'Stuff of nightmares': How prosecutors say attacks on Minn. lawmakers unfolded
'Stuff of nightmares': How prosecutors say attacks on Minn. lawmakers unfolded
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Authorities arrest suspected Minnesota lawmakers shooter
Police caught Vance Luther Boelter, the man accused of killing Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband and wounding a state senator and his wife.
Federal court documents released Monday shed light on how prosecutors say a 57-year-old man researched and carried out what they are calling a "political assassination" that left a Minnesota state lawmaker dead and put the entire state on edge.
Vance Boelter was arrested late Sunday following the largest manhunt in Minnesota state history. Federal prosecutors charged him with several counts of murder and stalking in the killings of Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. Boelter also faces charges in the shooting of State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who were injured but are expected to recover.
Investigators say Boelter "extensively researched" and planned the June 14 attack. He compiled a list of mostly Democratic state lawmakers and their addresses; fitted his SUV with lights and a fake license plate to resemble a police squad car; and he purchased a hyper-realistic silicone mask and a cache of weapons, according to a 20-page affidavit filed in federal court.
Boelter 'embarked on a planned campaign of stalking and violence, designed to inflict fear, injure and kill members of the Minnesota state legislature and their families," FBI agents wrote in the affidavit.
"It is not an exaggeration to say that his crimes are the stuff of nightmares,'' said Joseph Thompson, the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota.
Here's a timeline of the shootings and the search to find Boelter, according to the federal affidavit:
Shooting at the Hoffman home: 'This is the police'
Around 2 a.m. on the morning of Saturday, June 14, Boelter drove to the house of Minnesota State Sen. John Hoffman in Champlin, about 20 miles northwest of Minneapolis. Video footage from the home shows Hoffman at the front door wearing a black tactical vest and a flesh-colored mask. He repeatedly knocked on the door and shouted "This is the police. Open the door," court records say.
Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, both came to the door and Boelter told them he was there in response to a shooting. After a short exchange, the Hoffmans got a better look at Boelter and realized he was wearing a mask. One or both of them said he wasn't a real police officer. Boelter in response said "This is a robbery," according to the FBI.
John Hoffman tried to push Boelter back through the front door, but Boelter shot him repeatedly before turning his gun on Yvette Hoffman, court documents say. At approximately 2:06 a.m., the Hoffman's adult daughter called 911 and reported that her parents had been shot by a masked gunman.
Boelter appears at 2nd lawmaker's home
At approximately 2:24 a.m., Boelter – still wearing the tactical gear and the mask – arrived at the front door of a state legislator in Maple Grove, about 10 miles from Champlin.
He rang the door bell multiple times and said "This is the police. Open the door. This is the police. We have a warrant," court documents say.
The legislator, who has not been named in court records, was not home. Boelter left.
Cop tries to speak to Boelter outside 3rd official's home
Law enforcement in New Hope, Minnesota, learned of the shooting at the Hoffman home and dispatched an officer to the home of an unnamed elected official who lived in the area, the affidavit says.
At approximately 2:36 a.m., the officer encountered a man now believed to be Boelter in his SUV parked down the street from the state official's home. Believing the SUV belonged to a law enforcement officer with its lights and fake license plate, the officer pulled up beside the vehicle and tried to speak with the man.
The man "continued staring down and did not respond," the affidavit says.
The officer drove to the lawmaker's home, saw there were "no signs of distress" and waited for other law enforcement to arrive, according to the affidavit. By the time they did, Boelter was gone.
Suspect fatally shoots Melissa Hortman, husband, affidavit says
Around 3:30 a.m., law enforcement in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, went to the home of Rep. Melissa Hortman to conduct a safety check. Outside the home, officers saw the black SUV with its lights flashing. Then they saw the suspect – wearing the mask and tactical gear – facing the front door.
Moments later, the suspect fired several gunshots and moved into the house, where a second round of gunshots could be heard, records say. Inside, officers discovered the Hortmans with gunshot wounds and their dog gravely injured. Melissa and Mark Hortman were later pronounced dead.
Boelter fled the home and escaped into a wooded area. Investigators found a 9mm handgun and the mask outside the home. In the SUV, investigators recovered five firearms and several notebooks filled with handwritten notes. The writings included the names of more than 45 Minnesota state and federal public officials, including Hortman.
After shootings, suspect texts family: 'Dad went to war last night'
In a federal complaint, the FBI says Boelter sent multiple texts to his wife and his family a few hours after the shootings.
In a group chat that included his wife and children, he sent the following message at 6:18 a.m.: 'Dad went to war last night … I dont wanna say more because I dont wanna implicate anybody.'
Around the same time, his wife received a separate message from Boelter. 'Words are not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation … there's gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger-happy and I don't want you guys around.'
Boelter on the run: Buys e-bike, Buick and pens letter to the FBI
At 7 a.m., a man said he met Boelter for the first time at a bus stop in northern Minneapolis. Boelter, carrying two duffel bags, asked whether he could purchase an e-bike from the man. The man agreed and the pair boarded a bus heading for the man's home, court documents say.
Boelter was next seen at a bank in Robbinsdale, Minnesota, where he withdrew $2,200, emptying his account. Cameras at the bank captured him wearing a cowboy hat. He bought an e-bike and a Buick from the man he met earlier at the bus stop.
On Sunday, June 15, police received a tip that a man was riding an e-bike in the area of Boelter's family home in Green Isle, Minnesota. Soon police located the Buick Boelter had purchased near the reported e-bike sighting. Inside the car, police found the cowboy hat and a letter addressed to the FBI, which said the writer, "Dr. Vance Luther Boelter," had carried out the shootings the day before.
At 9:10 p.m., Boelter crawled out of a wooded area and peacefully surrendered to law enforcement. He was taken into custody about a mile from his family home.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
After Minnesota shooting, some states are more tightly guarding officials' personal information
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Lawmakers in some states are moving to delete their home addresses from online directories and Wisconsin legislators are seeking added security for a session this week after one Minnesota legislator was killed and another wounded in their suburban Minneapolis homes last weekend in what Gov. Tim Walz described as a targeted political attack. Vance Boelter is in federal custody facing murder and stalking charges in the shooting death of former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. Authorities say he also shot and wounded Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette. Boelter, 57, also faces state murder charges. Authorities said Boelter had a list of dozens of state and federal elected officials in Minnesota and meticulous notes on the homes and people he targeted early Saturday. He also stopped by the homes of two other legislators that night, according to police. Authorities say he found their addresses in a variety of internet searches. The Minnesota Legislature's website lists the addresses of members' offices in the state capital of St. Paul, not their home addresses. On Saturday, the North Dakota Legislature's staff agency removed lawmakers' addresses from their biographical webpages as a result of the targeted attacks in Minnesota, Legislative Council Director John Bjornson said. Most North Dakota lawmakers opt to give a home, business or postal box address on their webpage, where the public also can find their email addresses and phone numbers. Removing addresses of elected officials is a difficult decision because they have to be approachable, open and transparent, said Burleigh County Sheriff Kelly Leben, whose county is home to North Dakota's capital city. 'I think it's a balancing act between being a public official and the safety of myself and my family,' the elected county sheriff said. All home addresses for New Mexico legislators were also removed from the Statehouse website as an immediate precaution, said Shawna Casebier, director of the Legislature's legal office. Personal information on the website already had been limited at the discretion of individual lawmakers in the aftermath of drive-by shootings at the homes of four Democratic state and local lawmakers in Albuquerque in 2022 and 2023. In Colorado, at least 31 elected officials have filed requests to remove their personal contact information from a public-facing state campaign finance database called TRACER, which was briefly taken down Saturday so those requests could be fulfilled. 