Utah's new holiday to help folks combat loneliness is on Saturday
The last Saturday in April — this Saturday — is a new state holiday.
The Utah Legislature created Utah Social and Community Health Day to nudge people to mind their relationships. The day is a reminder to nurture friendships and to reach out to others to counter the growing problem of loneliness, a challenge that has seeped through communities across the country.
'Think of it as a day to level up your friendships,' said Brent Reed, one of the architects of the holiday and a strong advocate for the value of forging connections. 'Every major problem — and every joy — is easier to face when we're not alone."
The holiday's goal, he told Deseret News, is to get everyone to do something, however small, to connect with someone else. He'll be having lunch with an old friend he almost lost track of as both of their lives got busy.
Reed, 59, is a Highland dad with seven kids, who range from teens up to their 30s. He owns a window cleaning business. Reed said he got interested in the issue of social connections in 2023, when news stories were chronicling a loneliness epidemic. He took stock of his own life and realized he'd let many of his social connections drift away.
About the same time, Reed said he saw some of the work done by BYU professor of psychology Julianne Holt-Lunstad, who had been studying and publishing research on the impact of loneliness and isolation — which may not be the same thing. You can have people around you and still feel lonely. You can be by yourself and not feel lonely. But many people do suffer from feelings of one or the other — or both.
Reed got involved with 'friendship labs,' coming up with tools to help people increase the quantity of their friendships and improve the quality. He kept trying different things, plagued by the notion that disconnection was a solvable societal problem.
But loneliness is tricky, he said, because no one wants to own that they feel that way. 'Being lonely seems to be generally frowned upon,' he said.
He took his concerns to a legislator, who agreed that a day of recognition might be 'leverage to tell people to take it more seriously.' State Sen. Brady Brammer, R-Pleasant Grove, sponsored SCR4, while state Rep. Steve Eliason, R-Sandy, carried it in the House. The resolution says the day, which became official in 2025, 'recognizes loneliness and social isolation as critical public health priorities' and 'urges individuals to prioritize building positive relationships and fostering social connections.'
Holt-Lunstad, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Brigham Young University and director of the university's social connections lab, believes having a designated day could be 'an opportunity both for increasing awareness as well as for taking action.' She helped polish the resolution's language.
She's long been heavily involved in sounding the alarm about the very real dangers of loneliness and isolation, noting health risks more dangerous than obesity, air pollution, physical inactivity, excessive alcohol consumption or smoking 15 cigarettes a day.
'No factor is more consistently associated with long life and happiness than strong social connections,' she said, pointing to findings from Harvard's Study of Adult Development, which is the world's longest study of happiness.
When U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy issued his advisory on loneliness, which he characterized as an epidemic, she was the scientific editor. She's also a technical adviser to the World Health Organization's commission on social connection. The commission will issue a new report in July.
Despite recent attention from officials, Holt-Lunstad said she thinks there's a 'significant lack of awareness around this issue' among the public. So besides the push to get people involved with each other on a personal level, she believes an awareness day provides an opportunity to 'create messaging and campaigns and dialogue that can help us start to increase awareness around just how critically important our social connections are, not only for individuals, but the thriving of our communities and society.
'We know it impacts health, education, safety, prosperity, several different kinds of outcomes — and for far too long, our social connections have been taken for granted and so this is an opportunity for us to create awareness but also for communities to plan events, for individuals to take action in their own relationships and communities,' she said.
The day should remind people how important connections are, said Holt-Lunstad.
Reed said his own focus is on fortifying spiritual, relational health. 'Lots of groups are building parks and paths, and there are lots of things that build community. But until you start talking to someone, making friends, going to lunch, it's for naught.'
What he wants to do, he said, is 'level up as a friend. If people did that, it would be fantastic.' It's easy to let a relationship slide if it's not minded, according to Reed, who is pretty sure that on Saturday he'll be having lunch with someone who's been his friend for 30 years, but with whom he almost lost touch, then working in the man's backyard for a bit.
Helping others, doing things together — even chores — forms or strengthens bonds.
