
Mehidy 5-for helps to trim Zimbabwe lead against Bangladesh on 1st test
SYLHET, Bangladesh (AP) — Bangladesh off-spinner Mehidy Hasan claimed a five-for and Zimbabwe's lead was reduced to 25 runs by the end of day two Monday of the first test.
Half-centuries by opener Brian Bennet (57) and Sean Williams (59) led Zimbabwe to 273 and a first-innings lead of 82.
But that was down to 25 by day's end when Bangladesh reached 57-1 at stumps, with opener Mahmudul Hasan (28) and Mominul Haque (15), who hit 56 in the first innings, in the middle.
After bowling out Bangladesh for 191, Zimbabwe resumed on 67 without loss and looked set for a significant innings lead but Mehidy triggered a collapse. Zimbabwe lost its last five wickets for 80 runs.
Zimbabwe was initially unsettled by pacer Nahid Rana, who finished with 3-74.
Nahid struck in the day's second over. He banged one in short with searing pace and Ben Curran, unable to evade the extra bounce, fended it to short leg on 18 and 69-1. Mominul Haque dived forward to take an excellent catch.
Fellow opener Brian Bennet was comfortable negotiating all kinds of questions the Bangladeshi bowlers threw to him. He brought up his maiden test fifty off just 56 balls by driving Hasan Mahmud's back-of-length delivery past cover point.
But Bennet was undone by Nahid's extra bounce and pace, ending a 60-ball knock which included 10 boundaries.
Hasan Mahmud in the next over uprooted Nich Welch's stumps with an in-swinger.
With Zimbabwe at 88-3, Williams and captain Craig Ervine steadied the innings, hinting at a potential comeback.
But Nahid broke a threatening 41-run partnership in the penultimate over before lunch by inducing a faint outside edge from Ervine on 8. The on-field umpire initially gave not out but Bangladesh overturned the decision on review.
Williams swept left-arm spinner Taijul Islam to the boundary to raise his fourth test fifty from 87 balls, and shared another little but significant partnership with Wessley Madhevere.
Pacer Khaled Ahmed got the better of Madhevere for 24 with a short ball to end the 48-run partnership.
Mehidy, who was expensive in the morning session, readjusted his line and length to take Zimbabwe's last five wickets and earn his 11th five-for.
He began with the big wicket of Williams, caught by Mahmudul Hasan at long off after he hit six fours and two sixes in a 108-ball 59. By then Zimbabwe had a two-run lead.
With five wickets at hand, Zimbabwe still was favored to take the lead past 100 with Nyasha Mayavo batting resolutely and Richard Ngarava giving him support.
But Mehidy dismissed Mayavo on 35 to expose the tail and struck at regular intervals to deny Zimbabwe taking the lead out of Bangladesh's reach.
When Bangladesh came to bat in the second innings, fast bowler Blessing Muzurabani dismissed opener Shadman Islam for 4.
Then Mahmudul and Mominul survived some testing spells in the late afternoon to reach stumps unscathed.
___
AP cricket: https://apnews.com/hub/cricket

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox Sports
34 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
Federal judges rule in favor of NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row
Associated Press CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system. Both race teams sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. 23XI, which is owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, joined Front Row in suing NASCAR after 13 other organizations signed the renewals. The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn't scheduled to be heard until December. The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick's contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car. The original judge ruled that NASCAR's charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision. The judges said in Thursday's ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court's theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction. The teams have 14 days to appeal to the full court. The injunction also has no bearings on the merits of the case. ___ AP auto racing: recommended in this topic

Associated Press
35 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Federal judges rule in favor of NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system. Both race teams sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. 23XI, which is owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, joined Front Row in suing NASCAR after 13 other organizations signed the renewals. The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn't scheduled to be heard until December. The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick's contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car. The original judge ruled that NASCAR's charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision. The judges said in Thursday's ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court's theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction. The teams have 14 days to appeal to the full court. The injunction also has no bearings on the merits of the case. ___ AP auto racing:
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal judges rule in favor of NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system. Both race teams sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. 23XI, which is owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, joined Front Row in suing NASCAR after 13 other organizations signed the renewals. The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn't scheduled to be heard until December. The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick's contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car. The original judge ruled that NASCAR's charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision. The judges said in Thursday's ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court's theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction. The teams have 14 days to appeal to the full court. The injunction also has no bearings on the merits of the case. ___ AP auto racing: