logo
'For me that's a red line': Labour MP with disabled son says he can't vote for benefits changes

'For me that's a red line': Labour MP with disabled son says he can't vote for benefits changes

ITV News24-06-2025
North Somerset's Labour MP has said he is prepared to vote against the government on controversial changes to benefits, which he believes would have a detrimental impact on his disabled son's future.
Sadik Al-Hassan told ITV West Country: "I don't think I could ever vote for something that would make his life in the future worse, or other people like him, and for me that's a red line."
The Labour MP is one of more than 120 who have signed an amendment that would block cuts to disability and sickness-related benefits payments, in a government bid to save £5bn a year on the welfare bill by 2030.
It's a rebellion significant enough in size to wipe out Labour's majority in the House of Commons, but Sir Keir Starmer has doubled down on the plans and insisted he intends to "press ahead" with next week's vote.
"Nobody in North Somerset put me here just to rubber stamp and approve legislation," Al-Hassan said.
"They want me to read it, understand it, and vote on what I think is right. They want me to make a call on what I think would be best for North Somerset.
"It is tough sometimes to stand up and say, 'actually, I disagree.'"
The Labour MP was joined by the Forest of Dean's Matt Bishop and Stroud's Dr Simon Opher in publicly expressing discomfort with the changes, while ITV West Country understands a number of other MPs in the West Country remain hesitant to back them.
Among the most unpopular is a change to the way personal independence payments (PIP) are granted, meaning people with less severe conditions are at risk of losing out on the benefit that helps with the extra living costs of being disabled.
In a bid to ease growing discontent, the government said PIP recipients who will lose the benefit would get a 13-week extension to help ease the transition.
"From the government's own impact assessment, it's going to bring about 250,000 disabled people into poverty and about 50,000 children," Al-Hassan added.
"For me, it's a personal choice because when I look at these proposals I see them through the lens of a father. But I think there are better ways to raise revenue and better ways to intervene with regards to welfare."
He added: "We do need to rebuild it [the system], but we need to put the people in it, and helping them, at the heart of that. The bill misses the mark on that."
A number of the proposed changes have been welcomed by Labour MPs, like extra investment to help get people back into work and an increase in the basic rate of Universal Credit for people actively seeking employment.
But MPs, like Al-Hassan, Bishop and Opher, say there has been a lack of consultation over the plans and an inadequate impact assessment on the consequences on the jobs market and on people's health.
The government is planning to put the welfare reforms in place by November 2026.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK will recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel ends ‘appalling situation' in Gaza, Starmer vows
UK will recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel ends ‘appalling situation' in Gaza, Starmer vows

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

UK will recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel ends ‘appalling situation' in Gaza, Starmer vows

Keir Starmer and his senior ministers have agreed to recognise to recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel ends its starvation tactics in Gaza. The prime minister held an emergency virtual cabinet meeting where he laid out his plan for peace agreed over the weekend with French President Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz. In an ultimatum to Benjamin Netanyahu's government, he used the threat of recognising Palestine in September to try to force Israel to change tactics. A readout from the cabinet meeting stated: 'The Prime Minister said it had been this Government's longstanding position that recognition of a Palestinian state was an inalienable right of the Palestinian people and that we would recognise a Palestinian state as part of a process to peace and a two state solution. 'He said that because of the increasingly intolerable situation in Gaza and the diminishing prospect of a peace process towards a two state solution, now was the right time to move this position forward. 'He said that the UK will recognise the state of Palestine in September, before UNGA, unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two state solution.' Pressure had been mounting on Sir Keir to recognise Palestine as a state, but the decision to put the ball in the Israeli government's court was a compromise to satisfy two competing factions in his cabinet. Senior Cabinet members who support plans to recognise a Palestinian state include deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, justice secretary Shabana Mahmood, energy secretary Ed Miliband and foreign secretary David Lammy. Mr Lammy is at a conference in New York discussing recognising Palestine as a state where he is due to speak. But on the other side chancellor Rachel Reeves, tech secretary Peter Kyle, chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, who have been officers of Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), were worried recognition would 'reward Hamas'. Politically Sir Keir had been helped by Donald Trump when they met in Scotland on Monday, where the US president said he did not object to the prime minister taking a position on state recognition. This undermined the US State Department's opposition to the move, expressed angrily by secretary of state Marco Rubio last week, when President Macron announced France would recognise a Palestinian state. At home Sir Keir has been threatened by the creation of Jeremy Corbyn's new party which includes the former Gaza independents who unseated senior Labour MPs at the last election and came close to defeating Ms Mahmood and health secretary Wes Streeting. Added to that more than 250 MPs from nine different parties have called for Palestine to be recognised as a state. This included more than 90 of the new Labour MPs elected last year.

