logo
PM Anwar's leadership amid US tariff isssue praised

PM Anwar's leadership amid US tariff isssue praised

The Sun06-05-2025

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian chapter of the ASEAN-Business Advisory Council (ASEAN-BAC) has complimented Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's leadership and the MADANI government in handling the United States (US) tariff issue in a calm and balanced manner and protecting national interests.
Besides being very astute in handling the thorny issue, the government has engaged Washington to figure out what is rhetoric and what is reality on the US side, its chairman Tan Sri Nazir Razak said today.
More than that, he said 'Malaysia has then gone back to strategise, which we are doing now, and maybe going back and negotiate.'
'That's absolutely the right way to handle the situation, which is in contrast with the (confrontational) handling of the situation by many other countries, which reacted too quickly, or were too aggressive,' he said in response to questions on the US asking Malaysia to reduce non-tariff barriers such as in halal certification at a press conference on ASEAN-BAC Malaysia's 2025 initiatives.
On NTBs and whether Malaysia and other Southeast Asian governments had the political will to dismantle them, he said these barriers were an ASEAN-wide problem.
'There is a strong correlation between the reduction in tariffs and the rise of non-tariff barriers, and at last count, there's something like 9,642 non-tariff barriers across ASEAN,' said Nazir.
'One of the difficulties facing ASEAN is that there's no clear enforcement mechanism to bring this down.
'There's a lot of frustration from the private sector with non-tariff barriers.
'As we negotiate with the US, perhaps it's an opportunity for us to review those highlighted by businesses,' he said.
Nazir revealed that there is a mechanism called ASEAN Assist, whereby a company can go online and list down a non-tariff barrier employed by a country which should not be there.
Unfortunately, the take-up rate is very low because of the (perception) that nothing can be done about it. Which is why (the issue of) non-tariff barriers is an area that ASEAN has to focus on, said Nazir.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM Immunity: Anwar Files Appeal Notice Against Decision On Legal Questions Referral
PM Immunity: Anwar Files Appeal Notice Against Decision On Legal Questions Referral

Barnama

time25 minutes ago

  • Barnama

PM Immunity: Anwar Files Appeal Notice Against Decision On Legal Questions Referral

KUALA LUMPUR, June 5 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has filed a notice of appeal against the High Court's decision to dismiss his application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a sitting Prime Minister enjoys immunity from civil lawsuits. Anwar's lawyer, Datuk Seri K. Rajasegaran, when contacted, confirmed the filing of the notice by Messrs Zain Megat & Murad. 'The notice of appeal was filed immediately after the proceedings ended yesterday. We hope to secure a hearing date before June 16,' he said. Yesterday, High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's bid to refer the eight legal questions after finding that none of the articles of a Federal Constitution (FC) cited by Anwar's legal team give rise to any real, substantial or justiciable question of constitutional law requiring determination by the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the FC or Section 84 of Courts of Judicature Act 1964. On May 23, the Prime Minister filed the application to refer the eight legal questions, which also include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. However, the Attorney General's Chambers on Jan 14, 2020, announced that it would not pursue the matter further, citing insufficient evidence and contradictions of material facts that could not support the prosecution of any person under Section 354 of the Penal Code. The High Court, which is hearing the lawsuit, had earlier set the hearing dates from June 16 to 19, and from June 23 to 25. -- BERNAMA

MACC first enforcement agency to step forward as HAWANA 2025 strategic partner
MACC first enforcement agency to step forward as HAWANA 2025 strategic partner

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

MACC first enforcement agency to step forward as HAWANA 2025 strategic partner

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is the first enforcement agency to step forward to become a strategic partner for the National Journalists Day (HAWANA) 2025, marking a significant step in strengthening collaboration between the media and public institutions. The strategic partnership was announced during the HAWANA 2025 Strategic Partners Appreciation Ceremony held at Wisma Bernama last Tuesday. Representing Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki, MACC Director of Strategic Communications Hisyam Mohd Yusoff handed over a mock sponsorship cheque to Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil, who officiated the event. Hisyam said the sponsorship reflects MACC's recognition of the media's critical role in disseminating accurate and timely information to the public. 'This strategic partnership is a gesture of support to media organisations for their contribution and collaboration in delivering important information to society. 'Insya-Allah, although this is MACC's first time as a strategic partner, it will set a benchmark for broader and deeper cooperation between the Commission and media organisations in the future,' he said in a statement. HAWANA 2025 has attracted the participation of 79 public and private entities as its strategic partners, including the Malaysian Technology Development Corporation (MTDC), Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA), Human Resources Ministry (KESUMA), Department of Veterinary Services, Malaysian Foundation for Innovation, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, National Art Gallery, as well as MK Curtain Berhad and GM Klang. HAWANA 2025 will take place at the World Trade Centre Kuala Lumpur from June 13 to 15, with the highlight of the celebration, to be officiated by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, scheduled for June 14. More than 1,000 media practitioners, representatives of local journalist associations, and media delegates from ASEAN member states are expected to attend, bringing together the professional media fraternity and industry experts to exchange ideas and forge strategic partnerships. HAWANA 2025, organised by the Ministry of Communications through Bernama as the implementing agency, will feature various events, including a media forum jointly organised with the Malaysian Press Institute (MPI) on June 14 and a two-day HAWANA carnival and exhibition at Sunway Putra Mall starting June 13. There will also be sporting activities incorporating traditional elements, as well as visits to leading polytechnics in Selangor, Perak and Johor. HAWANA, now in its fifth edition since its debut in 2018, is organised annually to recognise the essential role of journalists in national development.

Foreign transaction firms must boost AMLA compliance diligence
Foreign transaction firms must boost AMLA compliance diligence

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Foreign transaction firms must boost AMLA compliance diligence

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian business owners engaged in international transactions are advised to maintain comprehensive records and promptly report any suspicious activity to Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) to ensure compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001(AMLA). Lawyer Guok Ngek Seong, who has nearly 25 years of experience in civil and criminal litigation, told Bernama that companies operating in high-risk sectors such as maritime, petroleum and logistics, which frequently conduct foreign exchange transactions, must exercise heightened diligence in documenting their operations. He was speaking on the matter in light of recent actions taken by BNM, which imposed administrative monetary penalties amounting to RM4.95 million on several financial institutions for breaches of statutory and regulatory obligations. The penalties involved non-compliance with provisions under the Development Financial Institutions Act 2002 as well as failures to adhere to requirements under the Anti-Money Laundering, Countering Financing of Terrorism and Targeted Financial Sanctions for Financial Institutions Policy Document. These regulatory actions reflect the heightened scrutiny placed on financial and corporate entities, reinforcing the need for robust compliance measures, especially in sectors exposed to cross-border transactions. Guok stressed that proper record-keeping may constitute a key line of defence should a company come under investigation for alleged money laundering or involvement in unlawful activities. 'BNM has the authority to conduct annual checks on such entities to ensure compliance with AMLA regulations,' he said. When asked whether litigants may obtain court orders through pre-action discovery or the Norwich Pharmacal process, Guok explained that such orders are available to parties seeking disclosure from individuals or entities not directly involved in the anticipated proceedings. He noted that Norwich Pharmacal orders permit a litigant to compel a third party, who is not itself implicated in the alleged wrongdoing but is mixed up in it innocently, to disclose information necessary to identify or pursue the actual wrongdoer. 'However, the court must balance such applications to prevent any form of abuse or 'fishing expeditions', particularly in light of, among other considerations, the principle of banker-client privilege. 'It is sometimes crucial for clients to obtain documents from banks, especially in cases where suspicious transactions have been traced to accounts held by corporations later found to be involved in fraudulent activities,' he said. He said the only viable means for victims to substantiate such transactions is by obtaining the relevant documentation, which may be instrumental in identifying the mechanisms or systems employed to facilitate the fraudulent activity. Commenting on the Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949 (BBEA), Guok noted that while Section 6 restricts the compellability of bank officers to produce bankers' books where the bank is not a party to the proceedings, the court nonetheless retains the discretion to issue such an order where appropriate. 'The court must balance the interests of banker-client confidentiality against the issues in the particular suit before making appropriate orders. 'While some discovery applications may be deemed an abuse of process, others are genuine, especially when litigants require documents from banks to trace the money trail in their cases,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store