Tom's Guide Awards 2025: Our favorite headphones, earbuds, Bluetooth speakers and more
From wireless earbuds to audiophile headphones, we're constantly on the lookout for new audio gear that will elevate the listening experience while bringing our favorite tunes and content to life.
Our team of experts has tested and reviewed all of the latest earbuds, headphones, soundbars and speakers for the Tom's Guide Awards 2025. Below, we highlight the headphones we just can't put down, the speakers we can't help but turn up and the rest of our favorite audio gear from the last 12 months which have brought music to our ears in the best way possible.
Bowers & Wilkins has always come close to the Bose and Sony alternatives with its headphones, but there's always been something holding it back. A bulky design, less impressive noise canceling and feature sets. That all changed with the PX7 S3, a pair of headphones that manage to do everything very well, and one thing better than absolutely everything else.
The first thing they get right is the design. They're slimmer than previous models, but retain their premium look and feel. There are loads of different textures on display, from the fabric covering the and metal covering the earcups to the soft leatherette that's on the cushioning. They're much more premium looking and feeling than the competition, all the way down to their hard case.
ANC is good, bringing them up to par with Sony and just behind Bose. The feature set is improved with customizable EQ, and more are on the way in 2025. It's the sound where the PX7 really shine, however.
They are some of the best-sounding wireless headphones around, with a lovely, warm profile. There's detail for days, mids for miles, and bass that wraps all around the world for a sound signature that makes you want to sink into your favorite wingback with a nice drink. I love them.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
When the Sony WH-1000XM6 were announced, we thought we'd be onto a winner in some regard. The XM6 delivered in one key area — noise canceling. This year, we've not had a huge number of big releases, but this pair from Sony has taken the cake when it comes to ANC.
That's thanks to some key upgrades over the XM5, mostly in its microphone array. There are now 12 mics as opposed to the XM5's 8 microphones, and when coupled with a new algorithm, the results are extremely impressive.
They're better at handling a wider range of noise than the previous model, and they now read the environment on the fly to work out the kind of noise canceling that you require. It works very well, and it's the reason that they've taken home this award this year.
Noble started out making wired earbuds for audiophiles, and then moved into the wireless game afterward. The brands other wireless buds have gotten close to being immaculate, but they've always been held back by their price. Now, with the Amadeus, we've got buds that aren't uncomfortably priced but bring some excellent sound and ANC to the table.
It's all down to the tips this time around. While the core ANC is good, the flanged tips in the box effectively work like earplugs, increasing the noise canceling from merely good to actually top notch.
Add in their good battery life and their game-changing sound, and you've got a pair of buds that do a spectacular job at making a very attractive alternative to the similarly priced competition.
There have been some excellent earbuds that have launched this year, but they all pale in comparison to the bargain that is the Sony WF-C710N. They're not cheap, per se, but they are affordable, while still offering flagship sound, ANC and an excellent feature set. They're easily our favorite earbuds of 2025 as a result.
The best bit? The transparent blue colorway. There's nothing that comes close in the color department, and it helps set them apart physically from other buds that cost around the same.
Not that they need to, there's plenty inside to set them apart. The sound is up there with models that cost double, the ANC is on par with the more expensive Bose QuietComfort Earbuds, and the battery life of 8.5 hours is going to last you plenty. They might not be the most premium, but they're the pair of buds to buy in 2025.
This is always a tricky one for me, given that audiophile headphones become something of a 'do these sound better, or different' case. But there's one pair of premium, audiophile headphones that have stood out to me as the best thing of the year. The extremely expensive, but also extremely good, Final D8000 DC have taken the audiophile crown.They're effortlessly detailed, but pack in some truly incredible bass depth to match. They sing when you give them ample amplification, and connect them to a decent DAC and you're in sonic heaven. I've tested some very expensive headphones already, and yet still, the DC8000 made me cry with some of the most impressive sonic imaging I've ever experienced.
It's all wrapped up in a simple but attractive design. I really like the audio scaffolding vibes, but my favorite thing is the ballistic briefcase with locks and keys they come packed in. The whole thing feels and sounds amazing — just get your checkbook ready.
Marshall made a soundbar — and it's excellent! The Heston 120 might not have the expandability of the likes of the Arc Ultra, but it more than makes up for it in sheer sonic weight and musicality.