UK will recognise state of Palestine by September unless Israel meets conditions
UK will recognise state of Palestine by September unless Israel meets conditions

STV News

time26 minutes ago

  • STV News

UK will recognise state of Palestine by September unless Israel meets conditions

The UK will recognise the state of Palestine by September, at the UN General Assembly, unless Israel agrees to a peace plan based on a two-state solution and the free flow of aid into Gaza. Hamas must also agree to a ceasefire and to release remaining hostages. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has faced mounting calls in recent weeks to recognise Palestinian statehood immediately. Downing Street previously said Starmer was working with France and Germany to 'bring about a lasting peace' with US President Donald Trump. Starmer plans to share details with Arab states and other key allies in the coming days. Recognition of a Palestinian state is supported by more than 200 MPs and was a commitment in Labour's election manifesto. The Prime Minister's official spokesman previously said: 'This week, the Prime Minister is focused on a pathway to peace to ensure immediate relief for those on the ground, and a sustainable route to a two-state solution. 'We are clear that the recognition of the Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if, but it must be one of the steps on the path to a two-state solution as part of a wider plan that delivers lasting security for both Palestinians and Israelis.' Amid international alarm over starvation in Gaza, Israel announced at the weekend that it would suspend fighting in three areas for ten hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Labour are engulfed in major online safety furore
Labour are engulfed in major online safety furore

The National

time27 minutes ago

  • The National

Labour are engulfed in major online safety furore

It worked for rapper Kendrick Lamar; why not Technology Secretary Peter Kyle? Kyle delivered a quite extraordinary, spittle-flecked response to critics of the Online Safety Act on Tuesday morning. Nigel Farage is on the same side as paedophiles, Kyle spat. Not just any paedos either, the minister said that Farage would be on the same side as Jimmy Savile, were he still alive. Going even further later on, he said that anyone wanting to overturn the controversial legislation is 'on the side of predators'. That includes more than 400,000 people who have signed a petition calling for the Act to be repealed and could expand to organisations like Liberty, Big Brother Watch, Index on Censorship and the parent companies of Facebook and Wikipedia. Even Ian Russell, the chair of the Molly Russell Foundation, a child protection charity, said that the Act was not up to snuff and had to be replaced by something even tougher. Who knew paedophiles had so many allies? Quite why Labour are defending a Tory piece of legislation – the Act was passed by the Conservatives but is only coming into force now – is a question with a couple of answers. The first is a political one. 'Protect our children' has become a potent rallying cry for the right, identifying bogeymen in everyone from asylum seekers to drag queens. This is Labour's counterblast: You're putting children at risk. If you're against us, you're on the same side as child abusers. READ MORE: Labour respond as 400k demand repeal of Online Safety Act As a strategy it could work. Many parents will doubtless be glad to see the Government come down hard on the worst bits of the internet. It will certainly be welcomed by many that unregulated social media companies will be held responsible for removing content like child pornography and blocking children's access to sexual content or instructions for committing acts of self-harm or suicide. There is unlikely to be great amounts of sympathy for arguments about the sanctity of end-to-end encryption or free online speech. The flipside: are Reform UK railing against the Act – which this week enforced age restrictions on adult content – as a means to target the porn-addicted, misanthropic young men likely to make up its youth base at the next election? Quite possibly. (Image: James Manning/PA) The other reason that Kyle and his Labour comrades so aggressively back the Act is that they genuinely believe in it. They do not care about warnings that by introducing strict age checks, people might be pushed into downloading software to evade restrictions and access the darker corners of the internet. Demand for virtual private networks, which allow people to browse the web away from the prying eyes of regulators, is soaring. Kyle, as a rational being, must consider it plausible that the Act could have unintended consequences, though he shows no signs that he does. He seems to believe that the intention of legislation is its effect. He appears to care only about why laws were introduced, not how they work. Keir Starmer's response to criticism of the Act earlier this week took a similar approach: 'I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.' It surely cannot be beyond him that the two are not mutually exclusive. So it was with the SNP's doomed Named Person Scheme. Ministers were warned in 2016 that while the aim of the policy was 'unquestionably legitimate', it would violate people's human rights. It took another three years before it was officially ditched by the Scottish Government. With Donald Trump's sidekick JD Vance threatening consequences for governments insufficiently amenable to his definition of free speech, perhaps Starmer and co might catch up with the laws of unintended consequences sooner rather than later.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store