logo
I'm a city councillor. Here's what Carney can learn from local government

I'm a city councillor. Here's what Carney can learn from local government

Prime Minister Mark Carney and the incoming Liberal government could learn a lot from the coalitions and non-partisan nature of local governments.
In contrast to most Western democracies, towns and cities in Canada have mostly managed to remain free of political parties. There are, of course, some exceptions, including Vancouver and Surrey, which have bespoke municipal parties. But at least in BC, the councils with political parties tend to be the most divided and politicized, and unfortunately reproduce the same type of partisanship that hamstrings higher orders of government.
In Victoria, where I serve as a city councillor, the city currently has no municipal parties, which allows for consensus-building and decision-making free from political interference. A local Redditor recently crunched the numbers and found that nine of us vote the same way over four-fifths of the time. As a political progressive, I apparently vote the same way as the most right-leaning member of council 83.7 per cent of the time. This fact reflects the many routine procedural votes that exist at all levels of government, but it also demonstrates the ability of people with divergent worldviews to reach consensus most of the time.
This does not mean that all nine members of Victoria City Council are always on the same page. We're not, and we often disagree strenuously on important matters and occasionally engage in bun fights, which are always well-covered by the local media. (There's a reason that 'Airplane Lands Safely at Airport' is never a headline.) But the absence of partisanship removes barriers to getting on the same page about the important things. I answer to the public, not a party, and that is a very freeing feeling.
In our case, the current council has approved more than 8,000 units of housing, required all new buildings to be electrified, successfully passed a referendum to replace the aging Crystal Pool, and invested millions in downtown arts, safety and revitalization. None of these things would have happened in a council hopelessly divided by partisanship.
I tend to think of political parties in the same way that I think of street gangs — beset by tribalism, turf wars and primordial grievances — right down to the colour-coded uniforms and catchy slogans. (The Conservatives are the Crips and the Liberals are the Bloods.)
We are in a national moment when the average Canadian does not give a toss about partisanship. What Canadians want is an effective response to the housing and affordability crisis; lasting and impactful climate action; meaningful action on reconciliation; and above all, a staunch defence of Canadian sovereignty and the national interest. It is no surprise that the politicians of diverse political stripes – Premiers David Eby and Wab Kinew (NDP), Doug Ford (PC), and Prime Minister Carney (Liberal) – who have advocated for Canada's sovereignty and national interest, have enjoyed a bump in approval ratings.
While I'm under no illusions that political parties will magically disappear at the federal level, I do think the existential threat represented by the Trump regime offers an opportunity to do things differently, writes Jeremy L. Caradonna
While I'm under no illusions that political parties will magically disappear at the federal level, I do think the existential threat represented by the Trump regime offers an opportunity to do things differently.
What was the point of the last several months of drama and political turmoil if we're simply going to return to a bog-standard Liberal-NDP CASA arrangement?
Historically, Canada doesn't really do coalitions, but it's never too late to start. Barring a major change in the recounts, it looks like the Liberals will end up with 169 seats in Parliament, four short of the 172 needed to pass legislation.
What I propose is for the Liberals to create the first-ever coalition in modern Canadian history.
Offer Speaker of the House to a member of the Conservative Party as a gesture of unity. There is little to suggest that Pierre Poilievre would go for it, but the gesture itself would mean something. (I think Joe Clark or Brian Mulroney would have gone for it.) If that fails, offer Speaker to Don Davies, the long-time NDP MP from Vancouver and the party's interim leader. Davies is a level-headed lawyer who is entirely qualified for the role.
More importantly, Carney could offer four members of the opposition positions as parliamentary secretaries in an effort to create greater stability for a four-year term. Having members of minority parties in government would give those parties a sense of ownership over the success of the mandate, and could decrease the risk that a junior CASA partner decides suddenly to pull the plug on the Liberals.
Imagine a cabinet that gave parliamentary secretaries a greater role, even if they weren't formally a part of the Privy Council. Those secretaries could include Elizabeth May (Greens) on climate adaptation, Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné (Bloc) on Quebec interests, Jenny Kwan (NDP) on immigrant integration, and Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) on labour relations.
It would require the Green, NDP and Bloc members to act as team players and accept two realities: 1) Their parties currently have little leverage, and in the case of the Greens and NDP, were nearly wiped from the electoral map, and 2) this would be their only real chance to make change and become the first members of their respective parties 'in government' at the federal level.
Carney would allow the non-Liberals to make their case in expanded cabinet meetings, but then, the parliamentary secretaries would be expected to vote with the coalition in Parliament.
Being effective even 25 per cent to 50 per cent of the time is better than being ineffective 100 per cent of the time.
Strategic compromise is what allows local government leaders to keep moving their communities forward. This is Carney's opportunity to shake things up and take a page from the most nimble and effective level of government in the country.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conservative MP calls on Ottawa to do more on wildfires, criticizes forest entry ban
Conservative MP calls on Ottawa to do more on wildfires, criticizes forest entry ban

