Newborn ‘suffered' from vacuum-assisted delivery and dies day later, TX suit says
An infant 'fought a losing battle' in his one day of life before dying of injuries from the doctor's attempted delivery method, according to a Texas lawsuit.
The family is suing the doctor, the unnamed nurses, Kessler Women's Healthcare and the Methodist Dallas Medical Center, saying the medical team was negligent in its failed attempts to deliver a baby boy vaginally via vacuum-assisted delivery in April 2024.
The lawsuit, filed May 29 in the Judicial District Court of Dallas County, says the boy died of internal brain bleeding from the delivery method but may have lived if the doctor had performed a Cesarean section earlier.
Methodist Health System told McClatchy News it has a 'longstanding policy of not commenting on pending litigation.' Kessler Women's Healthcare did not immediately respond to McClatchy News' request for comment June 13.
The obstetrician/gynecologist told The Dallas Morning News in an email that she couldn't comment on specific patients but wrote, 'I will simply say that I am committed to providing the highest quality medical care possible to my patients.'
The labor and delivery
The couple, both teachers, were anticipating the birth of their son, Prime, when the 32-year-old mom's water broke and they headed to the hospital on April 4, 2024, according to the lawsuit.
The doctor the family had been seeing wasn't the one to deliver the baby, according to the filing.
Issues quickly arose. The baby's heart rate was abnormal, the mom was diagnosed with preeclampsia, and she contracted a 102.9 degree fever during labor, the filing says. The lawsuit says these risk factors, including the baby's large head size and weight, meant the mother would likely have to receive a Cesarean section.
The doctor on call that day decided to try vacuum-assisted delivery for a vaginal birth, which involves using a suction-cup device that attaches to the baby's head to encourage the child to descend down the birth canal, according to the lawsuit.
The doctor tried four times, but the suction cup popped off twice, the family said.
The father 'recounted the very 'loud sound' produced by the pop-offs and noted that the force was so significant that it caused (the doctor) to push the chair backwards in the delivery room, suggesting that (she) exerted considerable force during the pulls,' the lawsuit says.
After the failed attempts, the doctor resorted to performing a C-section, and the baby was born on April 5, 2024, according to the family.
But the troubles persisted, as the baby entered the world already suffering from major injuries, including a brain bleed that led to a bruised and swollen head, the filing says.
He was rushed to the neonatal intensive care unit.
The mom said she when she saw what her son's neck looked like, 'she wanted to burst into tears,' the filing says.
The baby 'suffered' for 24 hours before he died, the family said. The lawsuit described that one day as a 'short life and prolonged death.'
Legal action
The lawsuit says the OB-GYN told the family their baby died from an E. coli infection he caught during labor, but a doctor who conducted the autopsy said the real cause of death was brain hemorrhages from failed vacuum-assisted delivery.
'Permanently wounded, the couple for days, weeks and months have broken down and cried, often uncontrollably,' the lawsuit says. 'Prime's loss has haunted them with nightmares, sleeplessness and intrusive thoughts. Daily life was permanently altered for both, though, they will try to move forward.'
According to another doctor conducting an independent review, the baby may have been born 'healthy and whole' if the medical team had performed a C-section earlier.
The lawsuit faults the doctor and the nursing staff for not recognizing the baby's distress during labor and taking appropriate steps sooner.
'It is my opinion, the nurses of Methodist Dallas Medical Center deviated from the standards of care in several critical areas,' another nurse wrote in her review. 'Firstly, they failed to advocate for (the mom) and her baby when recognizing the ongoing fetal intolerance of labor, as evidenced by their lack of action to advocate for an expedited delivery during the prolonged labor.'
The family also said the doctor never counseled them of the risks of vacuum-assisted delivery.
Though the family's attorneys accuse the obstetrician of a pattern of malpractice with other patients, records from the Texas Medical Board show she had no history of malpractice or disciplinary investigations.
The couple is seeking damages, citing negligence, lack of informed consent and their son's wrongful death.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
12 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Newborn ‘suffered' from vacuum-assisted delivery and dies day later, TX suit says
An infant 'fought a losing battle' in his one day of life before dying of injuries from the doctor's attempted delivery method, according to a Texas lawsuit. The family is suing the doctor, the unnamed nurses, Kessler Women's Healthcare and the Methodist Dallas Medical Center, saying the medical team was negligent in its failed attempts to deliver a baby boy vaginally via vacuum-assisted delivery in April 2024. The lawsuit, filed May 29 in the Judicial District Court of Dallas County, says the boy died of internal brain bleeding from the delivery method but may have lived if the doctor had performed a Cesarean section earlier. Methodist Health System told McClatchy News it has a 'longstanding policy of not commenting on pending litigation.' Kessler Women's Healthcare did not immediately respond to McClatchy News' request for comment June 13. The obstetrician/gynecologist told The Dallas Morning News in an email that she couldn't comment on specific patients but wrote, 'I will simply say that I am committed to providing the highest quality medical care possible to my patients.' The labor and delivery The couple, both teachers, were anticipating the birth of their son, Prime, when the 32-year-old mom's water broke and they headed to the hospital on April 4, 2024, according to the lawsuit. The doctor the family had been seeing wasn't the one to deliver the baby, according to the filing. Issues quickly arose. The baby's heart rate was abnormal, the mom was diagnosed with preeclampsia, and she contracted a 102.9 degree fever during labor, the filing says. The lawsuit says these risk factors, including the baby's large head size and weight, meant the mother would likely have to receive a Cesarean section. The doctor on call that day decided to try vacuum-assisted delivery for a vaginal birth, which involves using a suction-cup device that attaches to the baby's head to encourage the child to descend down the birth canal, according to the lawsuit. The doctor tried four times, but the suction cup popped off twice, the family said. The father 'recounted the very 'loud sound' produced by the pop-offs and noted that the force was so significant that it caused (the doctor) to push the chair backwards in the delivery room, suggesting that (she) exerted considerable force during the pulls,' the lawsuit says. After the failed attempts, the doctor resorted to performing a C-section, and the baby was born on April 5, 2024, according to the family. But the troubles persisted, as the baby entered the world already suffering from major injuries, including a brain bleed that led to a bruised and swollen head, the filing says. He was rushed to the neonatal intensive care unit. The mom said she when she saw what her son's neck looked like, 'she wanted to burst into tears,' the filing says. The baby 'suffered' for 24 hours before he died, the family said. The lawsuit described that one day as a 'short life and prolonged death.' Legal action The lawsuit says the OB-GYN told the family their baby died from an E. coli infection he caught during labor, but a doctor who conducted the autopsy said the real cause of death was brain hemorrhages from failed vacuum-assisted delivery. 'Permanently wounded, the couple for days, weeks and months have broken down and cried, often uncontrollably,' the lawsuit says. 'Prime's loss has haunted them with nightmares, sleeplessness and intrusive thoughts. Daily life was permanently altered for both, though, they will try to move forward.' According to another doctor conducting an independent review, the baby may have been born 'healthy and whole' if the medical team had performed a C-section earlier. The lawsuit faults the doctor and the nursing staff for not recognizing the baby's distress during labor and taking appropriate steps sooner. 'It is my opinion, the nurses of Methodist Dallas Medical Center deviated from the standards of care in several critical areas,' another nurse wrote in her review. 'Firstly, they failed to advocate for (the mom) and her baby when recognizing the ongoing fetal intolerance of labor, as evidenced by their lack of action to advocate for an expedited delivery during the prolonged labor.' The family also said the doctor never counseled them of the risks of vacuum-assisted delivery. Though the family's attorneys accuse the obstetrician of a pattern of malpractice with other patients, records from the Texas Medical Board show she had no history of malpractice or disciplinary investigations. The couple is seeking damages, citing negligence, lack of informed consent and their son's wrongful death.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
How to prep your legs for summer, according to a dermatologist
With the warmer weather comes blue skies, sunny days, vibrant blooms — and, of course, showing more skin. For those of us with dry, pasty, vein-y or uneven skin (i.e. all of us?), shedding layers can bring a level of self-consciousness, if not downright panic. A first outing in shorts or a shorter skirt can be especially daunting this time of year, as it means displaying a lot of leg. Even the most glamorous gams require at least a little extra TLC before the summer solstice arrives and, more likely, a full glow up. "Concerns that occur most commonly on legs are dry skin, eczema, psoriasis, keratosis pilaris [small, red bumps], ingrown hairs and varicose veins," says Dr. Dara Spearman, a board-certified dermatologist and the founder of Radiant Dermatology Associates. "Generally, the best way to care for leg skin is by exfoliating to get rid of dead skin and prevent ingrown hairs, [and] also using hydrating body wash and moisturizer to keep the legs looking soft and shiny." Of course, long-term leg care is not simply a surface-level affair. "[For the best-looking legs] I recommend trying to be active daily — like walking more — plus staying hydrated and protecting the skin from environmental factors like the sun," Spearman explains. "For other concerns like varicose and spider veins, elevating your legs can help prevent them from forming, and laser treatments can diminish their appearance." Read on for Spearman's top solutions for all your most pressing leg-skin concerns, but don't be afraid to strut your stuff even if your pins are not camera-ready. My advice: Give yourself a close shave, slather on some inexpensive anti-bump cream, throw on a pretty dress and enjoy the ever-fleeting joy of a warm breeze on your bare, just-fine-as-it-is skin. No one likes the look of flaky, rough-textured knees and legs, but the good news is, with consistent use, quality products can treat these issues — and treat them fast. Though these formulas are gentle, as with any new topical treatment, consult with a doctor first if you have sensitive skin, particularly if your dermatological issues are severe. The bad news is: If you want to diminish the appearance of varicose or spider veins, you'll need to head to a doctor's office. Depending on the type and severity, these can be treated with surgery or, potentially, less invasive procedures like sclerotherapy and laser ablation. However, if you're prone to varicose and spider veins, Spearman says wearing compression socks and regularly elevating your legs can help prevent future outbreaks. If you want to disguise your leg veins, high-quality self tanners can aid in blurring the blue-purple hue and make the condition look less severe. If you have Amazon Prime, you'll get free shipping, of course. Not yet a member? No problem. You can sign up for your free 30-day trial here. (And by the way, those without Prime still get free shipping on orders of $35 or more.)