Holt-Lunstad talks about a randomized controlled trial she was part of that asked people to do just small acts of kindness for their neighbors over the course of a month. 'What we found was that when people did that, that reduced loneliness, it reduced stress and it also reduced conflict in neighborhoods.'
Action on behalf of others is free, simple and anyone can do something, she said.
A single commemorative day is not going to change much, she adds, or be as helpful as something done consistently over time. But it could get people started thinking about others and launch some new connections.
Doing things with and for others makes people feel good. So it can lead somewhere important on a personal level.
'Relationships take time to develop and time to maintain,' she told Deseret News, noting the day 'really should be a reminder, more than a one-off.'
There's a website under development at Utahsocialhealthday.com. It will be built out with ideas for connecting and with different resources, Reed said.
Holt-Lunstad added that she's glad the holiday focuses on social connection, rather than targeting loneliness explicitly.
'I think oftentimes we focus so much on the problem that we lose sight of what we're aiming for. Social connection is something everyone needs and everyone can take part in. I'm happy that Utah is focusing on the bright spots.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
UnitedHealthcare accused The Guardian of looking to ‘capitalize' on CEO's murder in lawsuit
UnitedHealthcare sued The Guardian and its parent on Wednesday for defamation, claiming the US version of the British daily newspaper ran information it knew to be incorrect in order to 'capitalize' on the assassination of the medical insurer's CEO. The article in question was produced and published by The Guardian's US investigations team as part of a series titled 'Too Big to Care' and was available worldwide at publication. In the article, George Joseph, an investigative reporter for The Guardian's US publication, wrote that UnitedHealth Group, UnitedHealthcare's parent, had engaged in cost-cutting tactics by paying off nurses to cut down on hospital transfers. Citing internal emails, documents and interviews with more than 20 current and former staffers, the report claimed that the payments were made 'as part of a UnitedHealth program.' Nursing home residents in need of 'immediate hospital care under the program failed to receive it' because of 'interventions from UnitedHealth staffers,' per the report. The lawsuit from UnitedHealth Group, United Healthcare Services and Optum, the group's health services segment, filed in Delaware's Superior Court, accused The Guardian of publishing 'knowingly false claims' in the story, alleging it used 'deceptively doctored documents' and 'patently untruthful anecdotes' to produce the article. 'The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway, brazenly trying to capitalize on the tragic and shocking assassination of UnitedHealthcare's then-CEO, Brian Thompson,' the lawsuit alleged. The Guardian is strongly pushing back against UnitedHealthcare's lawsuit, emphasizing in a statement that it will defend Joseph's reporting. 'The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees — as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks,' The Guardian said in a statement. 'It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts,' the publication said. The health care giant's accusations echo a statement published by UnitedHealth Group the same day The Guardian released its investigation. In the statement, the company accused the publication of building a 'narrative' using 'anecdotes rather than facts.' The company noted that the Justice Department had investigated the allegations, interviewed witnesses, and combed through thousands of documents, only to find 'the significant factual inaccuracies in the allegations.' A UnitedHealth Group spokesperson told CNN that The Guardian 'refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative.' 'The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care,' the company said in a statement. However, despite the claim, a spokesperson for The Guardian told CNN that it has 'received no requests for correction or retraction on any aspect of the story.' UnitedHealthcare is being represented by Clare Locke, a law firm known for taking on defamation cases against media organizations. The firm has also represented Project Veritas; and one of its partners, Jered Ede, who is working on the UnitedHealthcare lawsuit, was also Project Veritas's chief legal officer.


USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Beef jerky, snack sticks recalled: See list of affected products
Beef jerky, snack sticks recalled: See list of affected products Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a health care provider, according to the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service. Show Caption Hide Caption Tips to help manage food recalls and prevent foodborne illnesses About 128,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 people die each year from preventable foodborne illnesses. Payton, USA TODAY Misbranding and an undeclared fishy allergen have led to the recall of more than 15,000 pounds of heat-treated shelf-stable ready-to-eat beef jerky and snack stick products, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Springville Meat & Cold Storage Co. issued the recall on Tuesday, June 3, for the beef jerky and beef stick items produced on various dates from May 30, 2023, to May 30, 2025, the FSIS announced. In addition to the recall, the Springville, Utah-based company is voluntarily inspecting elk, venison and buffalo jerky products for misbranding and undeclared allergens, the government agency said. The allergen not declared on the meat products' labels is fish, more specifically, anchovies, according to the FSIS. The affected products, which were shipped to retail locations nationwide, have the establishment number "EST. 20528" inside the USDA mark of inspection. FSIS inspectors discovered the issue during product observations, which revealed that the Worcestershire sauce used in the jerky and snack sticks contained anchovies, the government agency said. The meat processor previously used Worcestershire sauce without anchovies, but the new Worcestershire sauce used for the products does contain the small fish, the FSIS said. The FSIS said there have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to the consumption of the beef jerky and stick products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a health care provider, according to the government agency. What should I do if I bought the recalled beef jerky, snack stick products? For anyone who may have the affected products in their pantries, they should not consume them, the FSIS said. Instead, consumers should throw away or return the products to the place of purchase, the government agency added. Product labels, lot codes for recalled Springville Meat items There are multiple product labels and lot codes associated with the recall, which can be viewed below:


Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
'Coming for us': Expert sounds alarm on CCP's mission to 'kill Americans' after FBI makes shocking arrests
VIDEO ID: 6373876764112 Following news that two Chinese nationals were charged with allegedly smuggling a "dangerous biological pathogen" into the United States to study at a U.S. university, Fox News Digital spoke to an expert on China who said the arrests should be a wake-up call to the country. "I was entirely unsurprised, which is a sad commentary, but it speaks to the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP wants to kill Americans," Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute focusing on U.S. and China relations, told Fox News Digital after FBI Director Kash Patel announced the arrests of the two Chinese nationals. "Look at what they've done with smuggling fentanyl precursors into our country to kill Americans, look at the effects of them failing to stop the spread of COVID-19," Sobolik said. "Dead Americans. The fact that they want to target Americans here within the United States with pathogens and with bioweapons. This is the Chinese Communist Party. This is what they do. They're in a cold war with the United States. They want to become the most powerful nation in the world and they wanna make the world safe for their tyranny and unsafe for freedom. And they're coming for us here at home." The couple are accused of smuggling a fungus called Fusarium graminearum, which scientific literature classifies as a "potential agroterrorism weapon," according to the Justice Department. Federal prosecutors note that the noxious fungus causes "head blight," a disease of wheat, barley, maize, and rice, and "is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses worldwide each year." The Justice Department also says fusarium graminearum's toxins cause vomiting, liver damage, and "reproductive defects in humans and livestock." According to the criminal complaint, one of the accused allegedly received Chinese government funding for her work on the pathogen in China. The couple are accused of bringing the pathogen into the U.S. to study at a University of Michigan laboratory, which raises more concerns about Chinese nationals infiltrating American universities. Last month, a bombshell report out of Stanford University shed light on the influence of spies from the Chinese Communist Party that the student newspaper says have likely infiltrated the prestigious institution and other universities nationwide to gather intelligence. "American higher education is addicted to the Chinese Communist Party," Sobolik told Fox News Digital. "It's addicted to easy money that has come from Beijing for decades. It's addicted to international students that pay full tuition, many of which are then coerced and pressured by the Chinese embassy and consulates and other networks to spy for the party and report back." "American universities need to finally open their eyes and stop being willfully blind to the threat of the CCP. They're vectors for intelligence gathering. They are vectors for these threats that target Americans on our own soil. That's unacceptable. If sovereignty means anything, we need to be able to protect Americans within the borders of the United States. And universities cannot continue to be willing accomplices of the Chinese Communist Party." A Chinese embassy official said Wednesday he was unaware of the case involving two Chinese nationals charged with smuggling a "dangerous biological pathogen" into the U.S. for university research. "I don't know the specific situation, but I would like to emphasize that the Chinese government has always required overseas Chinese citizens to abide by local laws and regulations and will also resolutely safeguard their legitimate rights and interests," said Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Embassy in the U.S.