logo
World's major courts take growing role in climate fight

World's major courts take growing role in climate fight

IOL News5 days ago
Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.
Image: ImsoGabriel Stock via Pixabay
The world's top court is poised to tell governments what their legal obligations are to tackle global warming, and possibly outline consequences for polluters that cause climate harm to vulnerable countries.
Wednesday's highly anticipated advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice comes in the wake of landmark international decisions that experts say together have the potential to significantly shape climate action. How has climate litigation evolved?
Andrew Raine, deputy director of the UN Environment Programme's law division, said frustration over the pace of climate action had spurred people, organisations and countries to turn to the courts.
"When political systems fall short, the law is increasingly seen as a tool for driving ambition and enforcing commitments that have been made," he told AFP.
These have been bolstered by increasingly precise and detailed climate science, including from the UN's IPCC climate expert panel.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.
While not all have been successful -- and some have tried to slow climate progress -- there have been notable cases in recent years that have pushed states to do more.
Urgenda, an environmental organisation in the Netherlands, notched a win at the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019, with justices ordering the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the end of the following year.
And in 2021, the German Constitutional Court found that the government's failure to sufficiently cut planet-heating pollution placed an unacceptable burden on future generations.
Raine said that litigation was increasingly crossing borders, with 24 cases brought before international or regional courts, tribunals or other bodies.
"This marks a turning point and it reflects the transboundary and shared nature of the climate crisis," he said.
Why have recent cases been deemed historic?
Two in particular have been hailed as watershed moments that will help shape how courts, governments and businesses understand and act on their climate responsibilities.
Last year, an advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said carbon emissions can be considered a marine pollutant and that countries have a legal duty to take measures to reduce their effects on oceans.
The tribunal made clear that the work of defining countries' obligations is not limited to the Paris climate agreement or the UN body that runs climate change negotiations.
Major polluters have argued that the UN framework is sufficient and against courts taking climate decisions.
Another major advisory opinion was issued this month, with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reaffirming the right to a healthy climate system and acknowledging the rights of nature.
But perhaps the court's most profound statement was to place protection against irreversible climate harms on the same level as international prohibitions on genocide and torture, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University.
The court said "massive and serious harm to the climate system through emissions, through deforestation and so on, is absolutely forbidden by international law," he said.
In his view this made it the strongest statement yet by any international court on states' duty to avoid causing severe ecological destruction.
All eyes are now on the ICJ. What could be the impact?
Vanuatu, one of many low-lying islands threatened by sea level rise, has asked the ICJ to give its opinion on states' obligations to reduce emissions.
But the potentially more controversial request is what -- if any -- legal consequences there might be for major polluters who cause severe climate damages.
"These are questions of global justice," said Rodriguez-Garavito, potentially touching on contentious issues of "reparations for climate harms" to those least responsible for emissions.
While advisory opinions like the ICJ are not legally enforceable, Raine said they carry significant weight.
"They clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis, and that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes and public debates," he said.
"It doesn't force states to act, but it shows them where the law stands and where they should be headed."
AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DA and ActionSA face off in court over eThekwini's sewage crisis
DA and ActionSA face off in court over eThekwini's sewage crisis

IOL News

time7 minutes ago

  • IOL News

DA and ActionSA face off in court over eThekwini's sewage crisis

DA leaders Dean Macpherson and Heinz de Boer picketing outside the Pietermaritzburg High Court this week in support a legal action against eThekwini Municipality's failure to damaged sewerage system. Image: Supplied Instead of uniting in their legal challenge against eThekwini Municipality's failure to repair the city's health hazard sewage infrastructure, the DA and ActionSA, who are joined court applicants, were at each other's throats. The two parties took the city to the Durban High Court over the sewage problem. The matter was heard at the Pietermaritzburg High Court on Thursday and Friday and was adjourned after the full bench reserved the judgment. In its 2022 affidavit, ActionSA alleged that the municipality had failed to maintain and repair its sewage infrastructure, which would have prevented untreated effluent from spilling into rivers, the ocean, and beaches. DA councillor Thabani Mthethwa said his party used the court action to expose the municipality's failure to deal with sewerage challenges. "It was only after court papers were filed that the municipality began to make superficial attempts to address the crisis, clearly demonstrating that without pressure from the DA, no meaningful steps would have been taken," said Mthethwa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The municipality is yet to respond to questions sent to its spokesperson, Gugu Sisilana on Friday. However, in an unprecedented turn of events among conjoined applicants, DA's KwaZulu-Natal chairperson Dean Macpherson issued a damning press statement on Friday, alleging that the ActionSA's legal team came to court 'unprepared'. He alleged that the ActionSA's lawyers could not answer 'basic' questions from the court. Talking to this reporter, ActionSA provincial leader Zwakele Mncwango hit back at Macpherson, saying he was a lonely man seeking attention. Macpherson alleged that ActionSA's lawyers performed so badly that some of its embarrassed leaders hastily left the court. He said the DA effectively saved the legal action by spending the majority of Thursday and Friday presenting a strong argument that the ANC-led municipality was not complying with 'legally binding' national and provincial directives and lacked a credible action plan to fix the sewage crisis and rampant vandalism on the wastewater infrastructure. 'We also exposed that the municipality had not adhered to its water licenses. 'Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for ActionSA [as] their legal team was completely unprepared and was unable to answer basic questions from the court. 'Things got so bad for ActionSA that they were only able to argue their case for a mere 30 minutes before resigning in defeat,' said Macpherson. In reaction, Mncwango said he did not attribute the statement to the whole DA leadership, but only to Macpherson, whom he said was obsessed with ActionSA. 'Maybe he needs to get a boyfriend, I think he is just frustrated,' said Mncwango. He alleged that Macpherson was annoyed that the DA was forced by the court to join Action SA's application, which was filed on November 16, 2022, whereas the DA wanted to lodge a separate litigation, which it filed against the city in 2023. 'Because we did not want this thing to be about ActionSA, we invited all stakeholders, including political parties, to join us on this litigation so that we can be together in court. 'They decided not to respond, then four months later, they decided to go to court on their own,' said Mncwango. Mncwango said he was happy when the DA lodged its application, which was later joined with that of ActionSA. 'The only problem we had was that the DA, by joining our matter, delayed the matter because it was supposed to be heard some time ago, but the DA was not ready as it had to read affidavits. 'You have not heard us attacking the DA because I am happy that we are fighting together for the same residents; therefore, why must we provoke each other?' said Mncwango. He said he did not understand why the city was opposing the matter, instead of fixing the sewerage using part of its R1.5 billion, which was allocated to it to repair infrastructure that was damaged by floods. 'The municipality has an overall budget of R71 billion, which is why we asked how you prioritise your budget if sewage is your priority and you understand its impact on the environment,' he said. He said he was confident that the ActionSA legal team put up strong arguments. The DA supporters had on Thursday and Friday picketed outside the court in support of the court action. DA had applied for permission to picket. Mncwango said a group of ActionSA supporters were present outside the court, but not picketing because the party did not apply for permission. He said that while inside the court, he was alerted to the chaos caused by police attempting to disperse ActionSA members. He said when he questioned police about their action, they told him that the DA asked them to disperse the ActionSA members because they were picketing without permission. 'I went inside to call Francois Rodgers (DA provincial leader), who went outside and together with me spoke to the police, and the matter was easily resolved, but Dean was angry that the matter was resolved because he wanted a fight with the ActionSA. 'Therefore, I don't think that the statement was authored by the DA, but it was written by Dean with his anger issues, which is why I am saying that maybe he is looking for a boyfriend in the ActionSA' said Mncwango. During an interview with this reporter, Macpherson said Mncwago was sick and denied calling police to disperse 'hobbos', which he said ActionSA recruited to come to the court to pose as its members and were picketing. 'The ActionSA must answer why did they came to picket when they did not have permission to do so? Why did they break the law?' he said. When asked if he was happy to be joined with the ActionSA in the legal fight against the municipality, Macpherson said: 'It was in the ActionSA's benefit because we saved them from humiliation in court and they should be grateful that they were joined with us.'

