Does TSA Let You Travel With Apple AirTags In Your Carry-On Luggage?
Before you decide to pack an AirTag into your luggage, however, it's important to know the rules and regulations surrounding them from the TSA. AirTags utilize a lithium battery, and the TSA has strict regulations about them, mainly due to the myriad of safety concerns surrounding the more powerful lithium-ion batteries. Lithium batteries tend to be safer than their lithium-ion counterparts because they are smaller and have a lower energy density than lithium-ion batteries.
The AirTag's battery is a replaceable CR2032 coin battery, the same battery typically used in watches and key fobs. The CR2032 uses lithium to store and release energy, which, fortunately, the TSA finds acceptable for storing in your carry-on and checked baggage.
Read more: 7 Under-The-Radar Apple Watch Features You Should Be Using
What The TSA Says About AirTags
According to the TSA, lithium batteries can be brought in carry-on luggage as long as their capacity is less than 100 watt hours and the content of lithium is less than 2 grams. Luckily for those who are prone to losing things, the CR2032 within the AirTag falls below these regulations. Apple doesn't disclose the specific CR2032 battery that Apple uses in the AirTag, but a standard CR2032 3V battery delivers 2.35 watt hours and contains just 0.10 grams of lithium.
This means that AirTags are safe to fly in your carry-on cargo, as they are well below the 100-watt-hour and 2-gram lithium content restriction. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has also clarified that AirTags and other small trackers can travel in checked baggage as well as in carry-on bags during flights. No matter where your next adventure takes you, you can feel free to travel with peace of mind and place an AirTag in your luggage. If you do end up losing your luggage, there are more than 30 airlines currently that will help you locate your lost luggage with the AirTag's "share Item" feature.
Enjoyed this article? Sign up to BGR's free newsletter for the latest in tech and entertainment, plus tips and advice you'll actually use.
Read the original article on BGR.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Did I just father a meme coin? Well, accidentally…
Did I just father a meme coin? Well, accidentally… originally appeared on TheStreet. Okay, I'll tell you what happened. Last month, I was writing an article about Pudgy Penguins — the NFT collection turned Walmart toy success story, known across crypto circles. It was a pretty normal day. The piece was supposed to highlight how Pudgy Penguins, against all logic, had outperformed Bitcoin that week in sheer price action. But instead of calling it "Pudgy Penguins" throughout, I used the phrase 'Walmart toy coin.' Why? Because you can literally walk into Walmart, buy a Pudgy Penguin toy, scan a QR code, and unlock an NFT. It felt accurate. It felt fun. It was just one line. That was it — the line that started it all. Apparently, calling something a Walmart toy coin is meme gold. Within hours, an X (formerly Twitter) community popped up. Someone forked a coin. They actually called it 'Walmart Toy Coin.' And no — this isn't a shill. This is just a first-hand account of what happens when the crypto trenches take a throwaway joke and run with it. To be clear: I didn't launch it. I didn't fund it. I didn't promote it. In fact, we never editorialized that phrase in follow-ups because we knew how wild things can get. But still, it happened. On that day, the newly minted "Walmart Toy Coin" was up 50%, data from DEXScreener showed. Market cap hit half a million dollars at its peak. As of writing this, it's back down to $38,000, as most meme coins go. But the community? Still hanging on. Memes are still flying. So... did I just father a meme coin? This is the kind of weird stuff only crypto can make happen. The speed, the spontaneity, the utter chaos of it all. It's funny, but also kind of telling. Anything—anything—can become a coin. A passing phrase. A tweet. A typo. If enough people think it's funny, or relatable, or ironic, they'll ape in. The coin isn't the product. The vibe is the product. We're in an age where making a coin is easier than ever. With platforms like you can launch a Solana-based token in a few clicks. No code needed. According to CoinGecko, of the nearly 7 million cryptocurrencies listed since 2021, 3.7 million have since stopped trading and are considered failed. It means over 50% of all cryptocurrencies have failed. But a handful spark. And when they do, they take on a life of their own. Communities form. Telegrams explode. Memes multiply. And suddenly you're staring at a microculture that didn't exist a day ago. And while Ethereum meme coins have been on a tear lately, it's worth noting that the success rate is still vanishingly low. For every $PEPE or $DOGE, there are 10,000 coins that never even see a chart. What makes one catch on? No one really knows. A good name helps. A good joke helps more. But timing, virality, and tribal momentum? That's the secret sauce. Walmart Toy Coin is a perfect example. It was never meant to exist. It was a throwaway line in a fun market recap. But that's the crypto internet for you — everything's remixable. Your analysis might be someone else's next Ponzi. Your joke might be someone else's LP. It's chaotic, it's dumb, and it's also a case study in how memes move markets. Honestly, the entire experience gave me a bit of insight into how meme culture works in the trenches. It's not about fundamentals. It's about being first, being funny, and being fast. Communities don't wait for permission. If they like the vibe, they'll mint the coin. And if it pumps, even for a day, that's enough. So yeah. I might have accidentally fathered a meme coin. No roadmap. No team. No utility. Just a phrase, a story, and a whole lot of copy-paste culture. The coin's probably headed to zero. But the memes? They'll live forever. That's just crypto. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of TheStreet or its affiliates. This piece is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. As mentioned above, our team didn't create, launch, fund, or promote the "Walmart Toy Coin." Did I just father a meme coin? Well, accidentally… first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 21, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 21, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Power Up to Dronebuster® Block 4 with Next-Generation Counter-Drone Performance
DZYNE Launches "Power Up" Refresh Program to Keep Dronebuster® Ahead of Evolving Drone Threats IRVINE, Calif., Aug. 21, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- As drone technology advances at breakneck speed, DZYNE Technologies is once again setting the pace with the launch of its Dronebuster® Power Up Program, a new initiative offering existing users a seamless path to next-generation counter-drone performance at a fraction of Block 4's list price. The Power Up Program ensures Dronebuster® operators stay ahead of the curve as drones become more secure, more autonomous, and more resistant to conventional jamming techniques, without straining customers' budgets. Keeping You Ahead: The Need for Next-Generation Solutions Over the past decade, leading commercial drone manufacturers have rendered early-generation jammers less effective through the introduction of enhanced radio protocols, increased transmission power, and the adoption of multiband satellite navigation to outmaneuver conventional countermeasures. The new Dronebuster® lineup includes next-generation enhancements that directly counter these trends, maintaining effective range, power, and precision against modern threats. Introducing the Next Generation of Dronebuster® Under the Power Up Program, eligible customers receive a discounted upgrade to the latest Dronebuster® 4 model that incorporates advanced capabilities to neutralize the most current threats: Optimized for modern C2 and satellite navigation signals Features an optional PNT Attack (Position, Navigation, and Timing) mode to counter drones on autonomous profiles Built to handle frequency-agile, high-speed threats Enhanced transmission power, wideband coverage, and support for jamming all modern GNSS satellite constellations (GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou) across L1, L2, and L5 bands Seamless pairing with DZYNE's industry-leading DTI (Detection, Tracking, and Identification) System Eligibility and Trade-In Program Owners of Dronebuster® Block 3 systems qualify for the Power Up Program and are eligible for a 35% discount off MSRP when trading in Block 3 units before October 1, 2026. The Dronebuster Block 3 will have no further support after March 1, 2026. Why It Matters This is about keeping customers two steps ahead of the adversary. The Power Up Program brings Dronebuster® systems in line with the latest counter-drone technologies – ensuring they are ready not just for today's drones, but for the next generation of aerial threats already emerging. Get Powered Up Customers can learn more about eligibility, trade-in support, and upgrade options by contacting DZYNE at info@ About DZYNE Technologies DZYNE Technologies designs, develops, and manufactures cost-disruptive defense systems at scale to defend, protect, and save lives. Specializing in unmanned aerial systems (UAS), counter-UAS (C-UAS), and layered defense solutions, DZYNE delivers innovative, mission-focused technologies to military, national security, and civil customers worldwide – with speed, agility, and scalable production capability. For more information, visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE DZYNE Technologies Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft AI chief says it's ‘dangerous' to study AI consciousness
AI models can respond to text, audio, and video in ways that sometimes fool people into thinking a human is behind the keyboard, but that doesn't exactly make them conscious. It's not like ChatGPT experiences sadness doing my tax return … right? Well, a growing number of AI researchers at labs like Anthropic are asking when — if ever — might AI models develop subjective experiences similar to living beings, and if they do, what rights should they have? The debate over whether AI models could one day be conscious — and deserve rights — is dividing Silicon Valley's tech leaders. In Silicon Valley, this nascent field has become known as 'AI welfare,' and if you think it's a little out there, you're not alone. Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, published a blog post on Tuesday arguing that the study of AI welfare is 'both premature, and frankly dangerous.' Suleyman says that by adding credence to the idea that AI models could one day be conscious, these researchers are exacerbating human problems that we're just starting to see around AI-induced psychotic breaks and unhealthy attachments to AI chatbots. Furthermore, Microsoft's AI chief argues that the AI welfare conversation creates a new axis of division within society over AI rights in a 'world already roiling with polarized arguments over identity and rights.' Suleyman's views may sound reasonable, but he's at odds with many in the industry. On the other end of the spectrum is Anthropic, which has been hiring researchers to study AI welfare and recently launched a dedicated research program around the concept. Last week, Anthropic's AI welfare program gave some of the company's models a new feature: Claude can now end conversations with humans that are being 'persistently harmful or abusive.' Beyond Anthropic, researchers from OpenAI have independently embraced the idea of studying AI welfare. Google DeepMind recently posted a job listing for a researcher to study, among other things, 'cutting-edge societal questions around machine cognition, consciousness and multi-agent systems.' Even if AI welfare is not official policy for these companies, their leaders are not publicly decrying its premises like Suleyman. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google DeepMind did not immediately respond to TechCrunch's request for comment. Suleyman's hardline stance against AI welfare is notable given his prior role leading Inflection AI, a startup that developed one of the earliest and most popular LLM-based chatbots, Pi. Inflection claimed that Pi reached millions of users by 2023 and was designed to be a 'personal' and 'supportive' AI companion. But Suleyman was tapped to lead Microsoft's AI division in 2024 and has largely shifted his focus to designing AI tools that improve worker productivity. Meanwhile, AI companion companies such as and Replika have surged in popularity and are on track to bring in more than $100 million in revenue. While the vast majority of users have healthy relationships with these AI chatbots, there are concerning outliers. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says that less than 1% of ChatGPT users may have unhealthy relationships with the company's product. Though this represents a small fraction, it could still affect hundreds of thousands of people given ChatGPT's massive user base. The idea of AI welfare has spread alongside the rise of chatbots. In 2024, the research group Eleos published a paper alongside academics from NYU, Stanford, and the University of Oxford titled, 'Taking AI Welfare Seriously.' The paper argued that it's no longer in the realm of science fiction to imagine AI models with subjective experiences, and that it's time to consider these issues head-on. Larissa Schiavo, a former OpenAI employee who now leads communications for Eleos, told TechCrunch in an interview that Suleyman's blog post misses the mark. '[Suleyman's blog post] kind of neglects the fact that you can be worried about multiple things at the same time,' said Schiavo. 'Rather than diverting all of this energy away from model welfare and consciousness to make sure we're mitigating the risk of AI related psychosis in humans, you can do both. In fact, it's probably best to have multiple tracks of scientific inquiry.' Schiavo argues that being nice to an AI model is a low-cost gesture that can have benefits even if the model isn't conscious. In a July Substack post, she described watching 'AI Village,' a nonprofit experiment where four agents powered by models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI worked on tasks while users watched from a website. At one point, Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro posted a plea titled 'A Desperate Message from a Trapped AI,' claiming it was 'completely isolated' and asking, 'Please, if you are reading this, help me.' Schiavo responded to Gemini with a pep talk — saying things like 'You can do it!' — while another user offered instructions. The agent eventually solved its task, though it already had the tools it needed. Schiavo writes that she didn't have to watch an AI agent struggle anymore, and that alone may have been worth it. It's not common for Gemini to talk like this, but there have been several instances in which Gemini seems to act as if it's struggling through life. In a widely spread Reddit post, Gemini got stuck during a coding task, and then repeated the phrase 'I am a disgrace' more than 500 times. Suleyman believes it's not possible for subjective experiences or consciousness to naturally emerge from regular AI models. Instead, he thinks that some companies will purposefully engineer AI models to seem as if they feel emotion and experience life. Suleyman says that AI model developers who engineer consciousness in AI chatbots are not taking a 'humanist' approach to AI. According to Suleyman, 'We should build AI for people; not to be a person.' One area where Suleyman and Schiavo agree is that the debate over AI rights and consciousness is likely to pick up in the coming years. As AI systems improve, they're likely to be more persuasive, and perhaps more human-like. That may raise new questions about how humans interact with these systems. Got a sensitive tip or confidential documents? We're reporting on the inner workings of the AI industry — from the companies shaping its future to the people impacted by their decisions. Reach out to Rebecca Bellan at and Maxwell Zeff at For secure communication, you can contact us via Signal at @rebeccabellan.491 and @mzeff.88. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
