
Johnson shuts door on House vote before September on releasing Epstein files
Some of President Donald Trump's most loyal supporters in Congress have been pressing party leaders to allow for a vote to show they support transparency around the Epstein saga — an issue that continues to animate the MAGA base even as Trump has repeatedly sought to blame Democrats for fanning the flames.
The House forcing the Trump administration to turn over materials against its will would represent a remarkable rebuke of the president by his base. But the push has shown little forward momentum among the party's leadership on Capitol Hill.
Johnson told CNN on Monday the full House would not vote on a pending measure from members of his own party – a non-binding resolution calling for the release of additional Epstein files – before the chamber's August recess, which is slated to begin at week's end.
'My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing, and if further congressional action is necessary or appropriate, then we'll look at that, but I don't think we're at that point right now, because we agree with the president,' he said.
As part of a deal to approve the White House's rescissions package last week, Johnson reached an accord with GOP holdouts that allowed the House Rules Committee to advance that non-binding resolution calling for the Epstein files release. But it is unclear if that measure will make it to the House floor, with Johnson firmly standing behind Trump on the matter.
'There is no daylight between the House Republicans … the House and the president on maximum transparency,' Johnson said, adding that Trump wants 'all the credible files' on Epstein to be released and asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce grand jury testimony related to the case and 'all of that is in process right now.'
Still, a bipartisan group of House members — led by Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie — is seeking to circumvent Johnson and force a vote on a separate bill calling for the release of the files. Massie will need a majority of House members to sign on to what's known as a discharge petition to force a floor vote.
That measure wouldn't be considered by the full House until after Labor Day at the earliest if Massie is successful.
Johnson's leadership team had been privately signaling they would not bring up any Epstein measures this week, two Republicans familiar with the matter told CNN.
Ten House Republicans have now signed onto Massie's measure – a level of GOP support that would trigger a full vote by the GOP-controlled House on the measure if all Democrats supported it, as expected. But don't expect a new tranche of documents to immediately be made public.
A vote to compel the full House to consider the effort can't come until after Labor Day at the earliest when lawmakers return from their five-week summer recess. That's because Massie and California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna are using a discharge petition.
That procedural maneuver requires seven legislative days before House lawmakers can formally collect the necessary signatures. Once they prove they have support from 218 members, it would force party leaders to bring it to the floor.
Trump's attorney general has asked for grand jury material to be made public – which also is likely to be a slow-moving effort, and one that requires court approval. But the Massie and Khanna measure goes significantly further, requiring the Trump administration to release 'all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to Epstein within 30 days.
It would also require the White House to release a 'list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials' — a list that Trump's base has been demanding.
Khanna previously told CNN's Jake Tapper that he would deliver 'all 212 Democrats' on the measure. While many Democrats previously decried the promotion of conspiracy theories about Epstein, they have in recent days pushed for greater transparency, arguing Trump is trying to protect himself and aiming to further drive a wedge between Trump and his base.
'Why do we think President Joe Biden or President Barack Obama's names are being invoked because Donald Trump is running scared, and the Trump administration is running scared. What are they hiding from the American people, release the files so that the American people can make a decision on their own,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters during a press conference Monday.
With all Democrats behind the effort, 10 Republicans would be more than enough to meet the necessary 218 threshold. Along with Massie, the Republicans already on board are: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Eric Burlison of Missouri, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, Eli Crane of Arizona, Cory Mills of Florida, Tom Barrett of Michigan, Max Miller of Ohio and Nancy Mace of South Carolina.
The move, of course, could end as many things in Congress do – with a lot of talk, a little corresponding action. Last week, Republicans held up a vote to approve a $9 billion package of spending cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting, something Trump wanted, as they debated what to do on the Epstein case. They settled for the non-binding resolution calling for the release of additional files – which doesn't immediately force any action and to which Johnson has been noncommittal.
Even continued talk of the Epstein case, though, is likely to irk Trump. Over the weekend, the president seemed to acknowledge the intractability of the subject as he noted he had ordered the release of grand jury materials.