Yahoo
10-06-2025
- Yahoo
Prime Healthcare cutting about 100 jobs across its Illinois facilities, months after acquiring hospitals from Ascension
Prime Healthcare, which bought eight Illinois hospitals earlier this year, is eliminating more than 100 jobs, the hospital system confirmed Monday. Prime made most of the reductions Friday, and will continue cutting other jobs through July. 'As we continue to offer and create opportunities, we are also evaluating alignment with best practices and support from our national and regional teams,' Prime said in a statement. 'Through this process, there is a small number of positions that are duplicated or not aligned with the care model and service line offerings — most of them not directly providing patient care — that will be consolidated.' None of the affected jobs are union positions, according to Prime. Prime hired 13,000 workers from Ascension when it bought the hospitals from that health system, and has created nearly 1,000 new jobs since the acquisition. The job cuts represent less than 1% of the combined 14,000 employees, according to the statement. 'Importantly, these efforts will not affect the quality of care we deliver to the communities we serve and in fact will help expand best practices from across the nation,' Prime said in the statement. 'All decisions made at our Illinois facilities are guided by our mission to improve quality, strengthen care delivery, preserve access in underserved areas and ensure long-term sustainability.' The California-based Prime bought the Illinois hospitals for more than $370 million in March. Six of the hospitals sold to Prime changed from being nonprofit hospitals to for-profit hospitals as part of the sale. Hospitals that were sold include St. Mary's Hospital in Kankakee, Holy Family Medical Center in Des Plaines, Resurrection Medical Center in Chicago, St. Francis Hospital in Evanston, St. Joseph Medical Center in Joliet, St. Joseph Hospital in Elgin, Mercy Medical Center in Aurora and St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital in Chicago. The job cuts are the latest in a string of changes Prime has made since closing the deal, drawing criticism from elected officials and a nurses union. Prime announced in April that it planned to suspend inpatient pediatric care at St. Joseph Medical Center in Joliet, saying at the time that the unit had been averaging less than one patient a day, while the need for other services such as advanced surgical, neurosurgical and spinal care had grown. The Illinois Nurses Association condemned the move, arguing it would hurt the community, which only has one hospital. Also, Mercy Medical Center in Aurora lost its designation in April as a Level II trauma center. Prime also suspended obstetrical services at St. Mary's in Kankakee after the hospital's 'nearly sole obstetrics physician' retired, and because of low demand, Prime has said. Sens. Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth sent a letter to Prime's chairman, founder and CEO Dr. Prem Reddy in May expressing concern about those changes and asking Prime to elaborate on the reasons behind them and its future plans for the hospitals. Prime responded to that letter last week, emphasizing its mission of turning around struggling community hospitals across the country. Prime said that before it bought the hospitals in Illinois they were losing about $200 million a year. Prime said maintaining services with low patient demand is not sustainable, nor good for the quality of care. Prime also told the senators it plans to expand behavioral health care services for seniors at its Illinois facilities. In its statement Monday, Prime said it has started fulfilling a previously stated commitment to invest $250 million across the Illinois hospitals. Prime said those affected by the job cuts are invited to apply for any of the more than 900 open positions across its Illinois facilities. The job cuts were first reported by the Herald News.
