On two coasts, a show of force — and a test of ours
On two separate coasts this week, Donald Trump is wielding the military as a signal of his dominance and a hypermasculine display of leadership that is at odds with how many Americans think of the role of a commander-in-chief in a civilian-led democracy.
In Los Angeles, Trump has deployed thousands of members of the National Guard in an outsized response to protesters who took to the streets to oppose his immigration crackdown in the city. This was over the objections and without the cooperation of California's governor, in the absence of a national emergency. There were incidents of violence, but the protests were overwhelmingly peaceful and in response to the administration's own actions in sweeping up immigrants who were working, not specifically targeting violent criminals.
In Washington, dozens of tanks, thousands of soldiers, a parachute team and more than 50 types of aircraft will descend Saturday in a military parade to celebrate the Army's 250th anniversary — a celebration that, coincidentally, falls on Trump's 79th birthday.
Both scenes are the latest in Trump's reality show presidency, where strength and power are defined by a public and excessive show of force and pageantry is a means of reinforcing control.
For Trump, the military is the ultimate masculine accessory, said presidential historian Alexis Coe.
'Historically, war-making was seen as the most 'masculine' presidential duty,' Coe said.
What if the country isn't at war, and the threat doesn't rise to the level of crisis? For this president, patriotism still needs to be performed — and the perception, not reality, is the point.
But many Americans are also exercising their power in this moment. It's a reminder that military might isn't the only definition of strength, particularly in a democracy.
The last time an American president deployed the National Guard without a governor's permission was 60 years ago. Then, it was to protect the civil and First Amendment rights of Black citizens in Alabama peacefully marching from Selma to Montgomery pushing for voting rights and a freer and fairer America. Now, it is a president's actions that are raising questions about whose freedoms and rights matter in a democracy.
Unlike then-President Lyndon Johnson's actions in Selma, Trump's use of the military in Los Angeles is a counter to the protesters attempting to protect rights, said Maya Wiley, president of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. He's protecting the rights of armed law enforcement — not protesters or immigrants as his government faces rebukes in court for ignoring constitutionally-guaranteed due process rights.
'It demonstrates that he can use 'his military' as law enforcement, which is the ultimate strongman stereotype,' Wiley said. 'It's intended to say, 'I dominate you and the people you elected to office to enforce public safety and I can take their power.' It suggests that what power is, is hurting people.'
Trump villainized protesters as a threat to his authority in his first term, from Charlottesville to the racial reckoning of 2020. He has suggested shooting protesters in Washington, to the alarm of military officials in his administration. But guardrails in official Washington seem to be largely gone: His current defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has deployed 700 active duty Marines to Los Angeles and is backing Trump's decision to send troops to any American city to enforce his immigration policy.
This week's two-part performance points back to the administration's larger project of the erasure and exclusion of marginalized people in Trump's America. The president took office decrying diversity in the military and nominated a defense secretary who pledged to eliminate 'wokeness' from the country's armed forces. The administration has attempted to ban transgender troops, ended programs to boost women's leadership and participation in the national security sector, erased references to the historical contributions of women, Black and Hispanic Americans from military websites and banned books in military libraries they deemed as promoting 'anti-racism.'
Trump has long coveted a large-scale military parade — he openly lobbied for one after attending France's Bastille Day festivities in 2017 — but such events are rare as displays of democracy and more common in authoritarian-led countries like China, North Korea and Russia.
Trump, who has not served in the military, sees himself in the mold of former presidents like Andrew Jackson, who built his presidency and reputation as a military hero who would crush his opposition, or Teddy Roosevelt, who served in the Army Reserves, and his 'speak softly and carry a big stick' mantra. (Even if the first part of that mantra clearly holds less resonance.)
It's worth noting that the leaders he admires, here and abroad, are men.
'This kind of performative force has always targeted anyone challenging traditional power structures,' Coe said. 'It's not always deployed by men, but in America, it seems to be.'
Coe said Trump's style of leadership is less like that of many of his predecessors and more like those she has studied in fascist history.
'He rules by spectacle. He speaks mostly of intimidation. He equates dissent with insurrection,' Coe said.
'Trump is always going to see how far a president can stretch power in order to transform the office into that of an authoritarian — and that depends on weaponizing fear.'
Amid Trump's show of force, Americans have taken to the streets to send a message that this is a moment they neither recognize or accept.
As the military occupation of Los Angeles continues, protests have spread to cities including Chicago, Washington, San Francisco, New York and Austin. On Saturday, millions of Americans in more than 1,500 cities nationwide are expected to join the 'No Kings' protests in opposition to Trump's military parade.
Many in the crowds will likely be people who have historically been marginalized in our democracy, raising their voices in support of the vulnerable being targeted by the administration. Collectively, theirs will be a different public display of strength.
Much of the events of the first five months of Trump's second presidency have reinforced who he is, as he has attacked American institutions, values and norms. The current moment is another opportunity for Americans to consider who we are.
The post On two coasts, a show of force — and a test of ours appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs bring in record $27.7 billion in July as Trump calls haul 'incredible for our country'
President Trump's tariffs poured billions into US coffers in July as he continued to reshape the US trade landscape, putting the revenue supplied by importers at another monthly record. New data from the Treasury Department released Tuesday afternoon confirmed that June marked another record month on the revenue front, with some $27.7 billion in customs duties coming into US coffers. This was another step up from June's total of $26.6 billion and May's total of $22.2 billion. It represents a significant jump from around $8 billion in customs duties one year ago and brings the total for the fiscal year to around $135.7 billion. The government's fiscal year ends Sept. 30. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs The latest data is a continuation of the revenue spikes seen during Trump's second term in office, which are dwarfing counts from recent history, as well as the amounts collected during Trump's first term. Trump has frequently touted the new revenue source, writing in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday that it "has been incredible for our Country, its Stock Market, its General Wealth, and just about everything else." In that same post, Trump also attacked Goldman Sachs (GS) over its research and forecasts on tariffs and claimed tariff-related revenues were actually in the "trillions." The data also confirmed, however, that tariffs still don't make up a major piece of US government receipts, even in months like July, which the Treasury Department noted is generally softer on revenue "since there are usually no major corporate or individual tax due dates in this month." This latest Treasury monthly statement showed that total government receipts for the month topped $338 billion, meaning tariff-related revenues accounted for less than 10% of the total. Tariff revenue also hasn't helped make a dent in the overall US budget deficit, which grew around $291 billion last month. The gap for the 10 months through July came in around $1.63 trillion. And then there's the question of who ultimately pays the tariffs that supply that revenue to the US government. Contrary to Trump's claims, economists agree that the countries on which Trump has slapped tariffs do not ultimately foot the bill. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet In research this week, Goldman Sachs estimated that as of June, US businesses have borne the brunt of tariff price hikes — 64%, according to economists led by Jan Hatzius. Consumers' share of tariff hikes was only 22% through that time period. That mix could soon flip, the analysts noted. By October, US businesses could largely pass on those costs to consumers. Goldman Sachs estimates that consumers could foot around 67% of tariff costs by October, compared to just 8% for US businesses. Foreign exporters' share would sit around 25%, Goldman Sachs said. Still, tariff revenue numbers are likely to continue climbing in the coming months as Trump's tariffs take full effect. Measures that went into effect last week raised tariff rates on goods from dozens of partners, including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea. Another significant trade partner, India, is facing levies of 50% in the coming weeks. The latest complete tally, according to recent calculations from the Yale Budget Lab, shows that the US overall average effective tariff rate will jump to 18.6%, the highest level since 1933.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's BLS Pick Calls For Suspension Of Monthly Jobs Report: Data 'Needs To Be Fixed Immediately'
E.J. Antoni, the economist tapped by President Donald Trump to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics and an architect of the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, suggested the agency should suspend monthly jobs reports in a Tuesday television appearance. Antoni appeared on Fox Business Tuesday morning to discuss Trump's lack of confidence in the Bureau's monthly job data. 'How on earth are businesses supposed to plan – or how is the Fed supposed to conduct monetary policy – when they don't know how many jobs are being added or lost in our economy? It's a serious problem that needs to be fixed immediately,' Antoni told FOX Business. Suspending Job Reports: A Risky Proposition Trump nominated Antoni to the position after his unprecedented firing of former BLS Chief, Erika McEntarfer, on Aug. 1. The Bureau's July jobs report showed nonfarm payrolls rising by 73,000, far below economists' estimates of 110,000. The report also included a revision of May and June's tallies, down by over 100,000 each. Similar revisions were observed during the Biden Administration. 'Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' Antoni added. 'Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences.' Can Data Integrity Survive Political Pressure? Trump called the jobs report 'rigged' and 'fake' following his firing of McEntarfer. Top economists dismissed Trump and Antoni's insinuations and reiterated that attempts to erode the independence of reporting agencies could sow distrust in markets. '[Suspending monthly jobs reports] would [be] a serious mistake in my estimation. It would only fuel critiques of a politicization of job market data and likely result in volatility across asset classes,' RSM US chief economist Joe Brusuelas told Axios. Withholding or fabricating economic data is a common practice observed in many authoritarian regimes, such as the Soviet Union during the 1980s. The Dangers Of Distrust In Economic Data University of Michigan professor Justin Wolfers described Antoni as unqualified for the position in a post on X. 'Antoni finished grad school 5 years ago at Northern Illinois with no obvious distinction, his dissertation is meh, and involved no research on labor markets or data collection, he has never published a paper, and his life's work has earned 1 citation,' Wolfers said. 'This record would be insufficient to earn a job as a junior staffer at BLS.' Also Read:Photo: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Trump's BLS Pick Calls For Suspension Of Monthly Jobs Report: Data 'Needs To Be Fixed Immediately' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lisa Kudrow's Impersonation Of A Far-Right MAGA Spokesperson Is Going Viral Because People Say It's Like "Literally Every Republican"
A resurfaced clip of Lisa Kudrow doing a satirical impersonation of a far-right Republican spokesperson failing to debunk claims against the party is going viral thanks to a new tweet insisting she "nailed" the character. The impersonation comes from Kudrow's role in the Netflix mockumentary Death to 2020. And though the film released in that same year, people online can't help but feel striking similarities between Kudrow's character and the Trump administration today. To start, in the video, Kudrow, aka "Un-Official Spokesperson" Jeanetta Grace Susan, tells cameramen, "The whole impeachment thing was baseless, OK? So, the Democrats claim that Trump pressured Ukraine into digging up dirt on the Biden family. And their only real evidence of that is a transcript of him doing it." Related: Someone offscreen asks Jeanetta what was said on the transcript, to which the character replies, "What transcript?" She's then pressed about the transcript she just mentioned, but Jeanetta doubles down by insisting, "Check your tape, I said no such thing." "You said the only real evidence is a transcript of Trump pressurizing Ukraine," the person off-camera responds. To which Jeanetta says, "There's no such place as Ukraine." Later, she's asked, "In March, the president said the pandemic would simply get out of the way, didn't he?" Jeanetta responds, "OK, see, this is what the media does. You lie, fabricate, fantasize. The president never said that." She's then played a clip of the president saying exactly that. "OK, I know this doesn't fit with your agenda," Jeanetta snaps back. "But this never happened." Related: By the end of the video, which has been viewed nearly one million times since it was shared on X, Kudrow claims she has "never supported Trump." The questioner behind the camera reminds Jeanetta that she was, in fact, a part of Trump's campaign. Cleverly, Jeanetta, aka Kudrow, shoots back, "Who's Trump?" Related: In light of recent flip-flopping on the 'Epstein files' — you know, when Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed to have a "client list" of Jeffrey Epstein's on her desk, ready for review, only for the Department of Justice to release a memo stating there is no evidence of a client list — internet users latched on to the clip. The original tweeter said the clip reminded them of "literally every Republican." Others thought the clip reminded them of a very specific Republican: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Mostly, people thought the similarities between the satire and real life were "hysterical and depressing at the same time." Related: On person wrote, "Oh my God! This is my experience of trying to reason with a MAGA, fact-check with a MAGA, and even trying to do some critical thinking with a MAGA. I have given up. I don't know what is up in their heads, but it is not brains or the gift of reason. I am beginning to believe that they are not just stupid and ignorant, but they just do not take in any information that is going to challenge their current mindset." "We literally listen to this everyday. MAGA believe and stake their lives on memes, but call any reporting or data into question and often see document records as a compelling reason to believe the opposite of what they indicate," another agreed. Overall, life felt better when this was all just a parody. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: