logo
If US doesn't want Harvard, somebody else will

If US doesn't want Harvard, somebody else will

Gulf Today09-06-2025
In the 1930s and 1940s, America played a crucial role in keeping academic inquiry alive. By welcoming thousands of researchers fleeing fascism in Europe, it enhanced its national brainpower and fostered breakthroughs of immense value to people everywhere — from the digital computer to the discovery of DNA.
Now it's in the process of throwing that priceless legacy away. If wiser minds don't prevail, one can only hope Europe and others will step into the breach.
Establishing itself as a haven of academic freedom was among the smartest moves the US ever made. Its unrivaled collection of research universities attracts top global talent, fostering innovation that enriches the nation.
By some estimates, each dollar spent on research and development generates $5 or more in social benefits, such as higher productivity and better living standards. It's by far the most profitable form of public investment.
Yet the White House now seems bent on destruction. Citing (among other things) rising antisemitism on college campuses, it has withheld billions of dollars from the likes of Harvard and Columbia, forcing them to terminate projects, lay off researchers and limit graduate-school admissions.
It has proposed tens of billions in budget cuts at federal agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. It has detained foreign academics and — most recently — sought to block enrollment of international students.
The repercussions promise to be devastating. The economic damage could exceed that of the recession of 2008. Projects in areas ranging from climate science to medicine have shut down. An exodus looms: Three-fourths of U.S.-based scientists who responded to a recent Nature poll said they were seeking a way out, with Europe and Canada the top destinations. By one estimate, up to a fifth of postdoctoral students at elite US universities have studied in the European Union and hence might be amenable to moving.
Rival research centers are jumping at the opportunity. As Bloomberg News has reported, countries including Australia, Canada, Denmark and Norway are offering funding, streamlined visas and other perks to lure top academics. Germany has invited Harvard to set up an 'exile campus.' The EU has launched a €500 million 'Choose Europe' programme.
These efforts are welcome, to the extent that they keep crucial work going. Yet the funds so far committed pale in comparison to the potential cuts in the US. If America abdicates, Europe in particular will need to be much more ambitious.
A better option would be for the US to come to its senses. Legislators should reject the false economy of slashing public research funding. Courts should issue injunctions where the administration's actions have violated the law or the Constitution, as they plainly have in several cases. Researchers, alumni and industry groups should alert the public to the scale of potential damage ahead.
Universities, for their part, might consider some introspection. Although the administration's actions are nuts, it's true that too many schools have indulged antisemitic protesters who have created chaos on campus, obstructed learning and menaced their fellow students. Imposing zero-tolerance policies for such disruption might placate the White House; it's also the right thing to do.
Amid the chaos, researchers will need to do their jobs as best they can. It'd be a truly spectacular act of self-harm if America managed to trigger an exodus of talent back across the Atlantic. If other countries rise to the occasion, its loss will be their gain.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boil don't fry: How you cook potatoes can limit diabetes risk
Boil don't fry: How you cook potatoes can limit diabetes risk

The National

time8 hours ago

  • The National

Boil don't fry: How you cook potatoes can limit diabetes risk

Eating three portions of French fries a week raises the risk of developing type 2 diabetes by 20 per cent, a new study suggests. That risk increases to 27 per cent for people who eat fries five times a week. However, those who eat similar amounts of boiled, baked or mashed potatoes do not have an increased risk, researchers found. An international team of researchers wanted to investigate any links between potato consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Potatoes contain several nutrients, including fibre, vitamin C and magnesium, but they also have a high starch content and therefore a high glycemic index, which is linked to diabetes. Academics analysed data from studies tracking the health of more than 205,000 health workers in the US. Repeated surveys about people's diets were performed over almost four decades. During the study follow-up periods about 22,000 cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. According to the researchers, while previous studies hinted at a link between potatoes and T2D, the evidence was inconsistent. It often lacked detail of cooking methods and the potential effects of substituting other foods for potatoes. 'Our study offers deeper, more comprehensive insights by looking at different types of potatoes, tracking diet over decades, and exploring the effects of swapping potatoes for other foods,' said lead author Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Nutrition at Harvard University. 'We're shifting the conversation from 'are potatoes good or bad?' to a more nuanced – and useful question: How are they prepared, and what might we eat instead?' Writing in the The BMJ, the authors said: 'The risks associated with potato intake varied by cooking method. 'The association between higher potato intake and increased T2D risk is primarily driven by intake of French fries. 'Higher intake of French fries, but not combined baked, boiled or mashed potatoes, was associated with a higher risk of T2D.' The research team also found that replacing three servings of potatoes each week with whole grains was found to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8 per cent. 'Replacing any form of potatoes, particularly French fries, with whole grains is estimated to lower the risk of T2D, reinforcing the importance of promoting whole grains as an essential part of a healthy diet,' they wrote. But replacing potatoes with white rice was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, they found. The research team also reviewed all the other studies on the topic which had similar findings. In a linked editorial, also published in The BMJ, experts from the US and Denmark wrote: 'This finding also corresponds to the observed associations between high intake of ultra-processed foods and high risk of type 2 diabetes – French fries are often ultra-processed, whereas baked, boiled or mashed potatoes are often minimally processed.' They added: 'With their relatively low environmental impact and their health impact, potatoes can be part of a healthy and sustainable diet, though whole grains should remain a priority.' Commenting on the study, Dr Faye Riley, research communications lead at Diabetes UK, said: 'This research shows that the link between potatoes and type 2 diabetes isn't as clear-cut as it might seem. 'Type 2 diabetes is a complex condition, with many factors influencing its development, including genetics, age and ethnicity. 'Diet is just one part of the picture, but this study suggests that how food is prepared can make a difference and reinforces the advice to prioritise whole grains and cut back on fried or heavily processed foods as a way to support a balanced diet and reduce your risk.'

Senate Votes to Archive Impeachment Articles Against VP Sara Duterte
Senate Votes to Archive Impeachment Articles Against VP Sara Duterte

Filipino Times

timea day ago

  • Filipino Times

Senate Votes to Archive Impeachment Articles Against VP Sara Duterte

The Senate voted on Monday to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment filed against Vice President Sara Duterte. This decision came after the Supreme Court ruled the impeachment unconstitutional, citing violations of the one-year rule and due process. The vote passed with 19 senators in favor, 4 against, and 1 abstention. The decision followed a motion initially filed by Senator Rodante Marcoleta to dismiss the articles outright. However, Senate Majority Leader Joel Villanueva proposed an amendment to simply archive the documents instead of dismissing them entirely, which Marcoleta accepted. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero emphasized that this action upholds the Constitution and the rule of law, choosing to respect the Supreme Court's authority. Those who voted against archiving, including Senators Risa Hontiveros, Bam Aquino, Kiko Pangilinan, and Minority Leader Tito Sotto, argued that the Senate was abandoning its constitutional duty to try impeachment cases. Sotto questioned the validity of archiving documents that are technically part of an impeachment court's jurisdiction, while Hontiveros called it a departure from the Senate's mandate under the 1987 Constitution. Despite the archiving, Senate President Migz Zubiri noted that the case may be revived if the pending motions for reconsideration before the Supreme Court are granted. Meanwhile, the Vice President's camp said they are now focused on submitting the required response to the High Court's order. The Supreme Court maintained that while Duterte is not absolved of the accusations, any new impeachment complaint can only be filed starting February 6, 2026.

UAE a go-to hotspot for international students who fear being denied access to US
UAE a go-to hotspot for international students who fear being denied access to US

Gulf Today

timea day ago

  • Gulf Today

UAE a go-to hotspot for international students who fear being denied access to US

In China, wait times for US visa interviews are so long that some students have given up. Universities in Hong Kong are fielding transfer enquiries from foreign students in the US, and international applications for British undergraduate programmes have surged. President Donald Trump's administration has been pressuring US colleges to reduce their dependence on international enrolment while adding new layers of scrutiny for foreign students as part of its crackdown on immigration. Countries including the United Arab Emirates have invested heavily in attracting international students by partnering with universities elsewhere to host branch campuses. These arrangements could appeal to students who fear being denied access to the US. Dubai, which has designs on becoming a global education hub, hosts dozens of international institutions' satellite campuses. It saw international student numbers grow by a third in 2024-2025. Lisa Johnson, principal of Dubai's private American Academy for Girls, said her mostly Emirati student body is increasingly looking away from the US for college. "Every student wants and dreams to go to Harvard,' she said. "But as college options increase in the United Arab Emirates, more and more students are staying." Donald Trump Kazakhstan has similar ambitions, said Daniel Palm, who has helped US universities set up campuses abroad. Illinois Tech and the University of Arizona are among colleges offering degree programmes in the Central Asian country, drawing students mostly from China and Russia. "All of a sudden US colleges are asking how to provide diversity, provide access," Palm said, "because you have students who want to come to the US and can't." The US government has sought to deport foreign students for participating in pro-Palestinian activism. In the spring, it abruptly revoked the legal status of thousands of international students, including some whose only brush with law enforcement was a traffic ticket. After reversing course, the government paused new appointments for student visas while rolling out a process for screening applicants' social media accounts. Affecting America's economy The US remains the first choice for many international students, but institutions elsewhere are recognizing opportunity in the upheaval, and applicants are considering destinations they might have otherwise overlooked. The impact on US universities – and the nation's economy – may be significant. New international enrolment in the US could drop by 30% to 40% this fall, according to an analysis of visa and enrolment data by NAFSA, an agency that promotes international education. That would deprive the US economy of $7 billion in spending, according to the analysis. Many international students pay full price, so their absence would also hurt college budgets. Britain 2nd most popular attraction for students As the second most popular destination for international students, Britain is positioned to benefit. The country's new Labour government has vowed to cut migration, and officials have imposed time limits on post-study visas allowing graduates to stay and work. But admissions consultants say the United Kingdom is still seen as the most welcoming of the traditional "big four' English-speaking destinations in higher education – the US, UK, Canada and Australia. An Emirati student arrives at the building of the University of Wollongong in Dubai. File/Associated Press After declining last year, the number of international applications for undergraduate study in the UK this fall grew by 2.2%, official figures show. A record number of applications came from China, up 10% compared with the previous year. Applications from the US also reached nearly 8,000 students – an increase of 14% and a 20-year high. Acceptances of international students for graduate programmes in the UK grew an estimated 10% from last year, driven by demand for business and management courses in particular, according to data from UniQuest, which works with many British universities on admissions. Data showing the extent of any impact will not be available until fall, said Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, a consultancy that works with colleges in the US, Canada and Europe. "But the American brand has taken a massive hit, and the UK is the one that is benefiting," he said. Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia universities also in demand Demand from Chinese students has risen rapidly for universities places in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia, said Will Kwong, managing director of AAS Education, a consultancy in Hong Kong. Many Western universities have offshore campuses there that are more affordable than going to the US or UK. "Opting for study in Asia has been a trend since the easing of COVID-19,' Kwong said. "But obviously it's been exacerbated by the change of administration in the US.' Some Asian families have told him the US is no longer their clear first choice because of political turbulence and visa difficulties, many are still waiting for US visa interviews and will likely miss the start of the fall term, Kwong said. Chinese college student Alisa, who is studying data science, plans to attend an exchange programme this fall at the University of California, Berkeley. She hopes to pursue a master's degree in the US. But she is also looking into other options "just so I could still go to school if the extreme scenario occurs,' said Alisa, who spoke on condition of partial anonymity out of fear of being targeted. Hong Kong will welcome any students who are denied entry to the US., the city's leader John Lee has said. Last year, the Chinese territory decided to allow international students to work part-time. Hong Kong University said it has received over 500 enquiries from students in the US and is processing around 200 applications for transfer. At another school, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, international undergraduate applications have surged by 40% from last year, said Alison Lloyd, associate provost on institutional data and research. Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store