Global News

timea few seconds ago

  • Global News

Conservative MP calls on Ottawa to do more on wildfires, criticizes forest entry ban

Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner says the federal government needs to do more to fight Canada's devastating forest fires. Speaking to reporters Wednesday in Ottawa, the Alberta MP accused Ottawa of 'inaction' on wildfires. She also blamed that lack of action for new measures restricting activities in the forests of two provinces — even though those bans were imposed by the provinces themselves. Nova Scotia and New Brunswick last week banned hiking, fishing, camping and the use of vehicles in its forests in response to the heightened wildfire risk. Rempel Garner said that while she understands the fear Maritimers feel, restricting individuals' movements is 'not right.' 'Whenever there's a major crisis, what the Liberal government has done by their inaction has conditioned Canadians to expect that the only response they can see out of their federal government is to restrict their movement,' Rempel Garner told reporters. Story continues below advertisement 'We're calling on the federal government to actually get serious about this issue.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Conservative MP Marc Dalton presented a bill last year to stiffen penalties for wildfires caused by arson. It never made it past first reading and died when Parliament was dissolved ahead of this year's election. Rempel Garner said that's one area where the Liberals could have taken action on wildfires. She also called on the federal government to dedicate more resources to wildfire control. In its 2021 election platform, the Liberals promised to train 1,000 community-based firefighters to fight wildfires and to work with provinces and territories to get them more firefighting planes. Last month, Ontario Premier Doug Ford told reporters that Alberta-based water bomber manufacturer De Havilland was facing a four-year backlog of orders. 'Four full wildfire seasons ago, the Liberals promised more water bombers, more firefighters,' Rempel Garner said. 'Where are they?' Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston brushed off the criticisms of the forest entry ban at a press conference later Wednesday. 'I find it remarkable, the interest in travelling in Nova Scotia woods by people who aren't in Nova Scotia and probably haven't been here much in their life,' Houston told reporters. 'We're only concerned with keeping people safe. We'll do what's necessary to protect lives, and that's what we're doing in this case.' Story continues below advertisement So far this season, the total area of the country burned by wildfires is nearly the size of the entire province of New Brunswick. — With files from Sarah Ritchie.

EDITORIAL: Crushed by the two tariff tyrants
EDITORIAL: Crushed by the two tariff tyrants

Toronto Sun

timea few seconds ago

  • Toronto Sun

EDITORIAL: Crushed by the two tariff tyrants

Canada's prime minister Mark Carney Photo by David Kawai / Bloomberg The latest crippling tariff imposed by China on Canadian canola seeds is a graphic illustration of how Prime Minister Mark Carney and the previous government of Justin Trudeau have utterly failed to protect this country's vital industries. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Our ineffectual trade negotiations have resulted in this country being crushed between two industrial and commercial behemoths — China and the U.S. This week, China announced a 76% import duty on Canadian canola seeds. This follows a round robin of tit-for-tat tariffs, involving Canada, the U.S. and China. Last year, in concert with the U.S. and in order to keep that country happy, Canada imposed 100% tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, effectively cutting them out of the North American market. In March, Canada's 25% duties on steel and aluminum resulted in China adding a 100% tariff on canola meal. Western farmers are paying the price while the federal government protects the auto, steel and aluminum industries, which are largely located in Ontario and Quebec. Let's not forget, those farmers are Canadian. The big three auto manufacturers are U.S.-owned. And the U.S. gave us nothing in return. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. President Donald Trump continues to use us as his tariff whipping boy, with none of the concessions or delays he gave to China and Mexico. It's all very well for Carney and Co. to chant meaningless slogans like 'Elbows Up' and 'diversify.' It's difficult to diversify when the world's two largest economies are waging war on this country's two most valuable industries. Read More At a news conference this week, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe put it in perspective: Canada exports $4 billion of canola seed to China. Canola is planted on more than 12 million acres in this country and employs more than 200,000 people. 'That's significantly larger than the steel industry, the aluminum industry and the car manufacturing industry combined,' Moe said. The government has announced support to the auto, steel and aluminum sectors, but so far has been vague on help for farmers. The truth is, they don't want government handouts. They want Carney to negotiate this country out of the corner he's painted us into, so they can earn a decent wage from their blood, sweat and tears. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Toronto Maple Leafs World Columnists Editorial Cartoons World

Conservatives say the justice system favours non-citizens. Experts disagree

timea few seconds ago

Conservatives say the justice system favours non-citizens. Experts disagree

The Conservatives want to change the Criminal Code to eliminate what they say is a double standard in the justice system that allows non-citizens to get lighter sentences than Canadians who have been convicted of the same crime. When it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a form of two-tier justice, Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said Wednesday in Ottawa. This offends all principles of fairness that should be foundational to our justice system. Deportations are automatically scheduled to allow time for appeal, but certain criminal sentences remove the right of the offender to challenge their removal. Removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer, Rempel Garner said. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right. But immigration experts say the Conservatives' characterization of Canada's justice system as being biased in favour of non-citizens is simply false. They say the law is designed to ensure the sentence fits the crime, regardless of the offender's status. WATCH | Conservatives want judges to stop considering immigration status in sentencing: Rempel Garner said her party will introduce a private member's bill when the House of Commons returns in September, promising the change will restore the value of Canadian citizenship. The bill will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or that of their family members, should not be taken into consideration, the Conservative Party says in a statement. Rempel Garner's suggestion that Canada has two-tier sentencing provisions is, she said, the direct result of a 2013 Supreme Court of Canada ruling (new window) that clarified sentencing guidelines. One of several factors to consider In the ruling, Canada's top court said that when sentencing a non-citizen, a judge can use an offender's immigration status as one of several factors when considering what sentence to impose. That's what judges do in sentencing. They take into account factors that are individual that are relevant; this is just one more of them, said Audrey Macklin, a law professor at the University of Toronto. Macklin said other factors commonly considered during sentencing are whether the offender has a substance abuse issue; whether they are a single parent and what will happen to their child; or the prospects that they can be rehabilitated. Sentencing always takes into account factors unique or specific to that individual, she said. It's a misrepresentation to suggest that this is two-tier justice. Macklin said the 2013 ruling also clarified that while immigration status can be considered, it could not be used to reduce the sentence below the standard minimum. Losing the right to appeal deportation Under the law in Canada, a person who has been ordered to be removed from the country cannot appeal their deportation order if: They were convicted of a crime in Canada and given a sentence of six months or more. They were convicted of a crime outside Canada punishable in Canada by a sentence of 10​ years or more. They were involved in organized crime. They violated human or international rights law, by, for example, committing war crimes. Toronto immigration lawyer Pantea Jafari says she has argued similar cases. She told CBC News that the 2013 ruling was crafted to ensure the consequences of a sentence are proportional to what the judge intends. In a case where a judge may think someone has committed a minor offence and only deserves a slap on the wrist, Jafari said the judge may decide to give them a six-month sentence. For a Canadian citizen, the punishment would be six months in jail. But for a non-citizen, it could result in deportation without the ability to appeal. Jafari said the 2013 ruling simply gives the judge in her example the authority to lower the sentence to six months less a day so they can still appeal their deportation. She said this would ensure a citizen and non-citizen receive comparable sentences. When [a judge] is considering a sentence, they can't be blind to the fact that this person is not a naturalized Canadian, is still an immigrant and therefore will have additional consequences as a result of the sentence, Jafari said. To have [this provision] scrapped is really problematic and something that I would vigorously defend against. Peter Zimonjic (new window) · CBC News · Senior writer Peter Zimonjic is a senior writer for CBC News who reports for digital, radio and television. He has worked as a reporter and columnist in London, England, for the Telegraph, Times and Daily Mail, and in Canada for the Ottawa Citizen, Torstar and Sun Media. He is the author of Into The Darkness: An Account of 7/7, published by Vintage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store