There's more bass on offer in the bar itself than pretty much any other soundbar that I've tested, and it lends the bar a more 'standalone' feel. You won't need a subwoofer for medium rooms thanks to the pair of built in drivers, and then the Dolby Atmos performance more than holds its own.
Music is where it's at, though, with some excellent stereo separation. It sounds better than any other soundbar for music, and that makes it more a jack of all trades than the competition. It also happens to look really cool — Marshall's first soundbar is a massive success.
Marshall is back again this year. The consumer audio division of one of Britain's most well-known amplifier makers just keeps going from strength to strength, and the Marshall Kilburn III is perhaps the best Bluetooth speaker that I've seen for some time — and it's topped our list.
It takes home this award because it sounds so good. There's incredible bass here, but it doesn't overtake the rest of the music. The mids are wide, the highs clear. There's little more we could ask for. Mix in helpful placement tuning and some very clever Bluetooth connection modes, and you've a recipe for delicious success.Wrap it in a retro amp-like design that conjures images of the poast and you've a 3-course meal from a Michelin-star restaurant. Or a massive burger from your favorite ma and pa place — either way, the Kilburn III is an excellent Bluetooth speaker that outperforms the competition with epic battery life and stunning sound.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
The Best Open Earbuds You Can Buy Aren't Actually Earbuds at All
Back in my day, the name of the game when it came to wireless audio was noise cancellation. That's to say, how much noise can your wireless earbuds possibly block? And sure, active noise-cancellation (ANC) wireless earbuds are probably never going to fall out of vogue entirely, but in recent years, audio companies have recognized that it is, in fact, nice to sometimes be aware of your surroundings. Thus, a market for open earbuds was created. If you're not familiar with 'open earbuds,' as they've been marketed, they're a category of wireless earbuds that—instead of focusing on noise cancellation—actually allow ambient audio to bleed into your Bluetooth audio by design. Why in God's name would you ever want that, you ask? For lots of reasons, actually. Say you're biking, for example. On one hand, biking and listening to music is great, but on the other, so is hearing a runaway 18-wheeler barreling in your direction. The same can be said for exercising on foot—being able to hear traffic and pedestrians isn't just a perk; it could be potentially life-saving, and ANC earbuds don't exactly allow you to do that. And then there are less morbid perks like comfort. As great as being able to cancel out the screaming baby on an airplane is, sometimes shoving earbuds in your earholes isn't the most comfortable arrangement for extended use. Open earbuds don't have that problem. Bose's Ultra Open Earbuds, for example, are more like a piece of jewelry, with a clip-like design that tucks a speaker behind your ear so that your ear passage remains unblocked. If you're like me, you're probably skeptical that they could sound even remotely good, but I've tried them, and I'm here to tell you that not only are they comfy, but they also sound kind of ridiculously good. But what if I told you that—as useful and surprisingly functional as open earbuds are—there's actually a third category of open audio device that I think is even better, and they do a lot more than just play audio? This device is actually the best pair of open earbuds you can buy, and they're not even earbuds at all. Yes, I'm talking (once again) about smart glasses. I've extolled smart glasses a million times over at this point, but maybe one of the most underrated reasons why I actually like them in their current form is that they function incredibly well as an audio product. I personally use a pair of Meta Ray-Bans almost every day, and while they're not a solution I opt for 100% of the time, they're the first ones I grab when I need to actually hear my surroundings. Anyone that I ever convince to listen to Meta's Ray-Bans is immediately surprised by the quality of audio that they put out. Sure, you're not going to want to wear them when you're listening to a podcast on a crowded subway, but if you're in a non-Armageddon-like noise situation, they work a lot better than you'd think. And with Spotify integration, when Meta's onboard audio assistant actually hears my commands and understands them, they're fairly functional, too. And it's not just music; there's arguably a better use for smart glasses as an open-ear audio product, and it's voice calls. I use my Meta Ray-Bans so much for calls that going back to talking into wireless earbuds (even open-ear ones) feels like a major downgrade. Meta's Ray-Bans, in my experience, beat out most of the open-ear competition when it comes to calling, not just because the audio you're receiving sounds good, but because the microphones kind of kick the shit out of earbuds I've used. As much as I love Bose's Ultra Open Earbuds for their sound quality, the microphone on those things is weak at best. Nothing's Ear Open, which I've also used extensively, is a little better, but not exactly great. Meta's Ray-Bans, however, combine the best of both worlds. People who I've called often