An Invisible Medical Shortage: Oxygen
On Monday, a panel of experts published a comprehensive report on the shortage. Each year, the report noted, more than 370 million people worldwide need oxygen as part of their medical care, but fewer than 1 in 3 receive it, jeopardizing the health and lives of those who do not. Access to safe and affordable medical oxygen is especially limited in low- and middle-income nations.
'The need is very urgent,' said Dr. Hamish Graham, a pediatrician and a lead author of the report. 'We know that there's more epidemics coming, and there'll be another pandemic, probably like Covid, within the next 15 to 20 years.'
The report, published in The Lancet Global Health, comes just weeks after the Trump administration froze foreign aid programs, including some that could improve access to oxygen.
Boosting the availability of medical oxygen would require an investment of about $6.8 billion, the report noted. 'Within the current climate, that's obviously going to become a bit more of a challenge,' said Carina King, an infectious disease epidemiologist at the Karolinska Institute and a lead author of the report.
Still, she said, governments and funding organizations should prioritize medical oxygen because of its importance across health care. People of all ages may need oxygen for pneumonia and other respiratory conditions, for severe infections including malaria and sepsis, for surgeries and for chronic lung conditions.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
36 minutes ago
- CNN
Group of cities sues Trump administration over new changes to Obamacare enrollment and eligibility
A group of Democratic-led cities sued the Trump administration Tuesday over new changes to the Affordable Care Act that they say will undermine the sweeping health care law and result in nearly 2 million Americans losing health insurance. The rule, finalized on June 25, shortens the open enrollment period for Americans buying insurance on the marketplace and ends a monthly special enrollment period for people with incomes below 150% of the federal poverty line. It also introduces more preenrollment requirements, such as income verification checks. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimated last month between 725,000 and 1.8 million people could lose coverage due to the rule, but said the changes introduce new 'safeguards' against improper enrollment and overspending. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Maryland, was brought by the cities of Chicago, Baltimore and Columbus, Ohio, as well as an association of doctors and a non-profit network of small businesses that rely on the Affordable Care Act marketplace. They allege that several parts of the new rule violate the ACA and other federal laws, and say the administration ran afoul of federal rulemaking procedures when it created the new policies, including by failing to respond to public comments submitted as the rule was being finalized. 'Rather than reducing the cost of insurance for consumers, or increasing their enrollment rates and benefits, Defendants' new policies will cause at least 1.8 million Americans to lose coverage on the ACA's health insurance Exchanges in 2026 alone and will ultimately result in higher premiums in the long term and higher out-of-pocket costs for the remaining enrollees,' attorneys for the plaintiffs wrote in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys with Democracy Forward, are asking the court to wipe away the parts of the new rule they're challenging. Spokespeople for CMS and its parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit. Advocates for the Trump administration's rule changes say the ACA marketplace is rife with fraud because of expanded subsidies, or tax credits that keep Americans' monthly premiums low. Millions of people are enrolling in those low-cost plans even if their income makes them ineligible for heavily subsidized plans, according to conservative think tank Paragon Health Institute. Congress expanded those subsidies in 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic, but the temporary tax credits are set to expire at the end of 2025. The beefed-up subsidies helped drive a record 24 million people to sign up for coverage for 2025. The new rule is set to take effect in late August. The House version of President Donald Trump's agenda bill would codify the rule into law, though the Senate legislation has different provisions, which would also tighten eligibility for subsidies and increase verification requirements.
Boston Globe
37 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump accused by 20 states, including Mass., of sharing Medicaid data with ICE
'President Trump, Secretary Kristi Noem, and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are weaponizing Medicaid to fuel their anti-immigration campaign,' Bonta told reporters. 'They're threatening the personal health data of 78.4 million individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for their mass surveillance and federal immigration enforcement plans.' Advertisement The action asks the court to stop any further transfer of data and to block DHS from using any data obtained illegally for immigration enforcement purposes. In filing the lawsuit, Bonta joins the attorneys general of Connecticut, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
USAID cuts could result in 14M additional deaths: Research
A study published Monday found that the closure of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) could result in more than 14 million additional deaths globally by 2030, including 4.5 million deaths of children younger than 5 years. The findings were released hours before Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the agency would officially shut down following President Trump's executive order earlier this year aiming to dismantle the agency. Many of the deaths are expected to occur in the African countries of Nigeria and Uganda due to the loss of funding for maternal and child health aid, in addition to epidemic and emerging disease surveillance. Researchers found that those two countries would contribute to 107,000 additional deaths globally in just one year of a disrupted malaria-control supply chain. The end of USAID pulls funding from non-governmental organizations including the UN World Food Programme, which closed its southern Africa office, placing 27 million people at risk of hunger amid the country's worst drought in decades, the study says. Former Presidents Obama and Bush have been critical of the Trump administration for the USAID closure, which also threatens to scale back America's role in the global fight against HIV and AIDS. 'Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it's a tragedy. Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world,' Obama said, according to The Associated Press. Rubio on Tuesday defended the shuttering of USAID, arguing the agency's objectives were often left unmet. 'Development objectives have rarely been met, instability has often worsened, and anti-American sentiment has only grown,' Rubio wrote in a blog post on Tuesday. 'This era of government-sanctioned inefficiency has officially come to an end.' The Monday study found that USAID-supported efforts have helped to prevent more than 91 million deaths across all age groups, including 30 million deaths among children. It said high levels of USAID funding were associated with a 15 percent reduction in mortality across all ages, a 65 percent reduction in mortality from HIV/AIDS, a 51 percent reduction from malaria, and a 50 percent reduction from neglected tropical diseases. In 2022, USAID was responsible for more than half of nutrition interventions, food distribution and agricultural interventions globally. 'Therefore, the impact of USAID on health and mortality reduction extends beyond its direct funding of health programmes and interventions,' the study's authors wrote. 'In particular, USAID's support for poverty alleviation, education, and water and sanitation interventions—among many others—might have had a substantial effect on health outcomes, also considering the broader spillover effects these interventions can have on entire communities,' it added. 'Indeed, poverty alleviation interventions alone have demonstrated important effects on reducing both adult and child mortality.' The research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, UK Medical Research Council and EU Horizon Europe.
