
Why U.S. citizen children sent with their deported moms can't come back easily
The administration has responded to blowback from the children's expulsions and those of other U.S. citizen minors, including a child with cancer and one recovering from a rare brain tumor, by saying the mothers were in the U.S. illegally and chose to take their children with them. The families and their attorneys vehemently disagree that the mothers had a choice.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested in an interview April 27 on "Meet the Press" that the children's situations are easily fixed.
'If those children are U.S. citizens,' he said, 'they can come back into the United States if there's their father or someone here who wants to assume them.'
While attorneys, advocates and researchers agree that U.S. citizens generally have the right to return, they said suggestions that the children can just easily come back to the U.S. gloss over the barriers and difficulties of what that would entail.
There are many hurdles that families would need to overcome for their U.S. citizen children to be able to return, according to Mich P. González, co-founder of Sanctuary of the South, an immigration and LGBTQ civil rights cooperative. His group and its member organizations has been assisting two families whose mothers were deported from Florida and their children, including three U.S. citizens, who were sent with them.
González said ICE often confiscates identification documents when deporting people. For example, the 2-year-old U.S. citizen daughter of the Honduran mother González represents had her passport taken away before she left, he said. That means the family would have to get the necessary paperwork from the U.S. to prove the child was born there.
In many cases, U.S. citizen children don't have passports in the first place, which are required when returning to the U.S. from a foreign country by air. Children younger than 16 arriving from Canada or Mexico, if they don't have passports, must have original birth certificates or other specific documents to return to the U.S.
'They don't have passports, the two children only have their birth certificates," said Naiara Leite Da Silva, the attorney representing Parra Vargas. "Not sure if mom has the original or a copy, but she only has the birth certificates, so it would entail a long and convoluted process before they could potentially come back.'
Finding an authorized guardian who is a U.S. citizen and can travel with the child can also be difficult, González said. Families would have to come up with the money to cover the costs of flying their children back to the U.S. or covering the cost of a guardian at a time when they may be financially strained, attorneys said.
One of the biggest complications right now, according to González, is any potential risk for the U.S.-based guardian to travel outside the country to go get the child. The administration has ratcheted up the power of border authorities to determine who should be admitted back into the country, even those with legal immigration status.
'You can risk being stranded outside the United States,' González said.
Activists and attorneys said that the nation's focus should be on whether the children should have been expelled in the first place.
They argue that the parents may have had options for remaining in the U.S. had they been given a chance to consult with an attorney. In some of the recent cases, attorneys have pointed out that parents could have at least settled the question on whether their children should remain in the U.S. and with whom, before their deportation.
Leite Da Silva said the Parra Vargas' family 'strongly opposes the government narrative that it was the family's choice to keep the children with them ... they never had the choice of leaving their children in the United States." Because of that, she refers to the children as "forced expatriates."
She said Parra Vargas was 'entrapped' because the family alleges they were told to come in for an asylum interview where they would get work authorization papers, and they were told to bring the children with them. According to the attorney, once they were at the appointment and were told they were to be deported, they weren't allowed to communicate with family members who were in the Pflugerville processing center parking lot and who were legal residents and could have kept the children.
In response to questions from NBC News, Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated via email that if an immigrant in the country illegally is subject to detention, they 'will almost assuredly be detained.' DHS had previously stated that Parra Vargas had a deportation order after she failed to appear at a 2019 immigration hearing.
McLaughlin repeated DHS' previous statements that parents illegally in the country can 'take control of their departure' and leave using an app created by the administration and that the administration is offering those who leave $1,000 and a free flight.
ICE adopted procedures during the Obama administration — Trump border czar Tom Homan was acting ICE director at the time — to give families time to decide what to do about their citizen children, said Sirine Shebaya, executive director of the National Immigration Project. She added that one of the mothers deported from Florida had said she didn't want her U.S. citizen children to have to leave the country.
The parents' decision to keep their child with them or send them back to the U.S. is not so easily reached.
Parents have to consider whether leaving them behind, sending their child back to the U.S. or even the act of traveling without their parent could further traumatize their child, González said.
One of the children sent out of the country when her mother was deported to Mexico is 11 and is recovering from a brain tumor.
'Think about yourself when you were 11. Now think if you had a brain tumor and think about whether you could get to another country without your parents. Would that be feasible for you? We should not be asking kids to do something like that,' said Rochelle Garza, chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and president of the Texas Civil Rights Project.
Advocates and attorneys are working to petition for humanitarian parole to get the family members who are not citizens back in the U.S. with the girl.
In general, people who have been deported are not allowed to return to the U.S. for a stretch of time from three years to 10 years, depending on how long they were in the U.S. without legal authorization.
Generally, parents are more willing to allow older U.S. citizen children, more so than younger children, to remain in the U.S., said Wendy Cervantes, director of immigration and immigrant families at the Center for Law and Social Policy, an anti-poverty group.
In some of those cases, older children become guardians to younger siblings.
'I've seen cases where families are broken up and the older kids stay here and they might stay with an uncle or an aunt and in some cases if they are close to being 18, they actually are the ones left to care for other children, to keep the house that maybe was purchased (by the parents) and they become these super young adult caregivers,' Cervantes said.