report that I sound better than usual when I'm taking calls, and the same goes for their voice on my end. Also, being able to walk around and feel completely unencumbered when I'm taking calls is a perk that I didn't know I needed. But that's just the audio side of things. Smart glasses, as you may already know, are capable of a lot more than just playing music or taking calls. If you pivot away from open earbuds, you could wind up with a gadget that takes pictures and records video as well. Yes, Meta's Ray-Bans have AI built in, but having used (or tried to use) Meta AI often, I can't, with a clean conscience, recommend anyone buy these glasses for AI capabilities. In short, Meta AI is shaky at best when it's not just downright insubordinate or wrong about stuff. With that caveat out of the way, though, you are getting more than just an audio product in smart glasses, and I've got the pics to prove it. Obviously smart glasses aren't great in every situation. Right now, my biggest complaint about the Meta Ray-Bans that I own is that they're tinted, which makes using them indoors (especially in my dark-ass New York apartment) less than ideal. Earbuds obviously don't have that problem, so point for earbuds here. That could change in the future, though, since an increasing number of smart glasses are incorporating electrochromic lenses that allow you to adjust the tint of your glasses just by pressing a button. But mostly, I just see smart glasses as a better value, especially if you're considering high-end open earbuds like the aforementioned offering from Bose. Those usually retail for $299, which is the same price as a pair of Ray-Bans from Meta. And yes, the audio quality on Bose's earbuds is better than Meta's Ray-Bans, but you're still getting so much more for the money: a camera, audio, and a pair of sunglasses all in one. I know smart glasses aren't exactly the groundbreaking future product we all want them to be right now, but they are—if you can get past the fact they still have a lot of room to grow—solid for some things that we do in the here and now. And one of those things is listening to stuff. So, if you're in the market for a pair of earbuds that you can wear while you're exercising or on a bike, or ones that simply don't plug your ears up, you may want to buy the best open-ear earbuds of all: smart glasses.
Tom's Guide
10 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Samsung just launched the first 37-inch curved 4K gaming monitor — but there's a catch
While many of the best gaming monitors around try and find a sweet spot within the trifecta of screen size, resolution, and refresh rate, Samsung's latest offering is aiming to be all things to all people. The colossal 37-inch display offers up to 165Hz display refresh rate at a 4K resolution, and while you'll need a powerful GPU to get the best out of it, it's positioned at the apex of a crowded market. In fact, it's the first 37-inch model anywhere you'll find with a native 4K resolution. Sadly, the massive catch is it's currently only listed on the manufacturer's Malaysian storefront, with no whisper on a U.S. or U.K. announcement. In fact, the nature of this listing makes us think Samsung Malaysia has gone its own way and announced this sucka before the company's global HQ was ready to let the world know it's here. While the headline feature (and most obvious consideration) will be the sheer size of the 37-inch display (which isn't ultrawide, either, so reaches pretty high with a 16:9 aspect ratio), the 165Hz refresh rate at a 4K resolution isn't to be sniffed at. While alternatives like Sony's InZone M10S are pushing close to 500Hz, that's a 1440p monitor that's offering a 27-inch display. Not only is the resolution higher here and the screen larger, but there's a nice 1000R curvature to help immerse players into whatever it is they're doing on screen. It's not OLED, however, but it does have VESA DisplayHDR 600 certification to more detail in the shadows, and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro is here but there's no NVIDIA G-Sync. In terms of inputs and output, there's a DisplayPort 1.4 option, a pair of HDMI 2.1 ports, and USB ports, but you'll need your own speakers (as is often the case with gaming monitors). Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Pricing-wise, it's up for RM 4,399, which is $1,038 or £780 at the time of writing, but there's no guarantee the monitor will definitely get a release outside of Malaysia, at least until Samsung announces it formally in other regions. As someone using the LG UltraGear 39GS95QE-B I tested for Tom's Guide in recent months, I'm not sure I'm ready to drop my refresh rate to accommodate a 4K resolution, but if you're looking for a monitor for work and play — and happen to be in Malaysia right now — you may find Samsung's offering is worth looking at. The rest of us will need to wait for any possible global release. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Digital Trends
10 hours ago
- Digital Trends
With $80 Xbox games on the horizon, it's time to stop equating game length to value
The threat of the first $80 video game loomed in the distance for months and was ultimately broken by an unlikely candidate in Nintendo. Regardless of which company took that initial leap, this price increase was always a matter of when, not if. I was one of the many who assumed GTA 6 would be the first game to raise the price, but it seems the industry needed to start flirting with a new standard sooner rather than later. While we haven't heard Sony's plans to increase any PS5 game costs just yet, Xbox didn't wait long to announce that it was going to embrace this new price point as early as this winter on certain titles. Well, that was the original plan, anyway. Recommended Videos The Outer Worlds 2 bore the unfortunate weight of being Xbox's first $80 game for around a month before the decision was reversed and refunds were issued. While that is a minor win for us gamers, make no mistake — we are going to lose the war. $80 games are coming, and besides becoming more discerning consumers, we also need to start having better conversations about what makes a game worth $80. Putting a price on art I think it is important to recognize that having a standard price for art is weird. We all kind of accept it for games because that's how it's been after the N64 era when pricing became standardized. Ask any gamer who lived through those times — and was buying games with their own money — and they will gladly tell you about some games costing over $100 at launch. The advent of digital games and a growing indie and AA scene has provided a space for some games to explore the pricing scale, but the rule of thumb for 'major releases' has always been the standard $60, $70, and soon-to-be $80 price tag. Dear Galactic Citizens!⁰⁰We have received your SOS via skip drone about the pricing. As an organization devoted to making sure that corporations do not go unfettered, we at the Earth Directorate have worked with [REDACTED] to revise the price of The Outer Worlds 2. While this… — The Outer Worlds (@OuterWorlds) July 23, 2025 And that's just such an odd thing to do. It treats all games as a singular product rather than individual works of art. It simplifies the process of having a publisher somehow determine how valuable its own work is for the consumer, plus makes it far easier for budgets and projections, but has conditioned us to view games as products rather than art. We believe a game should cost $70, so a game that costs more had better be something spectacular, right? Not everyone operates that way, but I think it has seeped into a lot of our thought processes when it comes to what games we invest in. Don't get me wrong, we all should be highly conscious about what games we decide to buy at full price. $70 is already a huge investment for the majority of people, so taking advantage of sales, cheaper games, or even ways to get free games is only natural. But when we're so accustomed to treating games as monetary investments, I think we start to lose sight of their primary value — art. Almost every discussion about game pricing will include a portion of the community attempting to qualify whether a game is 'worth' its price based on objective metrics. The main factor that never seems to die off is game length. I'm too exhausted to fully dismantle this argument, but if you're reading this, I assume you don't need me to. Basing any work of art's value on its length has never held up to scrutiny. There are games I've beaten in less than two hours that I would pay way more for than games I've sunk 100+ hours into. Length is about the only yardstick we can use to compare all games with. In that regard, it makes sense why some try to wield it as a tool to measure a game's value. While I disagree with that wholeheartedly, I do have to concede that sometimes length is an important factor. However, it shouldn't be talked about in isolation. We can't stop the discussion at 'X game is Y hours long, therefore it is/isn't worth the price.' How are those hours spent? Does the game justify its short or long duration? The tricky thing here is that the answer is different for every person and every game. Would The Outer Worlds 2 be worth $80? I can't say. I think for some people it very much would be, but not for others. This is where the value in having trusted reviewers lies. Reviews (at least good ones) don't view a game as a product and judge it as such. Instead, they should discuss the message the game is trying to communicate through its narrative and gameplay systems, and how successful or not it is in that. They should be subjectively examining its artistic merit and how it affected them. If you have a reviewer who shares your taste in games, or you at least trust to critique a game in a way that communicates whether or not you'd enjoy it, that's the second best way to determine if a game is worth $80. The absolute best way is to play it yourself, but most of us can't do that without paying upfront cost and hoping it ends up being worth it. There's nothing wrong with wanting to know if you will like a game before you purchase it. The feeling of spending $70 on a game only to be disappointed can be gut-wrenching, and the risk only gets higher when we talk about $80 games. It would be so much easier if there were a simple metric to know with certainty if a game was worth your hard-earned cash, but there simply isn't. Games are art, and art is nuanced and deeply personal. I know times are tough out there and your dollars are more precious than ever, so I'm not suggesting you be careless. In fact, I'm asking the opposite. Let's have deeper conversations about what makes a game worth $80 or not while also understanding that the answer is going to be different for everyone.
