logo
Constitution is quiet revolution empowering marginalised: CJI Gavai

Constitution is quiet revolution empowering marginalised: CJI Gavai

New Delhi, Chief Justice of India B R Gavai has described the Constitution as a "quiet revolution etched in ink" and a transformative force that not only guarantees rights but actively uplifts the historically oppressed.
Speaking at the Oxford Union on the theme 'From Representation to Realisation: Embodying the Constitution's Promise' on Tuesday, the CJI, the second Dalit and the first Buddhist to hold India's highest judicial office, highlighted the positive impact of the Constitution on marginalised communities and gave his example to drive home the point.
"Many decades ago, millions of citizens of India were called 'untouchables'. They were told they were impure. They were told that they did not belong. They were told that they could not speak for themselves. But here we are today, where a person belonging to those very people is speaking openly, as the holder of the highest office in the judiciary of the country," the CJI said.
He said the Constitution told the citizens that "they belong, that they can speak for themselves, and that they have an equal place in every sphere of society and power".
"At the Oxford Union today, I stand before you to say for India's most vulnerable citizens, the Constitution is not merely a legal charter or a political framework, it is a feeling, a lifeline, a quiet revolution etched in ink. In my own journey, from a municipal school to the office of the Chief Justice of India, it has been a guiding force," he said.
He said India's Constitution was not merely a legal framework but a social and moral document crafted amidst deep inequality.
Its drafters, he noted, included representatives from some of the most marginalised communities in India Dalits, Adivasis, women, religious minorities, persons with disabilities, and even those formerly labelled "criminal tribes".
"The Constitution is a social document, one that does not avert its gaze from the brutal truths of caste, poverty, exclusion, and injustice. It does not pretend that all are equal in a land scarred by deep inequality. Instead, it dares to intervene, to rewrite the script, to recalibrate power, and to restore dignity," he said.
The CJI said the Constitution carries within it the "heartbeat of those who were never meant to be heard, and the vision of a country where equality is not just promised, but pursued".
"It compels the State not only to protect rights but to actively uplift, to affirm, to repair," he added.
Referring to B R Ambedkar's legacy, the CJI said he was a visionary who transformed his lived experience of caste discrimination into a global understanding of justice.
"He believed that democracy cannot last unless there lies at the base of it social democracy," CJI Gavai said, quoting Ambedkar's historic 1949 Constituent Assembly speech.
The CJI said that Ambedkar saw political representation as a necessary check against entrenched caste hierarchies and arbitrary power, a mechanism to redistribute not just institutional power, but social dignity.
"In an unequal society, he believed, democracy cannot survive unless power is also divided among communities, not just among institutions. Representation, therefore, was a mechanism of redistributing power, not only between the legislature, executive, and judiciary, but among social groups that had been denied a share for centuries," he said.
The CJI highlighted the evolution of affirmative action in India and said initially it was through quotas in legislatures, government jobs, and educational institutions, and later expanded through judicial interpretation and legislative reform.
Referring to landmark Supreme Court judgements, including the Mandal reservation verdict, he said they reaffirmed that affirmative action was not a contradiction of equality but a realisation of its spirit.
"The Constitution imposes a duty of care on the State," CJI Gavai said, invoking constitutional scholar Upendra Baxi, "to achieve equality both in letter and in spirit".
He also referred to the 2014 NALSA judgement recognising transgender rights, the 2020 decision allowing permanent commissions for women in the armed forces, and judicial mandates for reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
The CJI also talked about the 2023 constitutional amendment guaranteeing political reservations for women and the Supreme Court's endorsement of sub-classification within Scheduled Castes to ensure intra-group equity.
"The true beauty of Indian democracy lies in this: even as we commemorate 75 years of the Constitution, we continue to reflect, renew, and reimagine how to deepen and expand the meaning of representation. Just last year, Parliament passed a constitutional amendment to provide political reservations for women in Parliament and state legislatures," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nainar Nagenthran condemns DMK MLA for belittling women beneficiaries of ‘zero ticket' bus travel scheme
Nainar Nagenthran condemns DMK MLA for belittling women beneficiaries of ‘zero ticket' bus travel scheme

The Hindu

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Nainar Nagenthran condemns DMK MLA for belittling women beneficiaries of ‘zero ticket' bus travel scheme

