logo
Is solar threatening North Carolina farms, or is there room for cooperation?

Is solar threatening North Carolina farms, or is there room for cooperation?

Yahoo15-04-2025

Every morning, when Jim Howie takes his cattle out to pasture, he's following in family traditions that go back generations. His family's owned this land just outside of downtown Waxhaw since the 1860s, and Howie says it's always been used for farming.
'If you go back to the 50s and 60s, agriculture was Waxhaw's main source of income,' he said. 'Everybody had some ties to agriculture.'
Now, Waxhaw and much of Union County are rapidly changing. Howie said farms are disappearing, and in their place, the county's seeing far more housing development and often, solar.
'I'm very much a supporter of alternative, alternative sources of energy, but is taking productive farmland the best way to do that?' he said.
According to the Solar Energy Industries Association, North Carolina ranks 5th in the nation for solar development, but recently that development has seen a backlash.
North Carolina bill would make it harder to build solar in the name of protecting farmland
Several counties have instated moratoriums on solar development and House Bill 729, which is making its way through the statehouse aims to slow the industry further.
Titled, 'The Farmland Protection Act,' the bill would remove property tax abatements for new solar energy systems, raising the tax liability for such projects by 500%. It would also increase regulatory constraints by requiring the North Carolina Utilities Commission to refuse to issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity for a utility-scale solar project if the project is to be sited on land currently being used for agricultural production.
The bill's primary sponsor, Rep. Jimmy Dixon (R-Duplin), described the bill as a way to ensure solar does not take up valuable, productive farmland and that it's paying its fair share to the counties most-often used for development, rural predominantly agricultural communities.
'You travel across the state of North Carolina, and it's occupying the best farmland in the state,' he said. 'I think by experience now we see that this is an industry that does not need incentivizing, and it needs to pay its way.'
Joel Olsen sees the industry quite differently. His solar development company, O2, which has built about 25 solar facilities, primarily in North Carolina, does so with agriculture in mind.
His Montgomery Sheep Farm is a primary example. The property houses 600,000 solar modules, a few chicken coops, and seven herds of sheep.
'The sheep need the shade, they need the shelter from heat, the shelter from the rain and the solar really needs the vegetation to be kept at an acceptable height so that duality use of the land is fantastic,' Olsen said.
Much of his solar power goes to farm operations, but he's also connected to the Duke Energy Progress grid to feed roughly 40 million kWh of power to the nearby town of Biscoe annually.
'That's enough to power about 3,000 average homes,' he said.
Besides energy, Olsen said the farm is also paying far more in taxes than it would have without the solar installations.
Agricultural land has state tax exemptions, so it generally pays a lower overall cost to its county government. When that land is used for solar, it comes out of that tax exemption and Olsen said, in his case, the Montgomery Sheep Farm had to pay three years of back taxes on the land.
Finally, there's the taxes on the installation itself, the personal property tax. According to current North Carolina state law, the solar energy system gets an 80% tax abatement. HB 729 would change that to 0% for all future solar projects.
'That really pulls the rug out from the investments that have been made in North Carolina, the jobs that were created during construction and the opportunity to do agriculture here,' Olsen said.
For farmers like Howie, this bill represents an opportunity to push back against at least one pressure point that's been changing the face of the communities they've worked in their entire lives.
'I'm very much a proponent of property rights, somebody being able to do with their land what they would like, but taking farmland out of production is a, it's going to be a bigger and bigger problem,' he said.
Olsen said he's sympathetic to concerns about losing farmland, but he believes this bill is the wrong answer. He said farms like his show that agriculture and solar can be done together, and there are ways to encourage practices that don't pit the industries against each other.
'The way you develop this land matters,' he said. 'If you think about it upfront, and you incentivize people to do the right thing instead of trying to institute regulatory delays, regulatory fees and other taxes, on an industry then you're gonna have a benefit for the farmland rather than a lost opportunity.'
As of Tuesday April 15, HB 729 has made it through the House Finance Committee. It will face a vote in the Agriculture Committee Tuesday morning.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

