volume in the U.S. last year, with 19% market share, while Coke Zero Sugar was seventh and had a 4% market share. But Coke Zero Sugar's share grew 10%, while original Coke's share was flat.
Paige Leyden, the associate director of food service, flavors and ingredients reports at the market research company Mintel, said drinks with a health halo like Olipop — which has 1 gram of sugars compared to original Coke's 65 grams — are also pressuring legacy soda makers. Mintel expects full-sugar sodas will see a 3.4% rise in U.S. sales this year, while diet sodas will see 11.8% growth.
Still, nutritionists suggest avoiding added sugars, no matter the form, since they provide empty calories with no nutrients. The 2020 U.S. dietary guidelines advise people to limit foods and beverages higher in added sugars, and say children under 2 should not be fed them at all.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, whose nutrition views often diverge from mainstream nutrition science, has spoken out against sugar. His agency is expected to release updated nutrition guidelines later this year.
'There's things we'll never be able to eliminate, like sugar,' Kennedy said at an April news conference. 'And sugar is poison, and Americans need to know that.'
Aspartame and other artificial sweeteners are also named as a concern in a government report Kennedy issued in May.
___
AP Health and Science Editor Jonathan Poet contributed from Philadelphia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After Sitting on the Sidelines For 14 Months, Warren Buffett Could Be Buying One of His Favorite Stocks Again
Key Points Warren Buffett has been a net seller of stocks in each of the last 11 quarters. While he doesn't time the market, Buffett won't buy stocks if they don't trade below his estimate of intrinsic value. This stock's price has come down from its all-time high while its financials improve, making it a more appealing value right now. 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway › Warren Buffett hasn't seen a lot to like in the stock market recently. In fact, he and his team of investment managers at Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B) have been net sellers of stocks for 11 straight quarters. Buffett's stock sales have accelerated over the past five quarters. That includes monster sales of Berkshire's stakes in Apple and Bank of America. In the meantime, he's stopped buying one stock investors had seen him buy consistently each quarter since mid-2018. As a result, Berkshire's cash pile has climbed to a whopping $344 billion. But the market may be offering Buffett an opportunity to start buying his favorite stock again, and investors should consider doing the same. Buffett isn't timing the market Buffett's big stock sales over the last few years and his lack of purchases may be seen by some as the Oracle of Omaha trying to predict the future and time the market. While it might look like market timing, Buffett is merely sticking to what's worked for him as an investor for the last 60 years or so. "We try to price, rather than time, purchases," Buffett wrote in his 1994 letter to shareholders. The same could be said of Berkshire's stock sales. If the market is offering a massive premium on one of Berkshire's holdings, Buffett ought to sell it, pocket the cash, and look for opportunities in stocks trading well below their intrinsic value. That could even include buying Berkshire Hathaway shares themselves. In fact, the board of directors updated its share repurchase policy in 2018, allowing Buffett to buy back shares of the company as long as it traded below its intrinsic value, conservatively determined. Buffett quickly went to work buying back shares following that change, indicating that the stock looked like a bargain. Between 2018 and May 2024, Buffett spent $78 billion buying back shares of Berkshire Hathaway. Over the last 14 months, however, Buffett hasn't spent a single dollar buying back the stock based on Berkshire's quarterly earnings reports. He holds himself to the same high standards he expects of the CEOs of all the companies Berkshire invests in. "All stock repurchases should be price-dependent. What is sensible at a discount to business-value becomes stupid if done at a premium," he wrote in his 2023 letter to shareholders. But Berkshire shares have fallen considerably since Buffett announced he would step down as CEO at the end of the year during the company's annual meeting in May. And after a further sell-off sparked by its second-quarter earnings report, shares are starting to look a lot more appealing. That could open the door for Buffett to start buying back Berkshire's stock. Will Buffett start buying again? Berkshire Hathaway's earnings disappointed many investors, leading the market to sell off the stock. After a stellar 2024, the insurance business is back to more normalized operations, including big payouts earlier this year due to the California wildfires. That's led to a drop in underwriting profits, which pushed the conglomerate's total operating earnings down nearly 4% last quarter. It's worth noting, however, that Berkshire faced significant foreign exchange headwinds last quarter, which negatively affected operating earnings. Berkshire also wrote down its Kraft Heinz investment by $5 billion. That follows a $3 billion impairment charge it took in 2019. That further negatively affected reported earnings. Nonetheless, Buffett has seen the book value per share of Berkshire Hathaway climb, including a 2.1% gain from the first quarter, and a 10.9% increase from a year ago. Combined with the declining stock price over the last three months, Berkshire Hathaway shares now trade for a price-to-book ratio of about 1.5. That's an important valuation, because when Buffett last repurchased shares of Berkshire, the stock traded below that valuation. The stock has rarely dipped below that price since last May. But shares are certainly more attractive after the sell-off. A couple of factors could keep Buffett from buying at the current price. First, Berkshire's marketable equity portfolio is a significant factor in its book value. Buffett may still see most of the stocks in the portfolio as overpriced, especially as stocks continued to climb over the past year. That would push him to require a lower multiple for Berkshire stock, since repurchasing Berkshire shares would also mean purchasing a small piece of its equity portfolio. The other factor is that he may want to use a significant chunk of cash to bolster the railroad business in the near future. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern have agreed to a merger, threatening the competitiveness of Berkshire's Burlington Northern Santa Fe. When you consider the strength of Berkshire's balance sheet and that it's not relying on insurance float for any capital at this point, it should trade for a higher price-to-book value ratio than it has historically. With shares trading around 1.5 times book value, the stock finally looks to be trading near its intrinsic value again, making it worth buying. Should you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway right now? Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Adam Levy has positions in Apple and Union Pacific. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends Kraft Heinz and Union Pacific. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. After Sitting on the Sidelines For 14 Months, Warren Buffett Could Be Buying One of His Favorite Stocks Again was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Reddit Stock Skyrocketed This Week
Key Points Reddit reported its second-quarter results on July 31, and the stock has been on a tear since then. Reddit's sales and earnings are rising rapidly. Data licensing for artificial intelligence models has turned into a powerful growth driver for Reddit. 10 stocks we like better than Reddit › Reddit (NYSE: RDDT) stock continued to rocket higher in this week's trading thanks to strong quarterly results. The social media player's price rose 14.2% over the last week of trading. Reddit published its second-quarter report on July 31, and the results spurred a surge in bullish momentum that extended into this week's trading. The company's share price is now up roughly 308% over the last year of trading. Reddit stock roars higher on big Q2 beats Reddit's second-quarter report arrived with results that caused investors to adopt a far more bullish stance on the company's outlook. In Q2, Reddit reported a profit of $0.45 per share on sales of $500 million. The performance came in far better than the average analyst estimate, which had targeted earnings per share of $0.19 and revenue of $426 million. The company's sales increased 78% year over year in the period, and the strong performance beats caused a wide range of Wall Street analysts to significantly increase their one-year price targets on the stock. With excitement surrounding Reddit's future growing, strong post-earnings valuation gains continued over the last week of trading. What's next for Reddit? For the current quarter, Reddit expects its sales to come in between $535 million and $545 million. Hitting the midpoint of that guidance range would mean posting year-over-year sales growth of roughly 55% in the third quarter. Reddit is seeing strong sales and earnings momentum in conjunction with data generated from its platform being a go-to resource for the training of artificial intelligence (AI) models. While the platform's user base has historically monetized at relatively low levels compared to other social sites, data licensing for AI models seems to have changed the game. Should you invest $1,000 in Reddit right now? Before you buy stock in Reddit, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Reddit wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Reddit Stock Skyrocketed This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rivian Faces a Dreaded Triple Whammy. Can the Stock Recover?