BJP Tamil Nadu president Nainar Nagenthran on Wednesday condemned DMK MLA from Andipatti, A. Maharajan, for his remarks belittling women who travel free of cost in State-run buses under the Vidiyal Payanam or zero cost ticket scheme.. In a post on X, Mr. Nagenthran said this was not the first instance of inappropriate comments by DMK leaders. 'On several occasions, DMK members have demeaned beneficiaries of welfare schemes, including women who commute in State-run buses free of cost, by calling them 'free riders'. Such arrogant behaviour and mockery of ordinary people by those in power is unacceptable,' he said. Mr. Nagenthran added, 'Instead of focusing their energy on mocking women beneficiaries, DMK leaders should ensure buses are operated in good condition and that all eligible women are included under the Kalaignar Magalir Urimai Thittam.'

Rahul Gandhi Writes to PM, Flags Dismal State of Hostels for Students From Marginalised Communities
Rahul Gandhi Writes to PM, Flags Dismal State of Hostels for Students From Marginalised Communities

The Wire

time32 minutes ago

  • The Wire

Rahul Gandhi Writes to PM, Flags Dismal State of Hostels for Students From Marginalised Communities

Leader of the Opposition and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi. Photo: X/@OfficeOfKNath via PTI. New Delhi: Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has written a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, flagging the 'deplorable' conditions in residential hostels for Dalit, Scheduled Tribes (STs), Extremely Backward Classes (EBC), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and minority students. In his letter, Gandhi also highlighted the delay in providing post-Matriculation scholarships for students from marginalised communities and urged the Prime Minister to resolve these two critical issues. He added that these problems hampered opportunities for 90 per cent students from marginalised communities, reported The Hindu . 'Firstly, the conditions in residential hostels for students from Dalit, ST, EBC, OBC and minority communities are deplorable. During a recent visit to Ambedkar Hostel in Darbhanga, Bihar, students complained about single rooms which 6-7 students were forced to share, unhygienic toilets, unsafe drinking water, lack of mess facilities, and no access to libraries or the internet,' said Gandhi said in his letter dated June 10. 'Secondly, post-matric scholarships for students from marginalised communities are plagued by delays and failures,' said Gandhi. The Leader of Opposition cited the example of Bihar, and claimed that the scholarship portal had been non-functional for three years, and no student had received a scholarship in 2021-22. 'Even thereafter, the number of Dalit students receiving scholarships fell by nearly half, from 1.36 lakh in FY23 to 0.69 lakh in FY24. Students further complain that the scholarship amounts are insultingly low,' Gandhi wrote in the letter. Gandhi added that these 'failures' were widespread across India and called for an audit of every hostel for students from Dalit, ST, EBC, OBC and minority communities to ensure good infrastructure, sanitation, and food and academic facilities, and the allocation of adequate funds to address deficiencies. He also called for the timely disbursement of scholarships, increase in scholarship amount and improved execution of post-matric scholarships. 'I am sure you agree that India cannot progress unless youth from marginalised communities progress. I look forward to your positive response,' said Gandhi. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Census, followed by delimitation or freeze? The road ahead, likely legal challenges
Census, followed by delimitation or freeze? The road ahead, likely legal challenges

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Census, followed by delimitation or freeze? The road ahead, likely legal challenges

