How much does the UK spend on overseas aid – and where does the money go?
Keir Starmer's decision this week to slash Britain's overseas aid budget and divert to defence spending will take UK aid to developing countries to its lowest level in a generation. It will almost halve the already diminished aid pot, from 0.58% of national income to 0.3%. In 2023, the total aid spend was £15.34bn, almost a third of which was spent on supporting and housing refugees and asylum seekers in the UK.
The last time Britain's aid contribution dropped below 0.3% was a quarter of a century ago, in 1999. Starmer's move raised concerns among cabinet ministers, who feared it risked reducing soft power and made migration more likely, and outraged humanitarians and aid agencies who warned of a 'devastating' impact on the world's poorest.
It comes after President Donald Trump's drastic freeze on USAid spending, prompting warnings that lives would be lost in countries relying on US support.
UK overseas aid has historically risen during Labour governments, most noticeably after Tony Blair came to power in 1997 with a pledge to meet the UN's target of 0.7% of gross national income.
The UN general assembly set the target in 1970 for developed countries to spend 0.7% of gross national income (GNI) on official development assistance (ODA), to promote the economic development and welfare of poorer nations.
The Blair administration, with Gordon Brown as chancellor, set out to reverse a fall in aid spend, from 0.51 in 1979 to 0.27% in 1996, over 18 years of Tory government. Blair set up the Department for International Development (DfID), to focus on reducing poverty, making aid more effective, improving the lives of women and girls and fighting climate change.
Blair committed to achieve 0.7% by 2013. The target was enshrined in law in 2015 and was met every year from 2013 to 2020. Other EU countries committed to the 0.7% target by 2015.
In 2021, at the height of the Covid pandemic, then prime minister Boris Johnson said the economic impacts at home would result in a temporary reduction in ODA spend to 0.5% of GNI. The previous year, Johnson had controversially merged DfID with the Foreign Office.
The Starmer government had committed to restoring the 0.7% spend as soon as fiscal circumstances allowed.
In 2023, official figures show the top three country recipients of bilateral aid were Ukraine (£250m), Ethiopia (£164m) and Afghanistan (£115m). Keir Starmer has said the UK will continue to support Gaza, Ukraine and Sudan, as well as contribute to climate finance and global health.
Regionally, the continent of Africa is the largest regional recipient of UK aid, at £1,229m.
The UK's ODA spend was £15.34bn in 2023. Based on the most recent forecasts for GNI, reducing aid spend to 0.3% in 2027 would take the budget to £9.2bn.
Almost a third, 28% or £4.3bn, of aid went on support for refugees or asylum seekers in the UK or other donor countries in 2023, a dramatic rise from the 3.2%, or £400m, in 2020.
Britain's reported costs for each refugee or asylum seeker is many times that of other major European countries, due in part to a shortage of UK accommodation, leading to the Home Office housing people in hotels.
Humanitarian aid (15.3%) and health (13.3%) were the two largest sectors for bilateral aid in 2023, at £878m and £764m.
Before the pandemic, humanitarian spending was about 15% to 16% of bilateral aid, but was reduced by half in 2021 after the pandemic, to 10.3%, from £1.3bn to £743m.
In 2022 and 2023, the UK provided £592m to humanitarian crises in Ukraine, after the Russian invasion, and £467m to Afghanistan, after the Taliban takeover in 2021. It announced an increase in support for victims of the conflict in Sudan in 2025, to £226.5m.
In 2023, the UK gave the fourth highest aid spend in absolute terms and the ninth highest in terms of percentage of GNI.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Funding cuts to human rights are comfort to dictators, UN's Turk says
GENEVA, June 16 (Reuters) - The U.N. human rights chief said on Monday that he was deeply worried about donor cuts to his office that would weaken global accountability efforts and be a comfort to dictators and authoritarians. In an opening speech to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, Volker Turk warned that early warning systems for abuses as well as advocacy efforts for those wrongly imprisoned would be impacted by lower spending. "Funding cuts to my office, and the broader human rights ecosystem, offer comfort to dictators and authoritarians," he told the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva at the start of its four-week session.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The new grooming gangs inquiry must put council officials and police in jail
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has finally done what he should have done months ago, and announced a national inquiry into the issue of grooming gangs. It comes off the back of a months-long audit by Baroness Casey, who also conducted an inquiry into Rotherham Council's failings over the gangs a decade ago. Her audit is said to conclude that there is a need for a national inquiry. It is easy to see why Keir Starmer wanted to avoid one. The racially-driven rape of thousands of mainly white girls is the worst race-hate crime in modern Britain. In inquiry after inquiry, it was revealed that the authorities had failed to prevent the crimes, often over fears of racism, and in some cases were actively complicit in the cover up. This is especially true for the Labour Party, which often relied on the votes of Pakistani-heritage people, the community which was most linked to the abuse. Kings College London academic David Betz has described this as ' rapes for votes '. In the Rochdale grooming case, the police said that the grooming was not racially motivated. Previously the argument was that there had been national level inquiries. In 2020 the Home Office published a report looking at the controversial element of ethnicity, but it was a whitewash. It failed to use the Home Office's resources to look into this question in detail, relying on a summary of existing studies. But even those showed an over-representation of Pakistani-heritage abusers. There was also the recent Independent Inquiry Into Child Sex Abuse but that, despite taking years to complete, only looked briefly at the issue of rape gangs. So far its recommendations have not been acted on and it failed to get to the root of the issue. Clearly there is a need for a proper inquiry. That has been shown by groups like Open Justice, who used court sentencing remarks to track examples of girls being trafficked for abuse. Many of those data points showed girls being taken to Bradford for abuse, for example. But there have been few local prosecutions and the Council there has refused to hold a local inquiry. A national inquiry will be the only way for the victims there