Social Security targets tech team for cuts at a time when systems are under strain
The Social Security Administration plans to slash its technology team by nearly one-third at a time when the agency's complex and fragile computer systems are crashing more often.
Top executives in the agency's Office of the Chief Information Officer, known as OCIO, have been tasked with cutting 30% of its staff as part of a large-scale reduction-in-force being implemented across the federal government, according to two former employees with direct knowledge of the plan. The office had about 3,200 employees, though it has already lost hundreds of experienced workers due to retirement and separation incentives. (It has also gained some staffers after the agency shuttered other divisions and transferred the functions to OCIO.)
The planned purge comes as the agency's long-glitchy technology is suffering more outages than usual, multiple current and former employees, as well as advocates, told CNN. Also adding to the stress on the systems is the increased number of concerned Americans accessing the public 'my Social Security' website, calling the 800 number and visiting local offices amid the turmoil surrounding the agency's massive restructuring.
This week alone, the 'my Social Security' site was down for several hours, with a message reading 'Online Service Not Available.' Then, a tech update involving identity authentication resulted in a longer outage for Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries, blocking them from accessing their online accounts, according to one former employee. Some recipients, who are low-income older Americans and people with disabilities, saw an erroneous message that they are not currently receiving payments, according to an internal memo to employees that was read to CNN.
'Those are the risks,' the former employee told CNN. 'You lose staff that have the institutional knowledge, and when something happens, you can't recover, or it takes you a lot longer to recover. The implication is American people get degraded services on the tech side because people internally are understaffed.'
The agency, which is being run by acting Commissioner Leland Dudek while Trump's nominee, Frank Bisignano, awaits confirmation, did not return a request seeking comment.
Staffers in field offices are encountering more frequent glitches in recent weeks that are temporarily preventing them from helping customers, two union representatives who work in the local offices told CNN. They said they are seeing more internal notices that problems with one or more malfunctioning software programs are being addressed.
'If the system is down, we can't look at a record to be able to take a claim or help beneficiaries with an issue that arises after they are getting benefits,' said Angela Digeronimo, executive vice president of the American Federation of Government Employees Council 220, which represents Social Security employees in field offices, telecenters and other units that assist customers. 'If the system is down, we don't have the tools to give the beneficiary the answer that they are looking for.'
The increase in technology problems has prompted some former Social Security executives – notably Martin O'Malley, who served as commissioner in the last year of the Biden administration – to warn that a disruption in payments could occur in coming months. More than 73 million retirees, people with disabilities and others receive Social Security benefits each month.
Amid those warnings, the Trump administration is targeting the agency's unionized tech workforce. President Donald Trump signed an executive order last week aimed at stripping many federal workers' collective bargaining rights, which would make it easier to fire them or shift their duties. Trump said the move is intended to bolster national security, but the White House fact sheet also noted that 'certain federal unions have declared war on President Trump's agenda.'
The only union workers who would be affected at Social Security are those in OCIO, who number roughly 1,300 after taking into account those who took various incentives to leave, said Shelley Washington, executive vice president at AFGE Local 1923, which represents the office's staff. The agency has told AFGE that it is reviewing the executive order.
The administration is also suing multiple AFGE locals in federal court in Texas seeking to release several agencies, including Social Security, from their collective bargaining agreements.
Without a union contract in place, it would be easier for Social Security to replace OCIO's personnel with staffers who are 'more amenable to doing what they want to do,' Washington said, referring to the efforts by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency to gain access to databases containing hundreds of millions of Americans' personal information, which has been temporarily halted by a federal judge.
To be sure, Social Security's antiquated public and internal systems have long experienced outages. At one of the agency's weekly operational meetings last month, which is posted to the agency's YouTube site, Dudek asked if he had fired anyone that would impair the operations of my Social Security or the databases. Wayne Lemon, deputy chief information officer for implementation, responded no.
The acting commissioner then asked whether the team had the resources it needs to maintain the systems' stability, to which Lemon said it has what it needs for now.
'There's nothing, I'll call it 'unusual,' about these outages, per se,' Lemon said, responding to Dudek's query on whether these problems have happened in the past.
Dudek acknowledged the concerns that many Americans now have about their personal information and their benefits.
'I think we have a lot of customers that right now, a lot of Americans, that are very uneasy, and they need to understand that we are protecting their data, and that we will always have their data,' he said. 'And we can make sure their earnings record reflects the benefits that they will receive, both now and in the future.'
The coming cuts at OCIO are part of the agency's effort to whittle down its workforce by 7,000 staffers, or 12%. However, the overhaul lacks strategic planning, which has fanned concerns about the remaining employees' ability to handle tech problems, former officials and advocates said.
Social Security's core computer systems run on an aging programming language known as COBOL (Common Business Oriented Language). It's no longer taught, making the old hands at the agency even more essential when it comes to keeping the technology operating and addressing things that go wrong. In addition, there are 3,600 intra-connected applications that keep the agency running.
But Social Security is now losing the staff that can prevent upgrades from becoming outages through testing and understanding the implications of the changes being made, one former official said. Plus, it's very difficult to reduce the number of employees until the computer systems are simplified.