'With that being said, and even if the Court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request. It will always be more, more, more. MAGA!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he 'had to' move nuclear submarines after 'threat'
STORY: :: Trump says he 'had to' move nuclear submarines after a 'threat' from Russian ex-leader Dmitry Medvedev :: August 1, 2025 :: Washington, D.C. Security analysts called Trump's move a rhetorical escalation with Moscow, but not necessarily a military one, given that the United States already has nuclear-powered submarines that are deployed and capable of striking Russia. Medvedev on Thursday said Trump should remember that Moscow possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort, after Trump had told Medvedev to "watch his words." He did not specify what he meant by "nuclear submarines." Submarines may be nuclear-powered, or armed with nuclear missiles. It is extremely rare for the U.S. military to discuss the deployment and location of U.S. submarines given their sensitive mission in nuclear deterrence. The U.S. Navy declined comment. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
44 Jaw-Dropping Historical Photos That Are 100x More Interesting Than Anything I Learned In History Class
honestly so cool to see these parents marching in a pride parade in it also makes me sad that it's been 50 years and queer people are still facing so much prejudice. that Theodore Roosevelt's first wife and mother died on the same day, which was just days after the birth of his eldest child (the indomitable Alice, who, if you have not read should). He wrote this in his journal shortly afterward, and it's genuinely heartbreaking. contrast, this letter from Teddy Roosevelt after he was called a drunk is kind of hilarious. Someone remind me what the medicinal purposes of brandy are? 1939 predictions about what fashion would look like in 2000 are also funny to see now. TBH, you probably could buy a version of those shoes in 2000, though I don't know how comfortable they'd be. photo of American soldiers playing video games at Saddam Hussein's former palace in 2003 — while troops were still looking for Hussein — is genuinely wild. also kind of mind-blowing to see what a first-class room looked like on the Titanic. Honestly? I expected nicer. Related: ad for a journey on the Titanic – back to the UK from NYC — is eerie to look at now. Obviously, it's a journey the ship would never complete. this letter from survivor Charlotte Collyer is super, super sad. 9.I bet you never learned about this in school — in 1964, Martin Luther King, Jr. received the following letter, along with a tape of his alleged sexual activity. It reads like blackmail from a prior supporter, but King believed it was from the FBI — and it was eventually revealed that it was. The full text of the letter, except for one redacted name, was released in 2014, and you can read it below. was the FBI so concerned about King, you ask? Because they were worried he would endorse communism. Right-wing groups thus put up billboards like this during the Selma march as propaganda meant to make him lose supporters. is the gun used to kill Abraham Lincoln. In case you forgot, Lincoln was watching a performance of the comedy Our American Cousin at Ford's Theater with his wife, an officer, and the officer's fiancé. You may not know, however, that the plan was to wipe out the vice president, Andrew Johnson, and the secretary of state, William Henry Seward, as well. Seward actually had his throat slashed, but survived. kind of wild that this copy of the Magna Carta from 1305 still exists. not as mind-blowing as these 1800-year-old Roman leather sandals. news headline from 1933 did NOT age well. did this 1939 newspaper caption. Related: this 1914 article. To refresh your memory, the archduke's assassination is largely regarded as the event that jump-started WWI. and here's a photo of good ol' Franz and his wife just moments before they were assassinated. wonder when the first-ever selfie was? It's way further back than I thought — Robert Cornelius took one in 1839. leaflet for Black American soldiers during the Korean War is wildly fascinating to read — and made great points, tbh. handbook from WWI, translating important wartime phrases like "Run for your life!" or "we are losing," to me. about the first cat who went into space. Her name was Félicette, and she was a French stray who was flown in the rocket Veronique in 1964. She made it back safely and to this day is the only cat to have gone to space. fun fact? In Sweden, cars used to drive on the left side of the road. But in 1967, they switched to the right — leading to absolute chaos, as you can see below. York to Paris is a common flight now, but back in the early 1900s, it was unheard of — until Charles Lindbergh made the (solo!) journey in 1927. His airplane looked just a *bit* different than the ones we use today. Related: of Charles Lindbergh, his son was kidnapped and later found dead in 1932, and the case is fascinating to read about. The kidnapper exchanged multiple notes with the Lindberghs and their liaison, John Condon, who even apparently met with the kidnapper in a graveyard. Here's one of the notes. speaking of planes, check out this flight price from 1946. Of course, this would be $241.38 in today's dollars. what British passports used to look like, in case you wanted to pop over to another country in 1858. WWII, British people all had to carry these National Registration Identity Cards at all times — even children. If they were separated during bombing or for any other reason, this could assist with reunification. It would also assist with rationing food. here's what a WWII ration book looked like. psych wards are a far cry from what were called "lunatic asylums" back in the day. People could be admitted for a ton of different reasons, many of them completely unrelated to psychological conditions — you can read some of them, from the late 1800s, below. what the NYC subway looked like in 1961 — honestly, it doesn't look as different as I would've expected! here's what it looked like in 1987. is what a Japanese tram looked like after the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima — next to a restored version. here's a larger-scale photo of the bomb's destruction in Hiroshima. Colonel Paul Tibbets, who flew Enola Gay, which dropped the bomb. Related: doesn't seem all that long ago when you look at graffiti left by soldiers. of WWII, check out these propaganda posters reminding Americans of their allies in the feels ironic, considering how the US would feel about Russia and China very shortly afterward. letter sent home from a soldier in Vietnam just made me really, really sad. 38.I definitely do not remember learning about the Mormon War from 1857 in school. Basically, then-President James Buchanan sent troops to quell rebellion in Utah, where tensions were already high between Mormons and both Protestants and the government. The Mormons took up arms and fought back in their own namely, involved killing around 120 people traveling via wagons to move out west. They attacked the migrants, then offered them safe passage out, only to execute everyone over the age of seven and blame it on the nearby Native Americans. This was called the Mountain Meadows Massacre. Militia Leader John D. Lee was eventually excommunicated and executed for his actions — here you can see him sitting on his coffin just before being killed. 