to get justice. It will therefore be extremely important to see the terms of reference for the inquiry, as it will only be as good as the mandate it has. For the national inquiry to succeed, it should aim to send complicit officials to jail. To date, despite abject failings, no council worker or police officer has been. It needs to look at the role of anti-white racism among some ethnic minority groups, and the role played by anti-racist ideology in the failings of the authorities. It should look, not just at the role of illegal immigration in these crimes, as suggested by Baroness Casey, but also that of legal immigration: in many cases these crimes were driven by foreign cultural attitudes to women and girls, especially white ones. That should include the subject of abuse within ethnic minority communities. It should also expose the scale and geographic spread of these crimes, sending task forces into places like Bradford. Finally, it should commit the National Crime Agency into following up every lead, so that victims denied justice, sometimes for decades, finally get it. All this will be controversial. It will also be costly. It will cause the Prime Minister to have to look into some very dark places. But the full horror must be exposed and those responsible must be brought to justice.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Hundreds of people' could deserve jail over grooming gangs cover-up, claim Tories
Update: Date: 2025-06-16T08:43:36.000Z Title: Aletha Adu Content: Good morning. All governments have to perform U-turns from time to time and over the weekend Keir Starmer had to stage another, announcing that he would order a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal. Although Starmer can argue that he never firmly ruled out an inquiry, and that he is just responding to a recommendation from a short, evidence-based audit of 'our understanding of the scale, nature and drivers' of grooming gang abuse conducted by Louise Casey, this is still embarrassing because it is an obvious victory for Kemi Badenoch, Reform UK and Elon Musk (probably the prime mover in this) who were aggressively lobbying for one in the new year. Badenoch is now saying Starmer should apologise for not agreeing with her more swiftly. As explained last week, when the opposition has to resort to demanding an apology, that is normally a sign of weakness, not strength, because it means it is running out of proper grievances to pursue. But this remains difficult territory for Labour. The No 10 press operation will be grateful that it has been quite low down the news agenda because of what is happening in the Middle East. Here is 's overnight story. And here is an analysis by Peter Walker, who is with Starmer at the G7 in Canada and who explain how Starmer broke the news about the inquiry in a huddle with reporters on the plane crossing the Atlantic. And here are the key developments this morning. The Home Office has announced that National Crime Agency will lead a national operation against grooming gangs. It says: The NCA will work in partnership with police forces around the country and specialist officers from the Child Sexual Exploitation Taskforce, Operation Hydrant – which supports police forces to address all complex and high profile cases of child sexual abuse – and the Tackling Organised Exploitation Programme. Their job will be to give victims of these horrific crimes, whose cases were not progressed through the criminal justice system, long-awaited justice and prevent more children from being hurt by these vile criminals. This will build on action already taken by the government to see offenders locked up. Police have already reopened over 800 historic cases of group-based child sexual abuse since the home secretary asked them in January to look again at cases that were closed too early and victims denied justice. The Home Office is due to publish the Casey report into the grooming gangs. Casey was asked at the start of the year to 'uncover the nature, scale and profile of group based CSEA [child sexual exploitation and abuse] offending', to provide evidence about the ethnicity of offenders, and to consider 'the cultural and societal drivers for this type of offending and the motivations and characteristics of grooming gang offending'. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, has claimed that there could be hundreds of people who deserve to go to jail for covering up grooming gang abuse. In an interview with Sky News defending the need for an inquiry, Philp said: What I've heard in the last few months, meeting retired police officers and meeting survivors, and what has really shocked me, has been the way that this was deliberately covered up over years and possibly decades. It wasn't that people were just negligent or just didn't look into it properly. They deliberately and actively covered it up. I'm talking about senior police officers, local council leaders, social services, the Crown Prosecution Service. And the reason they deliberately covered it up for years was because the victims were mainly very young white girls, often from troubled backgrounds, from care homes and so on, whereas the perpetrators were mainly of Pakistani heritage. And people in authority at the time were more concerned about so-called race relations than they were about protecting young girls … There's a criminal offence called misconduct in public office, and I think those people – and I'm not talking about handful, it is probably dozens or maybe hundreds of people in positions of authority over the years – deliberately covered this up. I think they are guilty of that criminal offence and frankly should be going to prison. As an example, Philp cited evidence given by John Piekos, a former police office who says that, after he left the force and tried to get the police in West Yorkshire to investigate grooming at a children's home in Bradford, he was told by a serving police officer and a council official to drop the Here is the agenda for the day. 9.30am: John Swinney, Scotland's first minister, gives a speech promising a 'national project of renewal'. Morning: Rachel Reeves, the chancellor (who was also promising renewal in her spending review last week), is on a visit in the north-east of England, promoting plans to improve the road network/ 11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing. 2.30pm: Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, takes questions in the Commons. After 3.30pm: David Lammy, the foreign secretary, and Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, are both due to make Commons statement, on the Israel/Iran conflict, and the inquiry into grooming gangs respectfully. But we are not sure yet which is coming first, and, if the Speaker allows one or more urgent questions, they will come first. Around 5pm (UK time): Keir Starmer is due to arrive at the G7 meeting in Canada. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