A look into the 'de facto deported'
With younger children who are forced to live in their parents' homeland either by U.S. government policy and their parents' decisions, a return to the U.S. could be years away. And much can happen in those years.
U.S. citizen children who have been deported can face some immediate setbacks when they get to their parents' home country, said Victor Zúñiga González, a professor of sociology at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, who has studied the migration of U.S.-born children to Mexico and Central America for nearly three decades.
In addition to adjusting to language and cultural issues, U.S.-born children could have their school enrollments delayed by lack of documentation to establish their legal Mexican citizenship, which is needed to attend school. Mexico grants citizenship to children born abroad to Mexican parents, but official certification is required, a process that Zúñiga said takes less time in the U.S. than in Mexico.
Parents can face similar issues in other countries, Cervantes said. In Guatemala, requirements for notarized school documents — a process that differs than in the U.S. — can delay school enrollment.
The population of U.S.-born children living in Mexico between 2000 and 2015 doubled, according to Erin Hamilton, a University of California Davis sociology professor.
In her study of U.S.-born children living in Mexico in 2014 and 2018, she found 1 in 6, or about 80,000 to 100,000, were there because one or both of their parents were deported, which she and her research colleagues termed "de facto deported."
Hamilton found the "de facto deported" children were more likely to be economically disadvantaged than U.S.-born children who migrated to Mexico for other reasons. They also were less likely to be enrolled in primary school and 70% children had no health insurance, compared to 53% of the other U.S.-born children.
Garza, the civil rights commission chair, asked whether "we really want to have the conversation that it's OK to remove certain U.S. citizens from the country ... creating this fiction that they can come back if they want to."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'We quit US for country 5,000 miles away due to Trump and were blown away by experiences'
A family who moved from the USA to the popular Spanish city of Barcelona have spoken glowingly about the joys of reduced gun violence and a better healthcare system A family of three who moved from the United States to Spain because of their dislike of President Donald Trump have been blown away by their experiences in their new home. Benjamin Gorman, a former schoolteacher turned author, his wife Chrystal, and their daughter Franke, moved 5,000 miles across the Atlantic to live in the popular Spanish city of Barcelona. Benjamin said that he originally considered the move after he received 'very scary' death threats following his decision to sign a pledge to teach American history accurately. When he received backlash for this, he asked a friend of his from the FBI whether he could report the death threats if Trump were to win a second term, to which his friend said no. He claimed: 'He told me, 'You would basically be calling the Proud Boys for help.' So I knew that, if Trump won, I would have to get out.' After debating over which country to move to, the family eventually decided on Spain, in part because Benjamin speaks fluent Spanish and the family knew Barcelona well. Following their move, they have spoken glowingly about their decision and the benefits of living in Europe compared to the USA. Among the benefits are the improved healthcare system, and dramatically reduced danger of gun violence. Benjamin explained: 'The healthcare system is so much better that when we explain the American system to professionals here, they are gobsmacked by how ridiculous it sounds. 'Similarly, not having the constant threat of gun violence improves culture in so many ways. The way the police interact with people here is so positive. They're constantly de-escalating situations and working to protect people's dignity.' Whilst they are glad not to have to worry about gun violence or an incredibly expensive healthcare system, the family admitted there are some parts of home they miss dearly, most notably their family and friends. They also miss some sweet treats from home. Benjamin said: 'We've found a handful of specific products we can't get our hands on here in Spain. 'For example, we have chocolate M&M's and peanut M&M's here, but no peanut butter M&M's, which are absolutely the best kind.' Benjamin and his family aren't the first Americans to leave their homeland since the return of Trump to the White House, with others also fleeing to Canada or other parts of Europe. This includes Robert Apgar-Taylor who moved with his husband Robert Taylor to Canada. Speaking to CBC, he described the moment they stepped over the border. He told the broadcaster: 'We took a picture at the border. It was winter. We wore our plaid shirts and hats, and showed our immigration papers with the moving truck behind us. We were so excited.'


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Trump says he wants to get to heaven but is at the bottom of the totem pole
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump is trying his best to be a middleman for peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Although talks with Russian president Vladimir Putin were fruitless, the US leader still has hope he can stop the bloodshed – and joked it could get him into heaven. Speaking to Fox and Friends, Trump said: 'If I can save 7,000 people a week from being killed, I think that's pretty good. 'I want to try to get to heaven if possible. I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I'm really at the bottom of the totem pole. 'But if I get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.' He also referenced his 'intervention' to stop a potential war between India and Pakistan, saying he 'saved a lot of lives'. Trump added, 'They were going at it. Planes were being shot down. That was going to be maybe a nuclear war.' His remarks came after Trump said US troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Trump added that Ukraine's hopes of joining NATO and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. When asked by Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' But he would have no control over the US military after his term ends in January 2029. The president also said that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but said Ukraine will not keep Crimea or join NATO. As for Putin, he's hoping for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. After rambling about his path to heaven, Trump wrote on Truth Social about how museums throughout the nation's capital and all over the country are the 'last remaining segments of WOKE'. He's focusing his efforts on the Smithsonian. In a statement to NPR, the White House said: 'President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable. 'He will start with the Smithsonian and then go from there.' The White House previously said it plans to audit eight Smithsonian museums to 'ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' Trump added: 'This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.' Talks of a potential meeting between Putin and Zelensky are also in the works, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Trump himself said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Zelensky, Putin and himself. More Trending But after speaking to Putin, Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Zelensky and Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary. Zelensky and Putin last met in person in 2019, speaking about how to stop fighting in eastern Ukraine, where Russian troops had been trying to take land since 2014. Then, the pair met in Paris, but the meeting didn't lead to any long-term peace in the regions. The stakes have never been higher after Russia illegally invaded Ukraine in February 2022, sparking a war which has killed more than 70,000 Ukrainian civilians. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Zelensky should never have to hand over land to Putin MORE: Five key takeaways from Zelensky's crunch talks with Donald Trump at the White House MORE: Fact check: Donald Trump boasts he's ended 'six wars in six months' but has he?


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Brazen Russian soldiers who flew American flag into battle ‘are KILLED on frontline by Ukrainians' after sick taunt
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WARPED Russian soldiers who flew the American flag into battle as a sick taunt have been killed in action, according to reports. An armoured vehicle was filmed this week adorned with the flags of both Russia and the United States in the wake of Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin. 8 Swaggering Putin troops flying the US and Russian flags Credit: East2West 8 Swaggering Putin troops flying the US and Russian flags 8 A firefighter works at the site of a fuel storage facility hit by a Russian drone strike Credit: Reuters 8 The mocking stunt appeared to suggest that the US is now helping Russia in its brutal invasion and occupation of swathes of Ukraine. But the twisted Russian troops weren't laughing for long. Military analysts have reported that the vehicle's crew have been killed in battle since it was filmed heading towards Zaporizhzhia. Blogger MilitaryNewsUA posted on X: "Russian channels write that the Russian crew of the Gaz-71, which had American and Russian flags installed on it, died during the assault on Ukrainian positions." It comes as Russia continues to sustain heavy casualties in its attempts to push further into Ukrainian territory. Russia's total casualties - meaning troops killed or wounded - in Ukraine exceeded one million back in June. The head of the Centre for the Study of the Occupation, Petr Andryushchenko, previously said: "The Russians have already declared the United States an ally and are storming Mala Tokmachka in M113 armoured personnel carriers….with Russian and American flags. "This is the logical conclusion to all of Trump's absurdity. "And all of this is on the official propaganda channel of Russia Today. There are no words." Vladimir Putin came out of the diplomatic deep freeze last Friday when he met with Donald Trump in Alaska for a peace summit. Ukrainian raid behind enemy lines kills 330 Russian troops While no ceasefire deal emerged following the meeting, Russia has spun the summit as a diplomatic win for the Kremlin after years of increased isolation. Trump told reporters: "There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say. "A couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway." Fears have since grown in Western capitals that Trump may try to force Ukraine into surrendering further territory to Moscow in exchange for peace. Putin has signalled that he wants to take control of the whole Donbas region as a pre-condition for an end to the war. Russian forces occupy large swathes of the two provinces that make up this region - Donetsk and Luhansk. 8 8 Ukrainian firefighters search for survivors after a Russian air strike on a residential building Credit: Getty But Ukraine still controls the strategically critical "fortress belt" in Donetsk, that analysts fear could be used by Moscow as a launchpad for future invasions. It prompted European leaders to fly to Washington and accompany Volodymyr Zelensky for crunch peace talks with Trump on Monday. The Ukrainian war leader sought to shore up American and European security guarantees for his country in the event of a halt to the fighting. Donald Trump has ruled out putting US boots on the ground - and has dashed Ukrainian hopes of joining Nato. He said instead: "We've got the European nations, and they'll front-load it. "When it comes to security, the Europeans are willing to put people on the ground." The White House is now pushing for a trilateral meeting with Trump, Putin and Zelensky to further peace discussions. Will there be a summit with Putin? VLADIMIR Putin has failed to publicly commit to a sit down with Volodymyr Zelensky off back of duelling summits with Donald Trump. It came after a love-in at the White House yesterday which saw Zelensky and Trump smooth over their differences and appear to pave the way for peace. The Ukrainian leader said he was "ready" to speak to Putin in-person under any circumstances. And any face-to-face showdown - which would be their first since the start of the war in February 2022 - could be followed by a trilateral summit with Donald Trump. So far however the Kremlin have remained coy on any details, despite Vlad reportedly telling Trump he was interested in talks. Moscow have remained publicly silent - and there have been no details released about when, or where, such a historic summit could occur. Efforts have previously been made to bring Zelensky and Putin together - with the Ukrainian leader even challenging Vlad to meet in Istanbul back in May. Silence from the Russian side raises fears that once again the tyrant could torpedo any attempt for talks at the highest level. 8 European leaders dashed to Washington in support of Zelensky this week Credit: AFP