39.I'm always fascinated by old beauty trends, and it turns out that there were some wildly dangerous beauty trends back in the day. For example, people used to use products with arsenic in them. were also makeup and hair products that contained radium and other radioactive elements. medicine also used to be pretty darn dangerous. For example, heroin was used as a cough suppressant. people could be prescribed cocaine. of medicine and health, X-rays have been around a lot longer than I realized — since 1896. Here's what it looked like to get one back in 1914. finally, this sign is a fascinating reminder of just how far we've come. Back in the day, people had to be instructed how to use electricity — and assured it was safe. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How JD Vance's Approval Rating Has Changed Since Becoming Vice President
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Since taking office as vice president in January, JD Vance's favorability has steadily declined, according to tracking data from Civiqs. On January 20—the day of Vance's inauguration—43 percent of registered voters viewed him favorably, while 51 percent held an unfavorable view, giving him a net approval rating of -8. As of August 1, those numbers have worsened. Just 42 percent now view Vance favorably, while 54 percent view him unfavorably, widening his net disapproval to -12 points. Other polls reflect the same trend. Atlas showed that Vance's favorability fell from 49 percent in January to 44 percent in July, with unfavorability rising to 55 percent. YouGov/Economist also reported a decline, from 39 percent favorable and 45 percent unfavorable in January to 37 percent favorable and 51 percent unfavorable in July. Newsweek has contacted the vice president's office for comment via email. File photo: JD Vance speaks at the Metallus plant, Monday, July 28, 2025 in Canton, Ohio. File photo: JD Vance speaks at the Metallus plant, Monday, July 28, 2025 in Canton, Ohio. Lauren Leigh Bacho/AP Polarization Drives Decline Among Key Voter Groups Polling data suggests that Vance's falling favorability is the result of a sharply polarized political climate in which his appeal is hardening among conservatives but eroding among moderates, liberals, younger voters, and communities of color. In the YouGov/Economist polling, unfavorable sentiment surged by 9 and 12 points respectively among liberals and moderates, while conservative support rose slightly to 80 percent. The trend is similar in Civiqs polling, with 89 percent of Republicans viewing him favorably, while Democrats overwhelmingly disapprove—just 3 percent favorable and 95 percent unfavorable. Both polls also show strong support for Vance among older and white voters, who are key to the GOP's base. White voters remain Vance's strongest racial group, with 50 percent of white voters viewing him favorably in Civiqs polling and little change reported in YouGov's data. And Vance has favorability ratings of 48 percent in both the 50-to-64 and 65+ groups, according to the Civiqs data. Youth, Independents, and Voters of Color Turn Away But, outside of those groups, Vance's support is slipping. Independent voters, long seen as a key swing bloc, are turning away: Civiqs finds independents more negative than positive toward Vance, while YouGov reports a 6-point increase in unfavorable sentiment and a slight drop in favorability. Among younger voters—those aged 18 to 34 in Civiqs and 18 to 29 in YouGov—Vance's numbers are sharply negative, reflecting a generational divide that continues to widen. The data suggests that younger Americans, whose values tend to lean more progressive on cultural and economic issues, are increasingly resistant to Vance's messaging and policy positions. The racial gap in perception is just as stark. Civiqs shows only 10 percent of Black voters view Vance favorably, while 85 percent view him unfavorably. The YouGov/Economist poll shows Black voter favorability dropping from 26 percent in January to just 16 percent in July, while unfavorable views surged to 65 percent. Hispanic voters also trended more negative in both surveys, signaling a broader pattern of disengagement among communities of color. Trump Fallout Adds to Headwinds Polls have shown Trump's popularity drop to an all-time low in recent weeks amid backlash over the Jeffrey Epstein files and pessimism about the economy. Inflation rose to 2.7 percent in June, and job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added—down from 147,000 the previous month, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.2 percent, though it remains near historic lows. At the same time, a bipartisan majority of voters now believe that the government should release all files related to Epstein, with many suspecting a cover-up. Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, died by suicide in jail in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. There is no evidence that Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes. Trump has acknowledged knowing the man in the 1990s and early 2000s but maintains that he cut ties with him well before Epstein's 2006 arrest. A recent Wall Street Journal report uncovered a 2003 birthday card Trump allegedly sent to Epstein. The card included a drawing of a naked woman and the message: "We have certain things in common … may every day be another wonderful secret." Vance has dismissed reporting by the Wall Street Journal, calling the report alleging that President Trump once sent a "bawdy" birthday card to Epstein "bogus." Vance also alleged the Wall Street Journal was coordinating an attack to damage Trump's character, calling the report "fake news." Nonetheless, the Epstein allegations have created rare tension between Trump and Vance and their supporters, according to Professor William Hall, an adjunct professor of political science and business at Webster University in St. Louis. "The highly sensitive nature of the allegations—involving abuse of children and a possible cover-up—has triggered an unusual level of friction between Trump and his supporters, something we haven't seen before," Hall told Newsweek.