KY could lose thousands of solar, battery jobs if GOP in Congress ends tax credits
KY could lose thousands of solar, battery jobs if GOP in Congress ends tax credits

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

KY could lose thousands of solar, battery jobs if GOP in Congress ends tax credits

A technician services photovoltaic cells. (Photo By Getty Images) A solar industry group is warning that Kentucky stands to lose out on thousands of jobs in manufacturing solar energy components and batteries if clean energy tax credits are cut short under a mega-bill moving through Congress. An analysis published in late May by the nationwide Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) says Republican-led efforts to curtail or sunset tax credits would cost more than 300,000 jobs across the country and sacrifice hundreds of billions of dollars of investment through the end of the decade. Some of the credits are technology neutral but benefit solar and battery manufacturing industries. Republicans in Congress axed the 'green new scam,' but it's a red state boon The U.S. House has approved the spending and tax bill, dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill' by President Donald Trump. It is now under consideration by the U.S. Senate. Republicans are using a process called reconciliation to move the bill with a simple majority of votes in the Senate, rather than the three-fifths majority usually required in the upper chamber. That means the package could become law without any Democrats' votes. The bill as it came out of the House would accelerate the phase down of tax credits benefiting clean energy production, low-emission hydrogen fuel production, components for renewable energy, carbon capture technologies and the purchase of electric vehicles. These tax credits were created under the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022 and championed by the former Biden administration. A States Newsroom analysis found the tax credits primarily benefitRepublican-controlled states. In Kentucky, where solar and battery manufacturing industries are growing though at a slower pace than in other states, the Solar Energy Industries Association estimates about 3,300 existing and potential jobs could be lost. Brenden Frazier, a board member for the advocacy organization Kentucky Solar Energy Society, said the sunsetting of tax credits could hamper the residential solar industry in the state. He said recent 'Solarize' campaigns, in which cities encourage residents to adopt solar energy in their homes and businesses, show the incentives are having a 'big impact' in terms of growing the industry in Kentucky. He said he worries about sustaining the business without the incentives. Frazier serves as the director of product and technology for the Puerto Rico-based solar panel manufacturer SOLX. Frazier said the loss of tax credits would set back solar and battery manufacturing as Kentucky, like much of the rest of the country, faces growing energy demands from prospective data centers coming onto the electricity grid. While the amount of electricity generated through solar energy in Kentucky is miniscule, the state has seen an influx of solar developers interested in setting up utility-scale solar installations. A Canadian company also announced last year it was investing over $700 million in a Shelby County manufacturing plant to build utility-scale battery storage systems. Republicans supportive of ending the tax credits have argued they are too expensive and that incentives give renewable energy an unfair advantage over fossil fuel production. Republican Kentucky U.S. Rep. Brett Guthrie in a Wall Street Journal op-ed in May said the reconciliation legislation would end spending on 'Green New Deal-style waste' and 'reverse the most reckless parts of the engorged climate spending in the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act.' Matt Partymiller, the president of the Kentucky Solar Energy Industries Association, told the Lantern the accelerated phase down of the tax credits is a 'real threat to manufacturing jobs' and to the United States' ability to compete with China on solar energy. 'We just started onshoring U.S, manufacturing of solar in earnest in the past couple of years,' Partymiller said. 'A lot of these incentives are really tied to that, and if they go away, I think this whole manufacturing industry that was just created largely stops with it.' Solar panel manufacturers across the country have significantly ramped up production in recent years to meet a boom in utility-scale solar energy development, producing enough solar panels to generate nearly 52 gigawatts of electricity. China has historically controlled much of the world's solar panel production as the country has subsidized production. The U.S. Senate will likely change the version of the reconciliation bill that passed the U.S. House in May. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Investor Class Action Lawsuit
INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Investor Class Action Lawsuit