'We did so out of an abundance of caution for the safety of elected officials in an unprecedented political climate,' Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said in a statement. The Colorado development was first reported by Axios. Lawmakers in Wisconsin requested additional security for when the state Assembly meets on Wednesday, said Luke Wolff, spokesperson for Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos. Wolff did not detail what was requested or what changes may be made. The Wisconsin Capitol is one of the most open in the country, with public access seven days a week, no metal detectors, screening checkpoints or security badges required to gain entry. There are galleries in both the Senate and Assembly where the public can view legislative debate. Even before the Minnesota shooting, states in recent years have stepped up efforts to shield the personal information of officials in response to high-profile attacks. One day before the Minnesota killings, Oregon lawmakers passed a bill that would prohibit the Oregon Secretary of State from making the residential addresses of those associated with a candidates' campaign committee viewable by the public on its electronic filing system. The campaign filings would still be viewable online, but home addresses would be redacted, unless the person asks the Secretary of State's office to publish it. A public records request would need to be filed to obtain such addresses. Louisiana Louisiana lawmakers passed a bill last week that adds statewide elected officials and legislators to the list of people who can ask that their personal information be removed from public records and the internet. Certain judges were already on the list. Officials can seek to have home addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, date of birth, marital status, school or daycare of their child, their place of worship or employment location of their spouse removed. Under current law, if person does not comply with the removal request, they can be sued and face up to 90 days in prison or $1,000 fine for the misdemeanor. The measure still needs final approval from Gov. Jeff Landry, one of the Louisiana officials whose private information would be protected. Georgia Georgia legislators passed a law earlier this year to require that home addresses of candidates who file campaign finance reports, including themselves, be redacted from by the state Ethics Commission from public view. The action came after a number of Georgia officials were targeted by swatting incidents in December 2023. Lawmakers also passed a second law which removes the personal phone number, home address, and property or tax records of a judge or their spouse from public view. Records covered include voter registration and corporation records. Illinois The Illinois State Board of Elections stopped publishing the street addresses of candidates for political office on its website last year, spokesperson Matt Dietrich said. Lawmakers had raised concerns after protestors picketed the home of Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, the state librarian, over legislation he pushed through the General Assembly that would cut state funding to libraries that ban books. Candidates' addresses remain on elections board documents that are no longer published on the web but accessible via public records request. New Jersey In 2020, a gunman posing as a delivery driver shot and killed the 20-year-old son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas in New Jersey and injured her husband at their family home. The state legislature passed a law later that year by that exempted the home addresses of current or retired judges, prosecutors and law enforcement officers from disclosure under public records laws. The measure, called Daniel's Law in honor of the judge's son, also allowed officials to ask websites to remove their home addresses. Maryland Maryland enacted a law in 2024 preventing individuals from publishing judges' personal information online after a circuit court judge was shot by a man hours after the judge ruled against him in a divorce case. Judges can submit requests to government entities and private websites to remove information like phone numbers, social security numbers, and personal emails. — Associated Press reporters Claire Rush in Portland, Ore., Jack Dura in Bismarck, N.D., John O'Connor in Springfield, Ill., Jeff Amy in Atlanta, Scott McFetridge in Des Moines, Iowa, Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, La., Scott Bauer in Madison, Wis., Brian Witte in Annapolis, Md. and Morgan Lee in Santa Fe, N.M. contributed to this report.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's massive tax-cut bill could shield the president from court orders
A provision in President Donald Trump 's massive tax-cut bill that would shield Trump from some court orders is drawing Democratic opposition as it heads for the Senate. But a leading Republican says the court restriction is necessary to keep judges from abusing their authority. The provision drew little attention in the marathon debate that ended with a 215-214 House vote to approve the measure in the early-morning hours of May 22. But it would make a significant change in the standards for injunctions, the orders judges issue to prohibit a person, business or government agency from taking actions the judge has found to be illegal. Under the proposal, a judge could find a violator in contempt of court, and issue penalties, only if the judge who issued the order required those who sought it to post a bond that would reimburse the other side for its costs if the injunction was later found to be unjustified. And the new rule would apply not only to future injunctions, but also to those issued in the past, when judges have rarely required bonds. No bonds were ordered, for example, by judges who prohibited Trump from sending immigrants to a prison in El Salvador — injunctions that would become unenforceable under the legislation passed by the House. And it could even cast doubt on decades-old court orders to limit police practices or desegregate schools, said Erwin Chemerinsky, the UC Berkeley law school dean whose online posting called attention to the bill's language. While the debate has centered on the bill's reductions in taxes for the rich and health care for the poor, some Democrats are starting to voice opposition to the injunction limits. 