Court order bans more caravans at site of fire
A court order banning more caravans and mobile homes being added to a site has been put in place after several were destroyed by a fire.
The blaze spread to 11 caravans as well as stables, outbuildings and vehicles at The Laurels in Fen Road on the outskirts of Cambridge on 20 April.
South Cambridgeshire District Council said The Laurels only had planning permission for seven pitches.
The High Court injunction was obtained on Friday, a spokesperson said, and adding more caravans would pose a "public safety risk".
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
The council said planning permission was granted specifically for seven pitches to be used by people from the Gypsy and traveller communities.
"However, the green belt site has been used recently for a much greater number of caravans - some of which were being used by people who are not from the Gypsy and traveller community," they said.
"As well as breaking planning rules, the potential replacement of the unauthorised caravans would again pose a significant fire risk."
The authority, which shares its planning services with Cambridge City Council, said it was "assessing the most appropriate approach" for the units that remain at the site, but that it was illegal to add more.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
South Cambridgeshire District Council's lead member for housing, Liberal Democract John Batchelor, said the council "continues to offer free advice and support to people displaced from the site" after the fire.
He said council staff "always assess whether anyone facing homelessness needs a place to stay for a short time".
The injunction runs until 1 May 2026.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Related internet links
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
New plans for controversial Appleby statue submitted
REVISED plans for a controversial artwork in Appleby have been submitted to Westmorland & Furness Council. The application to install the Gypsy Stallion sculpture is now proposing to site it on land off Roman Road after the original application was rejected in April. According to the decision notice issued by the council the proposed 2.1-metre-tall sculpture, originally planned on the River Eden, would have 'eroded the neutral and harmonious relationship between the built and natural environment in this part of the town'. The council said the siting of the Gypsy stallion sculpture would visually compete with surrounding listed buildings including the Grade I listed Church of St Lawrence and the Grade II listed St Lawrence's Bridge. After the plans were refused the decision notice from the council stated: 'While the cultural intention of the proposal is fully acknowledged and respected, no compelling justification has been provided for locating the sculpture in this specific, highly sensitive position. 'It is considered that the commemorative aim could reasonably be delivered in an alternative location without resulting in such harm, and the public benefit is not sufficient to outweigh the identified heritage impact. 'Furthermore, the proposal would undermine the inclusive and neutral amenity value of a well-used public space, with a significant number of local representations raising concerns about the impact of the sculpture's symbolic presence on community cohesion, emotional comfort and the shared use of the site.' According to the artist's statement submitted with the application, outside the fair week, 'very little tangible evidence' exists of the 'central importance' of the fair to the town and its Gypsy and Traveller visitors. It adds the Gypsy and Traveller community would like to donate a public sculpture to the town of Appleby to make this 'crucial' part of the town's heritage more visible. The statement reads: 'It celebrates our history, culture and horses, and is intended as a thank you to the town for hosting an event that is like a spiritual pilgrimage for us.' Ward councillor Andy Connell (Appleby and Brough, Lib Dems) has commented on the proposal and said: 'This is a much better option than the previously proposed site on the riverbank, and has the support of at least some local previous objectors. 'It will be a striking and handsome feature at the main entrance into the town. Allusion to the annual Appleby Horse Fair won't be to everyone's taste; but it happens and the town is renowned for it.' However, a spokesman from the Appleby Fair Communities Group, said: 'Many of the issues raised, and reasons for refusal, in the original application remain unresolved and still relevant, particularly the distress that this statue will cause to many local residents. 'For a significant portion of the community, the Appleby Fair is not a celebration but a source of disruption, anxiety, and hardship. Installing a permanent statue commemorating the event is highly likely to deepen these feelings and worsen community division. 'The group behind this statue have shown themselves to be tone deaf and either have not listened to the original feedback or simply don't care. 'It appears they have ignored what many residents said and simply re-submitted their application for a different location, which I find quite bullish. 'The statue itself is little more than a Trojan horse — a supposed gift designed to impose an identity on the town that many do not recognise as their own, stamping ownership where none has been earned. It is certainly noteworthy that funding and effort can be readily found for a statue, with strong advocacy to ensure its installation, yet there seems to be no similar energy spent on funding the event itself. 'Instead, the expectation remains that local taxpayers will shoulder the burden. This is particularly jarring at a time when many residents are struggling to afford basic necessities, such as heating, while council tax continues to rise. The contrast is striking and unjust.'
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Son wipes out inheritance and left owing £100k after 15-year family feud
A son has been hit with a £282,000 inheritance tax bill following a 15-year legal battle with his family. Sharas Changizi had been locked in a bitter dispute with his mother and three siblings since his father's death in 2010, according to court documents. His siblings had given away their shares of their father's estate to their mother in 2012 using a deed of variation, which allows beneficiaries to redistribute their parts of the estate. As the surviving spouse, Mrs Changizi was an exempt beneficiary – meaning her portion of the estate should have been free from inheritance tax. However, Mr Changizi refused to give his share to his mother and argued that inheritance tax should be charged on the estate as a whole, and not just on his share. The family paid the £282,000 inheritance tax bill, including interest, but insisted that Mr Changizi was actually liable for the costs. In a judgment reached in April 2025, the High Court held that the family's approach of charging the son's share with all of the inheritance tax was correct. Mr Changizi already owed the family £116,000 in court costs following years of bitter litigation, which included him trying, and failing, to challenge the validity of the will. Together, these court costs and the inheritance tax liability ate up Mr Changizi's £300,000 share of the estate and left him owing his family £102,000, court documents show. The case shines a light on the potential complications of splitting the estate between exempt beneficiaries – such as spouses and charities – and non-exempt beneficiaries. Claire Roberts, of accountants Moore Kingston Smith, said: 'It has long been understood that inheritance tax on a non-exempt share of an estate is paid from that share and that exempt beneficiaries receive their share in full. In this case, the appellant arguably tried his luck by suggesting otherwise.' Mr Changizi had also received a payment from his father a year before his death. Gifts made within seven years of a person's death are generally considered part of the estate for inheritance tax purposes. Mr Changizi had tried to argue that the inheritance tax charge on this gift should not be deducted from his share of the estate, but this was dismissed in court. Ms Roberts added: 'This serves as a cautionary reminder to testators to ensure that they understand the implications of making lifetime gifts in conjunction with the terms in their will.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Here's How Audra McDonald Reacted to Patti LuPone Saying She's ‘Not a Friend'
Audra McDonald has responded to Patti LuPone's recent disses. Shortly after LuPone said that her fellow Broadway legend was 'not a friend,' citing a past 'rift' between them, McDonald told Gayle King for CBS Sunday Morning, 'If there's a rift between us, I don't know what it is.' More from Billboard Is Rose from 'Gypsy' the Greatest Role in Broadway History? That's What Tony Awards History Suggests The Amity Affliction Cover Turnstile's 'Holiday' for 'Like a Version' Mariah Carey Celebrates 20 Years of 'The Emancipation of Mimi': Stream It Now 'That's something that you'd have to ask Patti about,' the Private Practice star continued. 'I haven't seen her in about 11 years, just because I've been busy, just with life and stuff. I don't know what rift she's talking about, you'd have to ask her.' McDonald's response comes days after LuPone made her feelings quite clear in a New Yorker profile published Monday (May 26). The subject first came up as LuPone was recalling a kerfuffle with Broadway's Hell's Kitchen, which was located next door to her own Broadway play The Roommate. LuPone had asked Shubert Organization head Robert Wankel to step in after sound from the Alicia Keys-created musical kept bleeding over from their neighbors, after which Hell's Kitchen star Kecia Lewis posted a video on Instagram calling LuPone's actions 'bullying,' 'racially microaggressive' and 'rooted in privilege.' When The New Yorker's Michael Schulman pointed out that McDonald had shown support for Lewis' video in the comments, LuPone replied, 'Exactly.' 'And I thought, You should know better,' LuPone continued at the time. 'That's typical of Audra. She's not a friend.' That's when the publication noted that the two stage icons had previously 'had some long-ago rift,' about which LuPone didn't want to disclose details. When pressed for her review of McDonald's current portrayal of Rose in Gypsy on Broadway — a role LuPone played and won a Tony for in a 2008-09 revival — LuPone simply stared at the writer pointedly for 15 seconds. Watch McDonald address LuPone's remarks below. Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
