
UAE educators voice concern as Trump visa ban threatens future of foreign students
The move by US President Donald Trump's administration to halt new visa interviews for students has triggered widespread concern within academic communities worldwide, with educators in the UAE leading calls to uphold academic freedom and promote international collaboration in education.
According to reports, the US has instructed its embassies to suspend scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visitor visa applicants. The State Department is also preparing to expand social media vetting of foreign students.
Earlier, the Trump administration also barred Harvard University from enrolling international students — a policy that potentially threatens the dreams and futures of thousands of aspiring scholars worldwide.
Meanwhile, numerous students and professors at Harvard University came out in support of foreign students and protested Trump's attempts to withdraw funding from the university.
Undermining intellectually rich environment
Many regional academicians and education consultants emphasised the damaging consequences of such policies — not just for students, but for institutions, local and global academia as a whole.
Highlighting the economic and academic value international students bring to US campuses, Varun Jain, CEO, UniHawk said, 'Harvard is home to over 10,000 international students who contribute significantly to the university's revenue and academic diversity. A ban on admitting international students would not only affect financial stability but also undermine the competitive and intellectually rich environment that they help foster.
"The core mission of academia and university collaborations has always been to enhance the education system and promote global outreach by providing access to all. Such a restriction contradicts the very ideology of 'education without borders' putting at risk the progress made in building inclusive and globally connected learning communities.'
Others note a shift in student mindset — as learners explore broader opportunities beyond the traditional Ivy League route. Rema Menon Vellat, Director at Counselling Point Training and Development, said, "Students are now looking at other options, not just the Ivy leagues. Many are also exploring other education destinations. I am disheartened by this move because many students have worked really hard to attain places in such selective institutions."
School leaders across the UAE echoed concerns over the politicisation of academic access, reinforcing the need for openness and diversity in education.
Simon Crane, Head Master at Brighton College Dubai, said, 'Policies that restrict access to education based on nationality are deeply concerning. They undermine the very essence of academia, which thrives on openness, diversity, and the free exchange of ideas. The global academic community is interconnected — when opportunities are closed off in one part of the world, it weakens the whole system.'
Crane further underlined the UAE's strong positioning as an international education hub, rich in diversity and ambition. "In our school and across many schools in the UAE, we value and celebrate the diversity that defines our communities — our school alone brings together 77 nationalities. The UAE has positioned itself as a forward-thinking hub for international education, and we're proud to be part of that.'
'We can continue to strengthen partnerships with universities and schools around the world, promoting exchange programmes, collaborative research, and shared curriculum development. Our Sixth Form and Upper Sixth pupils benefit from comprehensive university guidance that supports applications to top institutions globally, including Ivy League US universities such as Harvard, Yale and Brown,' he added.
Industry professionals believe the UAE is well-placed to benefit from these global shifts, provided there is continued investment in academic support systems.
'As indicated by KHDA stats, there is already a 20 per cent increase in students studying here (at universities). We will know the exact figures after September. Furthermore, with the government's initiative of granting golden visas for high academic performance, will also help retain talented minds,' added Menon.
Beyond policies and permissions, many also credit the UAE's reputation for safety and stability as key factors drawing international students.
Chris Goodbourn, Director, GEMS for Life, said, 'We recognise the importance of global academic collaboration and the pivotal role international study plays in shaping well-rounded, future-ready graduates. We are proud that our students have successfully progressed to leading universities around the world, including Ivy League institutions, which continue to represent academic excellence for many families.'
Educators also observe a diversification in students' global preferences, with more graduates now setting their sights on Europe, other parts of Asia, and the UAE itself.
Goodbourn added, 'This shift reflects a growing emphasis among students and families on long-term stability, value for investment, and the ability to make flexible, well-informed decisions about their future. Over the past few years, approximately 11 per cent of GEMS Education graduates have gone on to study in the United States, drawn by the country's renowned institutions and broad academic offerings. While interest remains, students are increasingly exploring a wider range of global options and keeping pathways open until they feel confident in the overall value and clarity of the post-study experience.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Dubai Eye
an hour ago
- Dubai Eye
US and China set for trade talks in London
Three of US President Donald Trump's top aides will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the United States in the talks, Trump announced in a post on his Truth Social platform without providing further details. China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that vice premier He Lifeng will be in the United Kingdom between June 8 and June 13, adding that the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism would be held during this visit. "The meeting should go very well," Trump wrote. Trump spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday in a rare leader-to-leader call amid weeks of brewing trade tensions and a dispute over critical minerals. Trump and Xi agreed to visit one another and asked their staffs to hold talks in the meantime. Both countries are under pressure to relieve tensions, with the global economy under pressure over Chinese control over the rare earth mineral exports of which it is the dominant producer and investors more broadly anxious about Trump's wider effort to impose tariffs on goods from most US trading partners. China, meanwhile, has seen its own supply of key US imports like chip-design software and nuclear plant parts curtailed. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 in Geneva to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump returned to the presidency in January. That preliminary deal sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and US indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives. China sees mineral exports as a source of leverage. Halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican US president if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. In recent years, US officials have identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the United States economically and militarily.


Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
If US doesn't want Harvard, somebody else will
In the 1930s and 1940s, America played a crucial role in keeping academic inquiry alive. By welcoming thousands of researchers fleeing fascism in Europe, it enhanced its national brainpower and fostered breakthroughs of immense value to people everywhere — from the digital computer to the discovery of DNA. Now it's in the process of throwing that priceless legacy away. If wiser minds don't prevail, one can only hope Europe and others will step into the breach. Establishing itself as a haven of academic freedom was among the smartest moves the US ever made. Its unrivaled collection of research universities attracts top global talent, fostering innovation that enriches the nation. By some estimates, each dollar spent on research and development generates $5 or more in social benefits, such as higher productivity and better living standards. It's by far the most profitable form of public investment. Yet the White House now seems bent on destruction. Citing (among other things) rising antisemitism on college campuses, it has withheld billions of dollars from the likes of Harvard and Columbia, forcing them to terminate projects, lay off researchers and limit graduate-school admissions. It has proposed tens of billions in budget cuts at federal agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. It has detained foreign academics and — most recently — sought to block enrollment of international students. The repercussions promise to be devastating. The economic damage could exceed that of the recession of 2008. Projects in areas ranging from climate science to medicine have shut down. An exodus looms: Three-fourths of U.S.-based scientists who responded to a recent Nature poll said they were seeking a way out, with Europe and Canada the top destinations. By one estimate, up to a fifth of postdoctoral students at elite US universities have studied in the European Union and hence might be amenable to moving. Rival research centers are jumping at the opportunity. As Bloomberg News has reported, countries including Australia, Canada, Denmark and Norway are offering funding, streamlined visas and other perks to lure top academics. Germany has invited Harvard to set up an 'exile campus.' The EU has launched a €500 million 'Choose Europe' programme. These efforts are welcome, to the extent that they keep crucial work going. Yet the funds so far committed pale in comparison to the potential cuts in the US. If America abdicates, Europe in particular will need to be much more ambitious. A better option would be for the US to come to its senses. Legislators should reject the false economy of slashing public research funding. Courts should issue injunctions where the administration's actions have violated the law or the Constitution, as they plainly have in several cases. Researchers, alumni and industry groups should alert the public to the scale of potential damage ahead. Universities, for their part, might consider some introspection. Although the administration's actions are nuts, it's true that too many schools have indulged antisemitic protesters who have created chaos on campus, obstructed learning and menaced their fellow students. Imposing zero-tolerance policies for such disruption might placate the White House; it's also the right thing to do. Amid the chaos, researchers will need to do their jobs as best they can. It'd be a truly spectacular act of self-harm if America managed to trigger an exodus of talent back across the Atlantic. If other countries rise to the occasion, its loss will be their gain.


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
National Guard arrive in Los Angeles after Donald Trump orders posting to quell protests
National Guard troops fired tear gas at protesters gathered in Los Angeles on Sunday, after President Donald Trump issued an order to send troops to quell protests over immigration raids. Mr Trump said the guards were doing a 'great job'. 'These radical left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will not be tolerated,' he wrote on Truth Social. He said protesters would not be allowed to wear masks. Street protests erupted on Friday in Los Angeles after immigration raids by federal agents. At least 44 people were detained on alleged immigration offences. Footage showed burnt vehicles and piles of rubbish in the streets, and protesters hurling fireworks at police officers. Los Angeles, the second-largest city in the US, is home to a large immigrant community, predominantly from Mexico and other parts of Central and South America. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom condemned Mr Trump's move, calling it 'purposefully inflammatory', and said it would only worsen tensions. Mr Trump had signed a presidential order authorising 2,000 troops to be posted. He said he had directed his administration to take all "necessary" action to "liberate" Los Angeles. "Order will be restored, the illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free," he wrote on Truth Social. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said the guards are 'specifically trained for this type of crowd situation.' 'Governor Newsom has proven that he makes bad decisions,' Ms Noem told CBS on Sunday. 'The President knows that he makes bad decisions, and that's why the President chose the safety of this community over waiting for Governor Newsom to get some sanity.' Mr Trump ran on a campaign promise to conduct the largest deportation campaign in the nation's history. Since taking office, he has charged US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a federal law enforcement agency, to detain people living in the US without documentation. The White House recently set a goal for agents to arrest at least 3,000 migrants a day. Thousands have been swiftly deported, sometimes without due process. The sweeping raids have also affected people with no criminal record, or who are legal residents in the country. More than 200 migrants, primarily from Venezuela, have been sent to a prison in El Salvador.