The current freeze on delimitation — which for the past 50 years has based the allocation of seats to states in the Lok Sabha on the census figures of 1971 — will expire in 2026, unless Parliament passes another Constitutional Amendment Bill by then to extend it. The reason: the Constitution under Article 82 mandates delimitation after each census to readjust the seats as per changes in population. It says, 'Upon the completion of each census, the allocation of seats in the House of the People to the States and the division of each State into territorial constituencies shall be readjusted by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law determine.' Article 81 of the Constitution provides for the 'one person, one vote, one value' principle. Article 81 (2) (a) says, 'There shall be allotted to each State a number of seats in the House of the People in such manner that the ratio between that number and the population of the state is, so far as practicable, the same for all States.' Article 81 (2) (b) says, 'Each State shall be divided into territorial constituencies in such manner that the ratio between the population of each constituency and number of seats allotted to it is, so far as practicable, the same throughout the State.' With the collection of data for the next census ending by March 1, 2027, the release of census data could coincide with the expiry of the freeze on delimitation. This freeze was put in place first for 25 years through a constitutional amendment in 1976, and again by 25 years through a constitutional amendment in 2002. The reason for the freeze was the concern of the southern states that because their population had stabilised by then, and the population of some northern states had begun to grow at a brisk pace, their representation in the Lok Sabha would go down. To freeze or not to freeze With the Constitution ensuring equality of representation to citizens and not states of the Union, and mandating delimitation every 10 years to adjust the allocation of the seats to population, the only way in which the southern states will not lose representation would have to be another Constitutional amendment. However, with government sources saying that the idea is to have delimitation and then women's reservation in the Lok Sabha elections of 2029, the census is likely to be followed by delimitation. The website of the Election Commission of India says, 'Under Article 82 of the Constitution, the Parliament by law enacts a Delimitation Act after every census. After the commencement of the Act, the Central Government constitutes a Delimitation Commission. This Delimitation Commission demarcates the boundaries of the Parliamentary Constituencies as per provisions of the Delimitation Act. The present delimitation of constituencies has been done on the basis of 2001 census figures under the provisions of Delimitation Act, 2002. Notwithstanding the above, the Constitution of India was specifically amended in 2002 not to have delimitation of constituencies till the first census after 2026. Thus, the present Constituencies carved out on the basis of the 2001 census shall continue to be in operation till the first census after 2026.' In other words, the release of census data will be followed by the passage of the Delimitation Bill in Parliament, unless Parliament suspends the constitutionally mandated process by amending the Constitution to freeze delimitation by, say, another 25 years. Potential legal issues Once the Delimitation Commission is constituted by the Centre, it will use the latest census data to redraw Lok Sabha constituencies. However, it will be bound by Article 81 of the Constitution to redraw these on the basis of the latest population data, unless Article 81 is itself amended. Article 81 may anyway require amendments. For instance, since it limits the strength of the Lok Sabha to 550 under clauses (a) and (b), the strength will have to revised through a constitutional amendment so as to ensure that one MP does not represent too large a population, and to pave way for the reservation of women without cutting down the seats available to men. Article 81 as of now makes one exception to the 'one person, one vote, one value' principle, by giving small states and Union Territories at least one seat even if their population is very low. Since the Constitution is clear about the centrality of this principle in all other cases, the only way the south does not lose relative strength in the Lok Sabha will be by amending Article 81 (2) (a). However, any move to amend Article 81 (2) (a) would be liable to challenge in the Supreme Court as violative of the right to equality enshrined in Articles 14 and 15. The fear in south India is that if delimitation is based purely on population, northern states will get much more seats and thus a very large voice in Parliament. But if the law is amended and they get more seats than they would through the population criterion, then voters in the north and the south are not being treated equally. Even if the principle of reasonable classification — likes be treated alike — is evoked, it will be based on the argument that better social and economic indicators require special protection for southern states. This logic is exactly opposite to the one that permits reservation on the grounds that the state can make special provisions for the backward classes. The delimitation question, thus, has no easy answers, and is likely to lead to much litigation. Vikas Pathak is deputy associate editor with The Indian Express and writes on national politics. He has over 17 years of experience, and has worked earlier with The Hindustan Times and The Hindu, among other publications. He has covered the national BJP, some key central ministries and Parliament for years, and has covered the 2009 and 2019 Lok Sabha polls and many state assembly polls. He has interviewed many Union ministers and Chief Ministers. Vikas has taught as a full-time faculty member at Asian College of Journalism, Chennai; Symbiosis International University, Pune; Jio Institute, Navi Mumbai; and as a guest professor at Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi. Vikas has authored a book, Contesting Nationalisms: Hinduism, Secularism and Untouchability in Colonial Punjab (Primus, 2018), which has been widely reviewed by top academic journals and leading newspapers. He did his PhD, M Phil and MA from JNU, New Delhi, was Student of the Year (2005-06) at ACJ and gold medalist from University Rajasthan College in Jaipur in graduation. He has been invited to top academic institutions like JNU, St Stephen's College, Delhi, and IIT Delhi as a guest speaker/panellist. ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store