'You can't cut out staff until you cut out complexity in your application portfolio,' the former official said. 'They're kind of doing it really backwards on a lot of fronts.'
Wired reported last week that DOGE is planning to rewrite Social Security's COBOL code in a matter of months, which has alarmed former officials and advocates.
'It's reckless to do it so quickly,' Kathleen Romig, director of Social Security and disability policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told CNN. 'It's setting yourself up for possible catastrophe.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The U.S. Stock Market Has Made an Impressive Comeback, but Will It Last?
The U.S. stock market has made an impressive comeback since its April slump. In fact, the S&P 500 (SPY), which plunged into correction territory following President Trump's historic tariffs, is now up over 19% from its April low. Carson Group's Ryan Detrick sees this early-year bottom as a sign that 2025 could still finish with strong gains. He compared the current setup to market comebacks in 2009 and 2020, when early-year declines of over 15% were followed by double-digit rallies. '2025 bottomed in April and the slingshot effect is in full motion,' Detrick said. Confident Investing Starts Here: However, some market experts are not as optimistic. Indeed, Dan Niles, the founder of Niles Investment Management, believes that while the current rally could push stocks to new record highs in the short term, risks are building for later this year. He argues that both consumers and corporations have been pulling demand forward to get ahead of price hikes, which may have artificially boosted near-term strength. For example, Niles pointed to when Apple (AAPL) rushed its shipments of iPhones from China to avoid paying tariffs. Looking ahead, Niles warned that the market is overlooking some troubling signals, such as rising Treasury yields and a weakening U.S. dollar. He expects that as the holiday season approaches and the effects of pulled-forward demand fade, stocks could face another sharp downturn. 'The further we get into the year, [investors should] get a lot more cautious and expect another big downdraft,' Niles said. As a result, he is maintaining a defensive portfolio and raising cash in order to prepare for potential volatility. There is no doubt that the next several months will test whether this rally has staying power or if it's running on borrowed time. Is SPY a Buy Right Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on SPY stock based on 419 Buys, 79 Holds, and seven Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average SPY price target of $663.03 per share implies 10.6% upside potential.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court Grants Musk-Less DOGE Access to Social Security Data
Elon Musk may be persona non grata at the White House, but DOGE lives on. The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Department of Government Efficiency should be allowed access to Social Security Administration data, lifting a previously issued injunction that blocked the department from doing so. While the court's majority did not provide a detailed explanation of their ruling, they did write, 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work.' The three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioning the urgency of the application and expressing concerns about the potential privacy risks that would result from the ruling. She wrote, 'In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes.' The Trump administration had previously argued that DOGE employees needed access to SSA data in order to halt fraudulent payments, but a federal judge in Maryland ruled that DOGE being granted such access violated federal law and put millions of people's data at risk. Two unions—the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers—brought the lawsuit alongside the Alliance for Retired Americans. The groups argued that allowing DOGE broader access to individuals' personal data would violate the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. 'The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure—and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," their lawyers wrote. The data DOGE employees now have access to includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information. In her dissent, Jackson argued that the Supreme Court had 'truly lost its moorings,' by allowing the move and bending its usual standards to accommodate the Trump administration, adding, 'The Court is… unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration.'
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director
Podcaster Joe Rogan was shocked as he read billionaire Elon Musk's wild allegations against President Donald Trump on Thursday. Musk dropped a bomb on social media when he alleged Trump was in the Jeffrey Epstein files after a series of escalating back-and-forth social media messages between him and the president. This accusation occurred as part of a larger tirade against Trump and Republican leaders over the "Big Beautiful Bill." In the episode, which was recorded Thursday but released Friday, a "Joe Rogan Experience" producer interrupted the host's live interview with FBI director Kash Patel to inform him of Musk's Epstein tweet. Watch: Republicans Rally Behind Trump, Continue To Support Musk Amid 'Big, Beautiful' Brawl Rogan read the tweet out loud, "'Time to drop the really big bomb Donald Trump is in the Epstein files, that's the real reason they have not been made public, have a nice day.' "Jesus Christ," he said in shock. Read On The Fox News App "I'm not participating in any of that conversation," Patel said. "Someone should take his phone away," Rogan said as he marveled at Musk's tweet. "Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein files?" "I don't know how he would," the FBI director said, again insisting he would stay out of the feud. "What the f--- are they doing?" Rogan asked. "I understand he owns Twitter, I think it's bad for your mental health," Rogan said. "I think posting things public all day and arguing with people all day is bad for you." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful BIll because it does not include the policies he wanted," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The White House said a source familiar with the Epstein matter said it is widely known that Trump kicked Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club. The source also pointed out that the administration released the Epstein files, which included Trump's name, and nothing was new about Musk's revelation. "If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hang out with him for 6 months and say he 'loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?'" the source said. Shortly after Musk posted about Trump being in the Epstein file, Trump posted his response to Truth Social. "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress," Trump said, turning his attention to the "big, beautiful bill" that is before the Senate. "It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that." "I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" the president article source: Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director