Associated Press

timea day ago

  • Associated Press

INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Investor Class Action Lawsuit

SAN DIEGO, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) securities between March 18, 2022 and January 15, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until Tuesday, July 22, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Red Cat class action lawsuit. Captioned Olsen v. Red Cat Holdings, Inc., No. 25-cv-05427 (D.N.J.), the Red Cat class action lawsuit charges Red Cat and certain of Red Cat's top current and former executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Red Cat class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected]. CASE ALLEGATIONS: Red Cat, together with its subsidiaries, provides products and solutions to drone industry. Red Cat's products include, among others, the 'Teal 2' drone, a small, unmanned aircraft system designed to purportedly 'Dominate the Night' during nighttime military operations. The Red Cat class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Red Cat's Salt Lake City facility's production capacity, and defendants' progress in developing the same, was overstated; and (ii) the overall value of Red Cat's Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 contract (the 'SRR Contract') was overstated. The Red Cat class action lawsuit further alleges that on July 27, 2023, Red Cat revealed that its Salt Lake City facility could only currently produce 100 drones per month, the facility was still being built, refined, and expanded, and that construction of the facility was only 'substantially completed' and potentially could reach a production capacity of 1,000 drones per month over the next 2 to 3 years, but only with additional capital investments and manufacturing efficiencies realized. On this news, the price of Red Cat stock fell nearly 9%, according to the complaint. Then, on September 23, 2024, the Red Cat class action lawsuit further alleges that Red Cat announced its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, reporting losses per share of $0.17, missing consensus estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing consensus estimates by $1.07 million. According to the complaint, Red Cat further disclosed that Red Cat had spent 'the past four months . . . retooling [the Salt Lake City facility] and preparing for high volume production,' while admitting that a 'pause in manufacturing of Teal 2 and building Army prototypes impacted Teal 2 sales' because, among other things, Red Cat 'couldn't produce and sell Teal 2 units while retooling [its] factory.' The Red Cat class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Red Cat stock fell more than 25%. Finally, the Red Cat class action lawsuit further alleges that on January 16, 2025, Kerrisdale Capital published a report alleging that '[t]he SRR contract that Red Cat won in November and preemptively announced without the Army's permission is much smaller and less favorable than management as intimated,' and that '[i]t's highly implausible that a mass-production facility for manufacturing drones has been built at any point in the last two years for less than $1 million.' On this news, the price of Red Cat stock fell more than 21% over two trading sessions, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Red Cat securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Red Cat class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Red Cat class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Red Cat class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Red Cat class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. Contact: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 800-449-4900 [email protected]

House budget proposal cuts SNAP, Medicaid in major rollback
House budget proposal cuts SNAP, Medicaid in major rollback

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

House budget proposal cuts SNAP, Medicaid in major rollback

TYLER, Texas (KETK) — The House has passed a budget proposal within the 'Big Beautiful Bill' that would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid. This results in the largest rollback of food assistance in our nation's history, according to 'Feeding Texas'. Nacogdoches holds second annual Duck Derby fundraiser for county donations 'This represents a 30 percent cut to our nation's most important and effective anti-hunger program,' Vice President of Feeding Texas Jamie Olsen said. SNAP currently feeds 3 million Texans and cutting funding for this program would result in $300 billion lost in aid. 'Texas would be required to pay 1.8 billion dollars a year starting in 2028,' Olsen said. The estimated total of Texans at risk of losing all SNAP benefits is 392,000 and 806,000 are at risk of losing partial benefits. Additionally, the bill could leave one million Texans without health insurance, specifically putting elderly and pregnant women in rural areas at risk. 'We're urging Congress to ensure no one is forced to choose between food and other basic needs,' the East Texas Food Bank said. The Senate is projected to vote on the budget as early as June 16. Both chambers must conference and re-vote on a final bill before the August debt limit. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store