'Republicans are once again seeking to twist the rules to avoid accountability and advance their overtly political interests by attempting to shut down federal courts' enforcement mechanism,' Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., said after the House approved the measure. 'The Constitution outlines the Judicial Branch as an independent, co-equal branch of government, and I will do everything in my power both to ensure it remains that way and to shut down Republicans' attempts to further insulate Donald Trump from our system of checks and balances.' 'You have activist judges, a handful of them around the country who are abusing that power,' Johnson told a reporter last weekend. 'They're issuing these nationwide injunctions. They're engaging in political acts from the bench. And that is not what our system is intended for. And people have lost their faith in our system of justice.' His language was in line with Trump's responses to judges who rule against him, whom the president has labeled 'radical left lunatics' who should be impeached. One was U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of Washington, D.C., who ordered Trump in March to halt the deportations of more than 200 Venezuelans to El Salvador and turn the flights around, orders the Trump administration has ignored. Boasberg was initially appointed to the bench by Republican President George W. Bush, and promoted later by Democrat Barack Obama. The tax-cut legislation, however, does not address individual judges' authority to issue nationwide injunctions, an issue the Supreme Court is now considering in the Trump administration's challenge to birthright citizenship for U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants. The language in the bill would instead invalidate standard injunctions issued against one person, including the president, or a business or organization accused of violating the law. The bill 'has nothing to do with nationwide injunctions,' Chemerinsky said. 'The ability of the courts to review presidential actions was articulated in Marbury v. Madison,' an 1803 Supreme Court ruling, 'and was not something new created for the Trump administration,' he said. As budget-related legislation, the bill is exempt from filibusters and could be passed by a majority vote in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats. But Chemerinsky said that if the restrictions on injunctions remain in the measure, the Senate's nonpartisan parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, could determine they were unrelated to taxing or spending and could be blocked by a filibuster, which would require 60 votes to overcome. And a House Republican who voted for the bill last week predicted Friday that the injunction limits would be dropped from the legislation. 'I don't see any argument that could ever be made that this affects mandatory spending or revenue,' Rep. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said at a town-hall meeting. 'I don't see it getting into the Senate bill.' Chronicle reporter Shira Stein contributed to this article.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Scoop: Democrats challenge Bessent's victory lap on IRS tax revenue
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is leading a Democratic effort to challenge Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on the victory he claimed last week on increasing tax revenue in April and May. Why it matters: Democrats argue widespread cuts at the IRS will only hurt tax revenue and contradict Bessent's commitment to reduce the federal deficit. Bessent has claimed that cutting costs and trimming staff haven't lowered tax collection. Warren scoffs at that and insists those reductions are penny-wise and pound-foolish. Driving the news: In a letter to Bessent and IRS Commissioner Billy Long, Warren led Democrats in warning that staff cuts at the IRS will only plunge revenue in the coming years. "Further cutting IRS staff means less staff to monitor wealthy tax cheats and collect the tax revenue that will help offset our budget deficit," Warren writes, along with Sens. Tim Kaine (D-Va). Angus King (I-Maine) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), in a letter obtained by Axios. The big picture: A centerpiece of Bessent's economic agenda was cutting the federal budget to 3% of GDP. The Democrats argue the cuts to the IRS and the GOP's mega tax cut bill directly contradict that goal. The House-passed version of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" would add around $2.5 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, according to an estimate by the Congressional Budget Office. A March estimate by Yale University also concluded the IRS could miss out on as much as $2.4 trillion in revenue if the department's workforce is cut in half. Zoom in: The Democrats are demanding to know how Trump officials plan to slash IRS staff while keeping tax revenue steady. "Given the proven return on investment from increasing staffing levels at the IRS, how did the Administration determine that a 40 percent across-the-board cut in the IRS workforce was prudent?" "These actions are inconsistent with your public commitments to meaningfully reduce the federal deficit and will undo the improvements made to the IRS's taxpayer services," they write. Warren is the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee.