Zikalala defends ANC against US Bill: No evidence of wrongdoing, only justice for Palestine
Zikalala defends ANC against US Bill: No evidence of wrongdoing, only justice for Palestine

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Zikalala defends ANC against US Bill: No evidence of wrongdoing, only justice for Palestine

The US moves to sanction some ANC and government too officials. Image: AFP ANC Veterans League President, Dr Snuki Zikalala, has strongly condemned a proposed US bill seeking to review bilateral ties with South Africa and impose sanctions on top ANC and government leaders, calling the move 'baseless'. The bill, approved earlier this week by the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, cited South Africa's alignment with Russia and China, as well as its legal action against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), as key reasons for reassessing Washington's relationship with Pretoria. Committee Chairperson Brian Mast also pointed to South Africa's direct engagement with Hamas leaders as indicative of a growing rift between the two nations. The proposed legislation has sparked outrage within ANC circles and drawn criticism from some US lawmakers. Zikalala dismissed the bill as an unwarranted attack on South Africa's principled support for the Palestinian cause. 'Those sanctions have no basis at all, especially on ANC leaders,' Zikalala said. 'None of our leaders have been found wanting by the international community. The only reason we are being targeted is because we have stood firmly in support of the Palestinian people and taken Israel to the ICJ to answer for what we believe is genocide.' Zikalala emphasised that South Africa's actions were consistent with its values and international law, and were not aimed at undermining its relationship with the US. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'We believe in engagement. We think Pretoria and Washington can and must find each other. It's not in the interest of the American or South African people to escalate tensions,' he added. The US had taken a similar approach with Zimbabwe in the past, imposing sanctions that ultimately hurt ordinary citizens rather than the leadership. Zikalala also defended the ANC's internal accountability mechanisms, arguing that allegations of corruption within the party were being dealt with according to due process. 'We have made it clear: if anyone in the ANC is criminally charged, they must step down immediately. But our leadership has not been found guilty of wrongdoing internationally,' he said. The proposed sanctions bill has also caused divisions within the US Congress. Democratic Representative Gregory Meeks criticised the move, accusing Republicans of hypocrisy and undermining diplomatic norms. Despite the approval by the House committee, Zikalala expressed skepticism that the bill would ultimately pass into law. 'We don't think those sanctions will go through. This is not about wrongdoing – it's about standing up for human rights. We are not going to change our position. We say no to genocide, and we will continue to support the Palestinian cause,' he said. The bill's progression comes amid escalating global criticism of Israel's military campaign in Gaza and mounting legal challenges in international courts. South Africa's ICJ case against Israel, accusing it of genocide, has positioned the country as a leading voice in the Global South on issues of international justice and human rights. Meanwhile, ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri asserted that the sanctions stemmed from what she characterised as propaganda campaigns orchestrated by right-wing extremist organisations, between the two countries. President Cyril Ramaphosa has also called on the Democrats to protect them against the bill. IOL Politics

Trump Tariffs: South Africa signs framework deal in ongoing US trade talks
Trump Tariffs: South Africa signs framework deal in ongoing US trade talks

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

Trump Tariffs: South Africa signs framework deal in ongoing US trade talks

The Department of Trade and Industry has confirmed it has signed a condition precedent document with the US Image: Armand Hough /Independent Newspapers As the countdown to the US's planned 30% tariff increase on South African exports edges closer, the Department of Trade and Industry has confirmed it has signed a condition precedent document with the US Trade Representative's office. According to the department, the document signed is a condition precedent, serving as a preliminary framework that outlines the necessary steps before a full trade agreement can be finalised. "We have not signed any substantive agreement yet. The document signed was a precedent condition document," Ministerial spokesperson Kaamil Alli said. "This is a precursor to the finalizing of the negotiations, which are ongoing". This comes after US President Donald Trump sent a formal letter to President Cyril Ramaphosa demanding action on trade imbalances and warning of the impending tariff hike set for August 1, 2025. The tariffs are aimed at addressing what the US describes as South Africa's 'unsustainable trade deficits' and longstanding market barriers. The US decision to increase tariffs on South African goods has raised concerns among industry experts and exporters, who warn that key sectors such as automotive, agriculture, and mining could be severely impacted. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Last week, IOL reported that Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana warned that South Africa stands to lose around 100,000 jobs due to US tariffs if a trade deal is not renewed. "My prayer, first and foremost, is that the deal should be made by August 1st. And secondly, if it's not made, it would be useful that we get an extension until we finalise the deal,' he said. "Of course, the US has a huge economy. If we lose a trading partner such as the USA, it's going to have a major impact and create more unemployment in the economy.". Last month, the Automotive Business Council (Naamsa revealed that South Africa's vehicle exports to the United States have dropped dramatically following the imposition of US tariffs, with declines of 73% in the first quarter of 2025, and further falls of 80% and 85% in April and May, respectively. This was after Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all vehicles imported into the US earlier this year. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store