Key Points Losing sales of regulatory credits is a blow to the bottom line. Tariffs have added costs and complexities to the supply chain. Removing the $7,500 federal EV tax credit will hurt demand late in 2025. 10 stocks we like better than Rivian Automotive › Rivian (NASDAQ: RIVN) just drove in its second quarter that certainly felt negative impacts from multiple angles. The company reported a 13% rise in revenue to $1.3 billion and a narrowing net loss of $1.1 billion compared to the prior year's $1.5 billion, and reaffirmed its delivery guidance of 40,000 to 46,000 vehicles. Rivian also reported its full-year adjusted EBITDA loss is expected to be between $2 billion and $2.25 billion, worse than the prior forecast of $1.7 billion to $1.9 billion. Let's take a quick look at the triple whammy sending speed bumps at the young electric vehicle (EV) maker. Goodbye easy money When it comes to easy money, it doesn't get much easier than EV makers selling zero-emission, or regulatory, credits. Essentially, automakers that produce EVs are given credit for meeting emissions standards, while vehicles that don't meet emissions standards are fined. One way to get out of the fine is to simply purchase regulatory credits from automakers such as Rivian that don't have an internal combustion vehicle portfolio to offset. However, the Trump administration recently did away with the penalty for not meeting emissions standards, and thus removed the incentive to buy these regulatory credits. That's a significant, and sudden, removal of a vital chunk of business for Rivian. Now Rivian expects to receive no more revenue for the credits and for regulatory credits to generate roughly $160 million in 2025, down from the prior expectation of $300 million. Tortuous tariffs You aren't to be blamed if you can't keep up on all the tariffs, reciprocal tariffs, retaliatory tariffs, trade policy changes, among other developments. But the simple truth is the introduction of these tariffs complicated the lives of automakers and their investors, and Rivian is no different. The tariffs set by the current administration hit imported auto parts, causing pain even for companies such as Rivian that manufacture vehicles inside the U.S. Not only is that raising costs and eroding margins, it's causing supply chain disruptions and constraints that contributed to Rivian producing under 6,000 vehicles during the quarter, compared to nearly 14,000 during the prior year. Unfortunately for investors, management expects changes in trade regulation and tariffs to have a negative impact on cash flow, which had been long trending in the right direction, as you can see in the graph below. Rivian also expects tariffs to negatively impact vehicles by a couple thousand dollars per unit for the remainder of 2025, which is a big deal for a company already losing tens of thousands per vehicle. But tariffs are only part of the problem, and it goes hand in hand with the administration's removal of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. No longer a shock In the world's least kept secret, the $7,500 federal tax credit for EV purchases is set to go away at the end of September. It's apparent that long-term demand will be negatively impacted with the tax credit making every qualifying vehicle more expensive. But investors also need to be aware of the impact the knowledge of the credit's removal had on demand. First, it created a pull forward effect as consumers on the fence rushed to buy an EV before the credit disappeared. That coincided with a boost in OEM production as automakers rushed production ahead of tariffs, increasing costs on imported parts and vehicles. But that also means there's almost certainly going to be an equally powerful lull once that pull-through demand is worked through and the new reality of likely cost increases sets in, probably during the fourth quarter. That's important because for Rivian to hit its full-year delivery target it needs a strong second half for demand and deliveries. It currently expects the third quarter to post the strongest for deliveries, so it will be a key quarter for investors to watch after demand and deliveries have trended lower. What it all means A triple whammy of negative impacts from tariffs and trade regulation, removal of the federal tax credit, and lost revenue from regulatory credits amid slower than anticipated EV industry growth makes for a rough year for Rivian. For long-term investors, the thesis hasn't changed: It's all hands on deck until the R2, R3, and R3X are driving into consumer garages. Rivian can absolutely recover from these negative developments. However, it's becoming more and more clear how much Rivian's future depends on the R2, and that's why the company remains high risk, high reward. Invest accordingly. Should you invest $1,000 in Rivian Automotive right now? Before you buy stock in Rivian Automotive, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Rivian Automotive wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rivian Faces a Dreaded Triple Whammy. Can the Stock Recover? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
