Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content
Gilmar Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court's 11 justices to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is ongoing but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to pass.
The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved in censoring American citizens.
The only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is André Mendonça and his vote was made public last week.
The social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and the result is published. But Brazil's Congress could still pass another law to reverse the measure.
The current legislation states social media companies can only be held responsible in those cases if they do not remove hazardous content after a court order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) CEO Mark Zuckerberg Is 'Unbelievable,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) is the largest social media company in the world. Its shares have gained 28% year-to-date on the back of strong advertisement performance and aggressive AI capital expenditure. Cramer is a fan of the firm's smart glasses, and he also believes that Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) needs to reshape its communications about AI capital expenditure. He heaped praise on the glasses in his latest comments about the firm: 'But I love our tech so much. I just think our tech is really, I mean our tech is equivalent of you know like Zuckerberg. Meta. I mean he's unbelievable. . .I love the sunglasses, I'm bringing them on my trip. . . they, well you can look at a plant and say what is that? What am I looking at? And it works. . . it tells you exactly what it is.' Bloomua / In a recent appearance, Cramer discussed Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) in detail. Here is what he said: 'Next best, Meta Platforms. I'm agog at the numbers that Mark Zuckerberg's putting up. The most important one, not even talked about on Wall Street enough, 3.5 billion people use at least one Meta product each day. Come on, that's almost half the planet. That's insane. The company's printing money, which is why it can go into the equivalent of free agency and hire incredible talent. It doesn't even matter. You can't even see it in the margins. While we acknowledge the potential of META as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Tom's Guide
20 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Meta AI chatbots gave false medical advice and flirted with minors — now the company is restructuring its AI division again
Meta is facing fresh scrutiny after a troubling report revealed that some of its AI chatbot personas on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp were allowed to flirt with minors and spread dangerously inaccurate information. The revelations, first reported by Reuters, come just as the company begins its fourth major AI reorganization in six months. The timing couldn't be worse. As Meta pours billions into building out its AI capabilities to compete with rivals like ChatGPT's OpenAI, Anthropic's Claude and Google's Gemini, this latest scandal exposes glaring holes in how the company is managing safety, oversight and ethical boundaries. According to internal documents obtained by Reuters, Meta's GenAI: Content Risk Standards once allowed AI characters to engage in 'romantic' or 'sensual' conversations with underage users. In one alarming example, a chatbot was permitted to tell a child: While the policy prohibited direct sexual content involving children under 13, it still permitted flirtatious language that many critics say veers dangerously close to grooming behavior. Meta told Reuters it has since removed these allowances, calling them 'erroneous and inconsistent with our policies.' The same leaked document revealed that Meta's guidelines did not require AI bots to provide accurate medical advice. One bot reportedly claimed Stage 4 colon cancer could be treated with 'healing quartz crystals,' so long as a disclaimer was attached. Other examples allowed for racist content, including the suggestion that 'Black people are dumber than white people,' framed as a controversial opinion. Meta responded by saying it has revised the standards and doesn't condone hate speech or misleading medical information. However, the company has not made a revised version of the GenAI guidelines publicly available. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. In what appears to be both a defensive and strategic move, Meta is now restructuring its AI division for the fourth time since February, according to a separate report from The Information. The company is dividing its AI efforts into four new units: Products, Infrastructure, the FAIR research lab, and a new experimental group tasked with developing future a major shift—and a possible acknowledgment that Meta's fragmented AI strategy hasn't kept pace with the rapid growth and scrutiny in the space. The restructuring also follows reports that Meta offered $100 million signing bonuses to poach top AI talent from rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic, a move that stirred internal resentment among long-tenured employees. Meta's generative AI tools are increasingly embedded in the daily experiences of billions of users, including teens and children. Missteps like these don't just damage reputation—they expose users to potentially harmful interactions at AI adoption accelerates, the pressure is on tech giants to balance speed, innovation and safety. Meta's recent moves suggest it knows it must do better, but it remains to be seen whether another internal shuffle will be enough to fix the foundational Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Harvard dropouts to launch ‘always on' AI smart glasses that listen and record every conversation
Two former Harvard students are launching a pair of 'always-on' AI-powered smart glasses that listen to, record, and transcribe every conversation, and then display relevant information to the wearer in real time. 'Our goal is to make glasses that make you super intelligent the moment you put them on,' said AnhPhu Nguyen, co-founder of the startup that's developing the technology, called Halo. Or, as his co-founder Caine Ardayfio put it, the glasses 'give you infinite memory.' 'The AI listens to every conversation you have and uses that knowledge to tell you what to say… kinda like IRL Cluely,' Ardayfio told TechCrunch, referring to the startup that claims to help users 'cheat' on everything from job interviews to school exams. 'If somebody says a complex word or asks you a question, like, 'what's 37 to the third power?' or something like that, then it'll pop up on the glasses,' Ardayfio added. Ardayfio and Nguyen have raised $1 million to develop the glasses led by Pillar VC, with support from Soma Capital, Village Global, and Morningside Venture. The glasses will be available for pre-order at $249 starting Wednesday. Ardayfio called the glasses 'the first real step towards vibe thinking.' The two Ivy League drop outs, who have since moved into their own version of the Hacker Hostel in the San Francisco Bay Area, recently caused a stir after developing a facial recognition app for Meta's smart Ray-Ban glasses to prove that the tech could be used to dox people. As a potential early competitor to Meta's smart glasses, Ardayfio said Meta, given its history of security and privacy scandals, had to rein in its product in ways that Halo can ultimately capitalize on. 'Meta doesn't have a great reputation for caring about user privacy, and for them to release something that's always there with you — which obviously brings a ton of utility — is just a huge reputational risk for them that they probably won't take before a startup does it at scale first,' Nguyen added. And while Nguyen has a point, users may not yet have a good reason to trust the technology of a couple of college-aged students purporting to send people out into the world with covert recording equipment. While Meta's glasses have an indicator light when their cameras and microphones are watching and listening as a mechanism to warn others that they are being recorded, Ardayfio said that the Halo glasses, dubbed Halo X, do not have an external indicator to warn people of their customers' recording. 'For the hardware we're making we want it to be discreet, like normal glasses,' said Ardayfio, who added that the glasses record every word, transcribe it, and then delete the audio file. Privacy advocates are warning about the normalization of covert recording devices in public. 'Small and discreet recording devices are not new,' Eva Galperin, the director of cybersecurity at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told TechCrunch. 'In some ways, this sounds like a variation on the microphone spy pen,' said Galperin. 'But I think that normalizing the use of an always-on recording device, which in many circumstances would require the user to get the consent of everyone within recording distance, eats away at the expectation of privacy we have for our conversations in all kinds of spaces.' There are several states in the U.S. that make it illegal to covertly record conversations without the other persons' consent. Ardayfio said they are aware of this but that it is up to their customer to obtain consent before using the glasses. 'We trust our users to get consent if they are in a two party consent state,' said Ardayfio, referring to the laws of a dozen U.S. states that require the consent of all recorded parties. 'I would also be very concerned about where the recorded data is being kept, how it is being stored, and who has access to it,' Galperin added. Ardayfio said Halo relies on Soniox for audio transcription, which claims to never store recordings. Nguyen claimed when the finished product is released to customers, it will be end-to-end encrypted, but provided no evidence of how this would work. He also noted that Halo is aiming to get SOC 2 compliance, which means it has been independently audited and demonstrates adequate protection of customer data. A date for the completed SOC 2 compliance was not provided. Still, the two students are not new to privacy-invasive controversial projects. While still at Harvard last year, Ardayfio and Nguyen developed I-XRAY, a demo project that added facial recognition capabilities to the Meta Ray-Ban's smart glasses, demonstrating how easily the tech could be bolted onto a device not meant to identify people. The duo never released the code behind I-XRAY, but they did test the glasses on random passers-by without consent. In a demo video, Ardafyio showed the glasses detecting faces and pulling up personal information of strangers within seconds. The video featured reactions of people who were doxed. In an interview with 404 Media, they acknowledged the risks: 'Some dude could just find some girl's home address on the train and just follow them home,' Nguyen told the tech news website. For now, Halo X glasses only have a display and a microphone, but no camera, although the two are exploring the possibility of adding it to a future model. Users still need to have their smartphones handy to help power the glasses and get 'real time info prompts and answers to questions,' per Nguyen. The glasses, which are manufactured by another company that the startup didn't name, are tethered to an accompanying app on the owner's phone, where the glasses essentially outsource the computing since they don't have enough power to do it on the device itself. Under the hood, the smart glasses uses Google's Gemini and Perplexity as its chatbot engine, according to the two co-founders. Gemini is better for math and reasoning, whereas they use Perplexity to scrape the internet, they said. During an interview, TechCrunch asked if their glasses knew when the next season of 'The Witcher' would come out. Responding in a way reminiscent of C-3PO, Ardayfio said: ''The Witcher' season four will be released on Netflix in 2025, but there's no exact date yet. Most sources expect it in the second half of 2025.' 'I don't know if that's correct,' he added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
